Most C standard library functions are undefined if passed NULL, even
when the corresponding length is zero. This gives them (and, in turn,
all functions which call them) surprising behavior on empty arrays.
Some compilers will miscompile code due to this rule. See also
https://www.imperialviolet.org/2016/06/26/nonnull.html
Add OPENSSL_memcpy, etc., wrappers which avoid this problem.
BUG=23
Change-Id: I95f42b23e92945af0e681264fffaf578e7f8465e
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/12928
Commit-Queue: David Benjamin <davidben@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Adam Langley <agl@google.com>
We've taken to writing bssl::UniquePtr in full, so it's not buying
us much.
Change-Id: Ia2689366cbb17282c8063608dddcc675518ec0ca
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/12628
Reviewed-by: David Benjamin <davidben@google.com>
AES-GCM-SIV is an AEAD with nonce-misuse resistance. It can reuse
hardware support for AES-GCM and thus encrypt at ~66% the speed, and
decrypt at 100% the speed, of AES-GCM.
See https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-irtf-cfrg-gcmsiv-02
This implementation is generic, not optimised, and reuses existing AES
and GHASH support as much as possible. It is guarded by !OPENSSL_SMALL,
at least for now.
Change-Id: Ia9f77b256ef5dfb8588bb9ecfe6ee0e827626f57
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/12541
Reviewed-by: Adam Langley <agl@google.com>
Commit-Queue: Adam Langley <agl@google.com>
CQ-Verified: CQ bot account: commit-bot@chromium.org <commit-bot@chromium.org>
This finally removes the last Android hack. Both Chromium and Android
end up needing this thing (Chromium needs it for WebCrypto but currently
uses the EVP_AEAD version and Android needs it by way of
wpa_supplicant).
On the Android side, the alternative is we finish upstream's
NEED_INTERNAL_AES_WRAP patch, but then it just uses its own key-wrap
implementation. This seems a little silly, considering we have a version
of key-wrap under a different API anyway.
It also doesn't make much sense to leave the EVP_AEAD API around if we
don't want people to use it and Chromium's the only consumer. Remove it
and I'll switch Chromium to the new---er, old--- APIs next roll.
Change-Id: I23a89cda25bddb6ac1033e4cd408165f393d1e6c
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/11410
Commit-Queue: David Benjamin <davidben@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Adam Langley <agl@google.com>
This withdraws support for -DBORINGSSL_ENABLE_RC4_TLS, and removes the
RC4 AEADs.
Change-Id: I1321b76bfe047d180743fa46d1b81c5d70c64e81
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/10940
Reviewed-by: David Benjamin <davidben@google.com>
Commit-Queue: David Benjamin <davidben@google.com>
CQ-Verified: CQ bot account: commit-bot@chromium.org <commit-bot@chromium.org>
Now that we have the extern "C++" trick, we can just embed them in the
normal headers. Move the EVP_CIPHER_CTX deleter to cipher.h and, in
doing so, take away a little bit of boilerplate in defining deleters.
Change-Id: I4a4b8d0db5274a3607914d94e76a38996bd611ec
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/10804
Reviewed-by: Matt Braithwaite <mab@google.com>
Commit-Queue: David Benjamin <davidben@google.com>
CQ-Verified: CQ bot account: commit-bot@chromium.org <commit-bot@chromium.org>
Initial stab at moving contents of scoped_types.h into
include/openssl/c++ and into the |bssl| namespace.
Started with one file. Will do the remaining ones once this looks good.
Change-Id: I51e2f7c1acbe52d508f1faee7740645f91f56386
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/9175
Reviewed-by: Adam Langley <agl@google.com>
Commit-Queue: Adam Langley <agl@google.com>
CQ-Verified: CQ bot account: commit-bot@chromium.org <commit-bot@chromium.org>
This reverts commits:
8d79ed674019fdcb52348d79ed6740
Because WebRTC (at least) includes our headers in an extern "C" block,
which precludes having any C++ in them.
