We only need the size_t ones now.
BUG=22
Change-Id: Ie6935656bbc4bd2b602b8fad78effc401c493416
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/14312
Commit-Queue: David Benjamin <davidben@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Adam Langley <agl@google.com>
Not that this is remotely necessary since the code bounds to 1MB, the
caller bounds to INT_MAX (due to EVP_CIPHER) and the grandcaller bounds
to 16k (due to TLS).
BUG=22
Change-Id: Ia75990a30bac26ca617532630340ff94a88e4e20
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/14311
Commit-Queue: David Benjamin <davidben@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Adam Langley <agl@google.com>
This is redundant because these "AEAD"s are not meant to be used outside
of TLS, but since we've moved them into their own layer, they should
check internally.
Change-Id: Ieb3541b2e494902527c2bb56a816cef620cb237b
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/14310
Commit-Queue: David Benjamin <davidben@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Adam Langley <agl@google.com>
This makes it a bit easier to see what is what.
Change-Id: I0f73f6ffa84bd30de3efcbf2bd34e1d3a889d1ee
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/14309
Commit-Queue: David Benjamin <davidben@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Adam Langley <agl@google.com>
BUG=22
Change-Id: I9f392eef44e83efb4b13931acb2a3c642cbf1f29
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/14308
Commit-Queue: David Benjamin <davidben@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Adam Langley <agl@google.com>
BUG=22
Change-Id: I5bfa543c261623d125e7a25cea905e3b90b0c014
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/14307
Commit-Queue: David Benjamin <davidben@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Adam Langley <agl@google.com>
These will be used in follow-up commits. The _s names are taken from
upstream, to ease importing code. I've also promoted the CONSTTIME_*
macros from the test. None of them are really necessary except
~0u cannot substitute for CONSTTIME_TRUE_S on 64-bit platforms, so
having the macros seems safer.
Once everything is converted, I expect the unsigned versions can be
removed, so I've made the _8 and _int functions act on size_t rather
than unsigned. The users of these functions basically only believe that
array indices and bytes exist.
BUG=22
Change-Id: I987bfb0c708dc726a6f2afcb05b6619bbd600564
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/14306
Commit-Queue: David Benjamin <davidben@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Adam Langley <agl@google.com>
SSL_CTX_set_signed_cert_timestamp_list fails now if its input is not
well-formed.
Change-Id: I84a4034f66868da11f98bf33e5b7f5c9fc958933
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/14484
Reviewed-by: Steven Valdez <svaldez@google.com>
Commit-Queue: Steven Valdez <svaldez@google.com>
CQ-Verified: CQ bot account: commit-bot@chromium.org <commit-bot@chromium.org>
Since any ALPN mismatch and other cause for early data rejection will
cause the server to revert to the non-early data path, this is safe to
flip on for all the fuzzers.
BUG=76
Change-Id: I573740ef8f455915820943d82247fb6bfc37ae41
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/14465
Reviewed-by: David Benjamin <davidben@google.com>
Commit-Queue: David Benjamin <davidben@google.com>
CQ-Verified: CQ bot account: commit-bot@chromium.org <commit-bot@chromium.org>
Previously we only needed to be able to serve P-224 certificates, but
now we anticipate a need to be able to connect and validate them also.
Since this requires advertising support for P-224 in the handshake, we
need to support P-224 ECDHE too.
P-224 support is disabled by default and so clients need to both set the
enabled curves explicitly and set a maximum version of TLS 1.2.
Change-Id: Idc69580f47334e0912eb431a0db0e78ee2eb5bbe
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/14225
Reviewed-by: Adam Langley <alangley@gmail.com>
Commit-Queue: Adam Langley <alangley@gmail.com>
CQ-Verified: CQ bot account: commit-bot@chromium.org <commit-bot@chromium.org>
Allow the fuzzers to treat this situation, if they ever discover it,
as a bug.
