The naming breaks layering, but it seems we're stuck with it. We don't
seem to have bothered making first-party code call it BIO_print_errors
(I found no callers of BIO_print_errors), so let's just leave it at
ERR_print_errors.
Change-Id: Iddc22a6afc2c61d4b94ac555be95079e0f477171
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/11960
Commit-Queue: David Benjamin <davidben@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Adam Langley <agl@google.com>
Change-Id: I87cbc12aeb399646c6426b7a099dbf13aafc2532
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/11983
Commit-Queue: David Benjamin <davidben@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Adam Langley <agl@google.com>
d2i_X509_from_buffer parses an |X509| from a |CRYPTO_BUFFER| but ensures
that the |X509_CINF.enc| doesn't make a copy of the encoded
TBSCertificate. Rather the |X509| holds a reference to the given
|CRYPTO_BUFFER|.
Change-Id: I38a4e3d0ca69fc0fd0ef3e15b53181844080fcad
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/11920
Reviewed-by: David Benjamin <davidben@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Adam Langley <alangley@gmail.com>
Commit-Queue: Adam Langley <alangley@gmail.com>
CQ-Verified: CQ bot account: commit-bot@chromium.org <commit-bot@chromium.org>
Change-Id: I0aab9c94fcfa58b9cd46eaf716d9317f532f79a2
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/11850
Commit-Queue: David Benjamin <davidben@google.com>
Commit-Queue: Steven Valdez <svaldez@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Steven Valdez <svaldez@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Adam Langley <agl@google.com>
Tagging non-pointer return types const doesn't do anything and makes
some compilers grumpy. Thanks to Daniel Hirche for the report.
Change-Id: I157ddefd8f7e604b4d8317ffa2caddb8f0dd89de
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/11849
Commit-Queue: David Benjamin <davidben@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Adam Langley <agl@google.com>
Neither branch of the |if| statement is expected to touch |data_len|.
Clarify this by moving |data_len| after the |if| statement.
Change-Id: Ibbc81e5b0c006882672df18442a6e7987064ca6d
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/11880
CQ-Verified: CQ bot account: commit-bot@chromium.org <commit-bot@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: David Benjamin <davidben@google.com>
Commit-Queue: David Benjamin <davidben@google.com>
This patch changes the urandom PRNG to read one byte from the
getrandom(2) Linux syscall on initialization in order to find any
unexpected behavior.
Change-Id: I8ef676854dc361e4f77527b53d1a14fd14d449a8
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/8681
Reviewed-by: Adam Langley <alangley@gmail.com>
Commit-Queue: Adam Langley <alangley@gmail.com>
CQ-Verified: CQ bot account: commit-bot@chromium.org <commit-bot@chromium.org>
These structures allow for blobs of data (e.g. certificates) to be
deduplicated in memory.
Change-Id: Iebfec90b85d55565848a178b6951562b4ccc083e
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/11820
Reviewed-by: Adam Langley <alangley@gmail.com>
Commit-Queue: Adam Langley <alangley@gmail.com>
CQ-Verified: CQ bot account: commit-bot@chromium.org <commit-bot@chromium.org>
At some point, we'll forget to look in the commit message.
Change-Id: I3153aab679209f4f11f56cf3f883c4c74a17af1d
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/11800
CQ-Verified: CQ bot account: commit-bot@chromium.org <commit-bot@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: Steven Valdez <svaldez@google.com>
Reviewed-by: David Benjamin <davidben@google.com>
Commit-Queue: David Benjamin <davidben@google.com>
clang-cl now supports enough of `#pragma intrinsic` that
it can use SecureZeroMemory() without an explicit intrin.h include.
This reverts https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/#/c/8320/
BUG=chromium:592745
Change-Id: Ib766133f1713137bddd07654376a3b4888d4b0fb
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/11780
Reviewed-by: David Benjamin <davidben@google.com>
Commit-Queue: David Benjamin <davidben@google.com>
CQ-Verified: CQ bot account: commit-bot@chromium.org <commit-bot@chromium.org>
I missed these in the last round.
