1
0
mirror of https://github.com/henrydcase/nobs.git synced 2024-11-26 09:01:20 +00:00
nobs/dh/csidh/curve.go

213 lines
5.6 KiB
Go
Raw Normal View History

cSIDH-511: (#26) Implementation of Commutative Supersingular Isogeny Diffie Hellman, based on "A faster way to CSIDH" paper (2018/782). * For fast isogeny calculation, implementation converts a curve from Montgomery to Edwards. All calculations are done on Edwards curve and then converted back to Montgomery. * As multiplication in a field Fp511 is most expensive operation the implementation contains multiple multiplications. It has most performant, assembly implementation which uses BMI2 and ADOX/ADCX instructions for modern CPUs. It also contains slower implementation which will run on older CPUs * Benchmarks (Intel SkyLake): BenchmarkGeneratePrivate 6459 172213 ns/op 0 B/op 0 allocs/op BenchmarkGenerateKeyPair 25 45800356 ns/op 0 B/op 0 allocs/op BenchmarkValidate 297 3915983 ns/op 0 B/op 0 allocs/op BenchmarkValidateRandom 184683 6231 ns/op 0 B/op 0 allocs/op BenchmarkValidateGenerated 25 48481306 ns/op 0 B/op 0 allocs/op BenchmarkDerive 19 60928763 ns/op 0 B/op 0 allocs/op BenchmarkDeriveGenerated 8 137342421 ns/op 0 B/op 0 allocs/op BenchmarkXMul 2311 494267 ns/op 1 B/op 0 allocs/op BenchmarkXAdd 2396754 501 ns/op 0 B/op 0 allocs/op BenchmarkXDbl 2072690 571 ns/op 0 B/op 0 allocs/op BenchmarkIsom 78004 15171 ns/op 0 B/op 0 allocs/op BenchmarkFp512Sub 224635152 5.33 ns/op 0 B/op 0 allocs/op BenchmarkFp512Mul 246633255 4.90 ns/op 0 B/op 0 allocs/op BenchmarkCSwap 233228547 5.10 ns/op 0 B/op 0 allocs/op BenchmarkAddRdc 87348240 12.6 ns/op 0 B/op 0 allocs/op BenchmarkSubRdc 95112787 11.7 ns/op 0 B/op 0 allocs/op BenchmarkModExpRdc 25436 46878 ns/op 0 B/op 0 allocs/op BenchmarkMulBmiAsm 19527573 60.1 ns/op 0 B/op 0 allocs/op BenchmarkMulGeneric 7117650 164 ns/op 0 B/op 0 allocs/op * Go code has very similar performance when compared to C implementation. Results from sidh_torturer (4e2996e12d68364761064341cbe1d1b47efafe23) github.com:henrydcase/sidh-torture/csidh | TestName |Go | C | |------------------|----------|----------| |TestSharedSecret | 57.95774 | 57.91092 | |TestKeyGeneration | 62.23614 | 58.12980 | |TestSharedSecret | 55.28988 | 57.23132 | |TestKeyGeneration | 61.68745 | 58.66396 | |TestSharedSecret | 63.19408 | 58.64774 | |TestKeyGeneration | 62.34022 | 61.62539 | |TestSharedSecret | 62.85453 | 68.74503 | |TestKeyGeneration | 52.58518 | 58.40115 | |TestSharedSecret | 50.77081 | 61.91699 | |TestKeyGeneration | 59.91843 | 61.09266 | |TestSharedSecret | 59.97962 | 62.98151 | |TestKeyGeneration | 64.57525 | 56.22863 | |TestSharedSecret | 56.40521 | 55.77447 | |TestKeyGeneration | 67.85850 | 58.52604 | |TestSharedSecret | 60.54290 | 65.14052 | |TestKeyGeneration | 65.45766 | 58.42823 | On average Go implementation is 2% faster.
2019-11-24 03:39:35 +00:00
package csidh
2020-05-14 00:48:43 +01:00
// xAdd implements differential arithmetic in P^1 for Montgomery
// curves E(x): x^3 + A*x^2 + x by using x-coordinate only arithmetic.
