We don't actually have an API to let you know if the value is legal to
interpret as a curve ID. (This was kind of a poor API. Oh well.) Also add tests
for key_exchange_info. I've intentionally left server-side plain RSA missing
for now because the SSL_PRIVATE_KEY_METHOD abstraction only gives you bytes and
it's probably better to tweak this API instead.
(key_exchange_info also wasn't populated on the server, though due to a
rebasing error, that fix ended up in the parent CL. Oh well.)
Change-Id: I74a322c8ad03f25b02059da7568c9e1a78419069
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/6783
Reviewed-by: Adam Langley <agl@google.com>
I don't think we're ever going to manage to enforce this, and it doesn't
seem worth the trouble. We don't support application protocols which use
renegotiation outside of the HTTP/1.1 mid-stream client auth hack.
There, it's on the server to reject legacy renegotiations.
This removes the last of SSL_OP_ALL.
Change-Id: I996fdeaabf175b6facb4f687436549c0d3bb0042
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/6580
Reviewed-by: Adam Langley <agl@google.com>
This dates to SSLeay 0.8.0 (or earlier). The use counter sees virtually
no hits.
Change-Id: Iff4c8899d5cb0ba4afca113c66d15f1d980ffe41
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/6558
Reviewed-by: Adam Langley <agl@google.com>
This dates to SSLeay 0.9.0. The Internet seems to have completely
forgotten what "D5" is. (I can't find reference to it beyond
documentation of this quirk.) The use counter we added sees virtually no
hits.
Change-Id: I9781d401acb98ce3790b1b165fc257a6f5e9b155
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/6557
Reviewed-by: Adam Langley <agl@google.com>
yaSSL has a couple of bugs in their DH client implementation. This
change works around the worst of the two.
Firstly, they expect the the DH public value to be the same length as
the prime. This change pads the public value as needed to ensure this.
Secondly, although they handle the first byte of the shared key being
zero, they don't handle the case of the second, third, etc bytes being
zero. So whenever that happens the handshake fails. I don't think that
there's anything that we can do about that one.
Change-Id: I789c9e5739f19449473305d59fe5c3fb9b4a6167
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/6578
Reviewed-by: David Benjamin <davidben@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: Adam Langley <agl@google.com>
The current check has two problems:
- It only runs on the server, where there isn't a curve list at all. This was a
mistake in https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/1843 which flipped it
from client-only to server-only.
- It only runs in TLS 1.2, so one could bypass it by just negotiating TLS 1.1.
Upstream added it as part of their Suite B mode, which requires 1.2.
Move it elsewhere. Though we do not check the entire chain, leaving that to the
certificate verifier, signatures made by the leaf certificate are made by the
SSL/TLS stack, so it's reasonable to check the curve as part of checking
suitability of a leaf.
Change-Id: I7c12f2a32ba946a20e9ba6c70eff23bebcb60bb2
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/6414
Reviewed-by: Adam Langley <agl@google.com>
This exposes the ServerKeyExchange signature hash type used in the most recent
handshake, for histogramming on the client.
BUG=549662
Change-Id: I8a4e00ac735b1ecd2c2df824112c3a0bc62332a7
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/6413
Reviewed-by: Adam Langley <agl@google.com>
This option causes clients to ignore HelloRequest messages completely.
This can be suitable in cases where a server tries to perform concurrent
application data and handshake flow, e.g. because they are trying to
“renew” symmetric keys.
Change-Id: I2779f7eff30d82163f2c34a625ec91dc34fab548
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/6431
Reviewed-by: David Benjamin <davidben@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: Adam Langley <agl@google.com>
Right whether NPN is advertised can only be configured globally on the SSL_CTX.
Rather than adding two pointers to each SSL*, add an options bit to disable it
so we may plumb in a field trial to disable NPN.
Chromium wants to be able to route a bit in to disable NPN, but it uses SSL_CTX
incorrectly and has a global one, so it can't disconnect the callback. (That
really needs to get fixed. Although it's not clear this necessarily wants to be
lifted up to SSL_CTX as far as Chromium's SSLClientSocket is concerned since
NPN doesn't interact with the session cache.)
BUG=526713
Change-Id: I49c86828b963eb341c6ea6a442557b7dfa190ed3
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/6351
Reviewed-by: Adam Langley <alangley@gmail.com>
Add a slightly richer API. Notably, one can configure ssl_renegotiate_once to
only accept the first renego.
Also, this API doesn't repeat the mistake I made with
SSL_set_reject_peer_renegotiations which is super-confusing with the negation.
