By using non-DER or invalid encodings outside the signed portion of a
certificate the fingerprint can be changed without breaking the signature.
Although no details of the signed portion of the certificate can be changed
this can cause problems with some applications: e.g. those using the
certificate fingerprint for blacklists.
1. Reject signatures with non zero unused bits.
If the BIT STRING containing the signature has non zero unused bits reject the
signature. All current signature algorithms require zero unused bits.
2. Check certificate algorithm consistency.
Check the AlgorithmIdentifier inside TBS matches the one in the certificate
signature. NB: this will result in signature failure errors for some broken
certificates.
3. Check DSA/ECDSA signatures use DER.
Reencode DSA/ECDSA signatures and compare with the original received signature.
Return an error if there is a mismatch.
This will reject various cases including garbage after signature (thanks to
Antti Karjalainen and Tuomo Untinen from the Codenomicon CROSS program for
discovering this case) and use of BER or invalid ASN.1 INTEGERs (negative or
with leading zeroes).
CVE-2014-8275
(Imported from upstream's 85cfc188c0 and
4c52816d35)
Change-Id: Ic901aea8ea6457df27dc542a11c30464561e322b
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/2783
Reviewed-by: David Benjamin <davidben@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: Adam Langley <agl@google.com>
One of them was never implemented upstream or downstream. The other no longer
works in BoringSSL. They're not used within BoringSSL (this still compiles),
even in X509_INFO, and do not appear to be used by consumers. If they were, we
would like to know via a compile failure.
This removes the last consumer within BoringSSL of the ASN.1 parsing macros.
Change-Id: Ifb72b1fcd0a4f7b3e6b081486f8638110872334b
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/2203
Reviewed-by: Adam Langley <agl@google.com>
X509_NAME is one of the symbols that collide with wincrypt.h. Move it to x509.h
so libraries which only use the pure-crypto portions of BoringSSL without X.509
needn't have to resolve the collision.
Change-Id: I057873498e58fe4a4cf264356f9a58d7a15397b7
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/2080
Reviewed-by: Adam Langley <agl@google.com>
The same library code applies for both the error and the function, so modules
cannot easily report errors from each other. Switch evp/algorithm.c's error
codes to the EVP library. Remove the original error codes so it's obvious some
changes are needed.
- X509_R_DIGEST_AND_KEY_TYPE_NOT_SUPPORTED -> EVP_R_DIGEST_AND_KEY_TYPE_NOT_SUPPORTED
ASN1_R_DIGEST_AND_KEY_TYPE_NOT_SUPPORTED -> EVP_R_DIGEST_AND_KEY_TYPE_NOT_SUPPORTED
(Actually, the X509 version of this error code doesn't exist in OpenSSL. It should
have been ASN1.)
- ASN1_R_UNKNOWN_SIGNATURE_ALGORITHM -> EVP_R_UNKNOWN_SIGNATURE_ALGORITHM
- ASN1_R_WRONG_PUBLIC_KEY_TYPE -> EVP_R_WRONG_PUBLIC_KEY_TYPE
- ASN1_R_UNKNOWN_MESSAGE_DIGEST_ALGORITHM -> EVP_R_UNKNOWN_MESSAGE_DIGEST_ALGORITHM
Change-Id: I05b1a05b465d800c85f7d63ca74588edf40847b9
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/1940
Reviewed-by: Adam Langley <agl@google.com>
Verified that nothing uses it.
Change-Id: I1755144129e274f3d1680ddb8cb12273070eb078
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/1912
Reviewed-by: Adam Langley <agl@google.com>
Get all this stuff out of the way.
- OPENSSL_NO_MD5
- OPENSSL_NO_SHA
- OPENSSL_NO_EC
- OPENSSL_NO_ECDSA
- OPENSSL_NO_ECDH
- OPENSSL_NO_NEXTPROTONEG
- OPENSSL_NO_DH
- OPENSSL_NO_SSL3
- OPENSSL_NO_RC4
- OPENSSL_NO_RSA
Also manually removed a couple instances of OPENSSL_NO_DSA that seemed to be
confused anyway. Did some minor manual cleanup. (Removed a few now-pointless
'if (0)'s.)
Change-Id: Id540ba97ee22ff2309ab20ceb24c7eabe766d4c4
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/1662
Reviewed-by: Adam Langley <agl@google.com>
Windows doesn't have ssize_t, sadly. There's SSIZE_T, but defining an
OPENSSL_SSIZE_T seems worse than just using an int.
Change-Id: I09bb5aa03f96da78b619e551f92ed52ce24d9f3f
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/1352
Reviewed-by: Adam Langley <agl@google.com>
This function serialises a PKCS#7 structure containing a number of
certificates.
Change-Id: Iaf15887e1060d5d201d5a3dd3dca8d51105ee6d6
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/1431
Reviewed-by: Adam Langley <agl@google.com>
Avoid needing to manually increment the reference count and using the right
lock, both here and in Chromium.
Change-Id: If116ebc224cfb1c4711f7e2c06f1fd2c97af21dd
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/1415
Reviewed-by: Adam Langley <agl@google.com>
This change marks public symbols as dynamically exported. This means
that it becomes viable to build a shared library of libcrypto and libssl
with -fvisibility=hidden.
On Windows, one not only needs to mark functions for export in a
component, but also for import when using them from a different
component. Because of this we have to build with
|BORINGSSL_IMPLEMENTATION| defined when building the code. Other
components, when including our headers, won't have that defined and then
the |OPENSSL_EXPORT| tag becomes an import tag instead. See the #defines
in base.h
In the asm code, symbols are now hidden by default and those that need
to be exported are wrapped by a C function.
In order to support Chromium, a couple of libssl functions were moved to
ssl.h from ssl_locl.h: ssl_get_new_session and ssl_update_cache.
Change-Id: Ib4b76e2f1983ee066e7806c24721e8626d08a261
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/1350
Reviewed-by: Adam Langley <agl@google.com>
Previously, public headers lived next to the respective code and there
were symlinks from include/openssl to them.
This doesn't work on Windows.
This change moves the headers to live in include/openssl. In cases where
some symlinks pointed to the same header, I've added a file that just
includes the intended target. These cases are all for backwards-compat.
Change-Id: I6e285b74caf621c644b5168a4877db226b07fd92
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/1180
Reviewed-by: David Benjamin <davidben@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: Adam Langley <agl@google.com>
David Benjamin
Adam Langley
Adam Langley