Change-Id: I9b47216eef87c662728e454670e9e516de71ca21
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/11740
Commit-Queue: David Benjamin <davidben@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Adam Langley <agl@google.com>
Change-Id: I51e5a7dac3ceffc41d3a7a57157a11258e65bc42
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/11721
Commit-Queue: David Benjamin <davidben@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Adam Langley <agl@google.com>
Unhandled critical CRL extensions were not detected if they appeared
after the handled ones. (Upstream GitHub issue 1757). Thanks to John
Chuah for reporting this.
(Imported from upstream's 3ade92e785bb3777c92332f88e23f6ce906ee260.)
This additionally adds a regression test for this issue, generated with
der-ascii. The signatures on the CRLs were repaired per notes in
https://github.com/google/der-ascii/blob/master/samples/certificates.md
Change-Id: I74a77f92710e6ef7f46dcde5cb6ae9350084ddcb
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/11720
Commit-Queue: David Benjamin <davidben@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Adam Langley <agl@google.com>
It's possible that a BIO implementation could return a negative number
(say -1) for BIO_CTRL_PENDING or BIO_CTRL_WPENDING. Assert that this
doesn't happen and map it to zero if it happens anyway in NDEBUG builds.
Change-Id: Ie01214e80ff19acc1c7681a1125bbbf2038679c3
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/11700
Reviewed-by: David Benjamin <davidben@google.com>
Commit-Queue: David Benjamin <davidben@google.com>
CQ-Verified: CQ bot account: commit-bot@chromium.org <commit-bot@chromium.org>
Nodejs 6.9.0 calls this function.
Change-Id: I375f222cb819ebcb9fdce0a0d63df6817fa2dcae
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/11625
Commit-Queue: Adam Langley <alangley@gmail.com>
Commit-Queue: David Benjamin <davidben@google.com>
Reviewed-by: David Benjamin <davidben@google.com>
CQ-Verified: CQ bot account: commit-bot@chromium.org <commit-bot@chromium.org>
This code reportedly upsets VC++'s static analysis. Make it clear that,
yes, we want to count backwards.
Change-Id: I5caba219a2b87750d1a9d69b46d336a98c5824c9
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/11624
Commit-Queue: Adam Langley <alangley@gmail.com>
Commit-Queue: David Benjamin <davidben@google.com>
Reviewed-by: David Benjamin <davidben@google.com>
CQ-Verified: CQ bot account: commit-bot@chromium.org <commit-bot@chromium.org>
Macros need a healthy dose of parentheses to avoid expression-level
misparses. Most of this comes from the clang-tidy CL here:
https://android-review.googlesource.com/c/235696/
Also switch most of the macros to use do { ... } while (0) to avoid all
the excessive comma operators and statement-level misparses.
Change-Id: I4c2ee51e347d2aa8c74a2d82de63838b03bbb0f9
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/11660
Commit-Queue: David Benjamin <davidben@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Adam Langley <agl@google.com>
We have bool here. Also the comments were a mix of two styles.
Change-Id: I7eb6814b206efa960ae7e6e1abc14d64be6d61cf
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/11602
Reviewed-by: David Benjamin <davidben@google.com>
Commit-Queue: David Benjamin <davidben@google.com>
CQ-Verified: CQ bot account: commit-bot@chromium.org <commit-bot@chromium.org>
This reverts commit 7b9bbd9639. This seems
to cause some problem linking with gold in Chromium:
../../third_party/binutils/Linux_x64/Release/bin/ld.gold: warning: Cannot export local symbol 'free'
../../third_party/binutils/Linux_x64/Release/bin/ld.gold: warning: Cannot export local symbol 'malloc'
../../third_party/binutils/Linux_x64/Release/bin/ld.gold: warning: Cannot export local symbol 'realloc'
../../third_party/binutils/Linux_x64/Release/bin/ld.gold: error: treating warnings as errors
The same error in https://crbug.com/368351 implies we're actually
causing the compiler to make some assumptions it shouldn't make. The
obvious fix of marking things as visible causes crashes when built with
ASan (ASan's malloc interceptors and ours are conflicting somehow).
Revert this for now. We should study how ASan's interceptors work and
figure out how to make these two coexist.
