One of these days we may need to get a more aggressive C parser...
Change-Id: I7c6a848fb3b7f41083ac70542aa17e971baf10a4
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/4786
Reviewed-by: Adam Langley <agl@google.com>
Fleshes out the table of contents more.
Change-Id: I8f8f0e43bdf7419f978b4fc66de80922ed1ae425
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/4785
Reviewed-by: Adam Langley <agl@google.com>
Current thought is to organize this by:
- Core SSL_CTX APIs (creating, destroying)
- Core SSL APIs (creating destroying, maybe handshake, read, write as
well)
- APIs to configure SSL_CTX/SSL, roughly grouped by feature. Probably
options and modes are the first two sections. SSL_TXT_* constants can
be part of documenting cipher suite configuration.
- APIs to query state from SSL_CTX/SSL, roughly grouped by feature. (Or
perhaps these should be folded into the configuration sections?)
The functions themselves aren't reordered or reorganized to match the
eventual header order yet. Though I did do the s -> ssl rename on the
ones I've touched.
Also formally deprecate SSL_clear. It would be a core SSL API
except it's horrible.
Change-Id: Ia7e4fdcb7bad4e9ccdee8cf8c3136dc63aaaa772
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/4784
Reviewed-by: Adam Langley <agl@google.com>
The type names are perfectly serviceable. Most of them are
forward-declared in base.h.
Change-Id: Id03f5039a2d1bab82c68ade074a0e26cd3ab5ad9
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/4783
Reviewed-by: Adam Langley <agl@google.com>
Rather than duplicate all the various modifiers, which is quite
error-prone, write all the tests to a temporary array and then apply
modifiers afterwards.
Change-Id: I19bfeb83b722ed34e973f17906c5e071471a926a
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/4782
Reviewed-by: Adam Langley <agl@google.com>
We should be testing asynchronous renego.
BUG=429450
Change-Id: Ib7a5d42f2ac728f9ea0d80158eef63ad77cd77a4
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/4781
Reviewed-by: Adam Langley <agl@google.com>
Since we hope to eventually lose server-side renegotiation support
altogether, get the client-side version of those tests. We should have
had those anyway to test that the default is to allow it.
BUG=429450
Change-Id: I4a18f339b55f3f07d77e22e823141e10a12bc9ff
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/4780
Reviewed-by: Adam Langley <agl@google.com>
Looks like it was the use in type_check.h that was still causing
problems, not that MSVC doesn't short-circuit #if statements.
Change-Id: I574e8dd463c46b0133a989b221a7bb8861b3eed9
6e1f6456 tried to do this, but MSVC doesn't short-circuit #if
statements. So this change tries having the test be in a different #if.
Change-Id: Id0074770c166a2b7cd9ba2c8cd06245a68b77af8
While the compiler on OS X sets the macros as if it supports C11
atomics, stdatomic.h is actually missing.
Change-Id: Ifecaf1c8df6390e6b994663adedc284d9b8130b7
At this point, none of these functions or macros are used so they can
just be deleted.
Change-Id: I8ed1aae7a252e886864bf43e3096eff2228183cd
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/4777
Reviewed-by: Adam Langley <agl@google.com>
These ASN.1 macros are the last references to the old-style OpenSSL
locks that remain. The ASN.1 reference count handling was changed in a
previous commit to use |CRYPTO_refcount_*| so these lock references were
unused anyway.
Change-Id: I1b27eef140723050a8e6878a1bea11da3409d0eb
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/4776
Reviewed-by: Adam Langley <agl@google.com>
|SSL_CTX| and |X509_STORE| have grown their own locks. Several static
locks have been added to hack around not being able to use a
|CRYPTO_once_t| in public headers. Lastly, support for calling
|SSL_CTX_set_generate_session_id| concurrently with active connections
has been removed. No other property of an |SSL_CTX| works like that.
Change-Id: Iff5fe3ee3fdd6ea9c9daee96f850b107ad8a6bca
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/4775
Reviewed-by: Adam Langley <agl@google.com>
It's no longer needed after the conversion to |CRYPTO_refcount_t|.
Change-Id: Ied129c4c247fcd426745fa016350528b7571aaaa
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/4774
Reviewed-by: Adam Langley <agl@google.com>
Convert reference counts in ssl/ to use |CRYPTO_refcount_t|.
Change-Id: I5d60f641b0c89b1ddfe38bfbd9d7285c60377f4c
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/4773
Reviewed-by: Adam Langley <agl@google.com>
This change converts the reference counts in crypto/ to use
|CRYPTO_refcount_t|. The reference counts in |X509_PKEY| and |X509_INFO|
were never actually used and so were dropped.
