That's the last of it!
Change-Id: I93d1f5ab7e95b2ad105c34b24297a0bf77625263
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/19784
Reviewed-by: David Benjamin <davidben@google.com>
Commit-Queue: David Benjamin <davidben@google.com>
CQ-Verified: CQ bot account: commit-bot@chromium.org <commit-bot@chromium.org>
The fuzzer should discover this instantly, but it's a sufficiently
important failure case (don't accidentally drop the certificate on the
floor or anything weird like that) that it's probably worth testing.
Change-Id: I684932c2e8a88fcf9b2318bf46980d312c66f6ef
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/19744
Commit-Queue: Steven Valdez <svaldez@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Steven Valdez <svaldez@google.com>
CQ-Verified: CQ bot account: commit-bot@chromium.org <commit-bot@chromium.org>
OpenSSL's API has a non-fatal "soft fail" mode (can we get rid of
this?), so we should set the flag even if config->verify_fail is true.
Change-Id: I5a2a3290b9bf45c682f3a629a8b6474b1090fc6e
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/19684
Commit-Queue: David Benjamin <davidben@google.com>
Commit-Queue: Steven Valdez <svaldez@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Steven Valdez <svaldez@google.com>
CQ-Verified: CQ bot account: commit-bot@chromium.org <commit-bot@chromium.org>
We have fancy -on-initial and -on-resume prefixes now that can apply to
every flag.
Change-Id: I6195a97f663ebc94db320ca35889c213c700a976
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/19666
Commit-Queue: Adam Langley <agl@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Adam Langley <agl@google.com>
CQ-Verified: CQ bot account: commit-bot@chromium.org <commit-bot@chromium.org>
We currently forbid the server certificate from changing on
renegotiation. This means re-verifying the certificate is pointless and
indeed the callback being called again seems to surprise consumers more
than anything else.
Carry over the initial handshake's SCT lists and OCSP responses (don't
enforce they don't change since the server may have, say, picked up new
OCSP responses in the meantime), ignore new ones received on
renegotiation, and don't bother redoing verification.
For our purposes, TLS 1.2 renegotiation is an overcomplicated TLS 1.3
KeyUpdate + post-handshake auth. The server is not allowed to change
identity.
Bug: 126
Change-Id: I0dae85bcf243943b1a5a97fa4f30f100c9e6e41e
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/19665
Commit-Queue: Adam Langley <agl@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Adam Langley <agl@google.com>
CQ-Verified: CQ bot account: commit-bot@chromium.org <commit-bot@chromium.org>
We do not call the new_session callback on renego, but a consumer using
SSL_get_session may still attempt to resume such a session. Leave the
not_resumable flag unset. Also document this renegotiation restriction.
Change-Id: I5361f522700b02edf5272ba5089c0777e5dafb09
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/19664
Commit-Queue: Adam Langley <agl@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Adam Langley <agl@google.com>
CQ-Verified: CQ bot account: commit-bot@chromium.org <commit-bot@chromium.org>
I messed up https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/8883 and caused
both sides to believe they had sent the final Finished. Use next_message
to detect whether our last flight had a reply.
Change-Id: Ia4d8c8eefa818c9a69acc94d63c9c863293c3cf5
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/19604
Reviewed-by: Steven Valdez <svaldez@google.com>
Commit-Queue: David Benjamin <davidben@google.com>
CQ-Verified: CQ bot account: commit-bot@chromium.org <commit-bot@chromium.org>
This loosens the earlier restriction to match Channel ID. Both may be
configured and offered, but the server is obligated to select only one
of them. This aligns with the current tokbind + 0-RTT draft where the
combination is signaled by a separate extension.
Bug: 183
Change-Id: I786102a679999705d399f0091f76da236be091c2
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/19124
Reviewed-by: Steven Valdez <svaldez@google.com>
Commit-Queue: Steven Valdez <svaldez@google.com>
CertificateVerify must be sent after a non-empty Certificate msg for:
1) TLS1.2 client
2) TLS1.3 client and server
This CL adds tests for those use cases.
