I realized looking at the sigalgs parser that I messed up the
space-splitting logic slightly. If the CPU features are "foo bar baz",
it would not parse "baz". This doesn't particular matter (the last one
is "crc32"), but better to parse it correctly.
Fix this and add a unit test. While I'm here, may as well add a fuzzer
too.
Change-Id: Ifc1603b8f70d975f391d10e51ede95deec31a83d
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/31464
Commit-Queue: David Benjamin <davidben@google.com>
CQ-Verified: CQ bot account: commit-bot@chromium.org <commit-bot@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: Adam Langley <agl@google.com>
With Clang 6.0, libFuzzer is now included and there's a new
-fsanitize=fuzzer command to enable the needed compiler actions.
Change-Id: If8c0d649f494655c5bb1e55ebdbf39450940c75b
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/31324
Reviewed-by: David Benjamin <davidben@google.com>
Bug: 124
Change-Id: Iff02be9df2806572e6d3f860b448f598f85778c3
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/20107
Reviewed-by: David Benjamin <davidben@google.com>
Commit-Queue: David Benjamin <davidben@google.com>
CQ-Verified: CQ bot account: commit-bot@chromium.org <commit-bot@chromium.org>
There's not much point in enforcing this on these files, and clang
complains about LLVMFuzzerTestOneInput.
Change-Id: Ieae3287d7f7cd9736efd2b9fc11d0e6d89fcfa43
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/17806
Reviewed-by: Steven Valdez <svaldez@google.com>
Commit-Queue: Steven Valdez <svaldez@google.com>
Change-Id: I69cbb0679e1dbb6292a8f4737851736e58c17508
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/12481
Reviewed-by: David Benjamin <davidben@google.com>
Commit-Queue: David Benjamin <davidben@google.com>
CQ-Verified: CQ bot account: commit-bot@chromium.org <commit-bot@chromium.org>
This code has caused a long history of problems. This change rewrites it
completely with something that is, hopefully, much simplier and robust
and adds more testing.
Change-Id: Ibeef51f9386afd95d5b73316e451eb3a2d7ec4e0
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/8033
Reviewed-by: Adam Langley <agl@google.com>
We already had coverage for our new EVP_PKEY parsers, but it's good to have
some that cover them directly. The initial corpus was generated manually with
der-ascii and should cover most of the insanity around EC key serialization.
BUG=15
Change-Id: I7aaf56876680bfd5a89f5e365c5052eee03ba862
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/7728
Reviewed-by: Adam Langley <agl@google.com>
