Instead, extract it from the certificate, which is what everyone was
doing anyway. A follow-up change will take advantage of this cleanup to
deduplicate code between signing and verifying for which keys are good
for which signature algorithms.
BUG=188
Change-Id: Ic3f83a6477e8fa53e5e7233f4545f4d2c4b58d01
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/14565
Reviewed-by: Adam Langley <agl@google.com>
This moves the early data switch to CERT to make this
|SSL_set_SSL_CTX|-proof.
Change-Id: Icca96e76636d87578deb24b2d507cabee7e46a4a
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/14545
Reviewed-by: David Benjamin <davidben@google.com>
Commit-Queue: David Benjamin <davidben@google.com>
CQ-Verified: CQ bot account: commit-bot@chromium.org <commit-bot@chromium.org>
This allows a caller to configure a serving chain without dealing with
crypto/x509.
Change-Id: Ib42bb2ab9227d32071cf13ab07f92d029643a9a6
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/14126
Commit-Queue: Adam Langley <alangley@gmail.com>
Commit-Queue: David Benjamin <davidben@google.com>
Reviewed-by: David Benjamin <davidben@google.com>
CQ-Verified: CQ bot account: commit-bot@chromium.org <commit-bot@chromium.org>
There are still a few x509.h includes outside ssl_x509.c and ssl_file.c
due to referencing X509_V_* values, but otherwise these includes are no
longer needed.
Change-Id: Ide458e01358dc2ddb6838277d074ad249e599040
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/14026
Reviewed-by: Adam Langley <agl@google.com>
This adds a CRYPTO_BUFFER getter for the peer certificate chain. Other
things we need for Chromium:
- Verification callback. Ultimately, we want an asynchronous one, but a
synchronous one will do for now.
- Configure client cert chain without X509
I've also removed the historical note about SSL_SESSION serialization.
That was years ago and we've since invalidated all serialized client
sessions.
BUG=671420
Change-Id: I2b3bb010f9182e751fc791cdfd7db44a4ec348e6
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/14065
Reviewed-by: David Benjamin <davidben@google.com>
Commit-Queue: David Benjamin <davidben@google.com>
CQ-Verified: CQ bot account: commit-bot@chromium.org <commit-bot@chromium.org>
This function is a |CRYPTO_BUFFER|-based method for getting the X.509
names from a CertificateRequest.
Change-Id: Ife26f726d3c1a055b332656678c2bc560b5a66ec
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/14013
Commit-Queue: Adam Langley <agl@google.com>
Commit-Queue: David Benjamin <davidben@google.com>
Reviewed-by: David Benjamin <davidben@google.com>
CQ-Verified: CQ bot account: commit-bot@chromium.org <commit-bot@chromium.org>
Rather than store CA names and only find out that they're unparsable
when we're asked for a |STACK_OF(X509_NAME)|, check that we can parse
them all during the handshake. This avoids changing the semantics with
the previous change that kept CA names as |CRYPTO_BUFFER|s.
Change-Id: I0fc7a4e6ab01685347e7a5be0d0579f45b8a4818
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/13969
Reviewed-by: Adam Langley <agl@google.com>
Commit-Queue: Adam Langley <agl@google.com>
CQ-Verified: CQ bot account: commit-bot@chromium.org <commit-bot@chromium.org>
This change converts the CA names that are parsed from a server's
CertificateRequest, as well as the CA names that are configured for
sending to clients in the same, to use |CRYPTO_BUFFER|.
The |X509_NAME|-based interfaces are turned into compatibility wrappers.
Change-Id: I95304ecc988ee39320499739a0866c7f8ff5ed98
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/13585
Reviewed-by: Adam Langley <agl@google.com>
Commit-Queue: Adam Langley <agl@google.com>
CQ-Verified: CQ bot account: commit-bot@chromium.org <commit-bot@chromium.org>
This lets us trim another two pointers of per-connection state.
Change-Id: I2145d529bc25b7e24a921d01e82ee99f2c98867c
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/13804
Reviewed-by: David Benjamin <davidben@google.com>
Commit-Queue: David Benjamin <davidben@google.com>
CQ-Verified: CQ bot account: commit-bot@chromium.org <commit-bot@chromium.org>
This reduces us from seven different configuration patterns to six (see
comment #2 of linked bug). I do not believe there is any behavior change
here as SSL_set_SSL_CTX already manually copied the field. It now gives
us a nice invariant: SSL_set_SSL_CTX overrides all and only the
dual-SSL/SSL_CTX options hanging off of CERT.
