This uses ssl3_read_bytes for now. We still need to dismantle that
function and then invert the handshake state machine, but this gets
things closer to the right shape as an intermediate step and is a large
chunk in itself. It simplifies a lot of the CCS/handshake
synchronization as a lot of the invariants much more clearly follow from
the handshake itself.
Tests need to be adjusted since this changes some error codes. Now all
the CCS/Handshake checks fall through to the usual
SSL_R_UNEXPECTED_RECORD codepath. Most of what used to be a special-case
falls out naturally. (If half of Finished was in the same record as the
pre-CCS message, that part of the handshake record would have been left
unconsumed, so read_change_cipher_spec would have noticed, just like
read_app_data would have noticed.)
Change-Id: I15c7501afe523d5062f0e24a3b65f053008d87be
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/6642
Reviewed-by: Adam Langley <agl@google.com>
With server-side renegotiation gone, handshake_fragment's only purpose
in life is to handle a fragmented HelloRequest (we probably do need to
support those if some server does 1/n-1 record-splitting on handshake
records). The logic to route the data into
ssl3_read_bytes(SSL3_RT_HANDSHAKE) never happens, and the contents are
always a HelloRequest prefix.
This also trims a tiny bit of per-connection state.
Change-Id: Ia1b0dda5b7e79d817c28da1478640977891ebc97
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/6641
Reviewed-by: Adam Langley <agl@google.com>
Sometimes BadRSAClientKeyExchange-1 fails with DATA_TOO_LARGE_FOR_MODULUS if
the corruption brings the ciphertext above the RSA modulus. Ensure this does
not happen.
Change-Id: I0d8ea6887dfcab946fdf5d38f5b196f5a927c4a9
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/6731
Reviewed-by: Adam Langley <agl@google.com>
This callback is never used. The one caller I've ever seen is in Android
code which isn't built with BoringSSL and it was a no-op.
It also doesn't actually make much sense. A callback cannot reasonably
assume that it sees every, say, SSL_CTX created because the index may be
registered after the first SSL_CTX is created. Nor is there any point in
an EX_DATA consumer in one file knowing about an SSL_CTX created in
completely unrelated code.
Replace all the pointers with a typedef to int*. This will ensure code
which passes NULL or 0 continues to compile while breaking code which
passes an actual function.
This simplifies some object creation functions which now needn't worry
about CRYPTO_new_ex_data failing. (Also avoids bouncing on the lock, but
it's taking a read lock, so this doesn't really matter.)
BUG=391192
Change-Id: I02893883c6fa8693682075b7b130aa538a0a1437
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/6625
Reviewed-by: Adam Langley <agl@google.com>
Then deprecate the old functions. Thanks to upstream's
6977e8ee4a718a76351ba5275a9f0be4e530eab5 for the idea.
Change-Id: I916abd6fca2a3b2a439ec9902d9779707f7e41eb
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/6622
Reviewed-by: Adam Langley <agl@google.com>
It has no callers. I prepped for its removal earlier with
c05697c2c5
and then completely forgot.
Thanks to upstream's 6f78b9e824c053d062188578635c575017b587c5 for
the reminder. Quoth them:
> This only gets used to set a specific curve without actually checking
> that the peer supports it or not and can therefor result in handshake
> failures that can be avoided by selecting a different cipher.
It's also a very confusing API since it does NOT pass ownership of the
EC_KEY to the caller.
Change-Id: I6a00643b3a2d6746e9e0e228b47c2bc9694b0084
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/6621
Reviewed-by: Adam Langley <agl@google.com>
Cover not just the wrong version, but also other mistakes.
Change-Id: I46f05a9a37b7e325adc19084d315a415777d3a46
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/6610
Reviewed-by: Adam Langley <agl@google.com>
This is a remnant of ssl3_get_client_hello's old DTLS cookie logic, which has
since been removed. (If we ever need HelloVerifyRequest support on the server,
we'll implement something stateless in front.) We can switch this to something
more straightforward now.
See also upstream's 94f98a9019e1c0a3be4ca904b2c27c7af3d937c0,
Change-Id: Ie733030209a381a4915d6744fa12a79ffe972fa5
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/6601
Reviewed-by: Adam Langley <agl@google.com>
I don't think we're ever going to manage to enforce this, and it doesn't
seem worth the trouble. We don't support application protocols which use
renegotiation outside of the HTTP/1.1 mid-stream client auth hack.
There, it's on the server to reject legacy renegotiations.
This removes the last of SSL_OP_ALL.
Change-Id: I996fdeaabf175b6facb4f687436549c0d3bb0042
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/6580
Reviewed-by: Adam Langley <agl@google.com>
RFC 5746 forbids a server from downgrading or upgrading
renegotiation_info support. Even with SSL_OP_LEGACY_SERVER_CONNECT set
(the default), we can still enforce a few things.
