ssl is all that's left. Will do that once that's at a quiet point.
Change-Id: Ia183aed5671e3b2de333def138d7f2c9296fb517
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/19564
Commit-Queue: David Benjamin <davidben@google.com>
Commit-Queue: Adam Langley <agl@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Adam Langley <agl@google.com>
CQ-Verified: CQ bot account: commit-bot@chromium.org <commit-bot@chromium.org>
There are still a ton of them, almost exclusively complaints that
function declaration and definitions have different parameter names. I
just fixed a few randomly.
Change-Id: I1072f3dba8f63372cda92425aa94f4aa9e3911fa
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/18706
Reviewed-by: Steven Valdez <svaldez@google.com>
There are a few test vectors which were not imported from djb's. Mirror
those. Also as RFC 8032 uses a slightly different private key
representation, document this in curve25519.h.
BUG=187
Change-Id: I119381168ba1af9b332365fd8f974fba41759d57
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/14445
Commit-Queue: David Benjamin <davidben@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Adam Langley <agl@google.com>
For folks who prefer the named length constants, the current ones aren't
sufficient because the shared key isn't the private key or a public
value.
Well, it does have the same type as a public value, but it looks silly
to write:
uint8_t secret_key[X25519_PUBLIC_VALUE_LEN];
Change-Id: I391db8ee73e2b4305d0ddd22f6d99f6abbc6b45b
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/12680
Commit-Queue: David Benjamin <davidben@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Adam Langley <agl@google.com>
This function allows callers to unpack an Ed25519 “seed” value, which is
a 32 byte value that contains sufficient information to build a public
and private key from.
Change-Id: Ie5d8212a73e5710306314b4f8a93b707665870fd
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/12040
Reviewed-by: David Benjamin <davidben@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Adam Langley <alangley@gmail.com>
Commit-Queue: Adam Langley <alangley@gmail.com>
CQ-Verified: CQ bot account: commit-bot@chromium.org <commit-bot@chromium.org>
Now that we have the extern "C++" trick, we can just embed them in the
normal headers. Move the EVP_CIPHER_CTX deleter to cipher.h and, in
doing so, take away a little bit of boilerplate in defining deleters.
Change-Id: I4a4b8d0db5274a3607914d94e76a38996bd611ec
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/10804
Reviewed-by: Matt Braithwaite <mab@google.com>
Commit-Queue: David Benjamin <davidben@google.com>
CQ-Verified: CQ bot account: commit-bot@chromium.org <commit-bot@chromium.org>
Unlike the Scoped* types, bssl::UniquePtr is available to C++ users, and
offered for a large variety of types. The 'extern "C++"' trick is used
to make the C++ bits digestible to C callers that wrap header files in
'extern "C"'.
Change-Id: Ifbca4c2997d6628e33028c7d7620c72aff0f862e
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/10521
Reviewed-by: David Benjamin <davidben@google.com>
Commit-Queue: David Benjamin <davidben@google.com>
CQ-Verified: CQ bot account: commit-bot@chromium.org <commit-bot@chromium.org>
This reverts commits:
8d79ed674019fdcb52348d79ed6740
Because WebRTC (at least) includes our headers in an extern "C" block,
which precludes having any C++ in them.
Change-Id: Ia849f43795a40034cbd45b22ea680b51aab28b2d
MSVC doesn't define __cplusplus as 201103 to indicate C++11 support, so
just assume that the compiler supports C++11 if _MSC_VER is defined.
Change-Id: I27f6eeefe6e8dc522470f36fab76ab36d85eebac
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/8734
Reviewed-by: David Benjamin <davidben@google.com>
This change scatters the contents of the two scoped_types.h files into
the headers for each of the areas of the code. The types are now in the
|bssl| namespace.
Change-Id: I802b8de68fba4786b6a0ac1bacd11d81d5842423
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/8731
Reviewed-by: Adam Langley <agl@google.com>
Both the header-level and section-level documentation define curve25519 which
is a little odd.
Change-Id: I81aa2b74e8028d3cfd5635e1d3cfda402ba1ae38
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/7680
Reviewed-by: Adam Langley <agl@google.com>