BUG=655938
Change-Id: Iaad245d1028c442bd924d46519b20115d37a57c4
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/11604
Reviewed-by: Steven Valdez <svaldez@google.com>
Reviewed-by: David Benjamin <davidben@google.com>
Commit-Queue: David Benjamin <davidben@google.com>
CQ-Verified: CQ bot account: commit-bot@chromium.org <commit-bot@chromium.org>
This clears the last of Android's build warnings from BoringSSL. These
pragmas aren't actually no-ops, but it just means that MinGW consumers
(i.e. just Android) need to explicitly list the dependency (which they
do).
There may be something to be said for removing those and having everyone
list dependencies, but I don't really want to chase down every
consumer's build files. Probably not worth the trouble.
Change-Id: I8fcff954a6d5de9471f456db15c54a1b17cb937a
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/11573
Commit-Queue: David Benjamin <davidben@google.com>
Commit-Queue: Adam Langley <agl@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Adam Langley <agl@google.com>
CQ-Verified: CQ bot account: commit-bot@chromium.org <commit-bot@chromium.org>
This is part of TLS 1.3 draft 16 but isn't much of a wire format change,
so go ahead and add it now. When rolling into Chromium, we'll want to
add an entry to the error mapping.
Change-Id: I8fd7f461dca83b725a31ae19ef96c890d603ce53
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/11563
Reviewed-by: David Benjamin <davidben@google.com>
Change-Id: Id8099cc3a250e36e62b8a48e74706b75e5fa127c
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/11566
Commit-Queue: David Benjamin <davidben@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Adam Langley <agl@google.com>
BUG=77
Change-Id: If568412655aae240b072c29d763a5b17bb5ca3f7
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/10840
Reviewed-by: Steven Valdez <svaldez@google.com>
Reviewed-by: David Benjamin <davidben@google.com>
CQ-Verified: CQ bot account: commit-bot@chromium.org <commit-bot@chromium.org>
Commit-Queue: David Benjamin <davidben@google.com>
This finally removes the last Android hack. Both Chromium and Android
end up needing this thing (Chromium needs it for WebCrypto but currently
uses the EVP_AEAD version and Android needs it by way of
wpa_supplicant).
On the Android side, the alternative is we finish upstream's
NEED_INTERNAL_AES_WRAP patch, but then it just uses its own key-wrap
implementation. This seems a little silly, considering we have a version
of key-wrap under a different API anyway.
It also doesn't make much sense to leave the EVP_AEAD API around if we
don't want people to use it and Chromium's the only consumer. Remove it
and I'll switch Chromium to the new---er, old--- APIs next roll.
Change-Id: I23a89cda25bddb6ac1033e4cd408165f393d1e6c
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/11410
Commit-Queue: David Benjamin <davidben@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Adam Langley <agl@google.com>
We have CBS_get_asn1 / CBS_get_asn1_element, but not the "any" variants
of them. Without this, a consumer walking a DER structure must manually
CBS_skip the header, which is a little annoying.
Change-Id: I7735c37eb9e5aaad2bde8407669bce5492e1ccf6
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/11404
Commit-Queue: David Benjamin <davidben@google.com>
Commit-Queue: Adam Langley <agl@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Adam Langley <agl@google.com>
CQ-Verified: CQ bot account: commit-bot@chromium.org <commit-bot@chromium.org>
This is just to reduce the diff with upstream's files so it's easier to
tell what's going on. Upstream's files have lots and lots of trailing
whitespace. We were also missing a comment.
Change-Id: Icfc3b52939823a046a3744fd8e619b5bd6160715
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/11408
Commit-Queue: David Benjamin <davidben@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Adam Langley <agl@google.com>
If asn1_item_ex_combine_new fails in one of the ASN1_template_new calls
just before the ASN1_OP_NEW_POST call, ASN1_item_ex_free will free the
temporary object which ultimately calls ASN1_OP_FREE_POST. This means
that ASN1_OP_FREE_POST needs to account for zero-initialized objects.
