Change-Id: I156552df15de5941be99736cca694db4677e2b2a
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/27744
Reviewed-by: David Benjamin <davidben@google.com>
Commit-Queue: David Benjamin <davidben@google.com>
CQ-Verified: CQ bot account: commit-bot@chromium.org <commit-bot@chromium.org>
Change-Id: If3d93648cf6561c02c208895526ae1f1cbfa2b51
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/27524
Commit-Queue: David Benjamin <davidben@google.com>
Reviewed-by: David Benjamin <davidben@google.com>
CQ-Verified: CQ bot account: commit-bot@chromium.org <commit-bot@chromium.org>
This change follows up from e759a9cd with more extensive changes and
tests:
If a name checking function (like |X509_VERIFY_PARAM_set1_host|) fails,
it now poisons the |X509_VERIFY_PARAM| so that all verifications will
fail. This is because we have observed that some callers are not
checking the return value of these functions.
Using a length of zero for a hostname to mean |strlen| is now an error.
It also an error for email addresses and IP addresses now, and doesn't
end up trying to call |strlen| on a (binary) IP address.
Setting an email address with embedded NULs now fails. So does trying to
configure an empty hostname or email with (NULL, 0).
|X509_check_*| functions in BoringSSL don't accept zero lengths (unlike
OpenSSL). It's now tested that such calls always fail.
Change-Id: I4484176f2aae74e502a09081c7e912c85e8d090b
Update-Note: several behaviour changes. See change description.
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/26764
Reviewed-by: David Benjamin <davidben@google.com>
BoringSSL does not generally support this quirk but, in this case, we
didn't make it a fatal error and it's instead a silent omission of
hostname checking. This doesn't affect Chrome but, in case something is
using BoringSSL and using this trick, this change makes it safe.
BUG=chromium:824799
Change-Id: If417817b997b9faa9963c09dfc95d06a5d445e0b
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/26724
Commit-Queue: Adam Langley <alangley@gmail.com>
Commit-Queue: David Benjamin <davidben@google.com>
Reviewed-by: David Benjamin <davidben@google.com>
CQ-Verified: CQ bot account: commit-bot@chromium.org <commit-bot@chromium.org>
This is a reland of https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/2330. I
believe I've now cleared the fallout.
Android's attestion format uses some ludicrously large tag numbers:
https://developer.android.com/training/articles/security-key-attestation.html#certificate_schema
Add support for these in CBS/CBB. The public API does not change for
callers who were using the CBS_ASN1_* constants, but it is no longer the
case that tag representations match their DER encodings for small tag
numbers. When passing tags into CBS/CBB, use CBS_ASN1_* constants. When
working with DER byte arrays (most commonly test vectors), use the
numbers themselves.
Bug: 214
Update-Note: The in-memory representation of CBS/CBB tags changes.
Additionally, we now support tag numbers above 30. I believe I've now
actually cleared the fallout of the former. There is one test in
Chromium and the same test in the internal repository that needs
fixing.
Change-Id: I49b9d30df01f023c646d31156360ff69c91626a3
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/24404
Commit-Queue: Adam Langley <agl@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Adam Langley <agl@google.com>
CQ-Verified: CQ bot account: commit-bot@chromium.org <commit-bot@chromium.org>
The newer clang-cl is unhappy about the tautological comparison on
Windows, but the comparison itself is unnecessary anyway, since the
values will never exceed uint32_t.
I think the reason it's not firing elsewhere is because on other 64-bit
platforms, it is not tautological because long is 64-bit. On other
32-bit platforms, I'm not sure we actually have a standalone trunk clang
builder right now.
Update-Note: UTF8_getc and UTF8_putc were unexported. No one appears to
be calling them. (We're a crypto library, not a Unicode library.)
Change-Id: I0949ddea3131dca5f55d04e672c3ccf2915c41ab
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/23844
Commit-Queue: Adam Langley <agl@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Adam Langley <agl@google.com>
CQ-Verified: CQ bot account: commit-bot@chromium.org <commit-bot@chromium.org>
This reverts commit 66801feb17. This
turned out to break a lot more than expected. Hopefully we can reland it
soon, but we need to fix up some consumers first.
