Otherwise the fuzzer gets stuck at renegotiations.

Bug: 104
Change-Id: If37f9ab165d06e37bfc5c423fba35edaabed293b
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/17532
Reviewed-by: David Benjamin <davidben@google.com>

This is in preparation for upcoming experiments which will require
supporting multiple experimental versions of TLS 1.3 with, on the
server, the ability to enable multiple variants at once. This means the
version <-> wire bijection no longer exists, even when limiting to a
single SSL*.  Thus version_to_wire is removed and instead we treat the
wire version as the canonical version value.

There is a mapping from valid wire versions to protocol versions which
describe the high-level handshake protocol in use. This mapping is not
injective, so uses of version_from_wire are rewritten differently.

All the version-munging logic is moved to ssl_versions.c with a master
preference list of all TLS and DTLS versions. The legacy version
negotiation is converted to the new scheme. The version lists and
negotiation are driven by the preference lists and a
ssl_supports_version API.

To simplify the mess around SSL_SESSION and versions, version_from_wire
is now DTLS/TLS-agnostic, with any filtering being done by
ssl_supports_version. This is screwy but allows parsing SSL_SESSIONs to
sanity-check it and reject all bogus versions in SSL_SESSION. This
reduces a mess of error cases.

As part of this, the weird logic where ssl->version is set early when
sending the ClientHello is removed. The one place where we were relying
on this behavior is tweaked to query hs->max_version instead.

Change-Id: Ic91b348481ceba94d9ae06d6781187c11adc15b0
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/17524
Reviewed-by: David Benjamin <davidben@google.com>
Commit-Queue: David Benjamin <davidben@google.com>

Avoid dealing with that function call everywhere.

Change-Id: I7de64b59c8d17e8286c18a6b20c704e8ba8b9ebe
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/17267
Reviewed-by: Steven Valdez <svaldez@google.com>

This leaves just handshake_server.c.

BUG=128

Change-Id: I92503404eca0765539c95f107a726fb84c28e8bd
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/17247
Commit-Queue: Steven Valdez <svaldez@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Steven Valdez <svaldez@google.com>
CQ-Verified: CQ bot account: commit-bot@chromium.org <commit-bot@chromium.org>

This is done in three different places.

Change-Id: I1e55a14c464b1953b3d4de22b50688082ea65129
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/15306
Reviewed-by: Steven Valdez <svaldez@google.com>
Commit-Queue: Steven Valdez <svaldez@google.com>
CQ-Verified: CQ bot account: commit-bot@chromium.org <commit-bot@chromium.org>

When writing tests and BoGo isn't available, it is useful to be able to
configure the set of signature algorithms accepted on the verify side.
Add an API for this.

Change-Id: Ic873189da7f8853e412acd68614df9d9a872a0c8
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/15125
Reviewed-by: Steven Valdez <svaldez@google.com>
Reviewed-by: David Benjamin <davidben@google.com>
Commit-Queue: David Benjamin <davidben@google.com>
CQ-Verified: CQ bot account: commit-bot@chromium.org <commit-bot@chromium.org>

This only works at TLS 1.2 and above as, before TLS 1.2, there is no way
to advertise support for Ed25519 or negotiate the correct signature
algorithm. Add tests for this accordingly.

For now, this is disabled by default on the verifying side but may be
enabled per SSL_CTX. Notably, projects like Chromium which use an
external verifier may need changes elsewhere before they can enable it.
(On the signing side, we can assume that if the caller gave us an
Ed25519 certificate, they mean for us to use it.)

BUG=187

Change-Id: Id25b0a677dcbe205ddd26d8dbba11c04bb520756
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/14450
Commit-Queue: David Benjamin <davidben@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Adam Langley <agl@google.com>

Instead, extract it from the certificate, which is what everyone was
doing anyway. A follow-up change will take advantage of this cleanup to
deduplicate code between signing and verifying for which keys are good
for which signature algorithms.

BUG=188

Change-Id: Ic3f83a6477e8fa53e5e7233f4545f4d2c4b58d01
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/14565
Reviewed-by: Adam Langley <agl@google.com>

This is an unhelpfully generic name. Rename it to match SSL_ECDH_CTX.
Unqualified "public key" is typically assumed to be the certificate.