Change-Id: I696e9dd74dcd523c6f8868a4fb9ada28fd67746d
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/19044
Reviewed-by: David Benjamin <davidben@google.com>
Commit-Queue: David Benjamin <davidben@google.com>
CQ-Verified: CQ bot account: commit-bot@chromium.org <commit-bot@chromium.org>
This is analogous to needing to test that Finished is enforced in False
Start.
Change-Id: I168a72ac51b0f75156aaf6ccc9724ae66ce1e734
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/18986
Reviewed-by: Steven Valdez <svaldez@google.com>
Commit-Queue: David Benjamin <davidben@google.com>
These should use the shim/runner combined setting.
Change-Id: Iad6abb4e76f6e5accef446696aa4132073eca06a
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/18984
Commit-Queue: David Benjamin <davidben@google.com>
Commit-Queue: Steven Valdez <svaldez@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Steven Valdez <svaldez@google.com>
reuse_message and V2ClientHellos each caused messages to be
double-reported.
Change-Id: I8722a3761ede272408ac9cf8e1b2ce383911cc6f
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/18764
Reviewed-by: Steven Valdez <svaldez@google.com>
Commit-Queue: Steven Valdez <svaldez@google.com>
CQ-Verified: CQ bot account: commit-bot@chromium.org <commit-bot@chromium.org>
This would only come up if the peer didn't pack records together, but
it's free to handle. Notably OpenSSL has a bug where it does not pack
retransmits together.
Change-Id: I0927d768f6b50c62bacdd82bd1c95396ed503cf3
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/18724
Reviewed-by: David Benjamin <davidben@google.com>
I'm not that fast when debugging.
Change-Id: I37a120a77e9a35ac5255ad760513b983f83d9bd7
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/18605
Reviewed-by: David Benjamin <davidben@google.com>
Commit-Queue: David Benjamin <davidben@google.com>
CQ-Verified: CQ bot account: commit-bot@chromium.org <commit-bot@chromium.org>
I started by switching a couple fields to SSL_HANDSHAKE and then kept
following transitive bits.
Bug: 132
Change-Id: I640dadd3558615fa38c7e8498d4efe7449b0658f
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/18245
Reviewed-by: Steven Valdez <svaldez@google.com>
Commit-Queue: Steven Valdez <svaldez@google.com>
Commit-Queue: David Benjamin <davidben@google.com>
The previous attempt around the 'struct ssl_st' compatibility mess
offended OSS-Fuzz and UBSan because one compilation unit passed a
function pointer with ssl_st* and another called it with
bssl::SSLConnection*.
Linkers don't retain such types, of course, but to silence this alert,
instead make C-visible types be separate from the implementation and
subclass the public type. This does mean we risk polluting the symbol
namespace, but hopefully the compiler is smart enough to inline the
visible struct's constructor and destructor.
Bug: 132
Change-Id: Ia75a89b3a22a202883ad671a630b72d0aeef680e
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/18224
Commit-Queue: David Benjamin <davidben@google.com>
Commit-Queue: Steven Valdez <svaldez@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Steven Valdez <svaldez@google.com>
This is horrible, but everything else I tried was worse. The goal with
this CL is to take the extern "C" out of ssl/internal.h and move most
symbols to namespace bssl, so we can start using C++ helpers and
destructors without worry.
Complications:
- Public API functions must be extern "C" and match their declaration in
ssl.h, which is unnamespaced. C++ really does not want you to
interleave namespaced and unnamespaced things. One can actually write
a namespaced extern "C" function, but this means, from C++'s
perspective, the function is namespaced. Trying to namespace the
public header would worked but ended up too deep a rabbithole.
- Our STACK_OF macros do not work right in namespaces.
- The typedefs for our exposed but opaque types are visible in the
header files and copied into consuming projects as forward
declarations. We ultimately want to give SSL a destructor, but
clobbering an unnamespaced ssl_st::~ssl_st seems bad manners.