Note due to work that went in later, this is not a trivial revert and
should be re-reviewed.
Change-Id: I6474b67cce9a8aa03f722f37ad45914b76466bea
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/23644
Commit-Queue: Adam Langley <agl@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Adam Langley <agl@google.com>
CQ-Verified: CQ bot account: commit-bot@chromium.org <commit-bot@chromium.org>
This avoids taking quadratic time to pretty-print certificates with
excessively large integer fields. Very large integers aren't any more
readable in decimal than hexadecimal anyway, and the i2s_* functions
will parse either form.
Found by libFuzzer.
Change-Id: Id586cd1b0eef8936d38ff50433ae7c819f0054f3
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/23424
Commit-Queue: David Benjamin <davidben@google.com>
CQ-Verified: CQ bot account: commit-bot@chromium.org <commit-bot@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: Adam Langley <agl@google.com>
Matches the OpenSSL 1.1.0 spelling, which is what we advertise in
OPENSSL_VERSION_NUMBER now. Otherwise third-party code which uses it
will, in the long term, need ifdefs. Note this will require updates to
any existing callers (there appear to only be a couple of them), but it
should be straightforward.
Change-Id: I9dd1013609abca547152728a293529055dacc239
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/23325
Reviewed-by: Adam Langley <agl@google.com>
There is also no need to make the struct public. Also tidy up includes a
bit.
Change-Id: I188848dfd8f9ed42925b2c55da8dc4751c29f146
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/22126
Commit-Queue: David Benjamin <davidben@google.com>
CQ-Verified: CQ bot account: commit-bot@chromium.org <commit-bot@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: Steven Valdez <svaldez@google.com>
Some of the complaints seem a bit questionable or their replacements
problematic, but not using strcat, strcpy, and strncpy is easy and
safer.
Change-Id: I64faf24b4f39d1ea410e883f026350094975a9b5
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/22125
Reviewed-by: Steven Valdez <svaldez@google.com>
Commit-Queue: David Benjamin <davidben@google.com>
CQ-Verified: CQ bot account: commit-bot@chromium.org <commit-bot@chromium.org>
Right now, compiling with the stock gcc on debian, cmake is compiling
with -Wall which gives an error because -Wunused-value.
The gcc version is gcc (Debian 4.7.2-5) 4.7.2.
Change-Id: Iafd4cc14a22fe788d4c7bdb05202fd856f0c6395
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/21144
Reviewed-by: David Benjamin <davidben@google.com>
Commit-Queue: David Benjamin <davidben@google.com>
CQ-Verified: CQ bot account: commit-bot@chromium.org <commit-bot@chromium.org>
Although we are derived from 1.0.2, we mimic 1.1.0 in some ways around
our FOO_up_ref functions and opaque libssl types. This causes some
difficulties when porting third-party code as any OPENSSL_VERSION_NUMBER
checks for 1.1.0 APIs we have will be wrong.
Moreover, adding accessors without changing OPENSSL_VERSION_NUMBER can
break external projects. It is common to implement a compatibility
version of an accessor under #ifdef as a static function. This then
conflicts with our headers if we, unlike OpenSSL 1.0.2, have this
function.
This change switches OPENSSL_VERSION_NUMBER to 1.1.0 and atomically adds
enough accessors for software with 1.1.0 support already. The hope is
this will unblock hiding SSL_CTX and SSL_SESSION, which will be
especially useful with C++-ficiation. The cost is we will hit some
growing pains as more 1.1.0 consumers enter the ecosystem and we
converge on the right set of APIs to import from upstream.
It does not remove any 1.0.2 APIs, so we will not require that all
projects support 1.1.0. The exception is APIs which changed in 1.1.0 but
did not change the function signature. Those are breaking changes.
Specifically:
- SSL_CTX_sess_set_get_cb is now const-correct.
- X509_get0_signature is now const-correct.