I do not believe this has practical consequences. The attack variant
where the server half is prefixed does not involve a renegotiation on
the client. The converse where the client sees the renegotiation and
prefix does, but we only support renego for the mid-stream HTTP/1.1
client auth hack, which doesn't do this. (And with triple-handshake,
HTTPS clients should be requiring the certificate be unchanged across
renego which makes this moot.)
Ultimately, an application which makes the mistake of using
renegotiation needs to be aware of what exactly that means and how to
handle connection state changing mid-stream. We make renego opt-in now,
so this is a tenable requirement.
(Also the legacy -> secure direction would have been caught by the
server anyway since we send a non-empty RI extension.)
Change-Id: I915965c342f8a9cf3a4b6b32f0a87a00c3df3559
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/6559
Reviewed-by: Adam Langley <agl@google.com>
This dates to SSLeay 0.8.0 (or earlier). The use counter sees virtually
no hits.
Change-Id: Iff4c8899d5cb0ba4afca113c66d15f1d980ffe41
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/6558
Reviewed-by: Adam Langley <agl@google.com>
This dates to SSLeay 0.9.0. The Internet seems to have completely
forgotten what "D5" is. (I can't find reference to it beyond
documentation of this quirk.) The use counter we added sees virtually no
hits.
Change-Id: I9781d401acb98ce3790b1b165fc257a6f5e9b155
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/6557
Reviewed-by: Adam Langley <agl@google.com>
At least for newlib (Native Client) including sys/types.h
is not enough to get a timeval declaration.
Change-Id: I4971a1aacc80b6fdc12c0e81c5d8007ed13eb8b7
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/6722
Reviewed-by: Adam Langley <agl@google.com>
BUG=webrtc:5222
Change-Id: I8399bd595564dedbe5492b8ea6eb915f41367cbf
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/6690
Reviewed-by: David Benjamin <davidben@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: David Benjamin <davidben@google.com>
yaSSL has a couple of bugs in their DH client implementation. This
change works around the worst of the two.
Firstly, they expect the the DH public value to be the same length as
the prime. This change pads the public value as needed to ensure this.
Secondly, although they handle the first byte of the shared key being
zero, they don't handle the case of the second, third, etc bytes being
zero. So whenever that happens the handshake fails. I don't think that
there's anything that we can do about that one.
Change-Id: I789c9e5739f19449473305d59fe5c3fb9b4a6167
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/6578
Reviewed-by: David Benjamin <davidben@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: Adam Langley <agl@google.com>
Right now your options are:
- Bounce on a reference and deal with cleanup needlessly.
- Manually check the type tag and peek into the union.
We probably have no hope of opaquifying this struct, but for new code, let's
recommend using this function rather than the more error-prone thing.
Change-Id: I9b39ff95fe4264a3f7d1e0d2894db337aa968f6c
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/6551
Reviewed-by: Adam Langley <agl@google.com>
clang-format packing them tightly made newlines inconsistent which
wasn't very helpful.
Change-Id: I46a787862ed1f5b0eee101394e24c779b6bc652b
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/6517
Reviewed-by: Adam Langley <agl@google.com>
Trim the cipher table further. Those values are entirely determined by
algorithm_enc.
Change-Id: I355c245b0663e41e54e62d15903a4a9a667b4ffe
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/6516
Reviewed-by: Adam Langley <agl@google.com>
FIPS is the same as HIGH (but for CHACHA20), so those are redundant.
Likewise, MEDIUM vs HIGH was just RC4. Remove those in favor of
redefining those legacy rules to mean this.
One less field to keep track of in each cipher.
Change-Id: I2b2489cffb9e16efb0ac7d7290c173cac061432a
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/6515
Reviewed-by: Adam Langley <agl@google.com>
It's redundant with other cipher properties. We can express these in code.
Cipher rule matching gets a little bit complicated due to the confusing legacy
protocol version cipher rules, so add some tests for it. (It's really hard to
grep for uses of them, so I've kept them working to be safe.)
Change-Id: Ic6b3fcd55d76d4a51b31bf7ae629a2da50a7450e
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/6453
Reviewed-by: Adam Langley <agl@google.com>
The keylog BIO is internally synchronized by the SSL_CTX lock, but an
application may wish to log keys from multiple SSL_CTXs. This is in
preparation for switching Chromium to use a separate SSL_CTX per profile
to more naturally split up the session caches.
It will also be useful for routing up SSLKEYLOGFILE in WebRTC. There,
each log line must be converted to an IPC up from the renderer
processes.
This will require changes in Chromium when we roll BoringSSL.