- MSVC complains about ambiguous names if one typedefs SSL to bssl::SSL.
This CL opts for:
- ssl/*.cc must begin with #define BORINGSSL_INTERNAL_CXX_TYPES. This
informs the public headers to create forward declarations which are
compatible with our namespaces.
- For now, C++-defined type FOO ends up at bssl::FOO with a typedef
outside. Later I imagine we'll rename many of them.
- Internal functions get namespace bssl, so we stop worrying about
stomping the tls1_prf symbol. Exported C functions are stuck as they
are. Rather than try anything weird, bite the bullet and reorder files
which have a mix of public and private functions. I expect that over
time, the public functions will become fairly small as we move logic
to more idiomatic C++.
Files without any public C functions can just be written normally.
- To avoid MSVC troubles, some bssl types are renamed to CPlusPlusStyle
in advance of them being made idiomatic C++.
Bug: 132
Change-Id: Ic931895e117c38b14ff8d6e5a273e868796c7581
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/18124
Reviewed-by: David Benjamin <davidben@google.com>
This also serves as a certificate verification callback for
CRYPTO_BUFFER-based consumers. Remove the silly
SSL_CTX_i_promise_to_verify_certs_after_the_handshake placeholder.
Bug: 54, chromium:347402
Change-Id: I4c6b445cb9cd7204218acb2e5d1625e6f37aff6f
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/17964
Reviewed-by: David Benjamin <davidben@google.com>
Due to SSL 3.0 legacy, TLS 1.0 through 1.2 allow ClientHello and
ServerHello messages to omit the extensions field altogether, rather
than write an empty field. We broke this in
https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/c/17704/ when we needed to a
second ServerHello parsing path.
Fix this and add some regression tests to explicitly test both the
omitted and empty extensions ClientHello and ServerHello cases.
Bug: chromium:743218
Change-Id: I8297ba608570238e19f12ea44a9fe2fe9d881d28
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/17904
Reviewed-by: David Benjamin <davidben@google.com>
Commit-Queue: David Benjamin <davidben@google.com>
This is in an attempt to debug the Mac flakiness. The timestamps will
hopefully help narrow down the order of operations here.
Bug: 199
Change-Id: I8b8dd7222e3a57a8b055b8bc1b7731334e0fcdf0
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/17886
Commit-Queue: David Benjamin <davidben@google.com>
Commit-Queue: Steven Valdez <svaldez@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Steven Valdez <svaldez@google.com>
CQ-Verified: CQ bot account: commit-bot@chromium.org <commit-bot@chromium.org>
This was broken when we added the API to SSL.
Change-Id: I92d4330b0d70f655c9a9ad33898d6b84704e915c
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/17884
Reviewed-by: Steven Valdez <svaldez@google.com>
Commit-Queue: Steven Valdez <svaldez@google.com>
Commit-Queue: David Benjamin <davidben@google.com>
This implements PR #1051
(https://github.com/tlswg/tls13-spec/pull/1051).
Local experiments were not able to replicate the claims in the PR, but
implement this anyway for comparison purposes.
Change-Id: Ic9baf5e671f9a44565020466a553dd08f5ec0f1b
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/17844
Reviewed-by: Steven Valdez <svaldez@google.com>
Commit-Queue: Steven Valdez <svaldez@google.com>
CQ-Verified: CQ bot account: commit-bot@chromium.org <commit-bot@chromium.org>
I suspect this won't actually tell us much useful w.r.t. the Mac test
flakes, but we may as well print what we can get.
Change-Id: I4931f6000648c4bd955a132b54351ff83d6b6273
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/17804
Commit-Queue: Steven Valdez <svaldez@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Steven Valdez <svaldez@google.com>
CQ-Verified: CQ bot account: commit-bot@chromium.org <commit-bot@chromium.org>
Change-Id: Ie8216ab9de2edf37ae3240a5cb97d974e8252d93
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/17709
Reviewed-by: David Benjamin <davidben@google.com>
Commit-Queue: David Benjamin <davidben@google.com>
CQ-Verified: CQ bot account: commit-bot@chromium.org <commit-bot@chromium.org>
Adding it to tlsVersions is sort of pointless when we don't test it.