Change-Id: I75d572cdac1f8c1083c482e29c9519282d7fd16c
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/4772
Reviewed-by: Adam Langley <agl@google.com>
OpenSSL has traditionally done reference counting with |int|s and the
|CRYPTO_add| function. Unless a special callback is installed (rare),
this is implemented by doing the reference count operations under a
lock.
This change adds infrastructure for handling reference counts and uses
atomic operations when C11 support is available.
Change-Id: Ia023ce432319efd00f77a7340da27d16ee4b63c3
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/4771
Reviewed-by: Adam Langley <agl@google.com>
OPENSSL_COMPILE_ASSERT implements a static assertion, but the error
message is a little weird because it's a hack around the fact that C,
traditionally, doesn't have static assertions.
C11 now does have _Static_assert (a.k.a. static_assert when one includes
assert.h) so we can use that when provided to get cleaner error
messages.
Change-Id: Ia3625dfb2988de11fd95ddba957f118c0d3183ff
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/4770
Reviewed-by: Adam Langley <agl@google.com>
DH groups less than 1024 bits are clearly not very safe. Ideally servers
would switch to ECDHE because 1024 isn't great either, but this will
serve for the short term.
BUG=490240
Change-Id: Ic9aac714cdcdcbfae319b5eb1410675d3b903a69
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/4813
Reviewed-by: David Benjamin <davidben@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: Adam Langley <agl@google.com>
Change-Id: I1bade6ad22596857b208b2c8ad54b239b648b86e
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/4812
Reviewed-by: David Benjamin <davidben@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: Adam Langley <agl@google.com>
SSLeay is a compatibility function for OpenSSL, but I got it wrong. It
doesn't return a string, it returns a number. This doesn't end up making
any difference, but it fixes a warning when building OpenSSH.
Change-Id: I327ab4f70313c93c18f81d8804ba4acdc3bc1a4a
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/4811
Reviewed-by: David Benjamin <davidben@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: Adam Langley <agl@google.com>
This change import's upstream's beeb0fa7 and fixes a UAF in X509.
Thankfully, this shouldn't impact Chromium, which doesn't use OpenSSL
for certificate verification.
BUG=489764
Change-Id: I0ce2ec05083f7c588ba5504bb12151437dec593e
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/4810
Reviewed-by: David Benjamin <davidben@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: Adam Langley <agl@google.com>
Unlike the standalone build, builds generated from util/generate_build_files.py
do not exclude x86_64-gcc.c. Match the consumer builds by making the standalone
build unconditionally include it. (This would have noticed the missing
preprocessor checks in the file.)
Change-Id: I8d20f269dea63776320ae636ee1e5339cb85fa30
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/4761
Reviewed-by: Adam Langley <agl@google.com>
Android (on OS X) builds with NO_ASM and was getting both generic.c and
x86_64-gcc.c. This change updates the latter so that it's excluded in
NO_ASM builds.
Change-Id: I1f0e1c5e551eed9c575ce632ec3016fce7ec9d2e
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/4741
Reviewed-by: Adam Langley <agl@google.com>
We can't actually catch this with MSan because it requires all code be
instrumented, so it needs a NO_ASM build which no disables that code. valgrind
doesn't notice either, possibly because there's some computation being done on
it. Still, we shouldn't use uninitialized memory.
Also get us closer to being instrumentable by MSan, but the runner tests will
need to build against an instrumented STL and I haven't tried that yet.
Change-Id: I2d65697a3269b5b022899f361730a85c51ecaa12
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/4760
Reviewed-by: Adam Langley <agl@google.com>
This change exposes the functions needed to support arbitrary elliptic
curve groups. The Java API[1] doesn't allow a provider to only provide
certain elliptic curve groups. So if BoringSSL is an ECC provider on
Android, we probably need to support arbitrary groups because someone
out there is going to be using it for Bitcoin I'm sure.
Perhaps in time we can remove this support, but not yet.
[1] https://docs.oracle.com/javase/7/docs/api/java/security/spec/ECParameterSpec.html
Change-Id: Ic1d76de96f913c9ca33c46b451cddc08c5b93d80
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/4740
Reviewed-by: David Benjamin <davidben@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: Adam Langley <agl@google.com>
SSL_get_current_cipher is documented by upstream to return the cipher actually
being used. However, because it reads s->session, it returns information
pertaining to the session to be offered if queried before ServerHello or early
in an abbreviated handshake.
Logic around s->session needs more comprehensive cleanup but for just this
function, defining it to be the current outgoing cipher is close to the current
semantics but for fixing the initial state (s->session->cipher is populated
when sending CCS). Store it in the SSL_AEAD_CTX which seems a natural place to
associate state pertaining to a connection half.
BUG=484744
Change-Id: Ife8db27a16615d0dbb2aec65359537243e08af7c
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/4733
Reviewed-by: Adam Langley <agl@google.com>
This cuts down on one config knob as well as one case in the renego
combinatorial explosion. Since the only case we care about with renego
is the client auth hack, there's no reason to ever do resumption.