Change-Id: I7eb5d534e3e6c553b641793f4677fe5a56451c71
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/6221
Reviewed-by: Adam Langley <agl@google.com>
Allow configuring digest preferences for the private key. Some
smartcards have limited support for signing digests, notably Windows
CAPI keys and old Estonian smartcards. Chromium used the supports_digest
hook in SSL_PRIVATE_KEY_METHOD to limit such keys to SHA1. However,
detecting those keys was a heuristic, so some SHA256-capable keys
authenticating to SHA256-only servers regressed in the switch to
BoringSSL. Replace this mechanism with an API to configure digest
preference order. This way heuristically-detected SHA1-only keys may be
configured by Chromium as SHA1-preferring rather than SHA1-requiring.
In doing so, clean up the shared_sigalgs machinery somewhat.
BUG=468076
Change-Id: I996a2df213ae4d8b4062f0ab85b15262ca26f3c6
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/5755
Reviewed-by: Adam Langley <agl@google.com>
Change-Id: Ifa44fef160fc9d67771eed165f8fc277f28a0222
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/5840
Reviewed-by: David Benjamin <davidben@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: Adam Langley <agl@google.com>
Applications may require the stapled OCSP response in order to verify
the certificate within the verification callback.
Change-Id: I8002e527f90c3ce7b6a66e3203c0a68371aac5ec
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/5730
Reviewed-by: David Benjamin <davidben@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: Adam Langley <agl@google.com>
This change adds the ability to configure ciphers specifically for
TLS ≥ 1.0. This compliments the existing ability to specify ciphers
for TLS ≥ 1.1.
This is useful because TLS 1.0 is the first version not to suffer from
POODLE. (Assuming that it's implemented correctly[1].) Thus one might
wish to reserve RC4 solely for SSLv3.
[1] https://www.imperialviolet.org/2014/12/08/poodleagain.html
Change-Id: I774d5336fead48f03d8a0a3cf80c369692ee60df
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/5793
Reviewed-by: Adam Langley <agl@google.com>
The maximum buffer size computation wasn't quite done right in
ssl_buffer.c, so we were failing with BUFFER_TOO_SMALL for sufficiently
large records. Fix this and, as penance, add 103 tests.
(Test that we can receive maximum-size records in all cipher suites.
Also test SSL_OP_MICROSOFT_BIG_SSLV3_BUFFER while I'm here.)
BUG=526998
Change-Id: I714c16dda2ed13f49d8e6cd1b48adc5a8491f43c
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/5785
Reviewed-by: Adam Langley <agl@google.com>
Now that it even works at all (type = 0 bug aside), add tests for it.
Test both close_notify being received before and after SSL_shutdown is
called. In the latter case, have the peer send some junk to be ignored
to test that works.
Also test that SSL_shutdown fails on unclean shutdown and that quiet
shutdowns ignore it.
BUG=526437
Change-Id: Iff13b08feb03e82f21ecab0c66d5f85aec256137
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/5769
Reviewed-by: Adam Langley <agl@google.com>
This is a simpler implementation than OpenSSL's, lacking responder IDs
and request extensions support. This mirrors the client implementation
already present.
Change-Id: I54592b60e0a708bfb003d491c9250401403c9e69
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/5700
Reviewed-by: Adam Langley <agl@google.com>
This change mirrors upstream's custom extension API because we have some
internal users that depend on it.
Change-Id: I408e442de0a55df7b05c872c953ff048cd406513
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/5471
Reviewed-by: Adam Langley <agl@google.com>
Fastradio was a trick where the ClientHello was padding to at least 1024
bytes in order to trick some mobile radios into entering high-power mode
immediately. After experimentation, the feature is being dropped.
This change also tidies up a bit of the extensions code now that
everything is using the new system.
Change-Id: Icf7892e0ac1fbe5d66a5d7b405ec455c6850a41c
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/5466
Reviewed-by: Adam Langley <agl@google.com>
This change also switches the behaviour of the client. Previously the
client would send the SCSV rather than the extension, but now it'll only
do that for SSLv3 connections.
Change-Id: I67a04b8abbef2234747c0dac450458deb6b0cd0a
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/5143
Reviewed-by: Adam Langley <agl@google.com>
Rather than rely on Chromium to query SSL_initial_handshake_complete in the
callback (which didn't work anyway because the callback is called afterwards),
move the logic into BoringSSL. BoringSSL already enforces that clients never
offer resumptions on renegotiation (it wouldn't work well anyway as client
session cache lookup is external), so it's reasonable to also implement
in-library that sessions established on a renegotiation are not cached.
Add a bunch of tests that new_session_cb is called when expected.
BUG=501418
Change-Id: I42d44c82b043af72b60a0f8fdb57799e20f13ed5
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/5171
Reviewed-by: Adam Langley <agl@google.com>
This adds a new API, SSL_set_private_key_method, which allows the consumer to
customize private key operations. For simplicity, it is incompatible with the
multiple slots feature (which will hopefully go away) but does not, for now,
break it.