// x(PaQ) = x(P) + x(Q) by using x(P-Q)
cSIDH-511: (#26) Implementation of Commutative Supersingular Isogeny Diffie Hellman, based on "A faster way to CSIDH" paper (2018/782). * For fast isogeny calculation, implementation converts a curve from Montgomery to Edwards. All calculations are done on Edwards curve and then converted back to Montgomery. * As multiplication in a field Fp511 is most expensive operation the implementation contains multiple multiplications. It has most performant, assembly implementation which uses BMI2 and ADOX/ADCX instructions for modern CPUs. It also contains slower implementation which will run on older CPUs * Benchmarks (Intel SkyLake): BenchmarkGeneratePrivate 6459 172213 ns/op 0 B/op 0 allocs/op BenchmarkGenerateKeyPair 25 45800356 ns/op 0 B/op 0 allocs/op BenchmarkValidate 297 3915983 ns/op 0 B/op 0 allocs/op BenchmarkValidateRandom 184683 6231 ns/op 0 B/op 0 allocs/op BenchmarkValidateGenerated 25 48481306 ns/op 0 B/op 0 allocs/op BenchmarkDerive 19 60928763 ns/op 0 B/op 0 allocs/op BenchmarkDeriveGenerated 8 137342421 ns/op 0 B/op 0 allocs/op BenchmarkXMul 2311 494267 ns/op 1 B/op 0 allocs/op BenchmarkXAdd 2396754 501 ns/op 0 B/op 0 allocs/op BenchmarkXDbl 2072690 571 ns/op 0 B/op 0 allocs/op BenchmarkIsom 78004 15171 ns/op 0 B/op 0 allocs/op BenchmarkFp512Sub 224635152 5.33 ns/op 0 B/op 0 allocs/op BenchmarkFp512Mul 246633255 4.90 ns/op 0 B/op 0 allocs/op BenchmarkCSwap 233228547 5.10 ns/op 0 B/op 0 allocs/op BenchmarkAddRdc 87348240 12.6 ns/op 0 B/op 0 allocs/op BenchmarkSubRdc 95112787 11.7 ns/op 0 B/op 0 allocs/op BenchmarkModExpRdc 25436 46878 ns/op 0 B/op 0 allocs/op BenchmarkMulBmiAsm 19527573 60.1 ns/op 0 B/op 0 allocs/op BenchmarkMulGeneric 7117650 164 ns/op 0 B/op 0 allocs/op * Go code has very similar performance when compared to C implementation. Results from sidh_torturer (4e2996e12d68364761064341cbe1d1b47efafe23) github.com:henrydcase/sidh-torture/csidh | TestName |Go | C | |------------------|----------|----------| |TestSharedSecret | 57.95774 | 57.91092 | |TestKeyGeneration | 62.23614 | 58.12980 | |TestSharedSecret | 55.28988 | 57.23132 | |TestKeyGeneration | 61.68745 | 58.66396 | |TestSharedSecret | 63.19408 | 58.64774 | |TestKeyGeneration | 62.34022 | 61.62539 | |TestSharedSecret | 62.85453 | 68.74503 | |TestKeyGeneration | 52.58518 | 58.40115 | |TestSharedSecret | 50.77081 | 61.91699 | |TestKeyGeneration | 59.91843 | 61.09266 | |TestSharedSecret | 59.97962 | 62.98151 | |TestKeyGeneration | 64.57525 | 56.22863 | |TestSharedSecret | 56.40521 | 55.77447 | |TestKeyGeneration | 67.85850 | 58.52604 | |TestSharedSecret | 60.54290 | 65.14052 | |TestKeyGeneration | 65.45766 | 58.42823 | On average Go implementation is 2% faster.
