Unfortunately, this requires partially reverting
https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/31324. This is a mess.
While clang proper includes a fuzzer driver, Chromium doesn't use it.
Chromium builds exclusively with fuzzer-no-link and links to its own
copy of the fuzzer runtime[1]. As of [2], Chromium's clang (which we use
on bots) no longer includes the driver, so we must mimic them.
However, Chromium's setup is somewhat questionable because
fuzzer-no-link pulls in libclang_rt.fuzzer_no_main which still includes
most of libclang_rt.fuzzer, just not the one main function[3]. It
appears Chromium is actually linking two copies of
libclang_rt.fuzzer_no_main. Hopefully this mostly works out as Chromium's
clang and libFuzzer should be relatively aligned, but it's not a good
assumption for our build, which can take other Clangs too.
Thus, if you pass -DFUZZ=1 as-is, we will assume you are using a
"normal" Clang with all its relevant runtimes intact. If, however, you
are using Chromium clang, you must drop the matching libFuzzer where the
bots expected it and build with -DLIBFUZZER_FROM_DEPS=1.
This involves no changes to the bots because we never actually unwound
all the LIBFUZZER_FROM_DEPS bits before.
[1] https://cs.chromium.org/chromium/src/testing/libfuzzer/BUILD.gn?rcl=d21c49585f262e851e2984f96f52905782706325&l=14
[2] c79bf2ea4c
[3] 8ebc3668b0/lib/fuzzer/CMakeLists.txt (L93-L107)8ebc3668b0/lib/fuzzer/FuzzerMain.cpp
Change-Id: I946b3c821c3d7e6def7e07f1381f58241611ba3d
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/c/34184
Commit-Queue: David Benjamin <davidben@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Adam Langley <agl@google.com>
In particular, pull Go 1.11 to get module support. Also we don't need to
pull in libfuzzer anymore.
Change-Id: I8098f64cef59422d9d43f7eca5bf3ced69eb70c4
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/31864
Reviewed-by: Adam Langley <agl@google.com>
MSan and TSan both require instrumenting everything. Add some machinery so we
can do this on the bots.
Change-Id: I7d2106bc852ee976455d18787d3a20a35373a9e7
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/30644
Reviewed-by: Adam Langley <agl@google.com>
This is to transition BoringSSL's Windows build from Yasm to NASM. This
change itself is a no-op for now, but a later change to the BoringSSL
recipes will add a pair of standalone builders here. Then I'll get the
change I have lying around for Chromium moving.
Bug: chromium:766721
Change-Id: I4dca1c299f93bc5c01695983fe0478490c472deb
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/29324
Reviewed-by: Steven Valdez <svaldez@google.com>
Commit-Queue: David Benjamin <davidben@google.com>
CQ-Verified: CQ bot account: commit-bot@chromium.org <commit-bot@chromium.org>
Also remove the -Wtautological-constant-compare logic. I believe Clang
has since removed that problematic warning from -Wall and that check was
causing problems when we were embedded as a subproject in a project that
didn't set CMP0025.
(In that case, by the time our build file ran, the compiler had already
been detected and the damage done. This unfortunately means the next
Clang version check will hit the same issue, but let's deal with that
when we get there.)
Change-Id: Iea5f262899b74c5b84f707f4cf4ac4b3540c4acb
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/26375
Reviewed-by: Steven Valdez <svaldez@google.com>
Commit-Queue: David Benjamin <davidben@google.com>
CQ-Verified: CQ bot account: commit-bot@chromium.org <commit-bot@chromium.org>
Because the android sdk managed by CIPD (see go/use-adjective-apis),
its deps repo ndk needs to be relocated, as well as hooked by the root
DEPS instead of recursedeps. This CL addes android ndk deps in
util/bot/DEPS.
Bug: chromium:659808
Change-Id: I270053ae56ba1caaf9c67f2240855eafd499b782
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/24864
Reviewed-by: David Benjamin <davidben@google.com>
Commit-Queue: David Benjamin <davidben@google.com>
CQ-Verified: CQ bot account: commit-bot@chromium.org <commit-bot@chromium.org>
This is a reland 9d1f96606c, which should
hopefuly be fine after afd1cd959e. Though
I've also gone ahead and gotten the latest versions of things.
(android_tools and clang updated.)