BUG=123
Change-Id: I1ae06b791fb869917a6503cee41afb2d9be53d89
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/13865
Reviewed-by: David Benjamin <davidben@google.com>
Commit-Queue: David Benjamin <davidben@google.com>
CQ-Verified: CQ bot account: commit-bot@chromium.org <commit-bot@chromium.org>
Recent changes added SSL-level setters to these APIs. Unfortunately,
this has the side effect of breaking SSL_set_SSL_CTX, which is how SNI
is typically handled. SSL_set_SSL_CTX is kind of a weird function in
that it's very sensitive to which of the hodge-podge of config styles is
in use. I previously listed out all the config styles here, but it was
long and unhelpful. (I counted up to 7.)
Of the various SSL_set_SSL_CTX-visible config styles, the sanest seems
to be to move it to CERT. In this case, it's actually quite reasonable
since they're very certificate-related.
Later we may wish to think about whether we can cut down all 7 kinds of
config styles because this is kinda nuts. I'm wondering we should do
CERT => SSL_CONFIG, move everything there, and make that be the same
structure that is dropped post-handshake (supposing the caller has
disavowed SSL_clear and renego). Fruit for later thought. (Note though
that comes with a behavior change for all the existing config.)
Change-Id: I9aa47d8bd37bf2847869e0b577739d4d579ee4ae
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/13864
Reviewed-by: Martin Kreichgauer <martinkr@google.com>
Reviewed-by: David Benjamin <davidben@google.com>
Commit-Queue: David Benjamin <davidben@google.com>
CQ-Verified: CQ bot account: commit-bot@chromium.org <commit-bot@chromium.org>
Previously, the alert was uninitialised.
(Thanks to Robert Swiecki and honggfuzz.)
Change-Id: I2d4eb96b0126f3eb502672b2600ad43ae140acec
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/13700
Commit-Queue: Adam Langley <agl@google.com>
Commit-Queue: David Benjamin <davidben@google.com>
Reviewed-by: David Benjamin <davidben@google.com>
CQ-Verified: CQ bot account: commit-bot@chromium.org <commit-bot@chromium.org>
This change moves the interface between |X509| and |CRYPTO_BUFFER| a
little further out, towards the API.
Change-Id: I1c014d20f12ad83427575843ca0b3bb22de1a694
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/13365
Reviewed-by: Adam Langley <agl@google.com>
The recent CRYPTO_BUFFER changes meant that |X509| objects passed to
SSL_CTX_add_extra_chain_cert would be |free|ed immediately. However,
some third-party code (at least serf and curl) continue to use the
|X509| even after handing over ownership.
In order to unblock things, keep the past |X509| around for a while to
paper over the issues with those libraries while we try and upstream
changes.
Change-Id: I832b458af9b265749fed964658c5c34c84d518df
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/13480
Reviewed-by: Adam Langley <agl@google.com>
Commit-Queue: Adam Langley <agl@google.com>
CQ-Verified: CQ bot account: commit-bot@chromium.org <commit-bot@chromium.org>
If an existing chain had a NULL placeholder for a leaf we could end up
trying to increment its reference count. That results in a crash at
configuration time. Found via the SSL_CTX API fuzzer.
BUG=oss-fuzz:480
Change-Id: I0ddc2cbde2e625015768f1bdc8da625e8a4f05fd
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/13383
Reviewed-by: David Benjamin <davidben@google.com>
Commit-Queue: David Benjamin <davidben@google.com>
CQ-Verified: CQ bot account: commit-bot@chromium.org <commit-bot@chromium.org>
This change converts the |CERT| struct to holding certificates as binary
blobs, rather than in parsed form. The members for holding the parsed
form are still there, however, but are only used as a cache for the
event that someone asks us for a non-owning pointer to the parsed leaf
or chain.
Next steps:
* Move more functions in to ssl_x509.c
* Create an X509_OPS struct of function pointers that will hang off
the |SSL_METHOD| to abstract out the current calls to crypto/x509
operations.