Change-Id: I56fb63bd5c015d9dfe3961606449bc6f5b1259e3
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/11403
Commit-Queue: David Benjamin <davidben@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Adam Langley <agl@google.com>
Change-Id: Ia020ea08431859bf268d828b5d72715295de26e6
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/11401
Commit-Queue: David Benjamin <davidben@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Adam Langley <agl@google.com>
They just need a different name for the real malloc implementations.
Change-Id: Iee1aac1133113d628fd3f9f1ed0335d66c6def24
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/11400
Commit-Queue: David Benjamin <davidben@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Adam Langley <agl@google.com>
In order to align ppc64le with the existing code, 4467e59b changed the
prefix for both the ARM and ppc64le AES assembly code to be “aes_hw_”.
However, it didn't update aes.c as well.
Change-Id: I8e3c7dea1c49ddad8a613369af274e25d572a8fd
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/11342
Reviewed-by: Adam Langley <agl@google.com>
Reviewed-by: David Benjamin <davidben@google.com>
Commit-Queue: Adam Langley <agl@google.com>
CQ-Verified: CQ bot account: commit-bot@chromium.org <commit-bot@chromium.org>
This change adds AES and GHASH assembly from upstream, with the aim of
speeding up AES-GCM.
The PPC64LE assembly matches the interface of the ARMv8 assembly so I've
changed the prefix of both sets of asm functions to be the same
("aes_hw_").
Otherwise, the new assmebly files and Perlasm match exactly those from
upstream's c536b6be1a (from their master branch).
Before:
Did 1879000 AES-128-GCM (16 bytes) seal operations in 1000428us (1878196.1 ops/sec): 30.1 MB/s
Did 61000 AES-128-GCM (1350 bytes) seal operations in 1006660us (60596.4 ops/sec): 81.8 MB/s
Did 11000 AES-128-GCM (8192 bytes) seal operations in 1072649us (10255.0 ops/sec): 84.0 MB/s
Did 1665000 AES-256-GCM (16 bytes) seal operations in 1000591us (1664016.6 ops/sec): 26.6 MB/s
Did 52000 AES-256-GCM (1350 bytes) seal operations in 1006971us (51640.0 ops/sec): 69.7 MB/s
Did 8840 AES-256-GCM (8192 bytes) seal operations in 1013294us (8724.0 ops/sec): 71.5 MB/s
After:
Did 4994000 AES-128-GCM (16 bytes) seal operations in 1000017us (4993915.1 ops/sec): 79.9 MB/s
Did 1389000 AES-128-GCM (1350 bytes) seal operations in 1000073us (1388898.6 ops/sec): 1875.0 MB/s
Did 319000 AES-128-GCM (8192 bytes) seal operations in 1000101us (318967.8 ops/sec): 2613.0 MB/s
Did 4668000 AES-256-GCM (16 bytes) seal operations in 1000149us (4667304.6 ops/sec): 74.7 MB/s
Did 1202000 AES-256-GCM (1350 bytes) seal operations in 1000646us (1201224.0 ops/sec): 1621.7 MB/s
Did 269000 AES-256-GCM (8192 bytes) seal operations in 1002804us (268247.8 ops/sec): 2197.5 MB/s
Change-Id: Id848562bd4e1aa79a4683012501dfa5e6c08cfcc
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/11262
Reviewed-by: Adam Langley <agl@google.com>
Commit-Queue: Adam Langley <agl@google.com>
CQ-Verified: CQ bot account: commit-bot@chromium.org <commit-bot@chromium.org>
One of Chromium's toolchains can't handle this for some reason. See also
empty_crls and empty in TestVerify.
Change-Id: I5e6a849f3042288da2e406882ae5cfec249a86ae
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/11340
Reviewed-by: Steven Valdez <svaldez@google.com>
Reviewed-by: David Benjamin <davidben@google.com>
Commit-Queue: David Benjamin <davidben@google.com>
CQ-Verified: CQ bot account: commit-bot@chromium.org <commit-bot@chromium.org>
We used upstream's reformat script, but they had stuck hyphens
everywhere to tell indent to leave a comment alone. Fix this one since
it was especially hard to read.