Change-Id: Ie6f1562e9b185d49463cf1a6db28d28780169b11
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/14424
Reviewed-by: David Benjamin <davidben@google.com>
Change-Id: Ied6b73fde61eb133c9871b42a56aa5a64131b67b
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/14328
Reviewed-by: David Benjamin <davidben@google.com>
Commit-Queue: David Benjamin <davidben@google.com>
CQ-Verified: CQ bot account: commit-bot@chromium.org <commit-bot@chromium.org>
BUG=185
Change-Id: I4ce6735ca78cd687538a8c0fdbd78ee97b93585c
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/14382
Reviewed-by: David Benjamin <davidben@google.com>
Commit-Queue: David Benjamin <davidben@google.com>
CQ-Verified: CQ bot account: commit-bot@chromium.org <commit-bot@chromium.org>
This pulls in upstream's 0822d41b6d54132df96c02cc6f6fa9b179378351 and a
portion of a285992763f3961f69a8d86bf7dfff020a08cef9. The former, in
particular, fixes a crash on iOS.
Change-Id: I3c083975d8d11e58b5a2919fcabbf83628f36340
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/14383
Reviewed-by: Steven Valdez <svaldez@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: David Benjamin <davidben@google.com>
Commit-Queue: David Benjamin <davidben@google.com>
CQ-Verified: CQ bot account: commit-bot@chromium.org <commit-bot@chromium.org>
When we refactored all the buffering logic, we retained upstream
OpenSSL's allocation patterns. In particular, we always allocated fixed
size write buffer, even though, unlike when reading, we trivially know a
tighter bound (namely however much we happen to be writing right now).
Since the cutoff for when Windows' malloc starts having a hard time is
just below the TLS maximum record size, do the more natural thing of
allocating what we need to hold outgoing ciphertext.
(This only does anything to the write half. Read half is a bit more
involved.)
BUG=chromium:524258
Change-Id: I0165f9ce822b9cc413f3c77e269e6154160537a7
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/14405
Reviewed-by: Steven Valdez <svaldez@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: David Benjamin <davidben@google.com>
Commit-Queue: David Benjamin <davidben@google.com>
CQ-Verified: CQ bot account: commit-bot@chromium.org <commit-bot@chromium.org>
We now have another non-OpenSSL perlasm file.
Change-Id: Id5ab606089f22a4cb4c7d29f2cf7d140b66861f7
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/14404
Reviewed-by: Steven Valdez <svaldez@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: David Benjamin <davidben@google.com>
Commit-Queue: Steven Valdez <svaldez@chromium.org>
Commit-Queue: David Benjamin <davidben@google.com>
CQ-Verified: CQ bot account: commit-bot@chromium.org <commit-bot@chromium.org>
Remove another remnant of the SSL3_PROTOCOL_METHOD hook.
Change-Id: If6bf055e2ee318420e4c5c40b8eb5356eadda68c
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/14381
Commit-Queue: David Benjamin <davidben@google.com>
Commit-Queue: Steven Valdez <svaldez@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: Steven Valdez <svaldez@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: David Benjamin <davidben@google.com>
BUG=76
Change-Id: I68bc1dce13af9155b385a7b589480aacf02ec0db
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/14380
Commit-Queue: David Benjamin <davidben@google.com>
Commit-Queue: Steven Valdez <svaldez@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: Steven Valdez <svaldez@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: David Benjamin <davidben@google.com>
BUG=76
Change-Id: Ie894ea5d327f88e66b234767de437dbe5c67c41d
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/12960
Reviewed-by: David Benjamin <davidben@google.com>
Commit-Queue: David Benjamin <davidben@google.com>
CQ-Verified: CQ bot account: commit-bot@chromium.org <commit-bot@chromium.org>
BUG=76
Change-Id: I43672ee82a50f8fe706a5d607ef774a6e96db252
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/14379
Reviewed-by: David Benjamin <davidben@google.com>
Commit-Queue: David Benjamin <davidben@google.com>
CQ-Verified: CQ bot account: commit-bot@chromium.org <commit-bot@chromium.org>
This ends up under half the size of the original file.
