bssl::UniquePtr and FOO_up_ref do not play well together. Add a helper
to simplify this. This allows us to write things like:
foo->cert = UpRef(bar->cert);
instead of:
if (bar->cert) {
X509_up_ref(bar->cert.get());
}
foo->cert.reset(bar->cert.get());
This also plays well with PushToStack. To append something to a stack
while taking a reference, it's just:
PushToStack(certs, UpRef(cert))
Change-Id: I99ae8de22b837588a2d8ffb58f86edc1d03ed46a
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/29584
Commit-Queue: David Benjamin <davidben@google.com>
CQ-Verified: CQ bot account: commit-bot@chromium.org <commit-bot@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: Adam Langley <agl@google.com>
This is prefactoring for a coming change to the shim that will write
handoff and handback messages (which are serialized SSLConnection
objects) to the transcript.
This breaks the slightly tenuous ordering between the runner and the
shim. Fix the runner to wait until the shim has exited before
appending the transcript.
Change-Id: Iae34d28ec1addfe3ec4f3c77008248fe5530687c
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/27184
Reviewed-by: David Benjamin <davidben@google.com>
Commit-Queue: David Benjamin <davidben@google.com>
CQ-Verified: CQ bot account: commit-bot@chromium.org <commit-bot@chromium.org>
If the caller asked for the base to be treated as secret, we should
provide that. Allowing unbounded inputs is not compatible with being
constant-time.
Additionally, this aligns with the guidance here:
https://github.com/HACS-workshop/spectre-mitigations/blob/master/crypto_guidelines.md#1-do-not-conditionally-choose-between-constant-and-non-constant-time
Update-Note: BN_mod_exp_mont_consttime and BN_mod_exp_mont now require
inputs be fully reduced. I believe current callers tolerate this.
Additionally, due to a quirk of how certain operations were ordered,
using (publicly) zero exponent tolerated a NULL BN_CTX while other
exponents required non-NULL BN_CTX. Non-NULL BN_CTX is now required
uniformly. This is unlikely to cause problems. Any call site where the
exponent is always zero should just be replaced with BN_value_one().
Change-Id: I7c941953ea05f36dc2754facb9f4cf83a6789c61
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/27665
Commit-Queue: David Benjamin <davidben@google.com>
CQ-Verified: CQ bot account: commit-bot@chromium.org <commit-bot@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: Steven Valdez <svaldez@google.com>
These empty states aren't any use to either caller or implementor.
Change-Id: If0b748afeeb79e4a1386182e61c5b5ecf838de62
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/25254
Reviewed-by: Adam Langley <agl@google.com>
This is not a speedy operation, so the fuzzers need a bit of help to
avoid timeouts.
Bug: chromium:786049
Change-Id: Ib56281b63eb6c895057f21254f0cc7c5c2d85ee4
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/23484
Commit-Queue: Steven Valdez <svaldez@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Steven Valdez <svaldez@google.com>
CQ-Verified: CQ bot account: commit-bot@chromium.org <commit-bot@chromium.org>
Change-Id: Ie5055d6d1d33690f27cdd978a0aa696307880579
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/22964
Reviewed-by: Steven Valdez <svaldez@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: David Benjamin <davidben@google.com>
Also switch them to accepting a u16 length prefix. We appear not to have
any such tests right now, but RSA-2048 would involve modulus well larger
and primes just a hair larger than a u8 length prefix alows.
Change-Id: Icce8f1d976e159b945302fbba732e72913c7b724
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/22284
Commit-Queue: Steven Valdez <svaldez@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Steven Valdez <svaldez@google.com>
CQ-Verified: CQ bot account: commit-bot@chromium.org <commit-bot@chromium.org>
In particular, this starts a new DTLS corpus.
Bug: 124
Change-Id: I0fa0b38ac1cd213cef99badde693e75ed7357ab4
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/20108
Reviewed-by: David Benjamin <davidben@google.com>
Bug: 124
Change-Id: Iff02be9df2806572e6d3f860b448f598f85778c3
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/20107
Reviewed-by: David Benjamin <davidben@google.com>
Commit-Queue: David Benjamin <davidben@google.com>
CQ-Verified: CQ bot account: commit-bot@chromium.org <commit-bot@chromium.org>
There's a lot of duplicated code between the two. This is in preparation
for adding two more of these fuzzers, this time for DTLS.
Bug: 124
Change-Id: I8ca2a02d599e2c88e30838d04b7cf07d4221aa76
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/20106
Reviewed-by: Steven Valdez <svaldez@google.com>
Commit-Queue: Steven Valdez <svaldez@google.com>
Commit-Queue: David Benjamin <davidben@google.com>
CQ-Verified: CQ bot account: commit-bot@chromium.org <commit-bot@chromium.org>
Change-Id: I69157b5e2527a2f92fc7b4b924a36e3399d043db
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/19444
Reviewed-by: David Benjamin <davidben@google.com>
Commit-Queue: David Benjamin <davidben@google.com>
CQ-Verified: CQ bot account: commit-bot@chromium.org <commit-bot@chromium.org>
There's not much point in enforcing this on these files, and clang
complains about LLVMFuzzerTestOneInput.