Change-Id: I9f43bd57dbcf66b79b775ad10ee67867d815ed33
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/11243
Reviewed-by: Steven Valdez <svaldez@google.com>
Reviewed-by: David Benjamin <davidben@google.com>
We'd previously been assuming we'd want to predict P-256 and X25519 but,
on reflection, that's nonsense. Although, today, P-256 is widespread and
X25519 is less so, that's not the right question to ask. Those servers
are all 1.2.
The right question is whether we believe enough servers will get to TLS
1.3 before X25519 to justify wasting 64 bytes on all other connections.
Given that OpenSSL has already shipped X25519 and Microsoft was doing
interop testing on X25519 around when we were shipping it, I think the
answer is no.
Moreover, if we are wrong, it will be easier to go from predicting one
group to two rather than the inverse (provided we send a fake one with
GREASE). I anticipate prediction-miss HelloRetryRequest logic across the
TLS/TCP ecosystem will be largely untested (no one wants to pay an RTT),
so taking a group out of the predicted set will likely be a risky
operation.
Only predicting one group also makes things a bit simpler. I haven't
done this here, but we'll be able to fold the 1.2 and 1.3 ecdh_ctx's
together, even.
Change-Id: Ie7e42d3105aca48eb9d97e2e05a16c5379aa66a3
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/10960
Reviewed-by: David Benjamin <davidben@google.com>
Commit-Queue: David Benjamin <davidben@google.com>
CQ-Verified: CQ bot account: commit-bot@chromium.org <commit-bot@chromium.org>
Found by libFuzzer and then one more mistake caught by valgrind. Add a
test for this case.
Change-Id: I92773bc1231bafe5fc069e8568d93ac0df4c8acb
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/11129
Reviewed-by: David Benjamin <davidben@google.com>
The MinGW setup on Android already defines this stat macro.
Change-Id: Ia8e89195c06ec01d4b5a2fa7357fb8d2d500aa06
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/11124
Reviewed-by: Kenny Root <kroot@google.com>
Reviewed-by: David Benjamin <davidben@google.com>
Commit-Queue: David Benjamin <davidben@google.com>
CQ-Verified: CQ bot account: commit-bot@chromium.org <commit-bot@chromium.org>
Android uses MinGW for some host tools on Windows. That toolchain
doesn't support the #pragma tricks we use for thread-local destructors,
but does appear to support pthreads.
This also lets us remove the INIT_ONCE workaround, although that's
removable anyway since Android's MinGW is now new enough.
Change-Id: I8d1573923fdaac880a50d84acbebbf87461c50d2
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/11125
Reviewed-by: David Benjamin <davidben@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Kenny Root <kroot@google.com>
Commit-Queue: David Benjamin <davidben@google.com>
CQ-Verified: CQ bot account: commit-bot@chromium.org <commit-bot@chromium.org>
C99 decided that, like PRI* macros, UINT64_C and friends should be
conditioned on __STDC_CONSTANT_MACROS in C++. C++11 then decided this
was ridiculous and overruled this decision. However, Android's headers
in older NDKs mistakenly followed the C99 rules for C++, so work around
this.
This fixes the android_arm bots.
Change-Id: I3b49e8dfc20190ebfa78876909bd0dccd3e210ea
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/11089
Reviewed-by: David Benjamin <davidben@google.com>
Commit-Queue: David Benjamin <davidben@google.com>
CQ-Verified: CQ bot account: commit-bot@chromium.org <commit-bot@chromium.org>
Android currently implements this manually (see NativeBN_putULongInt) by
reaching into BIGNUM's internals. BN_ULONG is a somewhat unfortunate API
anyway as the size is platform-dependent, so add a platform-independent
way to do this.
The other things Android needs are going to need more work, but this
one's easy.
BUG=97
Change-Id: I4af4dc29f9845bdce0f0663c379b4b5d3e1dc46e
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/11088
Commit-Queue: David Benjamin <davidben@google.com>
Commit-Queue: Adam Langley <agl@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Adam Langley <agl@google.com>
CQ-Verified: CQ bot account: commit-bot@chromium.org <commit-bot@chromium.org>
Code acting generically on an EVP_AEAD_CTX may wish to get at the
underlying EVP_AEAD.