2019-11-24 03:39:35 +00:00
// This algorithms is correctly defined only for cases when
2020-05-14 00:48:43 +01:00
// P!=inf, Q!=inf, P!=Q and P!=-Q.
cSIDH-511: (#26) Implementation of Commutative Supersingular Isogeny Diffie Hellman, based on "A faster way to CSIDH" paper (2018/782). * For fast isogeny calculation, implementation converts a curve from Montgomery to Edwards. All calculations are done on Edwards curve and then converted back to Montgomery. * As multiplication in a field Fp511 is most expensive operation the implementation contains multiple multiplications. It has most performant, assembly implementation which uses BMI2 and ADOX/ADCX instructions for modern CPUs. It also contains slower implementation which will run on older CPUs * Benchmarks (Intel SkyLake): BenchmarkGeneratePrivate 6459 172213 ns/op 0 B/op 0 allocs/op BenchmarkGenerateKeyPair 25 45800356 ns/op 0 B/op 0 allocs/op BenchmarkValidate 297 3915983 ns/op 0 B/op 0 allocs/op BenchmarkValidateRandom 184683 6231 ns/op 0 B/op 0 allocs/op BenchmarkValidateGenerated 25 48481306 ns/op 0 B/op 0 allocs/op BenchmarkDerive 19 60928763 ns/op 0 B/op 0 allocs/op BenchmarkDeriveGenerated 8 137342421 ns/op 0 B/op 0 allocs/op BenchmarkXMul 2311 494267 ns/op 1 B/op 0 allocs/op BenchmarkXAdd 2396754 501 ns/op 0 B/op 0 allocs/op BenchmarkXDbl 2072690 571 ns/op 0 B/op 0 allocs/op BenchmarkIsom 78004 15171 ns/op 0 B/op 0 allocs/op BenchmarkFp512Sub 224635152 5.33 ns/op 0 B/op 0 allocs/op BenchmarkFp512Mul 246633255 4.90 ns/op 0 B/op 0 allocs/op BenchmarkCSwap 233228547 5.10 ns/op 0 B/op 0 allocs/op BenchmarkAddRdc 87348240 12.6 ns/op 0 B/op 0 allocs/op BenchmarkSubRdc 95112787 11.7 ns/op 0 B/op 0 allocs/op BenchmarkModExpRdc 25436 46878 ns/op 0 B/op 0 allocs/op BenchmarkMulBmiAsm 19527573 60.1 ns/op 0 B/op 0 allocs/op BenchmarkMulGeneric 7117650 164 ns/op 0 B/op 0 allocs/op * Go code has very similar performance when compared to C implementation. Results from sidh_torturer (4e2996e12d68364761064341cbe1d1b47efafe23) github.com:henrydcase/sidh-torture/csidh | TestName |Go | C | |------------------|----------|----------| |TestSharedSecret | 57.95774 | 57.91092 | |TestKeyGeneration | 62.23614 | 58.12980 | |TestSharedSecret | 55.28988 | 57.23132 | |TestKeyGeneration | 61.68745 | 58.66396 | |TestSharedSecret | 63.19408 | 58.64774 | |TestKeyGeneration | 62.34022 | 61.62539 | |TestSharedSecret | 62.85453 | 68.74503 | |TestKeyGeneration | 52.58518 | 58.40115 | |TestSharedSecret | 50.77081 | 61.91699 | |TestKeyGeneration | 59.91843 | 61.09266 | |TestSharedSecret | 59.97962 | 62.98151 | |TestKeyGeneration | 64.57525 | 56.22863 | |TestSharedSecret | 56.40521 | 55.77447 | |TestKeyGeneration | 67.85850 | 58.52604 | |TestSharedSecret | 60.54290 | 65.14052 | |TestKeyGeneration | 65.45766 | 58.42823 | On average Go implementation is 2% faster.
