e569c7e25d
This is much less interesting (stack-based parameters, Windows and SysV match, no SEH concerns as far as I can tell) than x86_64, but it was easy to do and I'm more familiar with x86 than ARM, so it made a better second architecture to make sure all the architecture ifdefs worked out. Also fix a bug in the x86_64 direction flag code. It was shifting in the wrong direction, making give 0 or 1<<20 rather than 0 or 1. (Happily, x86_64 appears to be unique in having vastly different calling conventions between OSs. x86 is the same between SysV and Windows, and ARM had the good sense to specify a (mostly) common set of rules.) Since a lot of the assembly functions use the same names and the tests were written generically, merely dropping in a trampoline and CallerState implementation gives us a bunch of ABI tests for free. Change-Id: I15408c18d43e88cfa1c5c0634a8b268a150ed961 Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/c/34624 Reviewed-by: Adam Langley <agl@google.com> Commit-Queue: David Benjamin <davidben@google.com> |
||
---|---|---|
.. | ||
asm | ||
cbc.c | ||
ccm.c | ||
cfb.c | ||
ctr.c | ||
gcm_test.cc | ||
gcm_tests.txt | ||
gcm.c | ||
internal.h | ||
ofb.c | ||
polyval.c |