Change-Id: I9cc905522ba76402bda4c255aa1488158323b02c
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/11085
CQ-Verified: CQ bot account: commit-bot@chromium.org <commit-bot@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: Matt Braithwaite <mab@google.com>
Commit-Queue: David Benjamin <davidben@google.com>
This withdraws support for -DBORINGSSL_ENABLE_RC4_TLS, and removes the
RC4 AEADs.
Change-Id: I1321b76bfe047d180743fa46d1b81c5d70c64e81
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/10940
Reviewed-by: David Benjamin <davidben@google.com>
Commit-Queue: David Benjamin <davidben@google.com>
CQ-Verified: CQ bot account: commit-bot@chromium.org <commit-bot@chromium.org>
Since gcm_test now contains variable decls in for loops it needs
-std=c11. However, tests are compiled with C++ test_support files in
Bazel, which doesn't work with -std=c11.
Change-Id: Ife18c2d80b01448bb3b7ee2728412289bf749bd9
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/11041
Reviewed-by: David Benjamin <davidben@google.com>
Commit-Queue: David Benjamin <davidben@google.com>
CQ-Verified: CQ bot account: commit-bot@chromium.org <commit-bot@chromium.org>
This function (actually a macro in OpenSSL) is used by several projects
(e.g. OpenResty, OpenVPN, ...) so it can useuful to provide it for
compatibility.
However, depending on the semantics of the BIO type (e.g. BIO_pair), the
return value can be meaningless, which might explain why it was removed.
Change-Id: I0e432c92222c267eb994d32b0bc28e999c4b40a7
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/11020
CQ-Verified: CQ bot account: commit-bot@chromium.org <commit-bot@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: Adam Langley <agl@google.com>
Commit-Queue: Adam Langley <agl@google.com>
The stuff around i being reused for |len| rounded to a number of blocks
is a little weird.
Change-Id: I6f07a82fe84d077062e5b34ce75cc68250be8a4a
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/10802
Reviewed-by: Adam Langley <agl@google.com>
Commit-Queue: Adam Langley <agl@google.com>
CQ-Verified: CQ bot account: commit-bot@chromium.org <commit-bot@chromium.org>
I hear our character set includes such novel symbols as '+'.
Change-Id: I96591a563317e71299748a948d68a849e15b5d60
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/11009
Commit-Queue: David Benjamin <davidben@google.com>
Commit-Queue: Adam Langley <agl@google.com>
CQ-Verified: CQ bot account: commit-bot@chromium.org <commit-bot@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: Adam Langley <agl@google.com>
This was done just by grepping for 'size_t i;' and 'size_t j;'. I left
everything in crypto/x509 and friends alone.
There's some instances in gcm.c that are non-trivial and pulled into a
separate CL for ease of review.
Change-Id: I6515804e3097f7e90855f1e7610868ee87117223
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/10801
Reviewed-by: Adam Langley <agl@google.com>
Commit-Queue: Adam Langley <agl@google.com>
CQ-Verified: CQ bot account: commit-bot@chromium.org <commit-bot@chromium.org>
Really the only thing we should be doing with these ciphers is hastening
their demise, but it was the weekend and this seemed like fun.
EVP_tls_cbc_copy_mac needs to rotate a buffer by a secret amount. (It
extracts the MAC, but rotated.) We have two codepaths for this. If
CBC_MAC_ROTATE_IN_PLACE is defined (always on), we make some assumptions
abuot cache lines, play games with volatile, and hope that doesn't leak
anything. Otherwise, we do O(N^2) work to constant-time select the
rotation incidences.
But we can do O(N lg N). Rotate by powers of two and constant-time
select by the offset's bit positions. (Handwaivy lower-bound: an array
position has N possible values, so, armed with only a constant-time
select, we need O(lg N) work to resolve it. There's N array positions,
so O(N lg N).)