BUG=chromium:671420
Change-Id: Ifa05d88c49a987fd561b349705c9c48f106ec868
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/13280
Reviewed-by: Adam Langley <agl@google.com>
This resolves a TODO, trims per-connection memory, and makes more sense.
These masks have nothing to do with certificate configuration.
Change-Id: I783e6158e51f58cce88e3e68dfa0ed965bdc894c
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/13368
Reviewed-by: Steven Valdez <svaldez@google.com>
Reviewed-by: David Benjamin <davidben@google.com>
Commit-Queue: David Benjamin <davidben@google.com>
CQ-Verified: CQ bot account: commit-bot@chromium.org <commit-bot@chromium.org>
EVP_parse_public_key already acts like CBS_get_* in that it peels one
element off and leaves a remainder.
Change-Id: Ic90952785005ed81664a6f46503b13ecd293176c
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/13045
Reviewed-by: David Benjamin <davidben@google.com>
Commit-Queue: David Benjamin <davidben@google.com>
Rather than doing it right before outputing, treat this as a part of the
pipeline to finalize the certificate chain, and run it right after
cert_cb to modify the certificate configuration itself. This means
nothing else in the stack needs to worry about this case existing.
It also makes it easy to support in both TLS 1.2 and TLS 1.3.
Change-Id: I6a088297a54449f1f5f5bb8b5385caa4e8665eb6
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/12966
Reviewed-by: Adam Langley <agl@google.com>
Most C standard library functions are undefined if passed NULL, even
when the corresponding length is zero. This gives them (and, in turn,
all functions which call them) surprising behavior on empty arrays.
Some compilers will miscompile code due to this rule. See also
https://www.imperialviolet.org/2016/06/26/nonnull.html
Add OPENSSL_memcpy, etc., wrappers which avoid this problem.
BUG=23
Change-Id: I95f42b23e92945af0e681264fffaf578e7f8465e
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/12928
Commit-Queue: David Benjamin <davidben@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Adam Langley <agl@google.com>
This removes another dependency on the crypto/x509 code.
Change-Id: Ia72da4d47192954c2b9a32cf4bcfd7498213c0c7
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/12709
Reviewed-by: Adam Langley <agl@google.com>
This change removes the use of |X509_get_pubkey| from the TLS <= 1.2
code. That function is replaced with a shallow parse of the certificate
to extract the public key instead.
Change-Id: I8938c6c5a01b32038c6b6fa58eb065e5b44ca6d2
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/12707
Reviewed-by: Adam Langley <agl@google.com>
Commit-Queue: Adam Langley <agl@google.com>
CQ-Verified: CQ bot account: commit-bot@chromium.org <commit-bot@chromium.org>
This currently only works for certificates parsed from the network, but
if making several connections that share certificates, some KB of memory
might be saved.
BUG=chromium:671420
Change-Id: I1c7a71d84e1976138641f71830aafff87f795f9d
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/12706
Reviewed-by: David Benjamin <davidben@google.com>
Commit-Queue: David Benjamin <davidben@google.com>
CQ-Verified: CQ bot account: commit-bot@chromium.org <commit-bot@chromium.org>
This change adds a STACK_OF(CRYPTO_BUFFER) to an SSL_SESSION which
contains the raw form of the received certificates. The X509-based
members still exist, but their |enc| buffer will alias the
CRYPTO_BUFFERs.
(This is a second attempt at
https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/#/c/12163/.)
BUG=chromium:671420
Change-Id: I508a8a46cab89a5a3fcc0c1224185d63e3d59cb8
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/12705
Reviewed-by: Adam Langley <agl@google.com>
Commit-Queue: Adam Langley <agl@google.com>
CQ-Verified: CQ bot account: commit-bot@chromium.org <commit-bot@chromium.org>
This avoids needing a extra state around client certificates to avoid
calling the callbacks twice. This does, however, come with a behavior
change: configuring both callbacks won't work. No consumer does this.
(Except bssl_shim which needed slight tweaks.)
