No sense in having it in both the 1.2 and 1.3 code.
Change-Id: Ib3854714afed24253af7f4bcee26d25e95a10211
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/9071
Reviewed-by: Adam Langley <agl@google.com>
Commit-Queue: Adam Langley <agl@google.com>
CQ-Verified: CQ bot account: commit-bot@chromium.org <commit-bot@chromium.org>
We will now send tickets as a server and accept them as a
client. Correctly offering and resuming them in the handshake will be
implemented in a follow-up.
Now that we're actually processing draft 14 tickets, bump the draft
version.
Change-Id: I304320a29c4ffe564fa9c00642a4ace96ff8d871
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/8982
Reviewed-by: David Benjamin <davidben@google.com>
Commit-Queue: David Benjamin <davidben@google.com>
CQ-Verified: CQ bot account: commit-bot@chromium.org <commit-bot@chromium.org>
None of the SSL_VERIFY_FAIL_IF_NO_PEER_CERT codepaths will ever be
reached if SSL_VERIFY_PEER is unset. If we've gotten as far as getting a
Certificate message, consider SSL_VERIFY_FAIL_IF_NO_PEER_CERT alone
significant grounds for rejecting no peer certificate.
Change-Id: I2c6be4269d65b2467b86b1fc7d76ac47ca735553
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/9070
Reviewed-by: Adam Langley <agl@google.com>
Commit-Queue: Adam Langley <agl@google.com>
CQ-Verified: CQ bot account: commit-bot@chromium.org <commit-bot@chromium.org>
Where we can move uncommon logic to the caller, we probably ought to.
Change-Id: I54a09fffffc20290be05295137ccb605d562cad0
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/9069
Reviewed-by: Adam Langley <agl@google.com>
Commit-Queue: Adam Langley <agl@google.com>
CQ-Verified: CQ bot account: commit-bot@chromium.org <commit-bot@chromium.org>
BUG=74
Change-Id: I72d52c1fbc3413e940dddbc0b20c7f22459da693
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/8981
Reviewed-by: David Benjamin <davidben@google.com>
Commit-Queue: David Benjamin <davidben@google.com>
CQ-Verified: CQ bot account: commit-bot@chromium.org <commit-bot@chromium.org>
Change-Id: I5cc194fc0a3ba8283049078e5671c924ee23036c
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/8980
Reviewed-by: David Benjamin <davidben@google.com>
Commit-Queue: David Benjamin <davidben@google.com>
CQ-Verified: CQ bot account: commit-bot@chromium.org <commit-bot@chromium.org>
To prevent configuration/established session confusion, the handshake
session state is separated into the configured session (ssl->session)
and the newly created session (ssl->s3->new_session). Upon conclusion of
the handshake, the finalized session is stored
in (ssl->s3->established_session). During the handshake, any requests
for the session (SSL_get_session) return a non-resumable session, to
prevent resumption of a partially filled session. Sessions should only
be cached upon the completion of the full handshake, using the resulting
established_session. The semantics of accessors on the session are
maintained mid-renego.
Change-Id: I4358aecb71fce4fe14a6746c5af1416a69935078
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/8612
Reviewed-by: David Benjamin <davidben@google.com>
Commit-Queue: David Benjamin <davidben@google.com>
CQ-Verified: CQ bot account: commit-bot@chromium.org <commit-bot@chromium.org>
This doesn't do anything since they're for DTLS, but we ought to satisfy
the API nonetheless. expect_flight is easy with
ssl_hs_flush_and_read_message. received_flight I think basically needs
to get sprinkled into the state machine.
Change-Id: I406c7f776ad8e5e3cbcafcac6b26a688c6d3caf1
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/8883
Reviewed-by: Steven Valdez <svaldez@google.com>
Reviewed-by: David Benjamin <davidben@google.com>
[Tests added by davidben.]
Change-Id: I0d54a4f8b8fe91b348ff22658d95340cdb48b089
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/8850
Reviewed-by: Steven Valdez <svaldez@google.com>
Reviewed-by: David Benjamin <davidben@google.com>
Commit-Queue: David Benjamin <davidben@google.com>
CQ-Verified: CQ bot account: commit-bot@chromium.org <commit-bot@chromium.org>
Every flush but the last is always immediately followed by a read. Add a
combined wait mode to make things simpler. Unfortunately, both flights
we have (the state machine doesn't write the first ClientHello) are
followed immediately by a state change, which means we still need some
state in between because we must run code after write_message but before
read_message.
(This way to fix that is to get rid of the buffer BIO, change
write_message to write_flight, and allow things like init_message /
finish_message / init_message / finish_message / set_write_state /
init_message / finish_message / write_flight.)
Change-Id: Iebaa388ccbe7fcad48c1b2256e1c0d3a7c9c8a2a
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/8828
Reviewed-by: Steven Valdez <svaldez@google.com>
Reviewed-by: David Benjamin <davidben@google.com>
Commit-Queue: David Benjamin <davidben@google.com>
CQ-Verified: CQ bot account: commit-bot@chromium.org <commit-bot@chromium.org>
This adds the machinery for doing TLS 1.3 1RTT.
Change-Id: I736921ffe9dc6f6e64a08a836df6bb166d20f504
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/8720
Reviewed-by: David Benjamin <davidben@google.com>
Commit-Queue: David Benjamin <davidben@google.com>
CQ-Verified: CQ bot account: commit-bot@chromium.org <commit-bot@chromium.org>
