Rather than blindly select SHA-1 if we can't find a matching one, act as
if the peer advertised rsa_pkcs1_sha1 and ecdsa_sha1. This means that we
will fail the handshake if no common algorithm may be found.
This is done in preparation for removing the SHA-1 default in TLS 1.3.
Change-Id: I3584947909d3d6988b940f9404044cace265b20d
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/8695
Reviewed-by: David Benjamin <davidben@google.com>
This reverts commits:
8d79ed674019fdcb52348d79ed6740
Because WebRTC (at least) includes our headers in an extern "C" block,
which precludes having any C++ in them.
Change-Id: Ia849f43795a40034cbd45b22ea680b51aab28b2d
For when the PackHandshakeFlight tests get enabled.
Change-Id: Iee20fd27d88ed58f59af3b7e2dd92235d35af9ce
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/8663
Reviewed-by: David Benjamin <davidben@google.com>
This change scatters the contents of the two scoped_types.h files into
the headers for each of the areas of the code. The types are now in the
|bssl| namespace.
Change-Id: I802b8de68fba4786b6a0ac1bacd11d81d5842423
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/8731
Reviewed-by: Adam Langley <agl@google.com>
We currently have the situation where the |tool| and |bssl_shim| code
includes scoped_types.h from crypto/test and ssl/test. That's weird and
shouldn't happen. Also, our C++ consumers might quite like to have
access to the scoped types.
Thus this change moves some of the template code to base.h and puts it
all in a |bssl| namespace to prepare for scattering these types into
their respective headers. In order that all the existing test code be
able to access these types, it's all moved into the same namespace.
Change-Id: I3207e29474dc5fcc344ace43119df26dae04eabb
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/8730
Reviewed-by: David Benjamin <davidben@google.com>
Since they include an ECDHE exchange in them, they are equally-well
suited to False Start.
Change-Id: I75d31493a614a78ccbf337574c359271831d654d
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/8732
Reviewed-by: David Benjamin <davidben@google.com>
[Originally written by nharper, revised by davidben.]
When we add this in the real code, this will want ample tests and hooks
for bugs, but get the core logic in to start with.
Change-Id: I86cf0b6416c9077dbb6471a1802ae984b8fa6c72
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/8598
Reviewed-by: David Benjamin <davidben@google.com>
TLS 1.3 will use a different function from processClientHello.
Change-Id: I8b26a601cf553834b508feab051927d5986091ca
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/8597
Reviewed-by: David Benjamin <davidben@google.com>
As with the client, the logic around extensions in 1.3 will want to be
tweaked. readClientHello will probably shrink a bit. (We could probably
stuff 1.3 into the existing parameter negotiation logic, but I expect
it'll get a bit unwieldy once HelloRetryRequest, PSK resumption, and
0-RTT get in there, so I think it's best we leave them separate.)
Change-Id: Id8c323a06a1def6857a59accd9f87fb0b088385a
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/8596
Reviewed-by: David Benjamin <davidben@google.com>
While the random connection property extensions like ALPN and SRTP
remain largely unchanged in TLS 1.3 (but for interaction with 0-RTT),
authentication-related extensions change significantly and need
dedicated logic.
Change-Id: I2588935c2563a22e9879fb81478b8df5168b43de
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/8602
Reviewed-by: David Benjamin <davidben@google.com>
Test with and without PackHandshakeFlight enabled to cover when the
early post-CCS fragment will get packed into one of the pre-CCS
handshake records. Also test the resumption cases too to cover more
state transitions.
The various CCS-related tests (since CCS is kind of a mess) are pulled
into their own group.
Change-Id: I6384f2fb28d9885cd2b06d59e765e080e3822d8a
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/8661
Reviewed-by: David Benjamin <davidben@google.com>
[Originally written by nharper and then revised by davidben.]
Most features are missing, but it works for a start. To avoid breaking
the fake TLS 1.3 tests while the C code is still not landed, all the
logic is gated on a global boolean. When the C code gets in, we'll
set it to true and remove this boolean.
Change-Id: I6b3a369890864c26203fc9cda37c8250024ce91b
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/8601
Reviewed-by: David Benjamin <davidben@google.com>
I'm surprised we'd never tested this. In addition to splitting handshake
records up, one may pack multiple handshakes into a single record, as
they fit. Generalize the DTLS handshake flush hook to do this in TLS as
well.