The new method is only routed up for the client for now. The server will
require a decrypt hook as well for the plain RSA key exchange.
BUG=347404
Change-Id: I35d69095c29134c34c2af88c613ad557d6957614
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/5049
Reviewed-by: Adam Langley <agl@google.com>
The only case where renego is supported is if we are a client and the
server sends a HelloRequest. That is still needed to support the renego
+ client auth hack in Chrome. Beyond that, no other forms of renego will
work.
The messy logic where the handshake loop is repurposed to send
HelloRequest and the extremely confusing tri-state s->renegotiate (which
makes SSL_renegotiate_pending a lie during the initial handshake as a
server) are now gone. The next change will further simplify things by
removing ssl->s3->renegotiate and the renego deferral logic. There's
also some server-only renegotiation checks that can go now.
Also clean up ssl3_read_bytes' HelloRequest handling. The old logic relied on
the handshake state machine to reject bad HelloRequests which... actually that
code probably lets you initiate renego by sending the first four bytes of a
ServerHello and expecting the peer to read it later.
BUG=429450
Change-Id: Ie0f87d0c2b94e13811fe8e22e810ab2ffc8efa6c
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/4824
Reviewed-by: Adam Langley <agl@google.com>
Since we hope to eventually lose server-side renegotiation support
altogether, get the client-side version of those tests. We should have
had those anyway to test that the default is to allow it.
BUG=429450
Change-Id: I4a18f339b55f3f07d77e22e823141e10a12bc9ff
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/4780
Reviewed-by: Adam Langley <agl@google.com>
This causes any unexpected handshake records to be met with a fatal
no_renegotiation alert.
In addition, restore the redundant version sanity-checks in the handshake state
machines. Some code would zero the version field as a hacky way to break the
handshake on renego. Those will be removed when switching to this API.
The spec allows for a non-fatal no_renegotiation alert, but ssl3_read_bytes
makes it difficult to find the end of a ClientHello and skip it entirely. Given
that OpenSSL goes out of its way to map non-fatal no_renegotiation alerts to
fatal ones, this seems probably fine. This avoids needing to account for
another source of the library consuming an unbounded number of bytes without
returning data up.
Change-Id: Ie5050d9c9350c29cfe32d03a3c991bdc1da9e0e4
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/4300
Reviewed-by: Adam Langley <agl@google.com>
Based on whether -false-start is passed, we expect SSL_CB_HANDSHAKE_DONE to or
not to fire. Also add a flag that asserts SSL_CB_HANDSHAKE_DONE does *not* fire
in any False Start test where the handshake fails after SSL_connect returns.
Change-Id: I6c5b960fff15e297531e15b16abe0b98be95bec8
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/4212
Reviewed-by: Adam Langley <agl@google.com>
Google C++ style allows these. It's also considerably less tedious and
error-prone than defining an out-of-line constructor.
Change-Id: Ib76ccf6079be383722433046ac5c5d796dd1f525
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/4111
Reviewed-by: Adam Langley <agl@google.com>
It was failing only on 32-bit for some reason. Part of TestConfig wasn't
getting initialized.
Change-Id: I2a3747a347a47b47e2357f34d32f8db86d6cc629
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/4110
Reviewed-by: Adam Langley <agl@google.com>
This callback receives information about the ClientHello and can decide
whether or not to allow the handshake to continue.
Change-Id: I21be28335fa74fedb5b73a310ee24310670fc923
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/3721
Reviewed-by: Adam Langley <agl@google.com>
Test both asynchronous and synchronous versions. This callback is somewhat
different from others. It's NOT called a second time when the handshake is
resumed. This appears to be intentional and not a mismerge from the internal
patch. The caller is expected to set up any state before resuming the handshake
state machine.
Also test the early callback returning an error.
Change-Id: If5e6eddd7007ea5cdd7533b4238e456106b95cbd
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/3590
Reviewed-by: Adam Langley <agl@google.com>
This involves more synchronization with child exits as the kernel no longer
closes the pre-created pipes for free, but it works on Windows. As long as
TCP_NODELAY is set, the performance seems comparable. Though it does involve
dealing with graceful socket shutdown. I couldn't get that to work on Windows
without draining the socket; not even SO_LINGER worked. Current (untested)
theory is that Windows refuses to gracefully shutdown a socket if the peer
sends data after we've stopped reading.
cmd.ExtraFiles doesn't work on Windows; it doesn't use fds natively, so you
can't pass fds 4 and 5. (stdin/stdout/stderr are special slots in
CreateProcess.) We can instead use the syscall module directly and mark handles
as inheritable (and then pass the numerical values out-of-band), but that
requires synchronizing all of our shim.Start() calls and assuming no other
thread is spawning a process.
