If it fails to be added to the list, the input should be freed. Found (sort of)
by scan-build; because of all the indirections and DYNAMIC flags, it doesn't
actually realize the leak's been fixed.
Change-Id: Idca10964e1ffb2ace1cea7f88d94693205d70d5b
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/2208
Reviewed-by: Adam Langley <agl@google.com>
Appease clang scan-build a bit. I'm not sure it's actually worth silencing all
of them because some of them look like preserving invariants between local
variables, but some are clearly pointless or can be restructured slightly.
Change-Id: I0bc81e2589bb402ff3ef0182d7a8921e31b85052
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/2205
Reviewed-by: Adam Langley <agl@google.com>
(Imported from upstream's ef908777218bd4a362dbe9cebb8e18fa8ab384cf.)
Change-Id: Id9b288d230cc9d8ab308690a18e687e2132e3293
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/2168
Reviewed-by: David Benjamin <davidben@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: Adam Langley <agl@google.com>
(Imported from upstream's 267e6f3cc0ef78dea4e5cf93907a71556a45f008)
Change-Id: I99cfd0196b9625449c50494562c44f57f09fed17
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/2167
Reviewed-by: David Benjamin <davidben@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: Adam Langley <agl@google.com>
This stopped being a sample program a bit ago.
Change-Id: I23301fd71a373f995847dcfd64346bd262811f39
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/2131
Reviewed-by: Adam Langley <agl@google.com>
This got lost in the initial commit. Add a test for d2i_AutoPrivateKey.
BUG=crbug.com/428671
Change-Id: Ib4f6114b03536edcfe3b1720a513f57f748e81d2
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/2130
Reviewed-by: Adam Langley <agl@google.com>
The only alias, EVP_PKEY_RSA2, is handled programmatically. ASN1_PKEY_ALIAS and
ASN1_PKEY_DYNAMIC are then unused and unexported and can be removed.
Change-Id: I990650636bac3b802c8b439257c67ce7a3f8bc70
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/2124
Reviewed-by: Adam Langley <agl@google.com>
It's never used, upstream or downstream. The 64-bit value is wrong anyway for
LLP64 platforms.
Change-Id: I56afc51f4c17ed3f1c30959b574034f181b5b0c7
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/2123
Reviewed-by: Adam Langley <agl@google.com>
Some archaeology: it was added in upstream's
ee1d9ec019a7584482bd95891404f1cad66a4a0a. This seems to come from upstream's
arrangement where an EVP_MD can specify both the signing algorithm and the
message digest. (Most of the usual hash algorithms were tied to RSA.)
The flag is set on EVP_MDs that should use the EVP_PKEY's method table in
EVP_Sign* rather than the one attached to the EVP_MD (there's also
required_pkey_type to filter on EVP_PKEY to prevent a mismatch). Without the
flag, the old codepath is hit where they're tied together.
Interestingly, EVP_md5 does not have the flag, but I suppose this is because no
one would sign ECDSA + MD5. EVP_DigestSign* also postdates this and doesn't use
the legacy mechanism anyway. Upstream also has, e.g., EVP_ecdsa(). Although
those too have since also gained the flag in
bce1af776247fee153223ea156228810779483ce.
Let's get rid of these TODOs. We don't have the old codepath. It's unclear if
upstream really does either at this point.
Note: EVP_PKEY_RSA_method in upstream is actually a macro that expands to three
fields, which is why it's so difficult to figure out what's going on with those
structs.
Change-Id: I1aea4d3f79f1eb1755063bb96c1c65276c6e3643
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/2122
Reviewed-by: Adam Langley <agl@google.com>
bl and bh are never used by macros if either BN_UMULT_LOHI or
BN_UMULT_HIGH are defined.
Change-Id: I7fdd45014a6b78cc586b5223396e09bc213608a5
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/2105
Reviewed-by: Adam Langley <agl@google.com>
Chromium's doesn't have built-in support for ml64.exe. Seems easier to
just build consistently with Yasm on both Win32 and Win64. (This will
require an equivalent change in Chromium's build, but keep upstream
and downstream builds consistent.)
Also don't set CMAKE_ASM_NASM_COMPILER explicitly; cmake's default
ASM_NASM behavior will search for both nasm or yasm in %PATH%. Leave
it unset so it can be overwritten on the command-line to point to
a particular yasm. Update BUILDING accordingly.
Verified the tests still pass.
Change-Id: I7e434be474b5b2d49e3bafbced5b41cc0246bd00
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/2104
Reviewed-by: Adam Langley <agl@google.com>
generic.c still needs to include generic implementations in Win64.
Those are currently done with inline assembly and won't work on
MSVC.
Change-Id: Ifeb5470872d8c97b2ccffeae6f3ccb5661051de3
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/2102
Reviewed-by: Adam Langley <agl@google.com>
This is no longer used but, by retaining it, we might miss cases where
code is still testing against it.