Change-Id: I8ba8c3f2bb1343d1c006845a1110e833451c5a56
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/14564
Reviewed-by: Adam Langley <agl@google.com>

We received an external request to add an option to undo the check added
in 3e51757de2.

Change-Id: Ifdd4b07705f2fa3d781d775d5cd139ea72d36734
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/14644
Reviewed-by: David Benjamin <davidben@google.com>
Commit-Queue: David Benjamin <davidben@google.com>
CQ-Verified: CQ bot account: commit-bot@chromium.org <commit-bot@chromium.org>

This moves the early data switch to CERT to make this
|SSL_set_SSL_CTX|-proof.

Change-Id: Icca96e76636d87578deb24b2d507cabee7e46a4a
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/14545
Reviewed-by: David Benjamin <davidben@google.com>
Commit-Queue: David Benjamin <davidben@google.com>
CQ-Verified: CQ bot account: commit-bot@chromium.org <commit-bot@chromium.org>

Change-Id: I0e2e4166ad2c57e3192af058f23374f014a2fcf4
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/14377
Reviewed-by: David Benjamin <davidben@google.com>
Commit-Queue: David Benjamin <davidben@google.com>
CQ-Verified: CQ bot account: commit-bot@chromium.org <commit-bot@chromium.org>

This adds support on the server and client to accept data-less early
data. The server will still fail to parse early data with any
contents, so this should remain disabled.

BUG=76

Change-Id: Id85d192d8e0360b8de4b6971511b5e8a0e8012f7
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/12921
Reviewed-by: David Benjamin <davidben@google.com>
Commit-Queue: David Benjamin <davidben@google.com>
CQ-Verified: CQ bot account: commit-bot@chromium.org <commit-bot@chromium.org>

This shuffles a bit of the code around session resumption in TLS 1.3 to
make the async point cleaner to inject. It also fills in cipher and
tlsext_hostname more uniformly.

Filling in the cipher on resumption is a no-op as SSL_SESSION_dup
already copies it, but avoids confusion should we ever implement TLS
1.3's laxer cipher matching on the server. Not filling in
tlsext_hostname on resumption was an oversight; the relevant check isn't
whether we are resuming but whether we have a fresh SSL_SESSION to fill
things into.

Change-Id: Ic02eb079ff228ce4a4d3e0de7445e18cd367e8b2
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/14205
Commit-Queue: David Benjamin <davidben@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Adam Langley <agl@google.com>

This change adds support for setting an |SSL_TICKET_AEAD_METHOD| which
allows a caller to control ticket encryption and decryption to a greater
extent than previously possible and also permits asynchronous ticket
decryption.

This change only includes partial support: TLS 1.3 work remains to be
done.

Change-Id: Ia2e10ebb3257e1a119630c463b6bf389cf20ef18
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/14144
Commit-Queue: David Benjamin <davidben@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Adam Langley <agl@google.com>

This makes its purpose clearer. That the session cache is based on the
initial SSL_CTX is confusing (it's a remnant of OpenSSL's backwards
session resumption ordering), but we're probably stuck with it.
Relatedly, document SSL_set_SSL_CTX better.

Change-Id: I2832efc63f6c959c5424271b365825afc7eec5e4
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/14204
Commit-Queue: David Benjamin <davidben@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Adam Langley <agl@google.com>

We'll measure this value to guide what tolerance to use in the 0-RTT
anti-replay mechanism. This also fixes a bug where we were previously
minting ticket_age_add-less tickets on the server. Add a check to reject
all those tickets.

BUG=113

Change-Id: I68e690c0794234234e0d0500b4b9a7f79aea641e
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/14068
Reviewed-by: Steven Valdez <svaldez@google.com>
Commit-Queue: Steven Valdez <svaldez@google.com>
CQ-Verified: CQ bot account: commit-bot@chromium.org <commit-bot@chromium.org>

Due to middlebox and ecosystem intolerance, short record headers are going to
be unsustainable to deploy.

