a54e2e85ee
I found no users of this. We can restore it if needbe, but I don't expect anyone to find it useful in its current form. The API is suspect for the same reasons DTLSv1_listen was. An SSL object is stateful and assumes you already have the endpoint separated out. If we ever need it, server-side HelloVerifyRequest and DTLSv1_listen should be implemented by a separate stateless listener that statelessly handles cookieless ClientHello + HelloVerifyRequest. Once a ClientHello with a valid cookie comes in, it sets up a stateful SSL object and passes control along to that. Change-Id: I86adc1dfb6a81bebe987784c36ad6634a9a1b120 Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/3480 Reviewed-by: Adam Langley <agl@google.com> |
||
---|---|---|
crypto | ||
doc | ||
include/openssl | ||
ssl | ||
tool | ||
util | ||
.clang-format | ||
.gitignore | ||
BUILDING | ||
CMakeLists.txt | ||
codereview.settings | ||
STYLE |