Previously we'd partially attempted the ssl_st / bssl::SSLConnection
subclassing split, but that gets messy when we actually try to add a
destructor, because CRYPTO_EX_DATA's cleanup function needs an ssl_st*,
not a bssl::SSLConnection*. Downcasting is technically undefined at this
point and will likely offend some CFI-like check.
Moreover, it appears that even with today's subclassing split,
New<SSL>() emits symbols like:
W ssl_st*& std::forward<ssl_st*&>(std::remove_reference<ssl_st*&>::type&)
The compiler does not bother emitting them in optimized builds, but it
does suggest we can't really avoid claiming the ssl_st type name at the
symbol level, short of doing reinterpret_casts at all API boundaries.
And, of course, we've already long claimed it at the #include level.
So I've just left this defining directly on ssl_session_st. The cost is
we need to write some silly "bssl::" prefixes in the headers, but so it
goes. In the likely event we change our minds again, we can always
revise this.
Change-Id: Ieb429e8eaabe7c2961ef7f8d9234fb71f19a5e2a
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/29587
Commit-Queue: David Benjamin <davidben@google.com>
CQ-Verified: CQ bot account: commit-bot@chromium.org <commit-bot@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: Adam Langley <agl@google.com>
bssl::UniquePtr and FOO_up_ref do not play well together. Add a helper
to simplify this. This allows us to write things like:
foo->cert = UpRef(bar->cert);
instead of:
if (bar->cert) {
X509_up_ref(bar->cert.get());
}
foo->cert.reset(bar->cert.get());
This also plays well with PushToStack. To append something to a stack
while taking a reference, it's just:
PushToStack(certs, UpRef(cert))
Change-Id: I99ae8de22b837588a2d8ffb58f86edc1d03ed46a
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/29584
Commit-Queue: David Benjamin <davidben@google.com>
CQ-Verified: CQ bot account: commit-bot@chromium.org <commit-bot@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: Adam Langley <agl@google.com>
This function can serialise a session to a |CBB|.
Change-Id: Icdb7aef900f03f947c3fa4625dd218401eb8eafc
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/25385
Commit-Queue: David Benjamin <davidben@google.com>
CQ-Verified: CQ bot account: commit-bot@chromium.org <commit-bot@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: David Benjamin <davidben@google.com>
Change-Id: I7932258890b0b2226ff6841af45926e1b11979ba
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/24844
Commit-Queue: David Benjamin <davidben@google.com>
Reviewed-by: David Benjamin <davidben@google.com>
CQ-Verified: CQ bot account: commit-bot@chromium.org <commit-bot@chromium.org>
Right now we report the per-connection value during the handshake and
the per-session value after the handshake. This also trims our tickets
slightly by removing a largely unused field from SSL_SESSION.
Putting it on SSL_HANDSHAKE would be better, but sadly a number of
bindings-type APIs expose it after the handshake.
Change-Id: I6a1383f95da9b1b141b9d6adadc05ee1e458a326
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/20064
Commit-Queue: David Benjamin <davidben@google.com>
Commit-Queue: Steven Valdez <svaldez@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Steven Valdez <svaldez@google.com>
CQ-Verified: CQ bot account: commit-bot@chromium.org <commit-bot@chromium.org>
That's the last of it!
Change-Id: I93d1f5ab7e95b2ad105c34b24297a0bf77625263
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/19784
Reviewed-by: David Benjamin <davidben@google.com>
Commit-Queue: David Benjamin <davidben@google.com>
CQ-Verified: CQ bot account: commit-bot@chromium.org <commit-bot@chromium.org>
They both can be moderately large. This should hopefully relieve a little
memory pressure from both connections to hosts which serve SCTs and
TLS 1.3's single-use tickets.
Change-Id: I034bbf057fe5a064015a0f554b3ae9ea7797cd4e
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/19584
Commit-Queue: Steven Valdez <svaldez@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Steven Valdez <svaldez@google.com>
CQ-Verified: CQ bot account: commit-bot@chromium.org <commit-bot@chromium.org>
Looks like they're using the pool now.
