|EC_GROUP_get0_order| doesn't require any heap allocations and never
fails, so it is much more convenient and more efficient for callers to
call.
Change-Id: Ic60f768875e7bc8e74362dacdb5cbbc6957b05a6
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/6532
Reviewed-by: Adam Langley <agl@google.com>
This change incorporates Intel's P-256 implementation. The record of
Intel's submission under CLA is in internal bug number 25330687.
Before:
Did 3582 ECDH P-256 operations in 1049114us (3414.3 ops/sec)
Did 8525 ECDSA P-256 signing operations in 1028778us (8286.5 ops/sec)
Did 3487 ECDSA P-256 verify operations in 1008996us (3455.9 ops/sec)
build/tool/bssl is 1434704 bytes after strip -s
After:
Did 8618 ECDH P-256 operations in 1027884us (8384.2 ops/sec)
Did 21000 ECDSA P-256 signing operations in 1049490us (20009.7 ops/sec)
Did 8268 ECDSA P-256 verify operations in 1079481us (7659.2 ops/sec)
build/tool/bssl is 1567216 bytes after strip -s
Change-Id: I147971a8e19849779c8ed7e20310d41bd4962299
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/6371
Reviewed-by: Adam Langley <agl@google.com>
The documentation for |BN_CTX_get| states: "Once |BN_CTX_get| has
returned NULL, all future calls will also return NULL until
|BN_CTX_end| is called." Some code takes advantage of that guarantee
by only checking the return value of the last call to |BN_CTX_get| in a
series of calls. That is correct and the most efficient way of doing
it. However, that pattern is inconsistent with most of the other uses
of |BN_CTX_get|. Also, static analysis tools like Coverity cannot
understand that pattern. This commit removes the instances of that
pattern that Coverity complained about when scanning *ring*.
Change-Id: Ie36d0223ea1caee460c7979547cf5bfd5fb16f93
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/5611
Reviewed-by: Adam Langley <agl@google.com>
This is the first structure to be implemented with the new BIGNUM ASN.1
routines. Object reuse in the legacy d2i/i2d functions is implemented by
releasing whatever was in *out before and setting it to the
newly-allocated object. As with the new d2i_SSL_SESSION, this is a
weaker form of object reuse, but should suffice for reasonable callers.
As ECDSA_SIG is more likely to be parsed alone than as part of another
structure (and using CBB is slightly tedious), add convenient functions
which take byte arrays. For consistency with SSL_SESSION, they are named
to/from_bytes. from_bytes, unlike the CBS variant, rejects trailing
data.
Note this changes some test expectations: BER signatures now push an
error code. That they didn't do this was probably a mistake.
BUG=499653
Change-Id: I9ec74db53e70d9a989412cc9e2b599be0454caec
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/5269
Reviewed-by: Adam Langley <agl@google.com>
Beyond generally eliminating unnecessary includes, eliminate as many
includes of headers that declare/define particularly error-prone
functionality like strlen, malloc, and free. crypto/err/internal.h was
added to remove the dependency on openssl/thread.h from the public
openssl/err.h header. The include of <stdlib.h> in openssl/mem.h was
retained since it defines OPENSSL_malloc and friends as macros around
the stdlib.h functions. The public x509.h, x509v3.h, and ssl.h headers
were not changed in order to minimize breakage of source compatibility
with external code.
Change-Id: I0d264b73ad0a720587774430b2ab8f8275960329
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/4220
Reviewed-by: Adam Langley <agl@google.com>
Including string.h in base.h causes any file that includes a BoringSSL
header to include string.h. Generally this wouldn't be a problem,
although string.h might slow down the compile if it wasn't otherwise
needed. However, it also causes problems for ipsec-tools in Android
because OpenSSL didn't have this behaviour.
This change removes string.h from base.h and, instead, adds it to each
.c file that requires it.
Change-Id: I5968e50b0e230fd3adf9b72dd2836e6f52d6fb37
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/3200
Reviewed-by: David Benjamin <davidben@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: Adam Langley <agl@google.com>
By using non-DER or invalid encodings outside the signed portion of a
certificate the fingerprint can be changed without breaking the signature.
Although no details of the signed portion of the certificate can be changed
this can cause problems with some applications: e.g. those using the
certificate fingerprint for blacklists.
1. Reject signatures with non zero unused bits.
If the BIT STRING containing the signature has non zero unused bits reject the
signature. All current signature algorithms require zero unused bits.
2. Check certificate algorithm consistency.
Check the AlgorithmIdentifier inside TBS matches the one in the certificate
signature. NB: this will result in signature failure errors for some broken
certificates.
3. Check DSA/ECDSA signatures use DER.
Reencode DSA/ECDSA signatures and compare with the original received signature.
Return an error if there is a mismatch.
This will reject various cases including garbage after signature (thanks to
Antti Karjalainen and Tuomo Untinen from the Codenomicon CROSS program for
discovering this case) and use of BER or invalid ASN.1 INTEGERs (negative or
with leading zeroes).
CVE-2014-8275
(Imported from upstream's 85cfc188c06bd046420ae70dd6e302f9efe022a9 and
4c52816d35681c0533c25fdd3abb4b7c6962302d)
Change-Id: Ic901aea8ea6457df27dc542a11c30464561e322b
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/2783
Reviewed-by: David Benjamin <davidben@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: Adam Langley <agl@google.com>
Thanks to Denis Denisov for running the analysis.
Change-Id: I80810261e013423e746fd8d8afefb3581cffccc0
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/1701
Reviewed-by: Adam Langley <agl@google.com>
Where possible, functions should return one for success and zero for
error. The use of additional negative values to indicate an error is,
itself, error prone.
This change fixes many EVP functions to remove the possibility of
negative return values. Existing code that is testing for <= 0 will
continue to function, although there is the possibility that some code
was differentiating between negative values (error) and zero (invalid
signature) for the verify functions and will now show the wrong error
message.
Change-Id: I982512596bb18a82df65861394dbd7487783bd3d
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/1333
Reviewed-by: Adam Langley <agl@google.com>
Initial fork from f2d678e6e89b6508147086610e985d4e8416e867 (1.0.2 beta).
(This change contains substantial changes from the original and
effectively starts a new history.)