Change-Id: Ia546d18c7c56ba45e50f489c5b53e1fcd6404f51
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/8650
Reviewed-by: David Benjamin <davidben@google.com>
TLS 1.2 and 1.3 will process more-or-less the same server extensions,
but at slightly different points in the handshake. In preparation for
that, split this out into its own function.
Change-Id: I5494dee4724295794dfd13c5e9f9f83eade6b20a
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/8586
Reviewed-by: Adam Langley <agl@google.com>
[Originally written by nharper, tweaked by davidben.]
For now, ignore them completely.
Change-Id: I28602f219d210a857aa80d6e735557b8d2d1c590
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/8585
Reviewed-by: Adam Langley <agl@google.com>
Also move them with the other version negotiation tests.
Change-Id: I8ea5777c131f8ab618de3c6d02038e802bd34dd0
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/8550
Reviewed-by: David Benjamin <davidben@google.com>
TLS 1.2 and 1.3 will both need to call it at different points.
Change-Id: Id62ec289213aa6c06ebe5fe65a57ca6c2b53d538
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/8600
Reviewed-by: David Benjamin <davidben@google.com>
TLS 1.3 will need to call it under different circumstances. We will also
wish to test TLS 1.3 post-handshake auth, so this function must work
without being passed handshake state.
In doing so, implement matching based on signature algorithms as 1.3
does away with the certificate type list.
Change-Id: Ibdee44bbbb589686fcbcd7412432100279bfac63
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/8589
Reviewed-by: David Benjamin <davidben@google.com>
[Originally written by nharper and then tweaked by davidben.]
TLS 1.3 tweaks them slightly, so being able to write them in one pass
rather than two will be somewhat more convenient.
Change-Id: Ib7e2d63e28cbae025c840bbb34e9e9c295b44dc6
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/8588
Reviewed-by: David Benjamin <davidben@google.com>
[Originally written by nharper. Test added by davidben.]
Test vectors taken from hkdf_test.c.
Change-Id: I214bcae325e9c7c242632a169ab5cf80a3178989
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/8587
Reviewed-by: David Benjamin <davidben@google.com>
[Originally written by nharper, tweaked by davidben.]
In TLS 1.3, every extension the server previously sent gets moved to a
separate EncryptedExtensions message. To be able to share code between
the two, parse those extensions separately. For now, the handshake reads
from serverHello.extensions.foo, though later much of the extensions
logic will probably handle serverExtensions independent of whether it
resides in ServerHello or EncryptedExtensions.
Change-Id: I07aaae6df3ef6fbac49e64661d14078d0dbeafb0
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/8584
Reviewed-by: David Benjamin <davidben@google.com>
[Originally written by nharper and tweaked by davidben.]
This will end up being split in two with most of the ServerHello
extensions being serializable in both ServerHello and
EncryptedExtensions depending on version.
Change-Id: Ida5876d55fbafb982bc2e5fdaf82872e733d6536
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/8580
Reviewed-by: David Benjamin <davidben@google.com>
[Originally written by nharper and then slightly tweaked by davidben.]
Between the new deeply nested extension (KeyShare) and most of
ServerHello extensions moving to a separate message, this is probably
long overdue.
Change-Id: Ia86e30f56b597471bb7e27d726a9ec92687b4d10
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/8569
Reviewed-by: David Benjamin <davidben@google.com>
TLS 1.3 defines its own EncryptedExtensions message. The existing one is
for Channel ID which probably should not have tried to generalize
itself.
Change-Id: I4f48bece98510eb54e64fbf3df6c2a7332bc0261
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/8566
Reviewed-by: David Benjamin <davidben@google.com>
Right now I believe we are testing against DTLS 1.3 ClientHellos. Fix
this in preparation for making VersionTLS13 go elsewhere in the Go code.
Unfortunately, I made the mistake of mapping DTLS 1.0 to TLS 1.0 rather
than 1.1 in Go. This does mean the names of the tests naturally work out
correctly, but we have to deal with this awkward DTLS-1.1-shaped hole in
our logic.
Change-Id: I8715582ed90acc1f08197831cae6de8d5442d028
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/8562
Reviewed-by: David Benjamin <davidben@google.com>
In preparation for TLS 1.3 using its actual handshake, switch most tests
to TLS 1.3 and add liberal TODOs for the tests which will need TLS 1.3
variants.
