Commit Graph

11 Commits

Author SHA1 Message Date
Adam Langley
d2b5af56cf Revert scoped_types.h change.
This reverts commits:
8d79ed6740
19fdcb5234
8d79ed6740

Because WebRTC (at least) includes our headers in an extern "C" block,
which precludes having any C++ in them.

Change-Id: Ia849f43795a40034cbd45b22ea680b51aab28b2d
2016-07-12 08:05:38 -07:00
Adam Langley
8d79ed6740 Assume that MSVC supports C++11.
MSVC doesn't define __cplusplus as 201103 to indicate C++11 support, so
just assume that the compiler supports C++11 if _MSC_VER is defined.

Change-Id: I27f6eeefe6e8dc522470f36fab76ab36d85eebac
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/8734
Reviewed-by: David Benjamin <davidben@google.com>
2016-07-12 00:04:04 +00:00
Adam Langley
8c3c3135a2 Remove scoped_types.h.
This change scatters the contents of the two scoped_types.h files into
the headers for each of the areas of the code. The types are now in the
|bssl| namespace.

Change-Id: I802b8de68fba4786b6a0ac1bacd11d81d5842423
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/8731
Reviewed-by: Adam Langley <agl@google.com>
2016-07-11 23:08:27 +00:00
David Benjamin
d206dfa91f Add missing newline in newhope.h.
doc.go is still a little unhappy.

Change-Id: I5a8f3da91dabb45d29d0e08f13b7dabdcd521c38
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/8145
Reviewed-by: David Benjamin <davidben@google.com>
2016-06-03 22:01:13 +00:00
Adam Langley
aa80ff50bf crypto/newhope: add OPENSSL_EXPORT to functions used by tests.
Change-Id: Ie6701d6ea809f5c590f0773cb4b733a208553879
2016-06-03 14:45:18 -07:00
Adam Langley
a34bd8e38c crypto/newhope: fix comment typo.
Change-Id: Ic7dc57680e8cc8306fb1541249fb356eece30999
2016-06-03 14:37:03 -07:00
Matt Braithwaite
6b7436b0d2 newhope: restore statistical tests.
One of these tests the distribution of noise polynomials; the other
tests that that agreed-upon keys (prior to whitening) have roughly equal
numbers of 0s and 1s.

Along the way, expose a few more API bits.

Change-Id: I6b04708d41590de45d82ea95bae1033cfccd5d67
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/8130
Reviewed-by: Adam Langley <agl@google.com>
2016-06-03 21:26:18 +00:00
Matt Braithwaite
27e863e711 newhope: improve test vectors.
This commit adds coverage of the "offer" (first) step, as well as
testing all outputs of the "accept" (second) step, not just the shared
key.

Change-Id: Id11fe24029abc302442484a6c01fa496a1578b3a
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/8100
Reviewed-by: Adam Langley <agl@google.com>
2016-06-02 19:28:00 +00:00
Matt Braithwaite
db207264ad newhope: refactor and add test vectors.
The test vectors are taken from the reference implementation, modified
to output the results of its random-number generator, and the results of
key generation prior to SHA3.  This allows the interoperability of the
two implementations to be tested somewhat.

To accomplish the testing, this commit creates a new, lower-level API
that leaves the generation of random numbers and all wire encoding and
decoding up to the caller.

Change-Id: Ifae3517696dde4be4a0b7c1998bdefb789bac599
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/8070
Reviewed-by: Adam Langley <agl@google.com>
2016-05-31 21:57:45 +00:00
Matt Braithwaite
e09e579603 Rename NEWHOPE functions to offer/accept/finish.
This is consistent with the new convention in ssl_ecdh.c.

Along the way, change newhope_test.c to not iterate 1000 times over each
test.

Change-Id: I7a500f45b838eba8f6df96957891aa8e880ba089
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/8012
Reviewed-by: David Benjamin <davidben@google.com>
2016-05-19 18:17:48 +00:00
Matt Braithwaite
045a0ffe35 Import `newhope' (post-quantum key exchange).
This derives from the reference implementation:

Source: https://github.com/tpoeppelmann/newhope/tree/master/ref at bc06c1ac
Paper: https://eprint.iacr.org/2015/1092

However, it does not interoperate, due to the replacement of SHAKE-128
with AES-CTR (for polynomial generation) and the replacement of SHA-3
with SHA-256 (for key whitening).

Change-Id: I6a55507aea85331245e2fbd41bae5cc049fdca3c
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/7690
Reviewed-by: Adam Langley <agl@google.com>
2016-04-26 22:53:59 +00:00