Change-Id: Ia5426ed2620e40eecdcf352216c4a46764e31a9a
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/12690
Reviewed-by: Adam Langley <agl@google.com>
This reverts commits 5a6e616961 and
e8509090cf. I'm going to unify how the
chains are kept in memory between client and server first otherwise the
mess just keeps growing.
Change-Id: I76df0d94c9053b2454821d22a3c97951b6419831
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/12701
Reviewed-by: David Benjamin <davidben@google.com>
Commit-Queue: David Benjamin <davidben@google.com>
CQ-Verified: CQ bot account: commit-bot@chromium.org <commit-bot@chromium.org>
This currently only works for certificates parsed from the network, but
if making several connections that share certificates, some KB of memory
might be saved.
Change-Id: I0ea4589d7a8b5c41df225ad7f282b6d1376a8db4
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/12164
Reviewed-by: Adam Langley <alangley@gmail.com>
This change adds a STACK_OF(CRYPTO_BUFFER) to an SSL_SESSION which
contains the raw form of the received certificates. The X509-based
members still exist, but their |enc| buffer will alias the
CRYPTO_BUFFERs.
The serialisation format of SSL_SESSIONs is also changed, in a backwards
compatible way. Previously, some sessions would duplicate the leaf
certificate in the certificate chain. These sessions can still be read,
but will be written in a way incompatible with older versions of the
code. This should be fine because the situation where multiple versions
exchange serialised sessions is at the server, and the server doesn't
duplicate the leaf certifiate in the chain anyway.
Change-Id: Id3b75d24f1745795315cb7f8089a4ee4263fa938
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/12163
Reviewed-by: Adam Langley <alangley@gmail.com>
These too have no reason to be called across files.
Change-Id: Iee477e71f956c2fa0d8817bf2777cb3a81e1c853
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/12585
Reviewed-by: Adam Langley <agl@google.com>
This change renames |peer| to |x509_peer| and |cert_chain| to
|x509_chain| in |SSL_SESSION|. It also renames |x509| to |x509_leaf| and
|chain| to |x509_chain| in |CERT|. (All with an eye to maybe making
them lazily initialised in the future).
This a) catches anyone who might be accessing these members directly and
b) makes space for |CRYPTO_BUFFER|-based values to take the unprefixed
names.
Change-Id: I10573304fb7d6f1ea03f9e645f7fc0acdaf71ac2
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/12162
Reviewed-by: David Benjamin <davidben@google.com>
These functions are only called once. It ends up being not much code if
just done inline.
Change-Id: Ic432b313a6f7994ff9f51436cffbe0c3686a6c7c
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/11525
Reviewed-by: Adam Langley <agl@google.com>
This releases memory associated with them after the handshake. Note this
changes the behavior of |SSL_get0_certificate_types| and
|SSL_get_client_CA_list| slightly. Both functions now return NULL
outside of the handshake. But they were already documented to return
something undefined when not called at the CertificateRequest.
A survey of callers finds none that would care. (Note
SSL_get_client_CA_list is used both as a getter for the corresponding
server config setter and to report client handshake properties. Only the
latter is affected.) It's also pretty difficult to imagine why a caller
would wish to query this stuff at any other time, and there are clear
benefits to dropping the CA list after the handshake (some servers send
ABSURDLY large lists).
Change-Id: I3ac3b601ff0cfa601881ce77ae33d99bb5327004
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/11521
Reviewed-by: Adam Langley <agl@google.com>
This was done just by grepping for 'size_t i;' and 'size_t j;'. I left
everything in crypto/x509 and friends alone.
There's some instances in gcm.c that are non-trivial and pulled into a
separate CL for ease of review.
Change-Id: I6515804e3097f7e90855f1e7610868ee87117223
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/10801
Reviewed-by: Adam Langley <agl@google.com>
Commit-Queue: Adam Langley <agl@google.com>
CQ-Verified: CQ bot account: commit-bot@chromium.org <commit-bot@chromium.org>
If code tries to inspect the verify result in the case of a failure then
it seems reasonable that the error code should be in there.
Change-Id: Ic32ac9d340c2c10a405a7b6580f22a06427f041d
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/10641
Commit-Queue: Adam Langley <agl@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Adam Langley <agl@google.com>
CQ-Verified: CQ bot account: commit-bot@chromium.org <commit-bot@chromium.org>
peer_sigalgs should live on SSL_HANDSHAKE. This both releases a little
bit of memory after the handshake is over and also avoids the bug where
the sigalgs get dropped if SSL_set_SSL_CTX is called at a bad time. See
also upstream's 14e14bf6964965d02ce89805d9de867f000095aa.