PROC_THREAD_ATTRIBUTE_HANDLE_LIST fixes threading problems, but requires
wrapping more syscalls. exec.Cmd also doesn't let us launch the process
ourselves. Plus it still requires every handle in the list be marked
inheritable, so it doesn't help if some other thread is launching a process
with bInheritHandles TRUE but NOT using PROC_THREAD_ATTRIBUTE_HANDLE_LIST.
(Like Go, though we can take syscall.ForkLock there.)
http://blogs.msdn.com/b/oldnewthing/archive/2011/12/16/10248328.aspx
The more natively Windows option seems to be named pipes, but that too requires
wrapping more system calls. (To be fair, that isn't too painful.) They also
involve a listening server, so we'd still have to synchronize with shim.Wait()
a la net.TCPListener.
Then there's DuplicateHandle, but then we need an out-of-band signal.
All in all, one cross-platform implementation with a TCP sockets seems
simplest.
Change-Id: I38233e309a0fa6814baf61e806732138902347c0
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/3563
Reviewed-by: Adam Langley <agl@google.com>
I found no users of this. We can restore it if needbe, but I don't expect
anyone to find it useful in its current form. The API is suspect for the same
reasons DTLSv1_listen was. An SSL object is stateful and assumes you already
have the endpoint separated out.
If we ever need it, server-side HelloVerifyRequest and DTLSv1_listen should be
implemented by a separate stateless listener that statelessly handles
cookieless ClientHello + HelloVerifyRequest. Once a ClientHello with a valid
cookie comes in, it sets up a stateful SSL object and passes control along to
that.
Change-Id: I86adc1dfb6a81bebe987784c36ad6634a9a1b120
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/3480
Reviewed-by: Adam Langley <agl@google.com>
The new V2ClientHello sniff asserts, for safety, that nothing else has
initialized the record layer before it runs. However, OpenSSL allows you to
avoid explicitly calling SSL_connect/SSL_accept and instead let
SSL_read/SSL_write implicitly handshake for you. This check happens at a fairly
low-level in the ssl3_read_bytes function, at which point the record layer has
already been initialized.
Add some tests to ensure this mode works.
(Later we'll lift the handshake check to a higher-level which is probably
simpler.)
Change-Id: Ibeb7fb78e5eb75af5411ba15799248d94f12820b
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/3334
Reviewed-by: Adam Langley <agl@google.com>
The minimum MTU (not consistently enforced) is just under 256, so it's
difficult to test everything, but this is a basic test. (E.g., without renego,
the only handshake message with encryption is Finished which fits in the MTU.)
It tests the server side because the Certificate message is large enough to
require fragmentation.
Change-Id: Ida11f1057cebae2b800ad13696f98bb3a7fbbc5e
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/2824
Reviewed-by: Adam Langley <agl@google.com>
Amend the version negotiation tests to test this new spelling of max_version.
min_version will be tested in a follow-up.
Change-Id: Ic4bfcd43bc4e5f951140966f64bb5fd3e2472b01
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/2583
Reviewed-by: Adam Langley <agl@google.com>
The ClientHello record is padded to 1024 bytes when
fastradio_padding is enabled. As a result, the 3G cellular radio
is fast forwarded to DCH (high data rate) state. This mechanism
leads to a substantial redunction in terms of TLS handshake
latency, and benefits mobile apps that are running on top of TLS.
Change-Id: I3d55197b6d601761c94c0f22871774b5a3dad614
We forgot to add those when we implemented the features. (Also relevant because
they will provide test coverage later for configuring features when using the
generic method tables rather than *_client_method.)
Change-Id: Ie08b27de893095e01a05a7084775676616459807
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/2410
Reviewed-by: Adam Langley <agl@google.com>
Just the negotiation portion as everything else is external. This feature is
used in WebRTC.
Change-Id: Iccc3983ea99e7d054b59010182f9a56a8099e116
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/2310
Reviewed-by: Adam Langley <agl@google.com>
These'll get removed once most of renego support is gone, but this is to prove
removing the warning alert from the previous commit still prevents legacy
renegotiations.
Change-Id: I7d9d95e1d4c5d23d3b6d170938a5499a65f2d5ea
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/2236
Reviewed-by: Adam Langley <agl@google.com>
This change adds support to the Go code for renegotiation as a client,
meaning that we can test BoringSSL's renegotiation as a server.
Change-Id: Iaa9fb1a6022c51023bce36c47d4ef7abee74344b
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/2082
Reviewed-by: Adam Langley <agl@google.com>
Only the three plain PSK suites for now. ECDHE_PSK_WITH_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 will
be in a follow-up.
Change-Id: Iafc116a5b2798c61d90c139b461cf98897ae23b3
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/2051
Reviewed-by: Adam Langley <agl@google.com>
