Our implementation now expects draft 15.

Change-Id: I261a090763951110a6c9f03acfda4ae23cc14cfc
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/11502
Reviewed-by: Steven Valdez <svaldez@google.com>
Reviewed-by: David Benjamin <davidben@google.com>

We've switched to the version extension, so refresh the corpus.

Change-Id: Ic50f58bd83d62dccae26063c9ea2d4a2c799da1f
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/11326
Reviewed-by: Adam Langley <agl@google.com>

This was done by first minimizing the existing set and then merging in a
fresh recording from runner. Glancing through LCOV output does not
reveal anything anomolous. Fuzzer mode seems to be working as expected.

Change-Id: Ife0959a5e16e3c7e2e5a2deb0c32539ff2bc740b
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/11229
Reviewed-by: Adam Langley <agl@google.com>

Corpus recorded from runner and merged into existing corpus with
libFuzzer's -merge flag.

BUG=79

Change-Id: I986a50976ffef141b63e31de3a81fdb4ed5c1348
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/11130
CQ-Verified: CQ bot account: commit-bot@chromium.org <commit-bot@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: Adam Langley <agl@google.com>
Commit-Queue: David Benjamin <davidben@google.com>

Now that client.cc and server.cc run through application data, regenerate the
corpus.

Change-Id: I8278ebfe47fd2ba74f67db6f9b545aabf9fd1f84
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/7301
Reviewed-by: Adam Langley <agl@google.com>

This results from running the fuzzers for a little while with both the
8bit-counters change and after taking the transcripts from the runner
tests as seeds for the `client` and `server` fuzzers.

Change-Id: I545a89d8dccd7ef69dd97546ed61610eea4a27a3
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/7276
Reviewed-by: David Benjamin <davidben@google.com>

This change adds fuzzing tests for:
  ∙ Certificate parsing
  ∙ Private key parsing
  ∙ ClientHello parsing
  ∙ Server first flow (ServerHello, Certificate, etc) parsing.

Change-Id: I5f53282263eaaff69b1a03c819cca73750433653
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/6460
Reviewed-by: Adam Langley <agl@google.com>