aba057a4e0
The Java client implementation of the 3SHAKE mitigation incorrectly rejects initial handshakes when all of the following are true: 1. The ClientHello offered a session. 2. The session was successfully resumed previously. 3. The server declines the session. 4. The server sends a certificate with a different SAN list than in the previous session. (Note the 3SHAKE mitigation is to reject certificates changes on renegotiation, while Java's logic applies to initial handshakes as well.) The end result is long-lived Java clients break on some certificate rotations. Fingerprint Java clients and decline all offered sessions. This avoids (2) while still introducing new sessions to clear any existing problematic sessions. See also b/65323005. Change-Id: Ib2b84c69b5ecba285ffb8c4d03de5626838d794e Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/20184 Reviewed-by: David Benjamin <davidben@google.com> Commit-Queue: David Benjamin <davidben@google.com> CQ-Verified: CQ bot account: commit-bot@chromium.org <commit-bot@chromium.org> |
||
|---|---|---|
| .. | ||
| runner | ||
| async_bio.cc | ||
| async_bio.h | ||
| bssl_shim.cc | ||
| CMakeLists.txt | ||
| fuzzer_tags.h | ||
| fuzzer.h | ||
| packeted_bio.cc | ||
| packeted_bio.h | ||
| PORTING.md | ||
| README.md | ||
| test_config.cc | ||
| test_config.h | ||
BoringSSL SSL Tests
This directory contains BoringSSL's protocol-level test suite.
Testing a TLS implementation can be difficult. We need to produce invalid but sufficiently correct handshakes to get our implementation close to its edge cases. TLS's cryptographic steps mean we cannot use a transcript and effectively need a TLS implementation on the other end. But we do not wish to litter BoringSSL with options for bugs to test against.
Instead, we use a fork of the Go crypto/tls package, heavily patched with
configurable bugs. This code, along with a test suite and harness written in Go,
lives in the runner directory. The harness runs BoringSSL via a C/C++ shim
binary which lives in this directory. All communication with the shim binary
occurs with command-line flags, sockets, and standard I/O.
This strategy also ensures we always test against a second implementation. All features should be implemented twice, once in C for BoringSSL and once in Go for testing. If possible, the Go code should be suitable for potentially upstreaming. However, sometimes test code has different needs. For example, our test DTLS code enforces strict ordering on sequence numbers and has controlled packet drop simulation.
To run the tests manually, run go test from the runner directory. It takes
command-line flags found at the top of runner/runner.go. The -help option
also works after using go test -c to make a runner.test binary first.
If adding a new test, these files may be a good starting point:
runner/runner.go: the test harness and all the individual tests.runner/common.go: contains theConfigandProtocolBugsstruct which control the Go TLS implementation's behavior.test_config.h,test_config.cc: the command-line flags which control the shim's behavior.bssl_shim.cc: the shim binary itself.
For porting the test suite to a different implementation see PORTING.md.