This only affects consumers using the old SNI callback and not
select_certificate_cb.
Add a test that the SNI callback works as expected. In doing so, add an
SSL_CTX version of the signing preferences API. This is a property of
the cert/key pair (really just the key) and should be tied to that. This
makes it a bit easier to have the regression test work with TLS 1.2 too.
I thought we'd fixed this already, but apparently not... :-/
BUG=95
Change-Id: I75b02fad4059e6aa46c3b05183a07d72880711b3
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/10445
Reviewed-by: David Benjamin <davidben@google.com>
Commit-Queue: David Benjamin <davidben@google.com>
CQ-Verified: CQ bot account: commit-bot@chromium.org <commit-bot@chromium.org>
Having two copies of this is confusing. This field is inherently tied to
the certificate chain, which lives on SSL_SESSION, so this should live
there too. This also wasn't getting reset correctly on SSL_clear, but
this is now resolved.
Change-Id: I22b1734a93320bb0bf0dc31faa74d77a8e1de906
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/10283
Reviewed-by: David Benjamin <davidben@google.com>
Commit-Queue: David Benjamin <davidben@google.com>
CQ-Verified: CQ bot account: commit-bot@chromium.org <commit-bot@chromium.org>
Since we are eliminating DHE support in TLS, this is just a waste of
bytes.
Change-Id: I3a23ece564e43f7e8874d1ec797def132ba59504
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/10260
Reviewed-by: Adam Langley <agl@google.com>
Commit-Queue: Adam Langley <agl@google.com>
CQ-Verified: CQ bot account: commit-bot@chromium.org <commit-bot@chromium.org>
No sense in having it in both the 1.2 and 1.3 code.
Change-Id: Ib3854714afed24253af7f4bcee26d25e95a10211
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/9071
Reviewed-by: Adam Langley <agl@google.com>
Commit-Queue: Adam Langley <agl@google.com>
CQ-Verified: CQ bot account: commit-bot@chromium.org <commit-bot@chromium.org>
Share a bit more of it between TLS 1.2 and 1.3.
Change-Id: I43c9dbf785a3d33db1793cffb0fdbd3af075cc89
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/8849
Reviewed-by: David Benjamin <davidben@google.com>
Commit-Queue: David Benjamin <davidben@google.com>
CQ-Verified: CQ bot account: commit-bot@chromium.org <commit-bot@chromium.org>
Change-Id: I9ec1a8c87e29ffd4fabef68beb6d094aa7d9a215
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/8795
Reviewed-by: David Benjamin <davidben@google.com>
Commit-Queue: David Benjamin <davidben@google.com>
CQ-Verified: CQ bot account: commit-bot@chromium.org <commit-bot@chromium.org>
This is already duplicated between client and server and otherwise will
get duplicated yet again for TLS 1.3.
Change-Id: Ia8a352f9bc76fab0f88c1629d08a1da4c13d2510
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/8778
Reviewed-by: David Benjamin <davidben@google.com>
This will get shared between TLS 1.2 and 1.3.
Change-Id: I9c0d73a087942ac4f8f2075a44bd55647c0dd70b
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/8777
Reviewed-by: David Benjamin <davidben@google.com>
These will all want to be shared with the TLS 1.3 handshake.
Change-Id: I4e50dc0ed2295d43c7ae800015d71c1406311801
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/8776
Reviewed-by: David Benjamin <davidben@google.com>
Commit-Queue: David Benjamin <davidben@google.com>
CQ-Verified: CQ bot account: commit-bot@chromium.org <commit-bot@chromium.org>
Upstream have added |EVP_PKEY_up_ref|, but their version returns an int.
Having this function with a different signature like that is dangerous
so this change aligns BoringSSL with upstream. Users of this function in
Chromium and internally should already have been updated.
Change-Id: I0a7aeaf1a1ca3b0f0c635e2ee3826aa100b18157
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/8736
Reviewed-by: David Benjamin <davidben@google.com>