BUG=119

Change-Id: I20fee79dd85bff229eafc6aeb72e4f33cac96d82
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/14044
Reviewed-by: Steven Valdez <svaldez@google.com>
Commit-Queue: Steven Valdez <svaldez@google.com>
CQ-Verified: CQ bot account: commit-bot@chromium.org <commit-bot@chromium.org>

This is the first part to fixing the SSL stack to be 2038-clean.
Internal structures and functions are switched to use OPENSSL_timeval
which, unlike timeval and long, are suitable for timestamps on all
platforms.

It is generally accepted that the year is now sometime after 1970, so
use uint64_t for the timestamps to avoid worrying about serializing
negative numbers in SSL_SESSION.

A follow-up change will fix SSL_CTX_set_current_time_cb to use
OPENSSL_timeval. This will require some coordinating with WebRTC.
DTLSv1_get_timeout is left alone for compatibility and because it stores
time remaining rather than an absolute time.

BUG=155

Change-Id: I1a5054813300874b6f29e348f9cd8ca80f6b9729
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/13944
Reviewed-by: David Benjamin <davidben@google.com>
Commit-Queue: David Benjamin <davidben@google.com>
CQ-Verified: CQ bot account: commit-bot@chromium.org <commit-bot@chromium.org>

The two non-trivial changes are:

1. The public API now queries it out of the session. There is a long
   comment over the old field explaining why the state was separate, but
   this predates EMS being forbidden from changing across resumption. It
   is not possible for established_session and the socket to disagree on
   EMS.

2. Since SSL_HANDSHAKE gets reset on each handshake, the check that EMS
   does not change on renego looks different. I've reworked that function a
   bit, but it should have the same effect.

Change-Id: If72e5291f79681381cf4d8ceab267f76618b7c3d
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/13910
Commit-Queue: David Benjamin <davidben@google.com>
Commit-Queue: Steven Valdez <svaldez@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Steven Valdez <svaldez@google.com>
CQ-Verified: CQ bot account: commit-bot@chromium.org <commit-bot@chromium.org>

This lets us trim another two pointers of per-connection state.

Change-Id: I2145d529bc25b7e24a921d01e82ee99f2c98867c
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/13804
Reviewed-by: David Benjamin <davidben@google.com>
Commit-Queue: David Benjamin <davidben@google.com>
CQ-Verified: CQ bot account: commit-bot@chromium.org <commit-bot@chromium.org>

Recent changes added SSL-level setters to these APIs. Unfortunately,
this has the side effect of breaking SSL_set_SSL_CTX, which is how SNI
is typically handled. SSL_set_SSL_CTX is kind of a weird function in
that it's very sensitive to which of the hodge-podge of config styles is
in use. I previously listed out all the config styles here, but it was
long and unhelpful. (I counted up to 7.)

Of the various SSL_set_SSL_CTX-visible config styles, the sanest seems
to be to move it to CERT. In this case, it's actually quite reasonable
since they're very certificate-related.

Later we may wish to think about whether we can cut down all 7 kinds of
config styles because this is kinda nuts. I'm wondering we should do
CERT => SSL_CONFIG, move everything there, and make that be the same
structure that is dropped post-handshake (supposing the caller has
disavowed SSL_clear and renego). Fruit for later thought. (Note though
that comes with a behavior change for all the existing config.)

Change-Id: I9aa47d8bd37bf2847869e0b577739d4d579ee4ae
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/13864
Reviewed-by: Martin Kreichgauer <martinkr@google.com>
Reviewed-by: David Benjamin <davidben@google.com>
Commit-Queue: David Benjamin <davidben@google.com>
CQ-Verified: CQ bot account: commit-bot@chromium.org <commit-bot@chromium.org>

|SSL_SESSION_from_bytes| now takes an |SSL_CTX*|, from which it uses the
|X509_METHOD| and buffer pool. This is our API so we can do this.

This also requires adding an |SSL_CTX*| argument to |SSL_SESSION_new|
for the same reason. However, |SSL_SESSION_new| already has very few
callers (and none in third-party code that I can see) so I think we can
get away with this.