For C++ consumers only, this change temporarily includes an overload
hack for SSL_CTX_sess_set_get_cb that keeps the old callback working.
This is a workaround for Node not yet supporting OpenSSL 1.1.0.
The version number is set at (the as yet unreleased) 1.1.0g to denote
that this change includes https://github.com/openssl/openssl/pull/4384.
Bug: 91
Change-Id: I5eeb27448a6db4c25c244afac37f9604d9608a76
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/10340
Commit-Queue: David Benjamin <davidben@google.com>
CQ-Verified: CQ bot account: commit-bot@chromium.org <commit-bot@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: Adam Langley <agl@google.com>
First, I spelled the wildcard name constraint in many_constraints.pem
wrong. It's .test, not *.test for name constraints. (This doesn't matter
for some_names*.pem, but it does to avoid a false negative in
many_names3.pem.)
Second, the CN of certs should be a host, not "Leaf". OpenSSL 1.1.0
checks "host-like" CNs against name constraints too and "Leaf" is
host-like.
I've also made the generator deterministic and checked it in, as PEM
blobs are not reviewable.
Change-Id: I195d9846315168a792cca829aff25c986339b8f5
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/20584
Reviewed-by: David Benjamin <davidben@google.com>
This guards against the name constraints check consuming large amounts
of CPU time when certificates in the presented chain contain an
excessive number of names (specifically subject email names or subject
alternative DNS names) and/or name constraints.
Name constraints checking compares the names presented in a certificate
against the name constraints included in a certificate higher up in the
chain using two nested for loops.
Move the name constraints check so that it happens after signature
verification so peers cannot exploit this using a chain with invalid
signatures. Also impose a hard limit on the number of name constraints
check loop iterations to further mitigate the issue.
Thanks to NCC for finding this issue.
Change-Id: I112ba76fe75d1579c45291042e448850b830cbb7
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/19164
Reviewed-by: Martin Kreichgauer <martinkr@google.com>
Commit-Queue: Martin Kreichgauer <martinkr@google.com>
CQ-Verified: CQ bot account: commit-bot@chromium.org <commit-bot@chromium.org>
Fuchsia isn't POSIX and doesn't have /etc. This CL adds the
location for the system certificate store on Fuchsia.
Change-Id: I2b48e0e13525a32fa5e2c5c48b8db41d76c26872
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/19224
Reviewed-by: Adam Langley <agl@google.com>
Commit-Queue: Adam Langley <agl@google.com>
X.509 functions and the like should not vary their behaviour based on
the configured locale, but tolower(3), strcasecmp(3) and strncasecmp(3)
change behaviour based on that.
For example, with tr_TR.utf8, 'I' is not the upper-case version of 'i'.
Change-Id: I896a285767ae0c22e6ce06b9908331c625e90af2
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/18412
Reviewed-by: David Benjamin <davidben@google.com>
Commit-Queue: David Benjamin <davidben@google.com>
CQ-Verified: CQ bot account: commit-bot@chromium.org <commit-bot@chromium.org>
This imports bf5b8ff17dd7039b15cbc6468cd865cbc219581d and
a696708ae6bbe42f409748b3e31bb2f3034edbf3 from upstream. I missed them at
some point.
Change-Id: I882d995868e4c0461b7ca51a854691cf4faa7260
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/17384
Reviewed-by: Adam Langley <agl@google.com>
Rather than adding a new mode to EVP_PKEY_CTX, upstream chose to tie
single-shot signing to EVP_MD_CTX, adding functions which combine
EVP_Digest*Update and EVP_Digest*Final. This adds a weird vestigial
EVP_MD_CTX and makes the signing digest parameter non-uniform, slightly
complicating things. But it means APIs like X509_sign_ctx can work
without modification.
Align with upstream's APIs. This required a bit of fiddling around
evp_test.cc. For consistency and to avoid baking details of parameter
input order, I made it eagerly read all inputs before calling
SetupContext. Otherwise which attributes are present depend a lot on the
shape of the API we use---notably the NO_DEFAULT_DIGEST tests for RSA
switch to failing before consuming an input, which is odd.