A microbenchmark of EVP_tls_cbc_copy_mac shows this is 27% faster than
the old one, but still 32% slower than the in-place version.
in-place:
Did 15724000 CopyFromMAC operations in 20000744us (786170.8 ops/sec)
N^2:
Did 8443000 CopyFromMAC operations in 20001582us (422116.6 ops/sec)
N lg N:
Did 10718000 CopyFromMAC operations in 20000763us (535879.6 ops/sec)
This results in the following the CBC ciphers. I measured
AES-128-CBC-SHA1 and AES-256-CBC-SHA384 which are, respectively, the
cipher where the other bits are the fastest and the cipher where N is
largest.
in-place:
Did 2634000 AES-128-CBC-SHA1 (16 bytes) open operations in 10000739us (263380.5 ops/sec): 4.2 MB/s
Did 1424000 AES-128-CBC-SHA1 (1350 bytes) open operations in 10002782us (142360.4 ops/sec): 192.2 MB/s
Did 531000 AES-128-CBC-SHA1 (8192 bytes) open operations in 10002460us (53086.9 ops/sec): 434.9 MB/s
N^2:
Did 2529000 AES-128-CBC-SHA1 (16 bytes) open operations in 10001474us (252862.7 ops/sec): 4.0 MB/s
Did 1392000 AES-128-CBC-SHA1 (1350 bytes) open operations in 10006659us (139107.4 ops/sec): 187.8 MB/s
Did 528000 AES-128-CBC-SHA1 (8192 bytes) open operations in 10001276us (52793.3 ops/sec): 432.5 MB/s
N lg N:
Did 2531000 AES-128-CBC-SHA1 (16 bytes) open operations in 10003057us (253022.7 ops/sec): 4.0 MB/s
Did 1390000 AES-128-CBC-SHA1 (1350 bytes) open operations in 10003287us (138954.3 ops/sec): 187.6 MB/s
Did 531000 AES-128-CBC-SHA1 (8192 bytes) open operations in 10002448us (53087.0 ops/sec): 434.9 MB/s
in-place:
Did 1249000 AES-256-CBC-SHA384 (16 bytes) open operations in 10001767us (124877.9 ops/sec): 2.0 MB/s
Did 879000 AES-256-CBC-SHA384 (1350 bytes) open operations in 10009244us (87818.8 ops/sec): 118.6 MB/s
Did 344000 AES-256-CBC-SHA384 (8192 bytes) open operations in 10025897us (34311.1 ops/sec): 281.1 MB/s
N^2:
Did 1072000 AES-256-CBC-SHA384 (16 bytes) open operations in 10008090us (107113.3 ops/sec): 1.7 MB/s
Did 780000 AES-256-CBC-SHA384 (1350 bytes) open operations in 10007787us (77939.3 ops/sec): 105.2 MB/s
Did 333000 AES-256-CBC-SHA384 (8192 bytes) open operations in 10016332us (33245.7 ops/sec): 272.3 MB/s
N lg N:
Did 1168000 AES-256-CBC-SHA384 (16 bytes) open operations in 10007671us (116710.5 ops/sec): 1.9 MB/s
Did 836000 AES-256-CBC-SHA384 (1350 bytes) open operations in 10001536us (83587.2 ops/sec): 112.8 MB/s
Did 339000 AES-256-CBC-SHA384 (8192 bytes) open operations in 10018522us (33837.3 ops/sec): 277.2 MB/s
TLS CBC performance isn't as important as it was before, and the costs
aren't that high, so avoid making assumptions about cache lines. (If we
care much about CBC open performance, we probably should get the malloc
out of EVP_tls_cbc_digest_record at the end.)
Change-Id: Ib8d8271be4b09e5635062cd3b039e1e96f0d9d3d
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/11003
Reviewed-by: Adam Langley <agl@google.com>
Commit-Queue: Adam Langley <agl@google.com>
CQ-Verified: CQ bot account: commit-bot@chromium.org <commit-bot@chromium.org>
For consistency and to avoid a pedantic GCC warning (even though it's
mostly old legacy code).
Change-Id: Iea63eb0a82ff52914adc33b83e48450f4f6a49ef
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/11021
Reviewed-by: Adam Langley <agl@google.com>
Commit-Queue: Adam Langley <agl@google.com>
CQ-Verified: CQ bot account: commit-bot@chromium.org <commit-bot@chromium.org>