In doing so, move a few tests from basic tests into one of the groups.
Also rename BadECDSACurve to BadECDHECurve (it was never ECDSA) and add
a test to make sure FALLBACK_SCSV is correctly sensitive to the maximum
version.
Change-Id: Ifca6cf8f7a48d6f069483c0aab192ae691b1dd8e
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/8560
Reviewed-by: David Benjamin <davidben@google.com>
TLS 1.3 defines a new SignatureScheme uint16 enum that is backwards
compatible on the wire with TLS1.2's SignatureAndHashAlgorithm. This
change updates the go testing code to use a single signatureAlgorithm
enum (instead of 2 separate signature and hash enums) in preparation for
TLS 1.3. It also unifies all the signing around this new scheme,
effectively backporting the change to TLS 1.2.
For now, it does not distinguish signature algorithms between 1.2 and
1.3 (RSA-PSS instead of RSA-PKCS1, ECDSA must match curve types). When
the C code is ready make a similar change, the Go code will be updated
to match.
[Originally written by nharper, tweaked significantly by davidben.]
Change-Id: If9a315c4670755089ac061e4ec254ef3457a00de
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/8450
Reviewed-by: David Benjamin <davidben@google.com>
This replaces the old key_exchange_info APIs and does not require the
caller be aware of the mess around SSL_SESSION management. They
currently have the same bugs around renegotiation as before, but later
work to fix up SSL_SESSION tracking will fix their internals.
For consistency with the existing functions, I've kept the public API at
'curve' rather than 'group' for now. I think it's probably better to
have only one name with a single explanation in the section header
rather than half and half. (I also wouldn't be surprised if the IETF
ends up renaming 'group' again to 'key exchange' at some point. We'll
see what happens.)
Change-Id: I8e90a503bc4045d12f30835c86de64ef9f2d07c8
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/8565
Reviewed-by: Adam Langley <agl@google.com>
This isn't filled in on the client and Chromium no longer uses it for
plain RSA. It's redundant with existing APIs. This is part of removing
the need for callers to call SSL_get_session where possible.
SSL_get_session is ambiguous when it comes to renego. Some code wants
the current connection state which should not include the pending
handshake and some code wants the handshake scratch space which should.
Renego doesn't exist in TLS 1.3, but TLS 1.3 makes NewSessionTicket a
post-handshake message, so SSL_get_session is somewhat silly of an API
there too.
SSL_SESSION_get_key_exchange_info is a BoringSSL-only API, so we can
freely change it and replace it with APIs keyed on SSL. In doing so, I
think it is better to provide APIs like "SSL_get_dhe_group_size" and
"SSL_get_curve_id" rather than make the caller do the multi-step
SSL_get_current_cipher / SSL_CIPHER_is_ECDHE dance. To that end, RSA
key_exchange_info is pointless as it can already be determined from the
peer certificate.
Change-Id: Ie90523083d8649701c17934b7be0383502a0caa3
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/8564
Reviewed-by: Adam Langley <agl@google.com>
QUIC, in particular, will set min_version to TLS 1.3 and has no need to send
any legacy ciphers.
Note this requires changing some test expectations. Removing all of TLS 1.1 and
below's ciphers in TLS 1.3 has consequences for how a tripped minimum version
reads.
BUG=66
Change-Id: I695440ae78b95d9c7b5b921c3cb2eb43ea4cc50f
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/8514
Reviewed-by: David Benjamin <davidben@google.com>
Otherwise if the client's ClientHello logic is messed up and ServerHello is
fine, we won't notice.
Change-Id: I7f983cca45f7da1113ad4a72de1f991115e1b29a
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/8511
Reviewed-by: David Benjamin <davidben@google.com>
This also adds a missing check to the C half to ensure fake record types are
always correct, to keep implementations honest.
Change-Id: I1d65272e647ffa67018c721d52c639f8ba47d647
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/8510
Reviewed-by: Steven Valdez <svaldez@google.com>
Reviewed-by: David Benjamin <davidben@google.com>
We were missing this case. It is possible to receive an early unencrypted
ChangeCipherSpec alert in DTLS because they aren't ordered relative to the
handshake. Test this case. (ChangeCipherSpec in DTLS is kind of pointless.)
