10bfb89859
This clearly was supposed to be a return 1. See https://github.com/openssl/openssl/issues/5537 for details. (Additionally, now that our BIGNUMs may be non-minimal, this function violates the rule that BIGNUM functions should not depend on widths. We should use w >= bn_minimal_width(a) to retain the original behavior. But the original behavior is nuts, so let's just fix it.) Update-Note: BN_mask_bits no longer reports failure in some cases. These cases were platform-dependent and not useful, and code search confirms nothing was relying on it. Change-Id: I31b1c2de6c5de9432c17ec3c714a5626594ee03c Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/26464 Commit-Queue: Steven Valdez <svaldez@google.com> Reviewed-by: Steven Valdez <svaldez@google.com> CQ-Verified: CQ bot account: commit-bot@chromium.org <commit-bot@chromium.org> |
||
|---|---|---|
| .. | ||
| openssl | ||