The fact that |value_free| expects to free() value->section is
inconsistent with the behavior of |add_string|, which adds a reference
to an existing string.
Along the way, add a |CONF_VALUE_new| method to simplify things a bit.
Change-Id: I438abc80575394e4d8df62a4fe2ff1050e3ba039
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/5744
Reviewed-by: Adam Langley <agl@google.com>
As I read it:
1. |_LHASH| contains
2. buckets of |LHASH_ITEMS|, which contain
3. |CONF_VALUE|s, which contain
4. various bits of data.
The previous code was freeing #1 and #2 in |lh_free|, and #4 in
|value_free_contents|, but was failing to free the |CONF_VALUE|s
themselves. The fix is to call |value_free| rather than
|value_free_contents|.
Change-Id: I1d5b48692ca9ac04df688e45d7fc113dc5cd6ddf
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/5742
Reviewed-by: Adam Langley <agl@google.com>
(Imported from upstream's 2747d73c1466c487daf64a1234b6fe2e8a62ac75.)
Also fix up some stylistic issues in conf.c and clarify empty case in
documentation.
Change-Id: Ibacabfab2339d7566d51db4b3ac4579aec0d1fbf
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/3023
Reviewed-by: Adam Langley <agl@google.com>
Otherwise, in C, it becomes a K&R function declaration which doesn't actually
type-check the number of arguments.
Change-Id: I0731a9fefca46fb1c266bfb1c33d464cf451a22e
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/1582
Reviewed-by: Adam Langley <agl@google.com>
Initial fork from f2d678e6e89b6508147086610e985d4e8416e867 (1.0.2 beta).
(This change contains substantial changes from the original and
effectively starts a new history.)