BUG=129
Change-Id: Idec69d9517bd57cee6b3b83bc0cce05396565b70
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/14305
Reviewed-by: David Benjamin <davidben@google.com>
Commit-Queue: David Benjamin <davidben@google.com>
CQ-Verified: CQ bot account: commit-bot@chromium.org <commit-bot@chromium.org>
OPENSSL_free will handle NULL.
Change-Id: I18593a015cd4a081c2eeebf0cd738a024d02a97d
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/14373
Reviewed-by: Steven Valdez <svaldez@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: David Benjamin <davidben@google.com>
Commit-Queue: Steven Valdez <svaldez@chromium.org>
Commit-Queue: David Benjamin <davidben@google.com>
CQ-Verified: CQ bot account: commit-bot@chromium.org <commit-bot@chromium.org>
It still depends on crypto/x509, but we will need a CRYPTO_BUFFER
version of PKCS7_get_certificates for Chromium. Start with this.
BUG=54
Change-Id: I62dcb9ba768091ce37dc9fe819f4f14ac025219c
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/14372
Reviewed-by: Steven Valdez <svaldez@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: David Benjamin <davidben@google.com>
Commit-Queue: Steven Valdez <svaldez@chromium.org>
Commit-Queue: David Benjamin <davidben@google.com>
CQ-Verified: CQ bot account: commit-bot@chromium.org <commit-bot@chromium.org>
Change-Id: I5e1302d75f863fb2e531d431a4e3ecfd90e0dca1
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/14376
Reviewed-by: David Benjamin <davidben@google.com>
Commit-Queue: David Benjamin <davidben@google.com>
CQ-Verified: CQ bot account: commit-bot@chromium.org <commit-bot@chromium.org>
This tests that the ticket age is measured from ticket issuance and not
the initial authentication. Specifically, that ssl_session_renew_timeout
also rebases the time.
Change-Id: Iba51efb49c691a44e6428d1cd35f0803ca3d396a
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/14375
Reviewed-by: David Benjamin <davidben@google.com>
Commit-Queue: David Benjamin <davidben@google.com>
CQ-Verified: CQ bot account: commit-bot@chromium.org <commit-bot@chromium.org>
Channel ID is incompatible with 0-RTT, so we gracefully decline 0-RTT
as a server and forbid their combination as a client. We'll keep this
logic around until Channel ID is removed.
Channel ID will be replaced by tokbind which currently uses custom
extensions. Those will need additional logic to work with 0-RTT.
This is not implemented yet so, for now, fail if both are ever
configured together at all. A later change will allow the two to
combine.
BUG=183
Change-Id: I46c5ba883ccd47930349691fb08074a1fab13d5f
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/14370
Reviewed-by: David Benjamin <davidben@google.com>
Commit-Queue: David Benjamin <davidben@google.com>
CQ-Verified: CQ bot account: commit-bot@chromium.org <commit-bot@chromium.org>
Change-Id: I0e2e4166ad2c57e3192af058f23374f014a2fcf4
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/14377
Reviewed-by: David Benjamin <davidben@google.com>
Commit-Queue: David Benjamin <davidben@google.com>
CQ-Verified: CQ bot account: commit-bot@chromium.org <commit-bot@chromium.org>
Once 0-RTT data is added to the current 0-RTT logic, the server will
trigger a write when processing incoming data via SSL_read. This means
SSL_read will block on transport write, which is something we've not
tried to avoid far (assuming no renegotiation).
The specification allows for tickets to be sent at half-RTT by
predicting the client Finished. By doing this we both get the tickets on
the wire sooner and avoid confusing I/O patterns. Moreover, we
anticipate we will need this mode for one of the QUIC stateless reject
patterns.
This is tested by always processing NewSessionTickets in the
ExpectHalfRTTData path on 0-RTT connections. As not other
implementations using BoGo may not do this, this is configurable via the
shim config.
BUG=76
Change-Id: Ia0f56ae63f15078ff1cacceba972d2b99001947f
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/14371
Reviewed-by: Steven Valdez <svaldez@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: David Benjamin <davidben@google.com>
Commit-Queue: Steven Valdez <svaldez@chromium.org>
Commit-Queue: David Benjamin <davidben@google.com>
CQ-Verified: CQ bot account: commit-bot@chromium.org <commit-bot@chromium.org>
These will be used by Chromium's crypto::ECPrivateKey to work with
EncryptedPrivateKeyInfo structures.