Change-Id: I1337cd2bd8cff03d4b9405ea3146b3b59584aa72
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/13584
Reviewed-by: Adam Langley <alangley@gmail.com>
Commit-Queue: Adam Langley <alangley@gmail.com>
CQ-Verified: CQ bot account: commit-bot@chromium.org <commit-bot@chromium.org>

Change-Id: I98903df561bbf8c5739f892d2ad5e89ac0eb8e6f
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/13369
Reviewed-by: Steven Valdez <svaldez@google.com>
Reviewed-by: David Benjamin <davidben@google.com>
Commit-Queue: David Benjamin <davidben@google.com>
CQ-Verified: CQ bot account: commit-bot@chromium.org <commit-bot@chromium.org>

We already have some cases where the default is DECODE_ERROR and, rather
than have two defaults, just harmonise on that. (INTERNAL_ERROR might
make more sense in some cases, but we don't want to have to remember
what the default is in each case and nobody really cares what the actual
value is anyway.)

Change-Id: I28007898e8d6e7415219145eb9f43ea875028ab2
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/13720
Reviewed-by: Adam Langley <agl@google.com>

Right now the only way to set an SCT list is the per-context function
SSL_CTX_set_signed_cert_timestamp_list. However this assumes that all the
SSLs generated from a SSL_CTX share the same SCT list, which is wrong.

In order to avoid memory duplication in case SSL_CTX has its own list, a
CRYPTO_BUFFER is used for both SSL_CTX and SSL.

Change-Id: Id20e6f128c33cf3e5bff1be390645441be6518c6
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/13642
Reviewed-by: David Benjamin <davidben@google.com>
Commit-Queue: David Benjamin <davidben@google.com>
CQ-Verified: CQ bot account: commit-bot@chromium.org <commit-bot@chromium.org>

ssl_get_new_session would stash a copy of the configured hostname
into the SSL_SESSION on the server. Servers have no reason to
configuring that anyway, but, if one did, we'd leak when filling in
the client-supplied SNI later.

Remove this code and guard against this by remembering to OPENSSL_free
when overwriting that field (although it should always be NULL).

Reported-By: Robert Swiecki <swiecki@google.com>
Change-Id: Ib901b5f82e5cf818060ef47a9585363e05dd9932
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/13631
Reviewed-by: David Benjamin <davidben@google.com>
Commit-Queue: David Benjamin <davidben@google.com>
CQ-Verified: CQ bot account: commit-bot@chromium.org <commit-bot@chromium.org>

This resolves a TODO, trims per-connection memory, and makes more sense.
These masks have nothing to do with certificate configuration.

Change-Id: I783e6158e51f58cce88e3e68dfa0ed965bdc894c
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/13368
Reviewed-by: Steven Valdez <svaldez@google.com>
Reviewed-by: David Benjamin <davidben@google.com>
Commit-Queue: David Benjamin <davidben@google.com>
CQ-Verified: CQ bot account: commit-bot@chromium.org <commit-bot@chromium.org>

Change-Id: Ifc28887cbf91c7a80bdaf56e3bf80b2f8cfa7d53
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/13260
Commit-Queue: David Benjamin <davidben@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Adam Langley <agl@google.com>

TLS 1.3 forbids warning alerts, and sending these is a bad idea. Per RFC
6066:

   If the server understood the ClientHello extension but
   does not recognize the server name, the server SHOULD take one of two
   actions: either abort the handshake by sending a fatal-level
   unrecognized_name(112) alert or continue the handshake.  It is NOT
   RECOMMENDED to send a warning-level unrecognized_name(112) alert,
   because the client's behavior in response to warning-level alerts is
   unpredictable.

The motivation is to cut down on the number of places where we send
non-closing alerts. We can't remove them yet (SSL 3.0 and TLS 1.3 draft
18 need to go), but eventually this can be a simplifying assumption.
Already this means DTLS never sends warning alerts, which is good
because DTLS can't retransmit them.

Change-Id: I577a1eb9c23e66d28235c0fbe913f00965e19486
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/13221
Reviewed-by: Adam Langley <agl@google.com>

This doesn't do anything useful. Every caller either never sets the
callback as a client or goes out of their way to filter out clients in
the callback.