In particular, get the new NDK. Unfortunately, the new clang picks up
an unfortunate change for clang-cl that we now must work around.
http://llvm.org/viewvc/llvm-project?view=revision&revision=319116
Bug: 109
Change-Id: If19b09c585957fefaffa8c3197a50189402a555a
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/25025
Reviewed-by: Steven Valdez <svaldez@google.com>
Commit-Queue: David Benjamin <davidben@google.com>
CQ-Verified: CQ bot account: commit-bot@chromium.org <commit-bot@chromium.org>
This reverts commit 9d1f96606c.
Reason for revert: aarch64 bots are breaking for some reason.
Original change's description:
> Update tools.
>
> In particular, get the new NDK. Unfortunately, the new clang picks up
> an unfortunate change for clang-cl that we now must work around.
>
> http://llvm.org/viewvc/llvm-project?view=revision&revision=319116
>
> Bug: 109
> Change-Id: I091ca7160683e70cd79b5c2b7a4267fea258ec17
> Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/24644
> Reviewed-by: Steven Valdez <svaldez@google.com>
> Commit-Queue: David Benjamin <davidben@google.com>
> CQ-Verified: CQ bot account: commit-bot@chromium.org <commit-bot@chromium.org>
TBR=davidben@google.com,svaldez@google.com
Change-Id: I98960f295987857c4e42c312059b6d5934bb5e43
No-Presubmit: true
No-Tree-Checks: true
No-Try: true
Bug: 109
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/24747
Reviewed-by: David Benjamin <davidben@google.com>
Commit-Queue: David Benjamin <davidben@google.com>
CQ-Verified: CQ bot account: commit-bot@chromium.org <commit-bot@chromium.org>
The newer clang should hopefully fix the new linux_clang_cfi bot.
Note the VS2017 revision actually went backwards due to
db45606398
Change-Id: Icaca7a57596f063ccca490917d4b78813f2e9537
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/23824
Reviewed-by: Adam Langley <agl@google.com>
d3868ac4d6f92e57376924a62e8d52f36d7a326561ec0bbd1d5681759a947134 sde-external-8.9.0-2017-08-06-lin.tar.bz2
9852d57e0d6b4509accb4f9faf862327a79c18b630aac4f35c65ce7a270a9230 strawberry-perl-5.26.1.1-32bit-portable.zip
I've left CMake alone for now because that involves building things and
there's some mess between newer CMakes trying to mess with the Android
NDK, so that needs to be tested out a bit.
Change-Id: I6beea9d4774474ac62e843c8668fcef7f6a6fc04
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/21824
Commit-Queue: David Benjamin <davidben@google.com>
CQ-Verified: CQ bot account: commit-bot@chromium.org <commit-bot@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: Steven Valdez <svaldez@google.com>
See
https://groups.google.com/a/chromium.org/d/msg/infra-announce/A6_zQKzCHDo/ZKqSptzeBgAJ.
This allows us to avoid checking out unnecessary things (right now every
Windows bot downloads clang). We also can maintain the SDE bits in DEPS
rather than having to update the recipe for it.
This is the first half of the change which conditions things on
variables but leaves the defaults as they are. This will be followed up
by a change to the recipe to set the variables, then to switch the
defaults.
Change-Id: Iebcc4d0a146d0b0df94f480e539d70cbf4c862d3
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/21804
Reviewed-by: Steven Valdez <svaldez@google.com>
Commit-Queue: David Benjamin <davidben@google.com>
CQ-Verified: CQ bot account: commit-bot@chromium.org <commit-bot@chromium.org>
Also document what versions of everything we're using as the .sha1 files
don't say.
Change-Id: I2d496c86761f6df6acd20e1af62094b7d89e5c1d
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/17485
Reviewed-by: Steven Valdez <svaldez@google.com>
Commit-Queue: David Benjamin <davidben@google.com>
The bots will need to get libFuzzer externally. As usual, borrow
Chromium's copy.
Change-Id: I5ed879bbc76188838adcf9d51855e76c481ace5b
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/16146
Reviewed-by: Steven Valdez <svaldez@google.com>
Commit-Queue: David Benjamin <davidben@google.com>
This should shave 20% (40 seconds) off our Windows cycle times, going by
the graphs. It's 15% off our Linux ones, but that 15% is only 11
seconds.
Change-Id: I077c3924c722d597f66fc6dec72932ed0c81660a
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/12562
Reviewed-by: Adam Langley <agl@google.com>
It's recursedeps, not recurse_deps.
