This one is easy. For others we may wish to get in the habit of pulling
assembly declarations into headers.
Bug: 181
Change-Id: I24c774e3c9b1f983585b9828b0783ceddd08f0e7
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/c/33967
Commit-Queue: David Benjamin <davidben@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Adam Langley <agl@google.com>
This CL omits the RandTest.Fork unit test on Fuchsia, which does not
have fork(). Fuchsia has a bug (SEC-140) to create a suitable
replacement test.
Change-Id: Ic42f9149c24dc7321bfac1c718e9ecbb4a18b5d0
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/c/32504
Reviewed-by: David Benjamin <davidben@google.com>
Commit-Queue: David Benjamin <davidben@google.com>
CQ-Verified: CQ bot account: commit-bot@chromium.org <commit-bot@chromium.org>
BoringSSL depends on the platform's locking APIs to make internal global
state thread-safe, including the PRNG. On some single-threaded embedded
platforms, locking APIs may not exist, so this dependency may be disabled
with a build flag.
Doing so means the consumer promises the library will never be used in any
multi-threaded address space. It causes BoringSSL to be globally thread-unsafe.
Setting it inappropriately will subtly and unpredictably corrupt memory and
leak secret keys.
Unfortunately, folks sometimes misinterpreted OPENSSL_NO_THREADS as skipping an
internal thread pool or disabling an optionally extra-thread-safe mode. This is
not and has never been the case. Rename it to
OPENSSL_NO_THREADS_CORRUPT_MEMORY_AND_LEAK_SECRETS_IF_THREADED to clarify what
this option does.
Update-Note: As a first step, this CL makes both OPENSSL_NO_THREADS and
OPENSSL_NO_THREADS_CORRUPT_MEMORY_AND_LEAK_SECRETS_IF_THREADED work. A later CL
will remove the old name, so migrate callers after or at the same time as
picking up this CL.
Change-Id: Ibe4964ae43eb7a52f08fd966fccb330c0cc11a8c
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/32084
Commit-Queue: David Benjamin <davidben@google.com>
CQ-Verified: CQ bot account: commit-bot@chromium.org <commit-bot@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: Adam Langley <agl@google.com>
We're a far cry from the good old days when we just read from /dev/urandom
without any fuss...
In particular, the threading logic is slightly non-trivial and probably worth
some basic sanity checks. Also write a fork-safety test, and test the
fork-unsafe-buffering path.
The last one is less useful right now, since fork-unsafe-buffering is a no-op
with RDRAND enabled (although we do have an SDE bot...), but it's probably
worth exercising the code in
https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/c/boringssl/+/31564.
Change-Id: I14b1fc5216f2a93183286aa9b35f5f2309107fb2
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/31684
Reviewed-by: Adam Langley <agl@google.com>
Commit-Queue: David Benjamin <davidben@google.com>
CQ-Verified: CQ bot account: commit-bot@chromium.org <commit-bot@chromium.org>