Change-Id: I6f07d000a727f9ccba080f812e6b8e7a38e04350
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/13220
Commit-Queue: David Benjamin <davidben@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Steven Valdez <svaldez@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Adam Langley <agl@google.com>

These are no longer needed.

Change-Id: I909f7d690f57dafcdad6254948b5683757da69f4
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/13160
Commit-Queue: David Benjamin <davidben@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Adam Langley <agl@google.com>

This extension will be used to test whether
https://github.com/tlswg/tls13-spec/pull/762 is deployable against
middleboxes. For simplicity, it is mutually exclusive with 0-RTT. If
client and server agree on the extension, TLS 1.3 records will use the
format in the PR rather than what is in draft 18.

BUG=119

Change-Id: I1372ddf7b328ddf73d496df54ac03a95ede961e1
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/12684
Reviewed-by: David Benjamin <davidben@google.com>
Commit-Queue: David Benjamin <davidben@google.com>
CQ-Verified: CQ bot account: commit-bot@chromium.org <commit-bot@chromium.org>

Most C standard library functions are undefined if passed NULL, even
when the corresponding length is zero. This gives them (and, in turn,
all functions which call them) surprising behavior on empty arrays.
Some compilers will miscompile code due to this rule. See also
https://www.imperialviolet.org/2016/06/26/nonnull.html

Add OPENSSL_memcpy, etc., wrappers which avoid this problem.

BUG=23

Change-Id: I95f42b23e92945af0e681264fffaf578e7f8465e
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/12928
Commit-Queue: David Benjamin <davidben@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Adam Langley <agl@google.com>

This dates to
62d05888d1
which intended to be removed in a later Android release once X25519 was
added. That has since happened.

This intentionally leaves the P-521 hooked up for now. Detaching it
completely is a more aggressive change (since it's slightly tied up with
SHA-512) that should wait until removing ECDSA+SHA512 has stuck in Chrome.

Change-Id: I04553c3eddf33a13b6e3e9a6e7ac4c4725676cb0
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/10923
Reviewed-by: David Benjamin <davidben@google.com>
Commit-Queue: David Benjamin <davidben@google.com>
CQ-Verified: CQ bot account: commit-bot@chromium.org <commit-bot@chromium.org>

The only accessor for this field is the group/curve ID. Switch to only
storing that so no cipher checks are needed to interpret it. Instead,
ignore older values at parse time.

Change-Id: Id0946d4ac9e7482c69e64cc368a9d0cddf328bd3
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/12693
Reviewed-by: David Benjamin <davidben@google.com>
Commit-Queue: David Benjamin <davidben@google.com>
CQ-Verified: CQ bot account: commit-bot@chromium.org <commit-bot@chromium.org>

Right now the only way to set an OCSP response is SSL_CTX_set_ocsp_response
however this assumes that all the SSLs generated from a SSL_CTX share the
same OCSP response, which is wrong.

This is similar to the OpenSSL "function" SSL_get_tlsext_status_ocsp_resp,
the main difference being that this doesn't take ownership of the OCSP buffer.

In order to avoid memory duplication in case SSL_CTX has its own response,
a CRYPTO_BUFFER is used for both SSL_CTX and SSL.

Change-Id: I3a0697f82b805ac42a22be9b6bb596aa0b530025
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/12660
Reviewed-by: David Benjamin <davidben@google.com>
Commit-Queue: David Benjamin <davidben@google.com>
CQ-Verified: CQ bot account: commit-bot@chromium.org <commit-bot@chromium.org>

size_t at the public API, uint8_t on the SSL structs since everything
fits in there comfortably.

Change-Id: I837c3b21e04e03dfb957c1a3e6770300d0b49c0b
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/12638
Reviewed-by: David Benjamin <davidben@google.com>
Commit-Queue: David Benjamin <davidben@google.com>
CQ-Verified: CQ bot account: commit-bot@chromium.org <commit-bot@chromium.org>

There is no need to retain it beyond this point.

Change-Id: Ib5722ab30fc013380198b1582d1240f0fe0aa770
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/12620
Reviewed-by: Adam Langley <agl@google.com>

This was useful when we were transitioning NPN off in Chromium, but now
there are no callers remaining.