Change-Id: Ie0c0167cef887aee54e5be90bf7fc98619c1a6fb
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/17708
Commit-Queue: Steven Valdez <svaldez@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Steven Valdez <svaldez@google.com>
CQ-Verified: CQ bot account: commit-bot@chromium.org <commit-bot@chromium.org>
TLS 1.3 deployment is currently blocked by buggy middleboxes
throughout the ecosystem. As an experiment to better understand these bugs
and the problems they are causing, implement TLS 1.3 variants with
alternate encodings. These are still the same protocol, only encoded
slightly differently. We will use what we learn from these experiments to
guide the TLS 1.3 deployment strategy and proposals to the IETF, if any.
These experiments only target the basic 1-RTT TLS 1.3 handshake. Based on
what we learn from this experiment, we may try future variations to
explore 0-RTT and HelloRetryRequest.
When enabled, the server supports all TLS 1.3 variants while the client
is configured to use a particular variant.
Change-Id: I532411d1abc41314dc76acce0246879b754b4c61
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/17327
Reviewed-by: David Benjamin <davidben@google.com>
Commit-Queue: David Benjamin <davidben@google.com>
CQ-Verified: CQ bot account: commit-bot@chromium.org <commit-bot@chromium.org>
Not sure why it was expanded out like that.
Change-Id: I6899dbd23130ed7196c45c2784330b2a4fe9bdba
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/17666
Commit-Queue: Steven Valdez <svaldez@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Steven Valdez <svaldez@google.com>
Like other handshake properties, when in 0-RTT on the client,
SSL_version should report the predicted version. This used to work on
accident because of how ssl->version got set in handshake_client.c early
(and that TLS 1.4 does not exist), but we no longer do that.
Change-Id: Ifb63a22b795fe8964ac553844a46040acd5d7323
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/17664
Commit-Queue: Steven Valdez <svaldez@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Steven Valdez <svaldez@google.com>
CQ-Verified: CQ bot account: commit-bot@chromium.org <commit-bot@chromium.org>
We were missing AES256 and 3DES. Though this test dates to the old
record-splitting code which was much scarier than the new one.
Change-Id: Ia84a8c1a2bbd79fa70941f80cf6393013e4f13d5
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/17543
Reviewed-by: David Benjamin <davidben@google.com>
This was a workaround for triple handshake put in way back, before
extended master secret.
Change-Id: Ie0112fa6323522b17c90a833d558f7182586d2c3
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/17541
Reviewed-by: David Benjamin <davidben@google.com>
Also mirror the structure of the TLS 1.2 and TLS 1.3 code a bit.
Change-Id: I7b34bf30de63fa0bd47a39a90570846fb2314ad5
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/17539
Reviewed-by: David Benjamin <davidben@google.com>
We've never actually written tests for equipreference groups at the
BoringSSL level.
Change-Id: I571c081534efbfa8e7b84846fafed0b772721da1
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/17538
Reviewed-by: David Benjamin <davidben@google.com>
Change-Id: I90286da596d5822d4cfedf40995d80cf76adaf97
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/17536
Reviewed-by: David Benjamin <davidben@google.com>
Commit-Queue: David Benjamin <davidben@google.com>
Otherwise the fuzzer gets stuck at renegotiations.
Bug: 104
Change-Id: If37f9ab165d06e37bfc5c423fba35edaabed293b
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/17532
Reviewed-by: David Benjamin <davidben@google.com>
This allows us to fill in holes in our fuzzer coverage, notably client
resumption (and thus early data) and server client certificates. The
corpora are not refreshed yet. This will be done in upcoming changes.
Also add an option for debugging fuzzers. It's very useful to test it on
transcripts and make sure that fuzzer mode successfully makes things
compatible.
