- In base.h, if BORINGSSL_PREFIX is defined, include
boringssl_prefix_symbols.h
- In all .S files, if BORINGSSL_PREFIX is defined, include
boringssl_prefix_symbols_asm.h
- In base.h, BSSL_NAMESPACE_BEGIN and BSSL_NAMESPACE_END are
defined with appropriate values depending on whether
BORINGSSL_PREFIX is defined; these macros are used in place
of 'namespace bssl {' and '}'
- Add util/make_prefix_headers.go, which takes a list of symbols
and auto-generates the header files mentioned above
- In CMakeLists.txt, if BORINGSSL_PREFIX and BORINGSSL_PREFIX_SYMBOLS
are defined, run util/make_prefix_headers.go to generate header
files
- In various CMakeLists.txt files, add "global_target" that all
targets depend on to give us a place to hook logic that must run
before all other targets (in particular, the header file generation
logic)
- Document this in BUILDING.md, including the fact that it is
the caller's responsibility to provide the symbol list and keep it
up to date
- Note that this scheme has not been tested on Windows, and likely
does not work on it; Windows support will need to be added in a
future commit
Change-Id: If66a7157f46b5b66230ef91e15826b910cf979a2
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/31364
Commit-Queue: David Benjamin <davidben@google.com>
CQ-Verified: CQ bot account: commit-bot@chromium.org <commit-bot@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: David Benjamin <davidben@google.com>
We currently write a mix of "if (FOO)" and "if(FOO)". While the former looks
more like a usual language, CMake believes everything, even "if" and "else", is
just a really really funny function call (a "command").
We should pick something for consistency. Upstream CMake writes "if(FOO)", so
go with that one.
Change-Id: I67e0eb650a52670110b417312a362c9f161c8721
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/30807
Reviewed-by: Adam Langley <agl@google.com>
This is mostly to make it easier for me to generate test Ed25519
certificates.
Change-Id: I45e42f556d949d62eb6cdf684194958fa9f909bf
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/14504
Reviewed-by: Adam Langley <agl@google.com>
Make it slightly easier for people to use.
Change-Id: I567e95bf1a5c203170a0b9732fd522fcbe5b7bc1
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/6773
Reviewed-by: Adam Langley <agl@google.com>
This simply converts a cipher suite string to the list of cipher suites
that it implies.
Change-Id: Id8b31086715d619ea6601c40a6eb84dc0d8c500d
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/6370
Reviewed-by: Adam Langley <agl@google.com>
This allows BoringSSL to build on OpenBSD with gcc/g++ 4.9.2.
Change-Id: Icce23de87b0358a581124eb8cd37dc48a1f096c9
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/5401
Reviewed-by: Adam Langley <agl@google.com>
This reverts commit e60e2a483b. Turns out we do
still use clock_gettime in speed.cc.
Change-Id: Idab42ef2863345c3d1409b5d33c3e36b41739e1f
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/4894
Reviewed-by: Adam Langley <agl@google.com>
I think, long ago, I tried to use the monotonic clock in speed.cc, which
needs -lrt. However, the current code doesn't use that and thus doesn't
need -lrt.
Change-Id: Ibcbf90f91ae6b852c0975dff006346125243df54
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/4622
Reviewed-by: David Benjamin <davidben@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: Adam Langley <agl@google.com>
Previously I've been using the Linaro toolchains and just building
static binaries. However, the Linaro toolchains have a broken
pthread_rwlock_wrlock—it does nothing and then unlocking corrupts the
lock.
Building with the Android NDK avoids this.
These build instructions depend on
https://github.com/taka-no-me/android-cmake which people will need to
clone into util/ if they want to use the Android NDK.
Change-Id: Ic64919f9399af2a57e8df4fb4b3400865ddb2427
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/4600
Reviewed-by: Adam Langley <agl@google.com>
The rand subcommand outputs entropy to stdout.
Change-Id: I95c2769a1784a8dd4c21efc15009080006d51349
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/4325
Reviewed-by: Adam Langley <agl@google.com>
Android might want to replace the system *sum (i.e. md5sum, sha256sum
etc) binaries with a symlink to the BoringSSL tool binary.
This change also allows the tool to figure out what to do based on
argv[0] if it matches one of the known commands.
Change-Id: Ia4fc3cff45ce2ae623dae6786eea5d7ad127d44b
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/2940
Reviewed-by: Adam Langley <agl@google.com>
This lets us run bssl speed at least. bssl client is currently compiled
out until we clean up our socket story on Windows and get it working.
Change-Id: Ib1dc0d0e0a6eed7544207e7bbe138503731fda67
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/2103
Reviewed-by: Adam Langley <agl@google.com>
This is cleaner than the OpenSSL code was, at least, but it's hardly
beautiful due to the "standard" that it's trying to implement. (See
[1].)
The references from the PKCS#8 code to various ciphers have digests have
been made into function pointer references rather than NIDs so that the
linker will be able to drop RC2 code for binaries that don't call PKCS#8
or #12 functions.
A bug that crashed OpenSSL/BoringSSL when parsing a malformed PKCS#8
structure has been fixed too.
See https://www.cs.auckland.ac.nz/~pgut001/pubs/pfx.html
Change-Id: Iaa1039e04ed7877b90792835e8ce3ebc3b29f89e
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/1592
Reviewed-by: Adam Langley <agl@google.com>
Apart from the obvious little issues, this also works around a
(seeming) libtool/linker:
a.c defines a symbol:
int kFoo;
b.c uses it:
extern int kFoo;
int f() {
return kFoo;
}
compile them:
$ gcc -c a.c
$ gcc -c b.c
and create a dummy main in order to run it, main.c:
int f();
int main() {
return f();
}
this works as expected:
$ gcc main.c a.o b.o
but, if we make an archive:
$ ar q lib.a a.o b.o
and use that:
$ gcc main.c lib.a
Undefined symbols for architecture x86_64
"_kFoo", referenced from:
_f in lib.a(b.o)
(It doesn't matter what order the .o files are put into the .a)
Linux and Windows don't seem to have this problem.
nm on a.o shows that the symbol is of type "C", which is a "common symbol"[1].
Basically the linker will merge multiple common symbol definitions together.
If ones makes a.c read:
int kFoo = 0;
Then one gets a type "D" symbol - a "data section symbol" and everything works
just fine.
This might actually be a libtool bug instead of an ld bug: Looking at `xxd
lib.a | less`, the __.SYMDEF SORTED index at the beginning of the archive
doesn't contain an entry for kFoo unless initialised.
Change-Id: I4cdad9ba46e9919221c3cbd79637508959359427
Initial fork from f2d678e6e89b6508147086610e985d4e8416e867 (1.0.2 beta).
(This change contains substantial changes from the original and
effectively starts a new history.)
