We only need the size_t ones now.
BUG=22
Change-Id: Ie6935656bbc4bd2b602b8fad78effc401c493416
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/14312
Commit-Queue: David Benjamin <davidben@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Adam Langley <agl@google.com>
This was removed in a00cafc50c because
none of the assembly actually appeared to need it. However, we found the
assembly the uses it: the MOVBE-based, x86-64 code.
Needing H seems silly since Htable is there, but rather than mess with
the assembly, it's easier to put H back in the structure—now with a
better comment.
Change-Id: Ie038cc4482387264d5e0821664fb41f575826d6f
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/13122
Reviewed-by: Adam Langley <alangley@gmail.com>
This was noticed by observing we had one line of missing test coverage
in polyval.c. CRYPTO_POLYVAL_update_blocks acts 32 blocks at a time and
all existing test vectors are smaller than that.
Test vector obtained by just picking random values and seeing what our
existing implementation did if I modified CRYPTO_POLYVAL_update_blocks
to consume many more blocks at a time. Then I fixed the bug and ensured
the answer was still the same.
Change-Id: Ib7002dbc10952229ff42a17132c30d0e290d4be5
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/13041
Commit-Queue: David Benjamin <davidben@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Adam Langley <agl@google.com>
Most C standard library functions are undefined if passed NULL, even
when the corresponding length is zero. This gives them (and, in turn,
all functions which call them) surprising behavior on empty arrays.
Some compilers will miscompile code due to this rule. See also
https://www.imperialviolet.org/2016/06/26/nonnull.html
Add OPENSSL_memcpy, etc., wrappers which avoid this problem.
BUG=23
Change-Id: I95f42b23e92945af0e681264fffaf578e7f8465e
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/12928
Commit-Queue: David Benjamin <davidben@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Adam Langley <agl@google.com>
AES-GCM-SIV is an AEAD with nonce-misuse resistance. It can reuse
hardware support for AES-GCM and thus encrypt at ~66% the speed, and
decrypt at 100% the speed, of AES-GCM.
See https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-irtf-cfrg-gcmsiv-02
This implementation is generic, not optimised, and reuses existing AES
and GHASH support as much as possible. It is guarded by !OPENSSL_SMALL,
at least for now.
Change-Id: Ia9f77b256ef5dfb8588bb9ecfe6ee0e827626f57
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/12541
Reviewed-by: Adam Langley <agl@google.com>
Commit-Queue: Adam Langley <agl@google.com>
CQ-Verified: CQ bot account: commit-bot@chromium.org <commit-bot@chromium.org>