Change-Id: Ieae3287d7f7cd9736efd2b9fc11d0e6d89fcfa43
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/17806
Reviewed-by: Steven Valdez <svaldez@google.com>
Commit-Queue: Steven Valdez <svaldez@google.com>
These are re-recorded with the new fuzzer format.
Bug: 104
Change-Id: I00798f8f2026ae4570ffdcdae4a47999fd277212
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/17535
Reviewed-by: David Benjamin <davidben@google.com>
This was done by prepending each file with kDataTag, or 0x0000. This
causes them to behave as they did before the fuzzer updates.
Bug: 104
Change-Id: Ic768606911e1310fb59bed647990c237fe15776b
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/17534
Reviewed-by: David Benjamin <davidben@google.com>
So long as the code is there, it should be fuzzed.
Bug: 104
Change-Id: Iffaa832cc50c2d3c064eb511ba3a133d7f5758f2
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/17533
Reviewed-by: David Benjamin <davidben@google.com>
This allows us to fill in holes in our fuzzer coverage, notably client
resumption (and thus early data) and server client certificates. The
corpora are not refreshed yet. This will be done in upcoming changes.
Also add an option for debugging fuzzers. It's very useful to test it on
transcripts and make sure that fuzzer mode successfully makes things
compatible.
Bug: 104
Change-Id: I02f0be4045d1baf68efc9a4157f573df1429575d
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/17531
Reviewed-by: David Benjamin <davidben@google.com>
Commit-Queue: David Benjamin <davidben@google.com>
CQ-Verified: CQ bot account: commit-bot@chromium.org <commit-bot@chromium.org>
OpenSSL's d2i_X509 parser is amazingly slow. Only do about 10,000 of
them, not 1,000,000.
BUG=chromium:729419
Change-Id: I7034c3dde7d5c5681986af2ab5e516e54553d3c6
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/16905
Commit-Queue: David Benjamin <davidben@google.com>
Commit-Queue: Adam Langley <agl@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Adam Langley <agl@google.com>
CQ-Verified: CQ bot account: commit-bot@chromium.org <commit-bot@chromium.org>
The fuzzers are timing out on inputs that spam SSL_CTX_add1_chain_cert
and SSL_CTX_get0_chain_certs. In our current X509* caching
implementation, this can be quadratic. As this is an API fuzzer, not an
actual attack surface, this is not of much interest in itself, but
bounding this will let the fuzzers fuzz faster.
Change-Id: I3e27e938c413e5a0e8e6c7fad641f17c152dac39
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/16887
Commit-Queue: Adam Langley <agl@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Adam Langley <agl@google.com>
CQ-Verified: CQ bot account: commit-bot@chromium.org <commit-bot@chromium.org>
I'm going to work on adding these to CI, since we keep breaking it on
accident.
Change-Id: I9acd4d3fa7b00c4f0cb0f187dae6bb9c51997515
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/16125
Reviewed-by: Steven Valdez <svaldez@google.com>
Commit-Queue: David Benjamin <davidben@google.com>
CQ-Verified: CQ bot account: commit-bot@chromium.org <commit-bot@chromium.org>
When writing tests and BoGo isn't available, it is useful to be able to
configure the set of signature algorithms accepted on the verify side.
Add an API for this.
Change-Id: Ic873189da7f8853e412acd68614df9d9a872a0c8
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/15125
Reviewed-by: Steven Valdez <svaldez@google.com>
Reviewed-by: David Benjamin <davidben@google.com>
Commit-Queue: David Benjamin <davidben@google.com>
CQ-Verified: CQ bot account: commit-bot@chromium.org <commit-bot@chromium.org>
This follows up on cedc6f18 by removing support for the
-DBORINGSSL_ENABLE_DHE_TLS compile flag, and the code needed to
support it.
Change-Id: I53b6aa7a0eddd23ace8b770edb2a31b18ba2ce26
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/14886
Reviewed-by: David Benjamin <davidben@google.com>
Commit-Queue: David Benjamin <davidben@google.com>
CQ-Verified: CQ bot account: commit-bot@chromium.org <commit-bot@chromium.org>
SSL_CTX_set_signed_cert_timestamp_list fails now if its input is not
well-formed.
Change-Id: I84a4034f66868da11f98bf33e5b7f5c9fc958933
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/14484
Reviewed-by: Steven Valdez <svaldez@google.com>
Commit-Queue: Steven Valdez <svaldez@google.com>
CQ-Verified: CQ bot account: commit-bot@chromium.org <commit-bot@chromium.org>
Since any ALPN mismatch and other cause for early data rejection will
cause the server to revert to the non-early data path, this is safe to
flip on for all the fuzzers.
BUG=76
Change-Id: I573740ef8f455915820943d82247fb6bfc37ae41
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/14465
Reviewed-by: David Benjamin <davidben@google.com>
Commit-Queue: David Benjamin <davidben@google.com>
CQ-Verified: CQ bot account: commit-bot@chromium.org <commit-bot@chromium.org>
Due to middlebox and ecosystem intolerance, short record headers are going to
be unsustainable to deploy.