Bug: 104
Change-Id: I02f0be4045d1baf68efc9a4157f573df1429575d
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/17531
Reviewed-by: David Benjamin <davidben@google.com>
Commit-Queue: David Benjamin <davidben@google.com>
CQ-Verified: CQ bot account: commit-bot@chromium.org <commit-bot@chromium.org>
This is in preparation for supporting multiple TLS 1.3 variants.
Change-Id: Ia2caf984f576f1b9e5915bdaf6ff952c8be10417
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/17526
Reviewed-by: David Benjamin <davidben@google.com>
Commit-Queue: David Benjamin <davidben@google.com>
SSL_set_max_proto_version(TLS1_3_DRAFT_VERSION) worked unintentionally.
Fix that. Also add an error when it fails.
Change-Id: I1048fede7b163e1c170e17bf4370b468221a7077
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/17525
Reviewed-by: David Benjamin <davidben@google.com>
Commit-Queue: David Benjamin <davidben@google.com>
CQ-Verified: CQ bot account: commit-bot@chromium.org <commit-bot@chromium.org>
WatchGuard's bug is very distinctive. Report a dedicated error code out
of BoringSSL so we can better track this.
Bug: chromium:733223
Change-Id: Ia42abd8654e7987b1d43c63a4f454f35f6aa873b
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/17328
Commit-Queue: Adam Langley <agl@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Adam Langley <agl@google.com>
CQ-Verified: CQ bot account: commit-bot@chromium.org <commit-bot@chromium.org>
Change-Id: Ice03a4e8378da8ab94f1aa0545615c8aee6982d7
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/17204
Reviewed-by: David Benjamin <davidben@google.com>
Commit-Queue: David Benjamin <davidben@google.com>
CQ-Verified: CQ bot account: commit-bot@chromium.org <commit-bot@chromium.org>
BUG=76
Change-Id: If58a73da38e46549fd55f84a9104e2dfebfda43f
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/14164
Reviewed-by: Steven Valdez <svaldez@google.com>
Reviewed-by: David Benjamin <davidben@google.com>
Commit-Queue: Steven Valdez <svaldez@google.com>
Commit-Queue: David Benjamin <davidben@google.com>
CQ-Verified: CQ bot account: commit-bot@chromium.org <commit-bot@chromium.org>
This doesn't hugely matter, but I noticed it was some missing coverage.
Change-Id: I3e425d47fbbeaacd9da2ae883f34e89b4562ec11
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/17184
Commit-Queue: Steven Valdez <svaldez@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Steven Valdez <svaldez@google.com>
CQ-Verified: CQ bot account: commit-bot@chromium.org <commit-bot@chromium.org>
Rather than adding a new mode to EVP_PKEY_CTX, upstream chose to tie
single-shot signing to EVP_MD_CTX, adding functions which combine
EVP_Digest*Update and EVP_Digest*Final. This adds a weird vestigial
EVP_MD_CTX and makes the signing digest parameter non-uniform, slightly
complicating things. But it means APIs like X509_sign_ctx can work
without modification.
Align with upstream's APIs. This required a bit of fiddling around
evp_test.cc. For consistency and to avoid baking details of parameter
input order, I made it eagerly read all inputs before calling
SetupContext. Otherwise which attributes are present depend a lot on the
shape of the API we use---notably the NO_DEFAULT_DIGEST tests for RSA
switch to failing before consuming an input, which is odd.
(This only matters because we have some tests which expect the operation
to abort the operation early with parameter errors and match against
Error. Those probably should not use FileTest to begin with, but I'll
tease that apart a later time.)
Upstream also named NID_Ed25519 as NID_ED25519, even though the
algorithm is normally stylized as "Ed25519". Switch it to match.
Change-Id: Id6c8f5715930038e754de50338924d044e908045
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/17044
Commit-Queue: Steven Valdez <svaldez@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Steven Valdez <svaldez@google.com>
CQ-Verified: CQ bot account: commit-bot@chromium.org <commit-bot@chromium.org>