(This only matters because we have some tests which expect the operation
to abort the operation early with parameter errors and match against
Error. Those probably should not use FileTest to begin with, but I'll
tease that apart a later time.)
Upstream also named NID_Ed25519 as NID_ED25519, even though the
algorithm is normally stylized as "Ed25519". Switch it to match.
Change-Id: Id6c8f5715930038e754de50338924d044e908045
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/17044
Commit-Queue: Steven Valdez <svaldez@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Steven Valdez <svaldez@google.com>
CQ-Verified: CQ bot account: commit-bot@chromium.org <commit-bot@chromium.org>
These are never referenced within the library or externally. Some of the
constants have been unused since SSLeay.
Change-Id: I597511208dab1ab3816e5f730fcadaea9a733dff
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/17025
Reviewed-by: Adam Langley <agl@google.com>
Commit-Queue: David Benjamin <davidben@google.com>
Change-Id: I4e0da85857e820f8151e2fb50d699f14fedee97b
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/16966
Reviewed-by: David Benjamin <davidben@google.com>
Commit-Queue: David Benjamin <davidben@google.com>
CQ-Verified: CQ bot account: commit-bot@chromium.org <commit-bot@chromium.org>
The only place it is used is EC_KEY_{dup,copy} and no one calls that
function on an EC_KEY with ex_data. This aligns with functions like
RSAPublicKey_dup which do not copy ex_data. The logic is also somewhat
subtle in the face of malloc errors (upstream's PR 3323).
In fact, we'd even changed the function pointer signature from upstream,
so BoringSSL-only code is needed to pass this pointer in anyway. (I
haven't switched it to CRYPTO_EX_unused because there are some callers
which pass in an implementation anyway.)
Note, in upstream, the dup hook is also used for SSL_SESSIONs when those
are duplicated (for TLS 1.2 ticket renewal or TLS 1.3 resumption). Our
interpretation is that callers should treat those SSL_SESSIONs
equivalently to newly-established ones. This avoids every consumer
providing a dup hook and simplifies the interface.
(I've gone ahead and removed the TODO(fork). I don't think we'll be able
to change this API. Maybe introduce a new one, but it may not be worth
it? Then again, this API is atrocious... I've never seen anyone use argl
and argp even.)
BUG=21
Change-Id: I6c9e9d5a02347cb229d4c084c1e85125bd741d2b
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/16344
Reviewed-by: Adam Langley <agl@google.com>
Commit-Queue: Adam Langley <agl@google.com>
CQ-Verified: CQ bot account: commit-bot@chromium.org <commit-bot@chromium.org>
Instead of a script which generates macros, emit static inlines in
individual header (or C files). This solves a few issues with the
original setup:
- The documentation was off. We match the documentation now.
- The stack macros did not check constness; see some of the fixes in
crypto/x509.
- Type errors did not look like usual type errors.
- Any type which participated in STACK_OF had to be made partially
public. This allows stack types to be defined an internal header or
even an individual file.
- One could not pass sk_FOO_free into something which expects a function
pointer.
Thanks to upstream's 411abf2dd37974a5baa54859c1abcd287b3c1181 for the
idea.
Change-Id: Ie5431390ccad761c17596b0e93941b0d7a68f904
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/16087
Reviewed-by: Adam Langley <agl@google.com>
A follow-up change will add a CRYPTO_BUFFER variant. This makes the
naming match the header and doesn't require including x509.h. (Though
like ssl.h and pkcs8.h, some of the functions are implemented with code
that depends on crypto/x509.)
Change-Id: I5a7de209f4f775fe0027893f711326d89699ca1f
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/15128
Commit-Queue: Steven Valdez <svaldez@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Steven Valdez <svaldez@google.com>
CQ-Verified: CQ bot account: commit-bot@chromium.org <commit-bot@chromium.org>
BUG=187
Change-Id: I5775ce0886041b0c12174a7d665f3af1e8bce511
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/14505
Commit-Queue: David Benjamin <davidben@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Adam Langley <agl@google.com>
OPENSSL_free will handle NULL.
