55b9acda99
This was caught by an aarch64 ABI tester. aarch64 has the same considerations around small arguments as x86_64 does. The aarch64 version of bn_mul_mont does not mask off the upper words of the argument. The x86_64 version does, so size_t is, strictly speaking, wrong for aarch64, but bn_mul_mont already has an implicit size limit to support its internal alloca, so this doesn't really make things worse than before. Change-Id: I39bffc8fdb2287e45a2d1f0d1b4bd5532bbf3868 Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/c/34804 Commit-Queue: David Benjamin <davidben@google.com> Reviewed-by: Adam Langley <agl@google.com> |
||
|---|---|---|
| .. | ||
| armv4-mont.pl | ||
| armv8-mont.pl | ||
| bn-586.pl | ||
| co-586.pl | ||
| rsaz-avx2.pl | ||
| x86_64-gcc.c | ||
| x86_64-mont5.pl | ||
| x86_64-mont.pl | ||
| x86-mont.pl | ||