Change-Id: Ieeb1cacb9cb039d35ff091bc9742262f0fc5b146
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/18364
Reviewed-by: Adam Langley <agl@google.com>
I started by switching a couple fields to SSL_HANDSHAKE and then kept
following transitive bits.
Bug: 132
Change-Id: I640dadd3558615fa38c7e8498d4efe7449b0658f
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/18245
Reviewed-by: Steven Valdez <svaldez@google.com>
Commit-Queue: Steven Valdez <svaldez@google.com>
Commit-Queue: David Benjamin <davidben@google.com>
The previous attempt around the 'struct ssl_st' compatibility mess
offended OSS-Fuzz and UBSan because one compilation unit passed a
function pointer with ssl_st* and another called it with
bssl::SSLConnection*.
Linkers don't retain such types, of course, but to silence this alert,
instead make C-visible types be separate from the implementation and
subclass the public type. This does mean we risk polluting the symbol
namespace, but hopefully the compiler is smart enough to inline the
visible struct's constructor and destructor.
Bug: 132
Change-Id: Ia75a89b3a22a202883ad671a630b72d0aeef680e
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/18224
Commit-Queue: David Benjamin <davidben@google.com>
Commit-Queue: Steven Valdez <svaldez@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Steven Valdez <svaldez@google.com>
Clear out some of the easy cases.
Bug: 132
Change-Id: Icd5c246cb6bec4a96c72eccd6569235c3d030ebd
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/18204
Commit-Queue: Steven Valdez <svaldez@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Steven Valdez <svaldez@google.com>
CQ-Verified: CQ bot account: commit-bot@chromium.org <commit-bot@chromium.org>
This is horrible, but everything else I tried was worse. The goal with
this CL is to take the extern "C" out of ssl/internal.h and move most
symbols to namespace bssl, so we can start using C++ helpers and
destructors without worry.
Complications:
- Public API functions must be extern "C" and match their declaration in
ssl.h, which is unnamespaced. C++ really does not want you to
interleave namespaced and unnamespaced things. One can actually write
a namespaced extern "C" function, but this means, from C++'s
perspective, the function is namespaced. Trying to namespace the
public header would worked but ended up too deep a rabbithole.
- Our STACK_OF macros do not work right in namespaces.
- The typedefs for our exposed but opaque types are visible in the
header files and copied into consuming projects as forward
declarations. We ultimately want to give SSL a destructor, but
clobbering an unnamespaced ssl_st::~ssl_st seems bad manners.
- MSVC complains about ambiguous names if one typedefs SSL to bssl::SSL.
This CL opts for:
- ssl/*.cc must begin with #define BORINGSSL_INTERNAL_CXX_TYPES. This
informs the public headers to create forward declarations which are
compatible with our namespaces.
- For now, C++-defined type FOO ends up at bssl::FOO with a typedef
outside. Later I imagine we'll rename many of them.
- Internal functions get namespace bssl, so we stop worrying about
stomping the tls1_prf symbol. Exported C functions are stuck as they
are. Rather than try anything weird, bite the bullet and reorder files
which have a mix of public and private functions. I expect that over
time, the public functions will become fairly small as we move logic
to more idiomatic C++.
Files without any public C functions can just be written normally.
- To avoid MSVC troubles, some bssl types are renamed to CPlusPlusStyle
in advance of them being made idiomatic C++.
Bug: 132
Change-Id: Ic931895e117c38b14ff8d6e5a273e868796c7581
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/18124
Reviewed-by: David Benjamin <davidben@google.com>
http://i1.kym-cdn.com/photos/images/original/000/242/631/382.gif
In the first step, switch C files to C++ individually, keeping
everything in internal.h C-compatible. We'll make minimal changes needed
to get things compiling (notably a lot of goto errs will need to turn to
bssl::UniquePtr right away), but more aggressive changes will happen in
later steps.
(To avoid a rebase, I'm intentionally avoiding files that would conflict
with CLs in flight right now.)
Bug: 132
Change-Id: Id4cfd722e7b57d1df11f27236b4658b5d39b5fd2
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/17667
Reviewed-by: David Benjamin <davidben@google.com>
Commit-Queue: David Benjamin <davidben@google.com>
CQ-Verified: CQ bot account: commit-bot@chromium.org <commit-bot@chromium.org>