Change-Id: Ic619613d6d475eea6bc258c4a90148f129ea4a81
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/12637
Reviewed-by: Steven Valdez <svaldez@google.com>
Reviewed-by: David Benjamin <davidben@google.com>
Commit-Queue: David Benjamin <davidben@google.com>
CQ-Verified: CQ bot account: commit-bot@chromium.org <commit-bot@chromium.org>

It's our ClientHello representation. May as well name it accordingly.
Also switch away from calling the variable name ctx as that conflicts
with SSL_CTX.

Change-Id: Iec0e597af37137270339e9754c6e08116198899e
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/12581
Reviewed-by: Adam Langley <agl@google.com>
Commit-Queue: Adam Langley <agl@google.com>
CQ-Verified: CQ bot account: commit-bot@chromium.org <commit-bot@chromium.org>

The remaining direct accesses are in functions which expect to be called
in and out of the handshake. Accordingly, they are NULL-checked.

Change-Id: I07a7de6bdca7b6f8d09e22da11b8863ebf41389a
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/12343
Reviewed-by: David Benjamin <davidben@google.com>
Commit-Queue: David Benjamin <davidben@google.com>
CQ-Verified: CQ bot account: commit-bot@chromium.org <commit-bot@chromium.org>

Change-Id: I84a8ff1d717f3291403f6fc49668c84f89b910da
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/12342
Reviewed-by: David Benjamin <davidben@google.com>
Commit-Queue: David Benjamin <davidben@google.com>
CQ-Verified: CQ bot account: commit-bot@chromium.org <commit-bot@chromium.org>

Change-Id: Id8543a88929091eb004a5205a30b483253cdaa25
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/12319
Reviewed-by: David Benjamin <davidben@google.com>
Commit-Queue: David Benjamin <davidben@google.com>
CQ-Verified: CQ bot account: commit-bot@chromium.org <commit-bot@chromium.org>

This takes care of many of the explicit ssl->s3->hs accesses.

Change-Id: I380fae959f3a7021d6de9d19a4ca451b9a0aefe5
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/12317
Reviewed-by: David Benjamin <davidben@google.com>
Commit-Queue: David Benjamin <davidben@google.com>
CQ-Verified: CQ bot account: commit-bot@chromium.org <commit-bot@chromium.org>

Although we ignore all but the first identity, keep clients honest by
parsing the whole thing. Also explicitly check that the binder and
identity counts match.

Change-Id: Ib9c4caae18398360f3b80f8db1b22d4549bd5746
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/12469
Reviewed-by: David Benjamin <davidben@google.com>
Commit-Queue: David Benjamin <davidben@google.com>
CQ-Verified: CQ bot account: commit-bot@chromium.org <commit-bot@chromium.org>

BUG=101

Change-Id: Ia1edbccee535b0bc3a0e18465286d5bcca240035
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/12470
Reviewed-by: David Benjamin <davidben@google.com>
Commit-Queue: David Benjamin <davidben@google.com>
CQ-Verified: CQ bot account: commit-bot@chromium.org <commit-bot@chromium.org>

According to the RFC[1], SCT lists may not be empty and nor may any SCT
itself be empty.

[1] https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc6962#section-3.3

Change-Id: Ia1f855907588b36a4fea60872f87e25dc20782b4
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/12362
Reviewed-by: Adam Langley <agl@google.com>

Since the printed format for errors uses colons to separate different
parts of the error message, this was confusing.

Change-Id: I4742becec2bcb56ad8dc2fdb9a3bb23e4452d1b2
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/12361
CQ-Verified: CQ bot account: commit-bot@chromium.org <commit-bot@chromium.org>
Commit-Queue: Adam Langley <alangley@gmail.com>
Commit-Queue: David Benjamin <davidben@google.com>
Reviewed-by: David Benjamin <davidben@google.com>

We do not change ALPN on renego, so the value should carry over and not
be cleared.

Change-Id: Id54a083945542b4457d9c2787f0fe7c30239b76f
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/12306
Reviewed-by: David Benjamin <davidben@google.com>