Currently far from passing and I haven't even tried with a leak checker yet.
Also bn_test is slow.

Change-Id: I4fe2783aa5f7897839ca846062ae7e4a367d2469
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/4794
Reviewed-by: Adam Langley <agl@google.com>

Unlike the standalone build, builds generated from util/generate_build_files.py
do not exclude x86_64-gcc.c. Match the consumer builds by making the standalone
build unconditionally include it. (This would have noticed the missing
preprocessor checks in the file.)

Change-Id: I8d20f269dea63776320ae636ee1e5339cb85fa30
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/4761
Reviewed-by: Adam Langley <agl@google.com>

Along the way, fix a host of missing failure checks. This will save some
headache when it comes time to run these under the malloc failure tests.

Change-Id: I3fd589bd094178723398e793d6bc578884e99b67
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/4126
Reviewed-by: Adam Langley <agl@google.com>

Previously, error strings were kept in arrays for each subdirectory and
err.c would iterate over them all and insert them at init time to a hash
table.

This means that, even if you have a shared library and lots of processes
using that, each process has ~30KB of private memory from building that
hash table.

This this change, all the error strings are built into a sorted list and
are thus static data. This means that processes can share the error
information and it actually saves binary space because of all the
pointer overhead in the old scheme. Also it saves the time taken
building the hash table at startup.

This removes support for externally-supplied error string data.

Change-Id: Ifca04f335c673a048e1a3e76ff2b69c7264635be

find -name CMakeLists.txt -type f | xargs sed -e 's/\t/  /g' -i

Change-Id: I01636b1849c00ba918f48828252492d99b0403ac

See upstream's c436e05bdc.

Change-Id: I7cbe5315a769450e4630dd4e8f465cdfd45c2e08
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/3025
Reviewed-by: Adam Langley <agl@google.com>

(This appears to be the case with upstream too, it's not that BoringSSL
is missing optimisations from what I can see.)

Change-Id: I0e54762ef0d09e60994ec82c5cca1ff0b3b23ea4
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/1080
Reviewed-by: David Benjamin <davidben@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: Adam Langley <agl@google.com>

Initial fork from f2d678e6e8 (1.0.2 beta).

(This change contains substantial changes from the original and
effectively starts a new history.)