Change-Id: I40ed47e41f903aaf2c5e5354d4348f8890021382
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/2110
Reviewed-by: David Benjamin <davidben@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: Adam Langley <agl@google.com>
Although x86masm.pl exists, upstream's documentation suggest only x86nasm.pl is
supported. Yasm seems to handle it fine with a small change.
Change-Id: Ia77be57c6b743527225924b2b398f2f07a084a7f
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/2092
Reviewed-by: Adam Langley <agl@google.com>
We were building the NASM flavor with MASM which is why it didn't work. Get the
MASM output working: cpuid and cmove are not available in MASM unless the file
declares .686. Also work around MASM rejecting a very long line in SHA-256.
The follow-up change will get the NASM flavor working. We should probably use
that one as it's documented as supported upstream. But let's make this one
functional too.
Change-Id: Ica69cc042a7250c7bc9ba9325caab597cd4ce616
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/2091
Reviewed-by: Adam Langley <agl@google.com>
Win32 still has assembly issues and bssl wants to select() on both sockets and
stdin (doesn't work on Windows). But this is a start.
Change-Id: Iafc5215be281aed836c5ac2dc8b379399848a2c2
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/2090
Reviewed-by: Adam Langley <agl@google.com>
X509_NAME is one of the symbols that collide with wincrypt.h. Move it to x509.h
so libraries which only use the pure-crypto portions of BoringSSL without X.509
needn't have to resolve the collision.
Change-Id: I057873498e58fe4a4cf264356f9a58d7a15397b7
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/2080
Reviewed-by: Adam Langley <agl@google.com>
It was already almost there. Just a malloc failure away. now all the
EVP_Digest{Sign,Verify}* functions may be used without worrying about -1 return
values.
Change-Id: I96a9750b300010615979bd5f1522b1d241764665
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/2064
Reviewed-by: Adam Langley <agl@google.com>
Do away with all those unreadable macros. Also fix many many memory leaks in
the SSL_SESSION reuse case. Add a number of helper functions in CBS to help
with parsing optional fields.
Change-Id: I2ce8fd0d5b060a1b56e7f99f7780997fabc5ce41
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/1998
Reviewed-by: Adam Langley <agl@google.com>
Zero is encoded as a single zero octet. Per X.690, 8.3.1:
The encoding of an integer value shall be primitive. The contents octets
shall consist of one or more octets.
Change-Id: If4304a2be5117b71446a3a62a2b8a6124f85a202
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/2010
Reviewed-by: Adam Langley <agl@google.com>
Companion to CBS_get_asn1_uint64. Also add tests for both the parsing and the
serializing.
Change-Id: Ic5e9a0089c88b300f874712d0e9964cb35a8c40b
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/1999
Reviewed-by: Adam Langley <agl@google.com>
This has been wrong since the initial rework of e_aes.c.
Change-Id: I91d92b643c151cd38a272a27f805e5f8ba6dc2df
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/1981
Reviewed-by: David Benjamin <davidben@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: Adam Langley <agl@google.com>
BUF_strlcpy still assumes |src| is a NUL-terminated string and will call strlen
on it to determine the actual length. BUF_strndup's input need not be
NUL-terminated.
Change-Id: I9ca95e92533d12f1b0283412249bda4f8cf92433
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/1997
Reviewed-by: Adam Langley <agl@google.com>
Intended to make parsing ASN.1 structures with OPTIONAL elements easier. (Just
attempting to parse the next tag doesn't distinguish between a malformed CBS
which has now been partially advanced and an optional tag mismatch.)
Change-Id: Idceb3dfd6ec028e87e1bc5aaddcec177b0c32150
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/1995
Reviewed-by: Adam Langley <agl@google.com>
The same library code applies for both the error and the function, so modules
cannot easily report errors from each other. Switch evp/algorithm.c's error
codes to the EVP library. Remove the original error codes so it's obvious some
changes are needed.
- X509_R_DIGEST_AND_KEY_TYPE_NOT_SUPPORTED -> EVP_R_DIGEST_AND_KEY_TYPE_NOT_SUPPORTED
ASN1_R_DIGEST_AND_KEY_TYPE_NOT_SUPPORTED -> EVP_R_DIGEST_AND_KEY_TYPE_NOT_SUPPORTED
(Actually, the X509 version of this error code doesn't exist in OpenSSL. It should
have been ASN1.)
- ASN1_R_UNKNOWN_SIGNATURE_ALGORITHM -> EVP_R_UNKNOWN_SIGNATURE_ALGORITHM
- ASN1_R_WRONG_PUBLIC_KEY_TYPE -> EVP_R_WRONG_PUBLIC_KEY_TYPE
- ASN1_R_UNKNOWN_MESSAGE_DIGEST_ALGORITHM -> EVP_R_UNKNOWN_MESSAGE_DIGEST_ALGORITHM
Change-Id: I05b1a05b465d800c85f7d63ca74588edf40847b9
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/1940
Reviewed-by: Adam Langley <agl@google.com>
Implementations of ENGINEs often don't want to implement every function.