Note this comes with a behavior change: PKCS8_encrypt and PKCS8_decrypt
will no longer preserve PKCS#8 PrivateKeyInfo attributes. However, those
functions are only called by Chromium which does not care. They are also
called by the PEM code, but not in a way which exposes attributes.
The PKCS#12 PFX code is made to use PKCS8_parse_encrypted_private_key
because it's cleaner (no more tossing X509_SIG around) and to ease
decoupling that in the future.
crypto/pkcs8's dependency on the legacy ASN.1 stack is now limited to
pkcs8_x509.c.
BUG=54
Change-Id: I173e605d175e982c6b0250dd22187b73aca15b1a
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/14215
Reviewed-by: David Benjamin <davidben@google.com>
Commit-Queue: David Benjamin <davidben@google.com>
CQ-Verified: CQ bot account: commit-bot@chromium.org <commit-bot@chromium.org>
This is a remnant of before we made the handshake write
flight by flight.
Change-Id: I94c0105bb071ffca9ff5aa4c4bf43311c750b49a
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/14369
Reviewed-by: Steven Valdez <svaldez@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: David Benjamin <davidben@google.com>
Commit-Queue: Steven Valdez <svaldez@chromium.org>
Commit-Queue: David Benjamin <davidben@google.com>
CQ-Verified: CQ bot account: commit-bot@chromium.org <commit-bot@chromium.org>
PKCS8_encrypt and PKCS8_decrypt still need to be split. The code for
processing PKCS#12 files is, for now, placed entirely in pkcs8_x509.c.
If we need to split it up, it should be straightforward to do so.
(Introduce a CRYPTO_BUFFER version of PKCS12_get_key_and_certs and go
from there.)
BUG=54
Change-Id: I9c87e916ec29ee14dbbd81c4d3fc10ac8a461f1a
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/14214
Reviewed-by: Steven Valdez <svaldez@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: David Benjamin <davidben@google.com>
Commit-Queue: Steven Valdez <svaldez@chromium.org>
Commit-Queue: David Benjamin <davidben@google.com>
CQ-Verified: CQ bot account: commit-bot@chromium.org <commit-bot@chromium.org>
This will make it easier to test 0-RTT later on.
BUG=76
Change-Id: I4d60b77c14bc9143ca9785d0a6b8169653a1b120
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/14367
Reviewed-by: Steven Valdez <svaldez@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: David Benjamin <davidben@google.com>
Commit-Queue: Steven Valdez <svaldez@chromium.org>
Commit-Queue: David Benjamin <davidben@google.com>
CQ-Verified: CQ bot account: commit-bot@chromium.org <commit-bot@chromium.org>
It's not immediately obvious what's going on here.
Change-Id: Ibbba80a6ff9ace4d88e89a42efc270b77b4fad12
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/14368
Reviewed-by: Steven Valdez <svaldez@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: David Benjamin <davidben@google.com>
Commit-Queue: Steven Valdez <svaldez@chromium.org>
Commit-Queue: David Benjamin <davidben@google.com>
CQ-Verified: CQ bot account: commit-bot@chromium.org <commit-bot@chromium.org>
The tests all work fine under it except for tests where the shim shuts
down. (In those the shim calls SSL_shutdown as the first function, so it
wouldn't do anything useful.)
Change-Id: Ia2e811bb3c553a690df38d1fd7d3107ae7c9aa12
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/14366
Reviewed-by: David Benjamin <davidben@google.com>
Commit-Queue: David Benjamin <davidben@google.com>
CQ-Verified: CQ bot account: commit-bot@chromium.org <commit-bot@chromium.org>
The padding check functions will need to tweak their calling conventions
and the constant-time helpers, so leaving those alone for now. These
were the easy ones.
