|a_is_minus_3| is calculated in |ec_GFp_simple_group_set_curve|, so
the custom |group_init| functions are unnecessary. Just as in
commit 9f1f04f313, it is never the case
that custom parameters are passed to the |group_set_curve| method for
these curves.
Change-Id: I18a38b104bc332e44cc2053c465cf234f4c5163b
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/7090
Reviewed-by: David Benjamin <davidben@google.com>
These are never called. Group parameters are not secret anyway. This is
a remnant of upstream's EC_GROUP_clear_free.
Change-Id: I23a4076eae8e4561abddbe74d0ba72641532f229
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/6823
Reviewed-by: Adam Langley <alangley@gmail.com>
clang scan-build is annoyed it's not obvious the sizeof line matches the
pointer type. This is easy to fix and makes it be quiet.
Change-Id: Iec80d2a087f81179c88cae300f56d3f76b32b347
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/6701
Reviewed-by: Adam Langley <agl@google.com>
In some cases it would be good to restrict the input range of scalars
given to |EC_METHOD::mul| to be [0, order-1]. This is a first step
towards that goal.
Change-Id: I58a25db06f6c7a68a0ac1fe79794b04f7a173b23
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/6562
Reviewed-by: Adam Langley <agl@google.com>
Without |EC_POINTs_mul|, there's never more than one variable point
passed to a |EC_METHOD|'s |mul| method. This allows them to be
simplified considerably. In this commit, the p256-x86_64 implementation
has been simplified to eliminate the heap allocation and looping
related that was previously necessary to deal with the possibility of
there being multiple input points. The other implementations were left
mostly as-is; they should be similarly simplified in the future.
Change-Id: I70751d1d5296be2562af0730e7ccefdba7a1acae
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/6493
Reviewed-by: Adam Langley <agl@google.com>
This moves us closer to having |EC_GROUP| and |EC_KEY| being immutable.
The functions are left as no-ops for backward compatibility.
Change-Id: Ie23921ab0364f0771c03aede37b064804c9f69e0
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/6485
Reviewed-by: Adam Langley <agl@google.com>
This extends 9f1f04f313 to the other
implementations.
|EC_GFp_nistp224_method| and |EC_GFp_nistp256_method| are not marked
|OPENSSL_EXPORT|. |EC_GROUP_set_generator| doesn't allow the generator
to be changed for any |EC_GROUP| for built-in curves. Consequently,
there's no way (except some kind of terrible abuse) that this code
could be executed with a non-default generator.
Change-Id: I5d9b6be4e6f9d384159cb3d708390a8e3c69f23f
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/6489
Reviewed-by: Adam Langley <agl@google.com>
Intel's P-256 code has very large tables and things like Chromium just
don't need that extra size. However, servers generally do so this change
adds an OPENSSL_SMALL define that currently just drops the 64-bit P-224
but will gate Intel's P-256 in the future too.
Change-Id: I2e55c6e06327fafabef9b96d875069d95c0eea81
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/6362
Reviewed-by: Adam Langley <alangley@gmail.com>
If the application is only using the P-256 implementation in p256-64.c,
then the WNAF code would all be dead code. The change reorganizes the
code so that all modern toolchains should be able to recognize that
fact and eliminate the WNAF-based code when it is unused.
Change-Id: I9f94bd934ca7d2292de4c29bb89e17c940c7cd2a
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/6173
Reviewed-by: Adam Langley <alangley@gmail.com>
None of these methods vary per group. Factoring these out of
|EC_METHOD| should help some toolchains to do a better job optimizing
the code for size.
Change-Id: Ibd22a52992b4d549f12a8d22bddfdb3051aaa891
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/6172
Reviewed-by: Adam Langley <alangley@gmail.com>
This imports the Google-authored P-224 implementation by Emilia Käsper
and Bodo Möller that is also in upstream OpenSSL.
Change-Id: I16005c74a2a3e374fb136d36f3f6569dab9d8919
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/6145
Reviewed-by: Adam Langley <agl@google.com>