BUG=119
Change-Id: I20fee79dd85bff229eafc6aeb72e4f33cac96d82
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/14044
Reviewed-by: Steven Valdez <svaldez@google.com>
Commit-Queue: Steven Valdez <svaldez@google.com>
CQ-Verified: CQ bot account: commit-bot@chromium.org <commit-bot@chromium.org>
The new APIs are SSL_CTX_set_strict_cipher_list() and
SSL_set_strict_cipher_list(). They have two motivations:
First, typos in cipher lists can go undetected for a long time, and
can have surprising consequences when silently ignored.
Second, there is a tendency to use superstition in the construction of
cipher lists, for example by "turning off" things that do not actually
exist. This leads to the corrosive belief that DEFAULT and ALL ought
not to be trusted. This belief is false.
Change-Id: I42909b69186e0b4cf45457e5c0bc968f6bbf231a
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/13925
Commit-Queue: Matt Braithwaite <mab@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Matt Braithwaite <mab@google.com>
|SSL_SESSION_from_bytes| now takes an |SSL_CTX*|, from which it uses the
|X509_METHOD| and buffer pool. This is our API so we can do this.
This also requires adding an |SSL_CTX*| argument to |SSL_SESSION_new|
for the same reason. However, |SSL_SESSION_new| already has very few
callers (and none in third-party code that I can see) so I think we can
get away with this.
Change-Id: I1337cd2bd8cff03d4b9405ea3146b3b59584aa72
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/13584
Reviewed-by: Adam Langley <alangley@gmail.com>
Commit-Queue: Adam Langley <alangley@gmail.com>
CQ-Verified: CQ bot account: commit-bot@chromium.org <commit-bot@chromium.org>
This picks up the short header stuff and any changes made in the
meantime.
Change-Id: Ia2ea680632f3f6c6c759a8f0606a9394ae85c92d
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/12972
Commit-Queue: David Benjamin <davidben@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Adam Langley <alangley@gmail.com>
Change-Id: Ib777dcc80c7acd6dc1eda1c211b91e5428b83df1
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/12971
Commit-Queue: David Benjamin <davidben@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Adam Langley <alangley@gmail.com>
There are no longer any consumers of these APIs.
These were useful back when the CBC vs. RC4 tradeoff varied by version
and it was worth carefully tuning this cutoff. Nowadays RC4 is
completely gone and there's no use in configuring these anymore.
To avoid invalidating the existing ssl_ctx_api corpus and requiring it
regenerated, I've left the entries in there. It's probably reasonable
for new API fuzzers to reuse those slots.
Change-Id: I02bf950e3828062341e4e45c8871a44597ae93d5
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/12880
Commit-Queue: David Benjamin <davidben@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Adam Langley <agl@google.com>
This was done by running:
./fuzz/cert -merge=1 ../fuzz/cert_corpus ~/openssl/fuzz/corpora/x509
I bumped the max_len while doing so because some of those are rather
large.
Change-Id: Ic2caa09d5ff9ab05b46363940a91a03f270cbad8
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/12682
Reviewed-by: Adam Langley <agl@google.com>
Change-Id: Ie947ab176d10feb709c6e135d5241c6cf605b8e8
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/12700
Reviewed-by: David Benjamin <davidben@google.com>
Commit-Queue: David Benjamin <davidben@google.com>
CQ-Verified: CQ bot account: commit-bot@chromium.org <commit-bot@chromium.org>
This allows a consumer to disable Channel ID (for instance, it may be
enabled on the SSL_CTX and later disabled on the SSL) without reaching
into the SSL struct directly.
Deprecate the old APIs in favor of these.
BUG=6
Change-Id: I193bf94bc1f537e1a81602a39fc2b9a73f44c73b
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/12623
Reviewed-by: Adam Langley <agl@google.com>
Commit-Queue: Adam Langley <agl@google.com>
CQ-Verified: CQ bot account: commit-bot@chromium.org <commit-bot@chromium.org>
Change-Id: I69cbb0679e1dbb6292a8f4737851736e58c17508
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/12481
Reviewed-by: David Benjamin <davidben@google.com>
Commit-Queue: David Benjamin <davidben@google.com>
CQ-Verified: CQ bot account: commit-bot@chromium.org <commit-bot@chromium.org>
This is getting to be a nuisance to do by hand.
Change-Id: If3aa7c666c4cc0bf97615564f258ff740a561766
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/12281
Reviewed-by: David Benjamin <davidben@google.com>
Fuzzer mode explores the handshake, but at the cost of losing coverage
on the record layer. Add a separate build flag and client/server
corpora for this mode.
Note this requires tweaks in consumers' fuzzer build definitions.
BUG=111
Change-Id: I1026dc7301645e165a761068a1daad6eedc9271e
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/12108
Commit-Queue: David Benjamin <davidben@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Adam Langley <agl@google.com>
