SSL_clear sets s->state and dtls1_clear sets cookie_len on the server. Setting
cookie_len on the server seems to serve no purpose but to let the callback know
how large the buffer is. This can be done just before calling the callback.
It also avoids a bug where the cookie check can be bypassed, should the server
not specify an app_verify_cookie_cb, by supplying a cookie of all zeros of the
maximum size. (Zero is fine because an empty cookie is rejected.)
The goal here is to avoid needing the SSL_clear calls in the handshake
functions. They are currently needed to fix the cookie_len setting when using
the generic method. (They get set wrong and then flipped back.)
Change-Id: I5095891bc0f7df62d83a9c84312fcf0b84826faa
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/2435
Reviewed-by: Adam Langley <agl@google.com>
This fixes bugs that kept the tests from working:
- Resolve DTLS version and cookie before the session.
- In DTLS_ANY_VERSION, ServerHello should be read with first_packet = 1. This
is a regression from f2fedefdca. We'll want to
do the same for TLS, but first let's change this to a boolean has_version in a
follow-up.
Things not yet fixed:
- DTLS code is not EVP_AEAD-aware. Those ciphers are disabled for now.
- On the client, DTLS_ANY_VERSION creates SSL_SESSIONs with the wrong
ssl_version. The tests pass because we no longer enforce the match as of
e37216f56009fbf48c3a1e733b7a546ca6dfc2af. (In fact, we've gone from the server
ignoring ssl_version and client enforcing to the client mostly ignoring
ssl_version and the server enforcing.)
- ssl3_send_client_hello's ssl_version check checks for equality against
s->version rather than >.
Change-Id: I5a0dde221b2009413df9b9443882b9bf3b29519c
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/2403
Reviewed-by: Adam Langley <agl@google.com>
This was added in http://rt.openssl.org/Ticket/Display.html?id=2033 to support
a mode where a DTLS socket would statelessly perform the ClientHello /
HelloVerifyRequest portion of the handshake, to be handed off to a socket
specific to this peer address.
This is not used by WebRTC or other current consumers. If we need to support
something like this, it would be cleaner to do the listen portion (cookieless
ClientHello + HelloVerifyRequest) externally and then spin up an SSL instance
on receipt of a cookied ClientHello. This would require a slightly more complex
BIO to replay the second ClientHello but would avoid peppering the DTLS
handshake state with a special short-circuiting mode.
Change-Id: I7a413932edfb62f8b9368912a9a0621d4155f1aa
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/2220
Reviewed-by: Adam Langley <agl@google.com>
I see no internal users and the existence of a THIRD version encoding
complicates all version-checking logic. Also convert another version check to
SSL_IS_DTLS that was missed earlier.
Change-Id: I60d215f57d44880f6e6877889307dc39dbf838f7
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/1550
Reviewed-by: Adam Langley <agl@google.com>
Of the remaining implementations left, ssl3_, dtls1_, and ssl23_, dtls1_ is
redundant and can be folded into ssl3_. ssl23_ actually isn't; it sets 5
minutes rather than 2 hours. Two hours seems to be what everything else uses
and seems a saner default. Most consumers seem to override it anyway
(SSL_CTX_set_timeout). But it is a behavior change.
The method is called at two points:
- SSL_get_default_timeout
- SSL_CTX_new
Incidentally, the latter call actually makes the former never called internally
and the value it returns a lie. SSL_get_default_timeout returns the default
timeout of the /current/ method, but in ssl_get_new_session, the timeout is
shadowed by session_timeout on the context. That is initialized when
SSL_CTX_new is called. So, unless you go out of your way to
SSL_CTX_set_timeout(0), it always overrides. (And it actually used to a
difference because, for SSL23, the SSL_CTX's method is SSL23, but, when session
creation happens, the SSL's method is the version-specific one.)
Change-Id: I331d3fd69b726242b36492402717b6d0b521c6ee
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/1521
Reviewed-by: Adam Langley <agl@google.com>
Windows doesn't have ssize_t, sadly. There's SSIZE_T, but defining an
OPENSSL_SSIZE_T seems worse than just using an int.
Change-Id: I09bb5aa03f96da78b619e551f92ed52ce24d9f3f
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/1352
Reviewed-by: Adam Langley <agl@google.com>
Initial fork from f2d678e6e89b6508147086610e985d4e8416e867 (1.0.2 beta).
(This change contains substantial changes from the original and
effectively starts a new history.)