Change-Id: I18593a015cd4a081c2eeebf0cd738a024d02a97d
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/14373
Reviewed-by: Steven Valdez <svaldez@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: David Benjamin <davidben@google.com>
Commit-Queue: Steven Valdez <svaldez@chromium.org>
Commit-Queue: David Benjamin <davidben@google.com>
CQ-Verified: CQ bot account: commit-bot@chromium.org <commit-bot@chromium.org>
It still depends on crypto/x509, but we will need a CRYPTO_BUFFER
version of PKCS7_get_certificates for Chromium. Start with this.
BUG=54
Change-Id: I62dcb9ba768091ce37dc9fe819f4f14ac025219c
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/14372
Reviewed-by: Steven Valdez <svaldez@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: David Benjamin <davidben@google.com>
Commit-Queue: Steven Valdez <svaldez@chromium.org>
Commit-Queue: David Benjamin <davidben@google.com>
CQ-Verified: CQ bot account: commit-bot@chromium.org <commit-bot@chromium.org>
asn1_template_noexp_d2i call ASN1_item_ex_free(&skfield,...) on error.
Reworked error handling in asn1_item_ex_combine_new:
- call ASN1_item_ex_free and return the correct error code if
ASN1_template_new failed.
- dont call ASN1_item_ex_free if ASN1_OP_NEW_PRE failed.
Reworked error handing in x509_name_ex_d2i and x509_name_encode.
(Imported from upstream's 748cb9a17f4f2b77aad816cf658cd4025dc847ee.)
I believe the tasn1_new.c change is a no-op since we have no
ASN1_OP_NEW_PRE hooks anymore. I'm not sure what the commit message is
referring to with ASN1_template_new. It also seems odd as
ASN1_item_ex_free should probably be able to survive *pval being NULL.
Whatever.
We'd previously tried to fix x509_name_ex_d2i, but I think ours wasn't
quite right. (This thing is a mess...) I've aligned that function with
upstream.
Change-Id: Ie71521cd8a1ec357876caadd13be1ce247110f76
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/13831
Reviewed-by: David Benjamin <davidben@google.com>
Commit-Queue: David Benjamin <davidben@google.com>
CQ-Verified: CQ bot account: commit-bot@chromium.org <commit-bot@chromium.org>
We compare pointer/length pairs constantly. To avoid needing to type it
everywhere and get GTest's output, add a StringPiece-alike for byte
slices which supports ==, !=, and std::ostream.
BUG=129
Change-Id: I108342cbd2c6a58fec0b9cb87ebdf50364bda099
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/13625
Reviewed-by: David Benjamin <davidben@google.com>
Commit-Queue: David Benjamin <davidben@google.com>
CQ-Verified: CQ bot account: commit-bot@chromium.org <commit-bot@chromium.org>
Otherwise we could pass a negative value into |d2i_X509|.
Change-Id: I52a35dd9648269094110b69eddd7667a56ec8253
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/13363
Commit-Queue: Adam Langley <agl@google.com>
Reviewed-by: David Benjamin <davidben@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Adam Langley <agl@google.com>
The motiviation is that M2Crypto passes an ASN1_GENERALIZEDTIME to
this function. This is not distinct from ASN1_UTCTIME (both are
asn1_string_st), but ASN1_GENERALIZEDTIME uses a 4-digit year in its
string representation, whereas ASN1_UTCTIME uses a 2-digit year.
ASN1_UTCTIME_print previously did not return an error on such inputs.
So, stricten (?) the function, ensuring that it checks for trailing
data, and rejects values that are invalid for their place. Along the
way, clean it up and add tests.
Change-Id: Ia8298bed573f2acfdab96638ea69c78b5bba4e4b
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/13082
Reviewed-by: Adam Langley <alangley@gmail.com>
Commit-Queue: Adam Langley <alangley@gmail.com>
CQ-Verified: CQ bot account: commit-bot@chromium.org <commit-bot@chromium.org>
Most C standard library functions are undefined if passed NULL, even
when the corresponding length is zero. This gives them (and, in turn,
all functions which call them) surprising behavior on empty arrays.