2019-11-24 03:39:35 +00:00
func xAdd(PaQ, P, Q, PdQ *point) {
var t0, t1, t2, t3 fp
addRdc(&t0, &P.x, &P.z)
subRdc(&t1, &P.x, &P.z)
addRdc(&t2, &Q.x, &Q.z)
subRdc(&t3, &Q.x, &Q.z)
mulRdc(&t0, &t0, &t3)
mulRdc(&t1, &t1, &t2)
addRdc(&t2, &t0, &t1)
subRdc(&t3, &t0, &t1)
mulRdc(&t2, &t2, &t2) // sqr
mulRdc(&t3, &t3, &t3) // sqr
mulRdc(&PaQ.x, &PdQ.z, &t2)
mulRdc(&PaQ.z, &PdQ.x, &t3)
}
2020-05-14 00:48:43 +01:00
// xDbl implements point doubling on a Montgomery curve
// E(x): x^3 + A*x^2 + x by using x-coordinate onlyh arithmetic.
// x(Q) = [2]*x(P)
// It is correctly defined for all P != inf.
cSIDH-511: (#26) Implementation of Commutative Supersingular Isogeny Diffie Hellman, based on "A faster way to CSIDH" paper (2018/782). * For fast isogeny calculation, implementation converts a curve from Montgomery to Edwards. All calculations are done on Edwards curve and then converted back to Montgomery. * As multiplication in a field Fp511 is most expensive operation the implementation contains multiple multiplications. It has most performant, assembly implementation which uses BMI2 and ADOX/ADCX instructions for modern CPUs. It also contains slower implementation which will run on older CPUs * Benchmarks (Intel SkyLake): BenchmarkGeneratePrivate 6459 172213 ns/op 0 B/op 0 allocs/op BenchmarkGenerateKeyPair 25 45800356 ns/op 0 B/op 0 allocs/op BenchmarkValidate 297 3915983 ns/op 0 B/op 0 allocs/op BenchmarkValidateRandom 184683 6231 ns/op 0 B/op 0 allocs/op BenchmarkValidateGenerated 25 48481306 ns/op 0 B/op 0 allocs/op BenchmarkDerive 19 60928763 ns/op 0 B/op 0 allocs/op BenchmarkDeriveGenerated 8 137342421 ns/op 0 B/op 0 allocs/op BenchmarkXMul 2311 494267 ns/op 1 B/op 0 allocs/op BenchmarkXAdd 2396754 501 ns/op 0 B/op 0 allocs/op BenchmarkXDbl 2072690 571 ns/op 0 B/op 0 allocs/op BenchmarkIsom 78004 15171 ns/op 0 B/op 0 allocs/op BenchmarkFp512Sub 224635152 5.33 ns/op 0 B/op 0 allocs/op BenchmarkFp512Mul 246633255 4.90 ns/op 0 B/op 0 allocs/op BenchmarkCSwap 233228547 5.10 ns/op 0 B/op 0 allocs/op BenchmarkAddRdc 87348240 12.6 ns/op 0 B/op 0 allocs/op BenchmarkSubRdc 95112787 11.7 ns/op 0 B/op 0 allocs/op BenchmarkModExpRdc 25436 46878 ns/op 0 B/op 0 allocs/op BenchmarkMulBmiAsm 19527573 60.1 ns/op 0 B/op 0 allocs/op BenchmarkMulGeneric 7117650 164 ns/op 0 B/op 0 allocs/op * Go code has very similar performance when compared to C implementation. Results from sidh_torturer (4e2996e12d68364761064341cbe1d1b47efafe23) github.com:henrydcase/sidh-torture/csidh | TestName |Go | C | |------------------|----------|----------| |TestSharedSecret | 57.95774 | 57.91092 | |TestKeyGeneration | 62.23614 | 58.12980 | |TestSharedSecret | 55.28988 | 57.23132 | |TestKeyGeneration | 61.68745 | 58.66396 | |TestSharedSecret | 63.19408 | 58.64774 | |TestKeyGeneration | 62.34022 | 61.62539 | |TestSharedSecret | 62.85453 | 68.74503 | |TestKeyGeneration | 52.58518 | 58.40115 | |TestSharedSecret | 50.77081 | 61.91699 | |TestKeyGeneration | 59.91843 | 61.09266 | |TestSharedSecret | 59.97962 | 62.98151 | |TestKeyGeneration | 64.57525 | 56.22863 | |TestSharedSecret | 56.40521 | 55.77447 | |TestKeyGeneration | 67.85850 | 58.52604 | |TestSharedSecret | 60.54290 | 65.14052 | |TestKeyGeneration | 65.45766 | 58.42823 | On average Go implementation is 2% faster.