Change-Id: Ia849f43795a40034cbd45b22ea680b51aab28b2d
This change scatters the contents of the two scoped_types.h files into
the headers for each of the areas of the code. The types are now in the
|bssl| namespace.
Change-Id: I802b8de68fba4786b6a0ac1bacd11d81d5842423
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/8731
Reviewed-by: Adam Langley <agl@google.com>
We currently have the situation where the |tool| and |bssl_shim| code
includes scoped_types.h from crypto/test and ssl/test. That's weird and
shouldn't happen. Also, our C++ consumers might quite like to have
access to the scoped types.
Thus this change moves some of the template code to base.h and puts it
all in a |bssl| namespace to prepare for scattering these types into
their respective headers. In order that all the existing test code be
able to access these types, it's all moved into the same namespace.
Change-Id: I3207e29474dc5fcc344ace43119df26dae04eabb
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/8730
Reviewed-by: David Benjamin <davidben@google.com>
While most of OpenSSL's assembly allows out < in too, some of it doesn't.
Upstream seems to not consider this a problem (or, at least, they're failing to
make a decision on whether it is a problem, so we should assume they'll stay
their course). Accordingly, require aliased buffers to exactly align so we
don't have to keep chasing this down.
Change-Id: I00eb3df3e195b249116c68f7272442918d7077eb
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/8231
Reviewed-by: Adam Langley <agl@google.com>
Cases where the input and output buffers overlap are always a little
odd. This change adds a test to ensures that the (generic) AEADs
function in these situations.
Change-Id: I6f1987a5e10ddef6b2b8f037a6d50737a120bc99
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/7195
Reviewed-by: David Benjamin <davidben@google.com>
The consumers have all been updated, so we can move EVP_aead_chacha20_poly1305
to its final state. Unfortunately, the _rfc7539-suffixed version will need to
stick around for just a hair longer. Also the tls1.h macros, but the remaining
consumers are okay with that changing underneath them.
Change-Id: Ibbb70ec1860d6ac6a7e1d7b45e70fe692bf5ebe5
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/6600
Reviewed-by: Adam Langley <agl@google.com>
Chromium's toolchains may now assume C++11 library support, so we may freely
use C++11 features. (Chromium's still in the process of deciding what to allow,
but we use Google's style guide directly, toolchain limitations aside.)
Change-Id: I1c7feb92b7f5f51d9091a4c686649fb574ac138d
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/6465
Reviewed-by: Adam Langley <agl@google.com>
QUIC has a complex relationship with BoringSSL owing to it living both
in Chromium and the Google-internal repository. In order for it to
handle the ChaCha20-Poly1305 AEAD switch more easily this change gives
the unsuffixed name to the old AEAD, for now.
Once QUIC has moved to the “_old” version the unsuffixed name can be
given to the new version.
Change-Id: Id8a77be6e3fe2358d78e022413fe088e5a274dca
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/6361
Reviewed-by: David Benjamin <davidben@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: Adam Langley <alangley@gmail.com>
Match the other stack-allocated types in that we expose a wrapper function to
get them into the zero state. Makes it more amenable to templates like
ScopedOpenSSLContext.
Change-Id: Ibc7b2b1bc0421ce5ccc84760c78c0b143441ab0f
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/5753
Reviewed-by: Adam Langley <agl@google.com>
Otherwise we leave stuff in the error queue for the next test.
Change-Id: I167b7420b9d3fada69d1d35ac8132dd21a04797c
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/5310
Reviewed-by: Adam Langley <agl@google.com>
This change makes it safe to call EVP_AEAD_CTX_cleanup after a failed
EVP_AEAD_CTX_init.
Change-Id: I608ed550e08d638cd7e941f5067edd3da4c850ab
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/4692
Reviewed-by: David Benjamin <davidben@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: Adam Langley <agl@google.com>
(The huge if-else was hard to visually parse.)
Change-Id: Ic2c94120f345085b619304181e861f662a931a29
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/4691
Reviewed-by: David Benjamin <davidben@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: Adam Langley <agl@google.com>