Especially since, no matter what's in the session cache:
- OpenSSL will only ever offer the session it just established,
whether or not a newer one with client auth was since established.
- Chrome will never cache sessions created on a renegotiation, so
such a session would never make it to the session cache.
- The new_session + SSL_OP_NO_SESSION_RESUMPTION_ON_RENEGOTIATION
logic had a bug where it would unconditionally never offer tickets
(but would advertise support) on renego, so any server doing renego
resumption against an OpenSSL-derived client must not support
session tickets.
This also gets rid of s->new_session which is now pointless.
BUG=429450
Change-Id: I884bdcdc80bff45935b2c429b4bbc9c16b2288f8
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/4732
Reviewed-by: Adam Langley <agl@google.com>
We have a lot of options that don't do anything.
Change-Id: I1681fd07d1272547d4face87917ce41029bbf0de
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/4731
Reviewed-by: Adam Langley <agl@google.com>
There's multiple different versions of this check, between
s->s3->have_version (only works at some points), s->new_session (really
weird and not actually right), s->renegotiate (fails on the server
because it's always 2 after ClientHello), and s->s3->tmp.finish_md_len
(super confusing). Add an explicit bit with clear meaning. We'll prune
some of the others later; notably s->renegotiate can go away when
initiating renegotiation is removed.
This also tidies up the extensions to be consistent about whether
they're allowed during renego:
- ALPN failed to condition when accepting from the server, so even
if the client didn't advertise, the server could.
- SCTs now *are* allowed during renego. I think forbidding it was a
stray copy-paste. It wasn't consistently enforced in both ClientHello
and ServerHello, so the server could still supply it. Moreover, SCTs
are part of the certificate, so we should accept it wherever we accept
certificates, otherwise that session's state becomes incomplete. This
matches OCSP stapling. (NB: Chrome will never insert a session created
on renego into the session cache and won't accept a certificate
change, so this is moot anyway.)
Change-Id: Ic9bd1ebe2a2dbe75930ed0213bf3c8ed8170e251
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/4730
Reviewed-by: Adam Langley <agl@google.com>
As of crbug.com/484543, Chromium's SSLClientSocket is not sensitive to whether
renegotiation is enabled or not. Disable it by default and require consumers to
opt into enabling this protocol mistake.
BUG=429450
Change-Id: I2329068284dbb851da010ff1fd398df3d663bcc3
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/4723
Reviewed-by: Adam Langley <agl@google.com>
Derived from upstream's new evp_test. The tests were taken from upstream
but tweaked so the diff from the old cipher_test.txt is more obvious.
Change-Id: Ic82593a8bb6aaee9b69fdc42a8b75516b03c1c5a
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/4707
Reviewed-by: Adam Langley <agl@google.com>
The generic RC4 implementation may read and write just past the end of the
buffer; when input and output are aligned, it always reads an RC4_CHUNK at a
time. It appropriately masks off and preserves the excess bytes off the end, so
this can only have practical effects if it crosses a page boundary. There's an
alignment check, so that can't happen; page boundaries are always aligned. But
it makes ASan unhappy and strictly speaking is a memory error.
Instead, fall through to the generic codepath which just reads it byte by byte.
This should fix the other bot failure.
Change-Id: I3cbd3bfc6cb0537e87f3252dea12d40ffa78d590
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/4722
Reviewed-by: Adam Langley <agl@google.com>
As with CRYPTO_ctr128_encrypt_ctr32, NULL in and out are legal in the
degenerate case when len is 0. This fixes one of the two failures on the bots.
Change-Id: If6016dfc3963d9c06c849fc8eba9908556f66666
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/4721
Reviewed-by: Adam Langley <agl@google.com>
crypto/test contains not tests, but a test support library that should be
linked into each test.
Change-Id: If1c85eda2a3df1717edd38575e1ec792323c400b
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/4720
Reviewed-by: Adam Langley <agl@google.com>
Change-Id: I3002d95d2b9db4dd05e1c56ef6ae410315b97ab9
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/4710
Reviewed-by: David Benjamin <davidben@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: Adam Langley <agl@google.com>
This change makes it safe to call EVP_AEAD_CTX_cleanup after a failed
EVP_AEAD_CTX_init.
Change-Id: I608ed550e08d638cd7e941f5067edd3da4c850ab
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/4692
Reviewed-by: David Benjamin <davidben@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: Adam Langley <agl@google.com>
(The huge if-else was hard to visually parse.)
Change-Id: Ic2c94120f345085b619304181e861f662a931a29
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/4691
Reviewed-by: David Benjamin <davidben@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: Adam Langley <agl@google.com>