Change-Id: I2c5cb293c5928ef5202ee18db5541712e5b012e6
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/12235
Reviewed-by: David Benjamin <davidben@google.com>
Commit-Queue: David Benjamin <davidben@google.com>
Change-Id: I0f085aed8bbb430b8d23ba2ac3f7aaa49816d785
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/12234
Reviewed-by: Steven Valdez <svaldez@google.com>
Reviewed-by: David Benjamin <davidben@google.com>
Commit-Queue: David Benjamin <davidben@google.com>
CQ-Verified: CQ bot account: commit-bot@chromium.org <commit-bot@chromium.org>
Change-Id: Ieee80e5949e7f5cda77a643bae8fb1c521eb3587
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/10762
Reviewed-by: Steven Valdez <svaldez@google.com>
Reviewed-by: David Benjamin <davidben@google.com>
Commit-Queue: David Benjamin <davidben@google.com>
CQ-Verified: CQ bot account: commit-bot@chromium.org <commit-bot@chromium.org>
This will be used by the bots to get adb and the NDK.
BUG=26
Change-Id: Iae07a380c49b4990f0aa7d73c4f0b399924b9784
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/7986
Reviewed-by: Adam Langley <agl@google.com>
See util/bot/UPDATING for where they come from.
Change-Id: Ib2eae6efc737dd8c4e5fb001fd4b478102e0ad6a
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/7822
Reviewed-by: Steven Valdez <svaldez@google.com>
Reviewed-by: David Benjamin <davidben@google.com>
Update the easy ones here. Also include instructions on how to do this. The
.sha1 files will be updated separately with instructions.
Change-Id: I2a3aba43b8ffbdf930b8a2602dc1460077f6d0e7
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/7412
Reviewed-by: Steven Valdez <svaldez@google.com>
Reviewed-by: David Benjamin <davidben@google.com>
See tools/clang/scripts/update.sh. This'll be used to run ASan on the bots.
BUG=469928
Change-Id: I6b5093c2db21ad4ed742852944e77a6b32e29e29
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/4402
Reviewed-by: Adam Langley <agl@google.com>
- Pull in a trimmed down version of vs_toolchain.py from Chromium.
- Drop in toolchain_vs2013.hash from Chromium to use Chromium's
current toolchain.
- Add a very hacky vs_env.py to pull in Visual Studio. This is
loosely based off a handful of lines of Chromium's
tools/clang/scripts/update.py. This (and vs_toolchain.py) depends
on gyp which is now pulled in via DEPS.
BUG=430237
Change-Id: Ic29cbb15e19a99616cfe778d0778b9a71c45338a
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/3900
Reviewed-by: Adam Langley <agl@google.com>
These are upstream's prebuilt binaries of:
e9493171de0edd8879755aa7229a701010a19561 cmake-3.1.3-win32-x86.zip
ab6e7aee6a915c4d820b86f5227094763b649fce strawberry-perl-5.20.2.1-32bit-portable.zip
4c4d1951181a610923523cb10d83d9ae9952fbf3 yasm-1.2.0-win32.exe
This is intentionally using yasm 1.2.0 rather than the latest 1.3.0 to match
Chromium's current bundled version. Chromium has additional patches, but they
all seem to be either in 1.2.0 or not relevant for us.
Also update extract.py a little to account for these.
BUG=430237
Change-Id: Iad6687e493900b25390d99882c7ceea62fff8b9b
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/3710
Reviewed-by: Adam Langley <agl@google.com>
Built from:
45f4d3fa8a2f61cc092ae461aac4cac1bab4ac6706f98274ea7f314dd315c6d0 cmake-3.1.3.tar.gz
We're still waiting on infra before the buildbot master is up, but let's get
this ready for when we do; it should be fairly easy.
BUG=430237
Change-Id: I3a414743d44052e1aa48759fa5f125db4d4913b5
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/3670
Reviewed-by: Adam Langley <agl@google.com>
Built from:
45f4d3fa8a2f61cc092ae461aac4cac1bab4ac6706f98274ea7f314dd315c6d0 cmake-3.1.3.tar.gz
Also drop in an extraction script.
Change-Id: I3487e9d432290a7dbabf854b927412c58c35d12b
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/3492
Reviewed-by: Adam Langley <agl@google.com>