BUG=458365,webrtc:4417
Change-Id: I2945bdb4def0a9c36e751eab3d5b06c330d66b54
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/6514
Reviewed-by: Adam Langley <agl@google.com>
Change-Id: I3072f884be77b8646e90d316154b96448f0cf2a1
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/6520
Reviewed-by: David Benjamin <davidben@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: Adam Langley <agl@google.com>
So long as we're not getting rid of them (the certificate variants may
be useful when we decouple from crypto/x509 anyway), get the types and
bounds checks right.
Also reject trailing data and require the input be a single element.
Note: this is a slight compatibility risk, but we did it for
SSL*_use_RSAPrivateKey_ASN1 previously and I think it's probably worth
seeing if anything breaks here.
Change-Id: I64fa3fc6249021ccf59584d68e56ff424a190082
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/6490
Reviewed-by: Adam Langley <agl@google.com>
This codepath should not actually be reachable, unless maybe the caller is
doing something really dumb. (Unconfiguring the key partway through the
connection.)
Change-Id: Ic8e0cfc3c426439016370f9a85be9c05509358f1
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/6483
Reviewed-by: Adam Langley <agl@google.com>
TLS resets it in t1_enc.c while DTLS has it sprinkled everywhere.
Change-Id: I78f0f0e646b4dc82a1058199c4b00f2e917aa5bc
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/6511
Reviewed-by: Adam Langley <agl@google.com>
Until we've done away with the d2i_* stack completely, boundaries need
to be mindful of the type mismatch. d2i_* takes a long, not a size_t.
Change-Id: If02f9ca2cfde02d0929ac18275d09bf5df400f3a
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/6491
Reviewed-by: Adam Langley <agl@google.com>
There's a few things that will be kind of a nuisance and possibly not worth it
(crypto/asn1 dumps a lot of undeclared things, etc.). But it caught some
mistakes. Even without the warning, making sure to include the externs before
defining a function helps catch type mismatches.
Change-Id: I3dab282aaba6023e7cebc94ed7a767a5d7446b08
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/6484
Reviewed-by: Adam Langley <agl@google.com>
Chromium's toolchains may now assume C++11 library support, so we may freely
use C++11 features. (Chromium's still in the process of deciding what to allow,
but we use Google's style guide directly, toolchain limitations aside.)
Change-Id: I1c7feb92b7f5f51d9091a4c686649fb574ac138d
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/6465
Reviewed-by: Adam Langley <agl@google.com>
dh.c had a 10k-bit limit but it wasn't quite correctly enforced. However,
that's still 1.12s of jank on the IO thread, which is too long. Since the SSL
code consumes DHE groups from the network, it should be responsible for
enforcing what sanity it needs on them.
Costs of various bit lengths on 2013 Macbook Air:
1024 - 1.4ms
2048 - 14ms
3072 - 24ms
4096 - 55ms
5000 - 160ms
10000 - 1.12s
UMA says that DHE groups are 0.2% 4096-bit and otherwise are 5.5% 2048-bit and
94% 1024-bit and some noise. Set the limit to 4096-bit to be conservative,
although that's already quite a lot of jank.
BUG=554295
Change-Id: I8e167748a67e4e1adfb62d73dfff094abfa7d215
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/6464
Reviewed-by: Adam Langley <agl@google.com>
The current check has two problems:
- It only runs on the server, where there isn't a curve list at all. This was a
mistake in https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/1843 which flipped it
from client-only to server-only.
- It only runs in TLS 1.2, so one could bypass it by just negotiating TLS 1.1.
Upstream added it as part of their Suite B mode, which requires 1.2.
Move it elsewhere. Though we do not check the entire chain, leaving that to the
certificate verifier, signatures made by the leaf certificate are made by the
SSL/TLS stack, so it's reasonable to check the curve as part of checking
suitability of a leaf.
Change-Id: I7c12f2a32ba946a20e9ba6c70eff23bebcb60bb2
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/6414
Reviewed-by: Adam Langley <agl@google.com>
There seems to have been a merge error.
Change-Id: I72e5c2a45c148e31c90b28bedfff48f8ca6e3c8c
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/6455
Reviewed-by: Adam Langley <agl@google.com>
This exposes the ServerKeyExchange signature hash type used in the most recent
handshake, for histogramming on the client.
BUG=549662
Change-Id: I8a4e00ac735b1ecd2c2df824112c3a0bc62332a7
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/6413
Reviewed-by: Adam Langley <agl@google.com>
This is completely a no-op as currently tls12_get_psigalgs always returns a
hardcoded list which always includes SHA-1. But if this were to be made
configurable in the future, we should reject SHA-1 when configured to do so.
Change-Id: I7ab188eeff850d1e5f70b9522304812bab2d941a
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/6411
Reviewed-by: Adam Langley <agl@google.com>
This fixes a number of bugs with the original logic:
- If handshake messages are fragmented and writes need to be retried, frag_off
gets completely confused.