Some compilers will miscompile code due to this rule. See also
https://www.imperialviolet.org/2016/06/26/nonnull.html
Add OPENSSL_memcpy, etc., wrappers which avoid this problem.
BUG=23
Change-Id: I95f42b23e92945af0e681264fffaf578e7f8465e
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/12928
Commit-Queue: David Benjamin <davidben@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Adam Langley <agl@google.com>
X509_STORE_set0_additional_untrusted allows one to set a stack of
additional untrusted certificates that can be used during chain
building. These will be merged with the untrusted certificates set on
the |X509_STORE_CTX|.
Change-Id: I3f011fb0854e16a883a798356af0a24cbc5a9d68
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/12980
Reviewed-by: Adam Langley <agl@google.com>
Commit-Queue: Adam Langley <agl@google.com>
CQ-Verified: CQ bot account: commit-bot@chromium.org <commit-bot@chromium.org>
d2i_X509 will free an existing |X509*| on parse failure. Thus
|X509_parse_from_buffer| would double-free the result on error.
Change-Id: If2bca2f1e1895bc426079f6ade4b82008707888d
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/12635
Reviewed-by: Adam Langley <agl@google.com>
Commit-Queue: Adam Langley <agl@google.com>
CQ-Verified: CQ bot account: commit-bot@chromium.org <commit-bot@chromium.org>
We've taken to writing bssl::UniquePtr in full, so it's not buying
us much.
Change-Id: Ia2689366cbb17282c8063608dddcc675518ec0ca
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/12628
Reviewed-by: David Benjamin <davidben@google.com>
Change-Id: I0e1d79e85a2d20ab4105b81d39cdbbd692ba67da
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/12221
Reviewed-by: David Benjamin <davidben@google.com>
Commit-Queue: David Benjamin <davidben@google.com>
CQ-Verified: CQ bot account: commit-bot@chromium.org <commit-bot@chromium.org>
In https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/#/c/11920/2, I addressed a
number of comments but then forgot to upload the change before
submitting it. This change contains the changes that should have been
included in that commit.
Change-Id: Ib70548e791f80abf07a734e071428de8ebedb907
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/12160
Commit-Queue: Adam Langley <agl@google.com>
Commit-Queue: David Benjamin <davidben@google.com>
Reviewed-by: David Benjamin <davidben@google.com>
CQ-Verified: CQ bot account: commit-bot@chromium.org <commit-bot@chromium.org>
The naming breaks layering, but it seems we're stuck with it. We don't
seem to have bothered making first-party code call it BIO_print_errors
(I found no callers of BIO_print_errors), so let's just leave it at
ERR_print_errors.
Change-Id: Iddc22a6afc2c61d4b94ac555be95079e0f477171
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/11960
Commit-Queue: David Benjamin <davidben@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Adam Langley <agl@google.com>
d2i_X509_from_buffer parses an |X509| from a |CRYPTO_BUFFER| but ensures
that the |X509_CINF.enc| doesn't make a copy of the encoded
TBSCertificate. Rather the |X509| holds a reference to the given
|CRYPTO_BUFFER|.
Change-Id: I38a4e3d0ca69fc0fd0ef3e15b53181844080fcad
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/11920
Reviewed-by: David Benjamin <davidben@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Adam Langley <alangley@gmail.com>
Commit-Queue: Adam Langley <alangley@gmail.com>
CQ-Verified: CQ bot account: commit-bot@chromium.org <commit-bot@chromium.org>
At some point, we'll forget to look in the commit message.
Change-Id: I3153aab679209f4f11f56cf3f883c4c74a17af1d
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/11800
CQ-Verified: CQ bot account: commit-bot@chromium.org <commit-bot@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: Steven Valdez <svaldez@google.com>
Reviewed-by: David Benjamin <davidben@google.com>
Commit-Queue: David Benjamin <davidben@google.com>
