Most importantly, this version of delocate works for ppc64le. It should
also work for x86-64, but will need significant testing to make sure
that it covers all the cases that the previous delocate.go covered.
It's less stringtastic than the old code, however the parser isn't as
nice as I would have liked. I thought that the reason we put up with
AT&T syntax with Intel is so that assembly syntax could be somewhat
consistent across platforms. At least for ppc64le, that does not appear
to be the case.
Change-Id: Ic7e3c6acc3803d19f2c3ff5620c5e39703d74212
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/16464
Reviewed-by: Adam Langley <agl@google.com>
Commit-Queue: Adam Langley <agl@google.com>
CQ-Verified: CQ bot account: commit-bot@chromium.org <commit-bot@chromium.org>
This is needed when unrandom.c is compiled on its own.
Change-Id: Ia46e06d267c097e5fa0296092a7270a4cd0b2044
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/16085
Commit-Queue: Adam Langley <agl@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Adam Langley <agl@google.com>
CQ-Verified: CQ bot account: commit-bot@chromium.org <commit-bot@chromium.org>
Change-Id: Icf1d6ec9d3fb33a124a9f61c75d29248a2582680
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/15964
Reviewed-by: David Benjamin <davidben@google.com>
Commit-Queue: David Benjamin <davidben@google.com>
CQ-Verified: CQ bot account: commit-bot@chromium.org <commit-bot@chromium.org>
This doesn't actually measure what we need(*) and, because of that, it's
way more noisy than expected.
(*) We want to know whether the pool has been initialised, not whether
it currently thinks it has a lot of bits, but we can't get what we want
without getrandom() support in the kernel.
Change-Id: I20accb99a592739c786a25c1656aeea050ae81a3
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/15624
Reviewed-by: David Benjamin <davidben@google.com>
Commit-Queue: David Benjamin <davidben@google.com>
CQ-Verified: CQ bot account: commit-bot@chromium.org <commit-bot@chromium.org>
Support for platforms that we don't support FIPS on doesn't need to be
in the module. Also, functions for dealing with whether fork-unsafe
buffering is enabled are left out because they aren't implementing any
cryptography and they use global r/w state, making their inclusion
painful.
Change-Id: I71a0123db6f5449e9dfc7ec7dea0944428e661aa
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/15084
Reviewed-by: Adam Langley <agl@google.com>