Change-Id: I84268bc1821734f606fb20bfbeda91abf372f32c
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/8460
Reviewed-by: Adam Langley <agl@google.com>
This is the only codepath where ssl->version can get a garbage value, which is
a little concerning. Since, in all these cases, the peer is failing to connect
and speaks so low a version we don't even accept it anymore, there is probably
not much value in letting them distinguish protocol_version from a record-layer
version number mismatch, where enforced (which will give a version-related
error anyway).
Should we get a decode_error or so just before version negotiation, we'd have
this behavior already.
Change-Id: I9b3e5685ab9c9ad32a7b7e3129363cd1d4cdaaf4
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/8420
Reviewed-by: Steven Valdez <svaldez@google.com>
Reviewed-by: David Benjamin <davidben@google.com>
This implements the cipher suite constraints in "fake TLS 1.3". It also makes
bssl_shim and runner enable it by default so we can start adding MaxVersion:
VersionTLS12 markers to tests as 1.2 vs. 1.3 differences begin to take effect.
Change-Id: If1caf6e43938c8d15b0a0f39f40963b8199dcef5
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/8340
Reviewed-by: David Benjamin <davidben@google.com>
This unifies a bunch of tests and also adds a few missing ones.
Change-Id: I91652bd010da6cdb62168ce0a3415737127e1577
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/8360
Reviewed-by: Nick Harper <nharper@google.com>
Reviewed-by: David Benjamin <davidben@google.com>
Both messages go between CCS and Finished. We weren't testing their relative
order and one of the state machine edges. Also test resume + NPN since that too
is a different handshake shape.
Change-Id: Iaeaf6c2c9bfd133103e2fb079d0e5a86995becfd
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/8196
Reviewed-by: Adam Langley <agl@google.com>
This is not very satisfactory.
Change-Id: I7e7a86f921e66f8f830c72eac084e9fea5ffd4d9
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/8270
Reviewed-by: David Benjamin <davidben@google.com>
By corrupting the X25519 and Newhope parts separately, the test shows
that both are in use. Possibly excessive?
Change-Id: Ieb10f46f8ba876faacdafe70c5561c50a5863153
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/8250
Reviewed-by: Adam Langley <agl@google.com>
There's a __pragma expression which allows this. Android builds us Windows with
MinGW for some reason, so we actually do have to tolerate non-MSVC-compatible
Windows compilers. (Clang for Windows is much more sensible than MinGW and
intentionally mimicks MSVC.)
MinGW doesn't understand MSVC's pragmas and warns a lot. #pragma warning is
safe to suppress, so wrap those to shush them. This also lets us do away with a
few ifdefs.
Change-Id: I1f5a8bec4940d4b2d947c4c1cc9341bc15ec4972
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/8236
Reviewed-by: Adam Langley <agl@google.com>
Change-Id: I0aaf9d926a81c3a10e70ae3ae6605d4643419f89
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/8210
Reviewed-by: Taylor Brandstetter <deadbeef@google.com>
Reviewed-by: David Benjamin <davidben@google.com>
It's useful, when combined with patching crypto/rand/deterministic.c in, for
debugging things. Also if we want to record fuzzer transcripts again, this
probably should be on.
Change-Id: I109cf27ebab64f01a13466f0d960def3257d8750
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/8192
Reviewed-by: David Benjamin <davidben@google.com>
Depending on bittedness of the runner, uint16 * uint16 can overflow an int.
There's other computations that can overflow a uint32 as well, so I just made
everything uint64 to avoid thinking about it too much.
Change-Id: Ia3c976987f39f78285c865a2d7688600d73c2514
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/8193
Reviewed-by: Adam Langley <agl@google.com>
-timeout collides with go test's flags.
Change-Id: Icfc954915a61f1bb4d0acc8f02ec8a482ea10158
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/8188
Reviewed-by: David Benjamin <davidben@google.com>
This was probably the worst offender of them all as read_bytes is the wrong
abstraction to begin with. Note this is a slight change in how processing a
record works. Rather than reading one fragment at a time, we process all
fragments in a record and return. The intent here is so that all records are
processed atomically since the connection eventually will not be able to retain
a buffer holding the record.
This loses a ton of (though not quite all yet) those a2b macros.
Change-Id: Ibe4bbcc33c496328de08d272457d2282c411b38b
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/8176
Reviewed-by: David Benjamin <davidben@google.com>