BUG=22
Change-Id: Ia00e41e26a134de17d56be3def5820cb042794e1
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/14265
Reviewed-by: David Benjamin <davidben@google.com>
Commit-Queue: David Benjamin <davidben@google.com>
CQ-Verified: CQ bot account: commit-bot@chromium.org <commit-bot@chromium.org>
We've never allowed this as no good can come of it. Add a test for this.
Change-Id: I4b92372f58c1fe2054e33007adbe496d153a9251
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/14266
Reviewed-by: David Benjamin <davidben@google.com>
Commit-Queue: David Benjamin <davidben@google.com>
CQ-Verified: CQ bot account: commit-bot@chromium.org <commit-bot@chromium.org>
With PKCS8_encrypt_pbe and PKCS8_decrypt_pbe gone in
3e8b782c0c, we can restore the old
arrangement where the password encoding was handled in pkcs12_key_gen.
This simplifies the interface for the follow-up crypto/asn1 split.
Note this change is *not* a no-op for PKCS#12 files which use PBES2.
Before, we would perform the PKCS#12 password encoding for all parts of
PKCS#12 processing. The new behavior is we only perform it for the parts
that go through the PKCS#12 KDF. For such a file, it would only be the
MAC.
I believe the specification supports our new behavior. Although RFC 7292
B.1 says something which implies that the transformation is about
converting passwords to byte strings and would thus be universal,
appendix B itself is prefaced with:
Note that this method for password privacy mode is not recommended
and is deprecated for new usage. The procedures and algorithms
defined in PKCS #5 v2.1 [13] [22] should be used instead.
Specifically, PBES2 should be used as encryption scheme, with PBKDF2
as the key derivation function.
"This method" refers to the key derivation and not the password
formatting, but it does give support to the theory that password
formatting is tied to PKCS#12 key derivation.
(Of course, if one believes PKCS#12's assertion that their inane
encoding (NUL-terminated UTF-16!) is because PKCS#5 failed to talk about
passwords as Unicode strings, one would think that PBES2 (also in
PKCS#5) would have the same issue and thus need PKCS#12 to valiantly
save the day with an encoding...)
This matches OpenSSL's behavior and that of recent versions of NSS. See
https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1268141. I was unable to
figure out what variants, if any, macOS accepts.
BUG=54
Change-Id: I9a1bb4d5e168e6e76b82241e4634b1103e620b9b
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/14213
Reviewed-by: David Benjamin <davidben@google.com>
Commit-Queue: David Benjamin <davidben@google.com>
CQ-Verified: CQ bot account: commit-bot@chromium.org <commit-bot@chromium.org>
This isn't strictly necessary for Chromium yet, but we already have a
decoupled version of hash algorithm parsing available. For now, don't
export it but eventually we may wish to use it for OCSP.
BUG=54
Change-Id: If460d38d48bd47a2b4a853779f210c0cf7ee236b
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/14211
Reviewed-by: Steven Valdez <svaldez@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: David Benjamin <davidben@google.com>
Commit-Queue: Steven Valdez <svaldez@chromium.org>
Commit-Queue: David Benjamin <davidben@google.com>
CQ-Verified: CQ bot account: commit-bot@chromium.org <commit-bot@chromium.org>
This adds support on the server and client to accept data-less early
data. The server will still fail to parse early data with any
contents, so this should remain disabled.
BUG=76
Change-Id: Id85d192d8e0360b8de4b6971511b5e8a0e8012f7
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/12921
Reviewed-by: David Benjamin <davidben@google.com>
Commit-Queue: David Benjamin <davidben@google.com>
CQ-Verified: CQ bot account: commit-bot@chromium.org <commit-bot@chromium.org>
The OPTIONAL prf field is an AlgorithmIdentifier, not an OID. I messed
this up in the recent rewrite.
Fix the parsing and add a test, produced by commenting out the logic in
OpenSSL to omit the field for hmacWithSHA1. (We don't currently support
any other PBKDF2, or I'd just add a test for that.)
