BUG=129
Change-Id: Ibbd6d0804a75cb17ff33f64d4cdf9ae80b26e9df
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/13867
Reviewed-by: Steven Valdez <svaldez@google.com>
Reviewed-by: David Benjamin <davidben@google.com>
Commit-Queue: David Benjamin <davidben@google.com>
CQ-Verified: CQ bot account: commit-bot@chromium.org <commit-bot@chromium.org>
Most C standard library functions are undefined if passed NULL, even
when the corresponding length is zero. This gives them (and, in turn,
all functions which call them) surprising behavior on empty arrays.
Some compilers will miscompile code due to this rule. See also
https://www.imperialviolet.org/2016/06/26/nonnull.html
Add OPENSSL_memcpy, etc., wrappers which avoid this problem.
BUG=23
Change-Id: I95f42b23e92945af0e681264fffaf578e7f8465e
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/12928
Commit-Queue: David Benjamin <davidben@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Adam Langley <agl@google.com>
While most of OpenSSL's assembly allows out < in too, some of it doesn't.
Upstream seems to not consider this a problem (or, at least, they're failing to
make a decision on whether it is a problem, so we should assume they'll stay
their course). Accordingly, require aliased buffers to exactly align so we
don't have to keep chasing this down.
Change-Id: I00eb3df3e195b249116c68f7272442918d7077eb
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/8231
Reviewed-by: Adam Langley <agl@google.com>
The coverage tool revealed that we weren't testing all codepaths of the ChaCha
assembly. Add a standalone test as it's much easier to iterate over all lengths
when there isn't the entire AEAD in the way.
I wasn't able to find a really long test vector, so I generated a random one
with the Go implementation we have in runner.
This test gives us full coverage on the ChaCha20_ssse3 variant. (We'll see how
it fares on the other codepaths when the multi-variant test harnesses get in. I
certainly hope there isn't a more novel way to call ChaCha20 than this...)
Change-Id: I087e421c7351f46ea65dacdc7127e4fbf5f4c0aa
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/7299
Reviewed-by: Adam Langley <agl@google.com>