This change adds an error code for those situations.
Change-Id: Id6b7eace36d06ffad7f347f556d942d447d8a2fd
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/1920
Reviewed-by: Wan-Teh Chang <wtc@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: Adam Langley <agl@google.com>
Factor the AlgorithmIdentifier portions of ASN1_item_sign and ASN1_item_verify
out. This makes it possible to initialize a signature context from an
AlgorithmIdentifier without needing the data parsed into an ASN1_ITEM/void*
pair and reserialized.
Change-Id: Idc2e06b1310a3f801aa25de323d39d2b7a44ef50
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/1916
Reviewed-by: Adam Langley <agl@google.com>
Verified that nothing uses it.
Change-Id: I1755144129e274f3d1680ddb8cb12273070eb078
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/1912
Reviewed-by: Adam Langley <agl@google.com>
We only ever use the EVP_PKEY case, not the EVP_PKEY_CTX one.
Change-Id: Ibead854f793663da0a9e474599507d9c3ff920cb
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/1915
Reviewed-by: Adam Langley <agl@google.com>
It should return 0 for failure, not -1; the call site was expecting 0 anyway.
Change-Id: I24ab5d3695b8ac438e40be1a4fd74ecd3b845f5a
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/1914
Reviewed-by: Adam Langley <agl@google.com>
One ASN1_R_UNKNOWN_FORMAT got mispelled into ASN1_R_UNKOWN_FORMAT and
duplicated.
Change-Id: If123ef848ffe68afa021f5f3e3fb08eac92c5f94
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/1911
Reviewed-by: Adam Langley <agl@google.com>
ERR_FLAG_MALLOCED is now masked and isn't returned through
ERR_get_error_line_data.
Change-Id: Ida633bf1a5ca01f563c1323dbdfb2433c2ab5159
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/1910
Reviewed-by: Adam Langley <agl@google.com>
I misunderstood the OpenSSL semantics here. When receiving an error data
pointer via ERR_get_error_line_data and friends, although the error is
cleared, OpenSSL retains ownership of the data pointer. It's kept in the
cleared error until another error overrides it, or the whole error queue
is cleared.
It's pretty odd to have live pointers in empty errors so this change
allows an error queue to retain one data pointer. Thus the pointer
returned from ERR_get_error_line_data is valid until the next call to
ERR_get_error_line_data, or until the queue is freed.
From reviewing uses of the API, this is sufficient for all of them.
Change-Id: I73cb8e9c792452ae3c1a934ac8bbe8b5353b65b2
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/1880
Reviewed-by: Adam Langley <agl@google.com>
Not that these functions can actually fail. The only codepaths that do so are
user errors.
Change-Id: I9fcbd402ab6574b5423ae22b462a0e1192ef01d7
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/1900
Reviewed-by: Adam Langley <agl@google.com>
NaCl defines _POSIX_C_SOURCE on the command line for some reason, thus
we have to be defensive about defining it.
Change-Id: Icbc8afcb1ac0e0ca23b788b11ea911c3f55a8b7f
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/1891
Reviewed-by: David Benjamin <davidben@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: Adam Langley <agl@google.com>
_BSD_SOURCE has been deprecated (see bug). The manpage for printf
suggests that any _POSIX_C_SOURCE >= 200112L is also sufficient to bring
in the needed declarations and the bug reporter confirms that it's
sufficient for him.
https://code.google.com/p/chromium/issues/detail?id=419859
Change-Id: Ifc053f11c5aa1df35aae8e952d2c73a7f4599ec2
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/1890
Reviewed-by: Adam Langley <agl@google.com>
Winsock needs to be initialized. Also, perror doesn't do anything
useful and read/recv aren't interchangeable.
Change-Id: Ic9dfd6907b7b0d396eafe72072a29d027b66bc0c
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/1871
Reviewed-by: Adam Langley <agl@google.com>
vsnprintf returns -1 on Windows on truncation, not the needed
size.
Change-Id: I0a9f32504127b2fb740244c3b59132e201d14234
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/1870
Reviewed-by: Adam Langley <agl@google.com>
This resolves a pile of MSVC warnings in Chromium.
Change-Id: Ib9a29cb88d8ed8ec4118d153260f775be059a803
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/1865
Reviewed-by: Adam Langley <agl@google.com>
This avoids unnecessary differences between LP64 and LLP64. Also
MSVC throws overflow warnings in the big-endian 64-bit codepath,
so use the preprocessor.
Change-Id: I74cef2d631d39f282177e043ed24bc6ecbbcb8fd
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/1860
Reviewed-by: Adam Langley <agl@google.com>
