No code within BoringSSL or Google (grep for EVP_PKEY_CTX_(ctrl|get|set)) is
sensitive to the various failure cases. Normalize it all to 0/1 for simplicity.
This does carry a slight risk: any new ctrl hooks we import from upstream that,
like EVP_PKEY_CTX_get_rsa_oaep_md, return something other than success/failure
cannot be called directly via EVP_PKEY_CTX_ctrl. They instead need to
internally be routed through a struct like CBS and only called through the
wrappers. To that end, unexport EVP_PKEY_CTX_ctrl and require that callers use
the wrappers. No code in Google uses it directly and, if need be, switching to
the wrapper would be an incredibly upstreamable patch.
Change-Id: I3fd4e5a1a0f3d4d1c4122c52d4c74a5105b99cd5
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/3874
Reviewed-by: Adam Langley <agl@google.com>
This removes another place where we're internally sensitive to the
success/failure conditions.
Change-Id: I18fecf6457e841ba0afb718397b9b5fd3bbdfe4c
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/3872
Reviewed-by: Adam Langley <agl@google.com>
Including string.h in base.h causes any file that includes a BoringSSL
header to include string.h. Generally this wouldn't be a problem,
although string.h might slow down the compile if it wasn't otherwise
needed. However, it also causes problems for ipsec-tools in Android
because OpenSSL didn't have this behaviour.
This change removes string.h from base.h and, instead, adds it to each
.c file that requires it.
Change-Id: I5968e50b0e230fd3adf9b72dd2836e6f52d6fb37
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/3200
Reviewed-by: David Benjamin <davidben@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: Adam Langley <agl@google.com>
Removes a bit of unused code. This effectively reverts upstream's
25af7a5dbc05c7359d1d7f472d50d65a9d876b7e. It's new with OpenSSL 1.0.2 so
nothing can be using it yet. We can restore it with tests if we end up wanting
it later.
(Also I think it might be misnamed. The KDF seems to be defined in X9.63, not
X9.62.)
Change-Id: I482daf681e0cf5c3bbdc72c57793f91448deaee8
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/2846
Reviewed-by: Adam Langley <agl@google.com>
Where possible, functions should return one for success and zero for
error. The use of additional negative values to indicate an error is,
itself, error prone.
This change fixes many EVP functions to remove the possibility of
negative return values. Existing code that is testing for <= 0 will
continue to function, although there is the possibility that some code
was differentiating between negative values (error) and zero (invalid
signature) for the verify functions and will now show the wrong error
message.
Change-Id: I982512596bb18a82df65861394dbd7487783bd3d
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/1333
Reviewed-by: Adam Langley <agl@google.com>
Initial fork from f2d678e6e89b6508147086610e985d4e8416e867 (1.0.2 beta).
(This change contains substantial changes from the original and
effectively starts a new history.)