Change-Id: I7d258bb01b93cd203a6fc1b8cccbddfdbc4dbbad
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/14330
Reviewed-by: Steven Valdez <svaldez@google.com>
Commit-Queue: Steven Valdez <svaldez@google.com>
CQ-Verified: CQ bot account: commit-bot@chromium.org <commit-bot@chromium.org>
This isn't something we need to fix, just an explanatory comment.
Change-Id: I284e6580d176f981c6b161e9951f367fef1b1be6
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/14264
Reviewed-by: Steven Valdez <svaldez@google.com>
Commit-Queue: Steven Valdez <svaldez@google.com>
CQ-Verified: CQ bot account: commit-bot@chromium.org <commit-bot@chromium.org>
We forgot to run the script at some point.
Change-Id: I0bd142fdd13d64c1ed81d9b1515449220d1c936b
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/14329
Commit-Queue: David Benjamin <davidben@google.com>
Commit-Queue: Steven Valdez <svaldez@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Steven Valdez <svaldez@google.com>
CQ-Verified: CQ bot account: commit-bot@chromium.org <commit-bot@chromium.org>
EVP_DigestUpdate can tolerate zero length inputs. Also properly clean up
ctx in all codepaths.
Change-Id: I90889c6236f6bf74625ba9f967de36949a9a6f83
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/14327
Commit-Queue: David Benjamin <davidben@google.com>
Commit-Queue: Steven Valdez <svaldez@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Steven Valdez <svaldez@google.com>
CQ-Verified: CQ bot account: commit-bot@chromium.org <commit-bot@chromium.org>
We still need to expose a suitable API for Chromium to consume, but the
core implementation itself should now be ready.
The supported cipher list is based on what EVP_get_cipherbynid currently
supports, excluding the entries which don't have OIDs.
BUG=54
Change-Id: I3befca0a34b330ec1f663a029a8fbf049a4406bd
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/14212
Commit-Queue: David Benjamin <davidben@google.com>
Commit-Queue: Steven Valdez <svaldez@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Steven Valdez <svaldez@google.com>
CQ-Verified: CQ bot account: commit-bot@chromium.org <commit-bot@chromium.org>
Playing around with the code, we seem to have sufficient positive test
vectors for the logic around the high bits, but not negative test
vectors. Add some. Also add a negative test vector for the trailing
byte.
(For future reference, use openssl rsautl -raw for raw RSA operations
and openssl pkeyutil for EVP_PKEY_sign.)
Change-Id: I36eddf048e51e037fd924902cd13dcb3c62bfd02
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/14325
Commit-Queue: David Benjamin <davidben@google.com>
Commit-Queue: Steven Valdez <svaldez@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Steven Valdez <svaldez@google.com>
CQ-Verified: CQ bot account: commit-bot@chromium.org <commit-bot@chromium.org>
The |select_certificate_cb| return values are somewhat confusing due
to the fact that they don't match the |cert_cb| ones, despite the
similarities between the two callbacks (they both have "certificate" in
the name! well, sort of).
This also documents the error return value (-1) which was previously
undocumented, and it expands the |SSL_CTX_set_select_certificate_cb|
documentation regarding retrial (by shamelessly copying from
|SSL_CTX_set_ticket_aead_method|).
Also updates other scattered documentation that was missed by previous
changes.
Change-Id: Ib962b31d08e6475e09954cbc3c939988b0ba13f7
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/14245
Reviewed-by: David Benjamin <davidben@google.com>
Commit-Queue: David Benjamin <davidben@google.com>
CQ-Verified: CQ bot account: commit-bot@chromium.org <commit-bot@chromium.org>
They can be restored by compiling with -DBORINGSSL_ENABLE_DHE_TLS.
This is similar to 9c8c4188 for RC4 ciphers.
Change-Id: I7cd3421b108a024f1ee11f13a6df881c2d0de3c3
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/14284
Commit-Queue: Matt Braithwaite <mab@google.com>
Commit-Queue: David Benjamin <davidben@google.com>
Reviewed-by: David Benjamin <davidben@google.com>
CQ-Verified: CQ bot account: commit-bot@chromium.org <commit-bot@chromium.org>