- The BIO_flush call didn't set rwstate, so it wasn't resumable at that point.
- The msg_callback call gets garbage because the fragment header would get
scribbled over the handshake buffer.
The original logic was also extremely confusing with how it handles init_off.
(init_off gets rewound to make room for the fragment header. Depending on
where you pause, resuming may or may not have already been rewound.)
For simplicity, just allocate a new buffer to assemble the fragment in and
avoid clobbering the old one. I don't think it's worth the complexity to
optimize that. If we want to optimize this sort of thing, not clobbering seems
better anyway because the message may need to be retransmitted. We could avoid
doing a copy when buffering the outgoing message for retransmission later.
We do still need to track how far we are in sending the current message via
init_off, so I haven't opted to disconnect this function from
init_{buf,off,num} yet.
Test the fix to the retry + fragment case by having the splitHandshake option
to the state machine tests, in DTLS, also clamp the MTU to force handshake
fragmentation.
Change-Id: I66f634d6c752ea63649db8ed2f898f9cc2b13908
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/6421
Reviewed-by: Adam Langley <agl@google.com>
This was a mistake from when we added async CertificateVerify support.
No test because the final state of each write state is semi-unreachable
due to the buffer BIO that gets installed on each handshake.
Change-Id: I0180926522113c8b1ca58b8c9c6dc37fb0dd8083
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/6412
Reviewed-by: Adam Langley <agl@google.com>
Later when TLS 1.3 comes around, we'll need SSL_CIPHER_get_max_version too. In
the meantime, hide the SSL_TLSV1_2 messiness behind a reasonable API.
Change-Id: Ibcc17cccf48dd99e364d6defdfa5a87d031ecf0a
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/6452
Reviewed-by: Adam Langley <agl@google.com>
This function allows one to extract the current IVs from an SSL
connection. This is needed for the CBC cipher suites with implicit IVs
because, for those, the IV can't be extracted from the handshake key
material.
Change-Id: I247a1d0813b7a434b3cfc88db86d2fe8754344b6
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/6433
Reviewed-by: Adam Langley <agl@google.com>
They run through completely different logic as only handshake is fragmented.
This'll make it easier to rewrite the handshake logic in a follow-up.
Change-Id: I9515feafc06bf069b261073873966e72fcbe13cb
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/6420
Reviewed-by: Adam Langley <agl@google.com>
This option causes clients to ignore HelloRequest messages completely.
This can be suitable in cases where a server tries to perform concurrent
application data and handshake flow, e.g. because they are trying to
“renew” symmetric keys.
Change-Id: I2779f7eff30d82163f2c34a625ec91dc34fab548
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/6431
Reviewed-by: David Benjamin <davidben@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: Adam Langley <agl@google.com>
That function doesn't do anything useful for DTLS. It's meant for tracking the
rest of the record we've already committed to by writing half of one. But one
cannot write half a datagram, so DTLS never tracks this. Just call
ssl_write_buffer_flush straight and don't touch wpend_*.
Change-Id: Ibe191907d64c955c7cfeefba26f5c11ad5e4b939
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/6418
Reviewed-by: Adam Langley <agl@google.com>
Although the DTLS transport layer logic drops failed writes on the floor, it is
actually set up to work correctly. If an SSL_write fails at the transport,
dropping the buffer is fine. Arguably it works better than in TLS because we
don't have the weird "half-committed to data" behavior. Likewise, the handshake
keeps track of how far its gotten and resumes the message at the right point.
This broke when the buffering logic was rewritten because I didn't understand
what the DTLS code was doing. The one thing that doesn't work as one might
expect is non-fatal write errors during rexmit are not recoverable. The next
timeout must fire before we try again.
This code is quite badly sprinkled in here, so add tests to guard it against
future turbulence. Because of the rexmit issues, the tests need some hacks
around calls which may trigger them. It also changes the Go DTLS implementation
from being completely strict about sequence numbers to only requiring they be
monotonic.
The tests also revealed another bug. This one seems to be upstream's fault, not
mine. The logic to reset the handshake hash on the second ClientHello (in the
HelloVerifyRequest case) was a little overenthusiastic and breaks if the
ClientHello took multiple tries to send.
Change-Id: I9b38b93fff7ae62faf8e36c4beaf848850b3f4b9
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/6417
Reviewed-by: Adam Langley <agl@google.com>
It's somewhat annoying to have to parse out the packetAdaptor mini-language.
Actually seeing those is only useful when debugging the adaptor itself, rather
than DTLS. Switch the order of the two middleware bits and add an escape hatch
to log the funny opcodes.
Change-Id: I249c45928a76b747d69f3ab972ea4d31e0680a62
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/6416
Reviewed-by: Adam Langley <agl@google.com>