2019-11-24 03:39:35 +00:00
func xDbl(Q, P, A *point) {
var t0, t1, t2 fp
addRdc(&t0, &P.x, &P.z)
mulRdc(&t0, &t0, &t0) // sqr
subRdc(&t1, &P.x, &P.z)
mulRdc(&t1, &t1, &t1) // sqr
subRdc(&t2, &t0, &t1)
mulRdc(&t1, &four, &t1)
mulRdc(&t1, &t1, &A.z)
mulRdc(&Q.x, &t0, &t1)
addRdc(&t0, &A.z, &A.z)
addRdc(&t0, &t0, &A.x)
mulRdc(&t0, &t0, &t2)
addRdc(&t0, &t0, &t1)
mulRdc(&Q.z, &t0, &t2)
}
2020-05-14 00:48:43 +01:00
// xDblAdd implements combined doubling of point P
// and addition of points P and Q on a Montgomery curve
// E(x): x^3 + A*x^2 + x by using x-coordinate onlyh arithmetic.
// x(PaP) = x(2*P)
// x(PaQ) = x(P+Q)
cSIDH-511: (#26) Implementation of Commutative Supersingular Isogeny Diffie Hellman, based on "A faster way to CSIDH" paper (2018/782). * For fast isogeny calculation, implementation converts a curve from Montgomery to Edwards. All calculations are done on Edwards curve and then converted back to Montgomery. * As multiplication in a field Fp511 is most expensive operation the implementation contains multiple multiplications. It has most performant, assembly implementation which uses BMI2 and ADOX/ADCX instructions for modern CPUs. It also contains slower implementation which will run on older CPUs * Benchmarks (Intel SkyLake): BenchmarkGeneratePrivate 6459 172213 ns/op 0 B/op 0 allocs/op BenchmarkGenerateKeyPair 25 45800356 ns/op 0 B/op 0 allocs/op BenchmarkValidate 297 3915983 ns/op 0 B/op 0 allocs/op BenchmarkValidateRandom 184683 6231 ns/op 0 B/op 0 allocs/op BenchmarkValidateGenerated 25 48481306 ns/op 0 B/op 0 allocs/op BenchmarkDerive 19 60928763 ns/op 0 B/op 0 allocs/op BenchmarkDeriveGenerated 8 137342421 ns/op 0 B/op 0 allocs/op BenchmarkXMul 2311 494267 ns/op 1 B/op 0 allocs/op BenchmarkXAdd 2396754 501 ns/op 0 B/op 0 allocs/op BenchmarkXDbl 2072690 571 ns/op 0 B/op 0 allocs/op BenchmarkIsom 78004 15171 ns/op 0 B/op 0 allocs/op BenchmarkFp512Sub 224635152 5.33 ns/op 0 B/op 0 allocs/op BenchmarkFp512Mul 246633255 4.90 ns/op 0 B/op 0 allocs/op BenchmarkCSwap 233228547 5.10 ns/op 0 B/op 0 allocs/op BenchmarkAddRdc 87348240 12.6 ns/op 0 B/op 0 allocs/op BenchmarkSubRdc 95112787 11.7 ns/op 0 B/op 0 allocs/op BenchmarkModExpRdc 25436 46878 ns/op 0 B/op 0 allocs/op BenchmarkMulBmiAsm 19527573 60.1 ns/op 0 B/op 0 allocs/op BenchmarkMulGeneric 7117650 164 ns/op 0 B/op 0 allocs/op * Go code has very similar performance when compared to C implementation. Results from sidh_torturer (4e2996e12d68364761064341cbe1d1b47efafe23) github.com:henrydcase/sidh-torture/csidh | TestName |Go | C | |------------------|----------|----------| |TestSharedSecret | 57.95774 | 57.91092 | |TestKeyGeneration | 62.23614 | 58.12980 | |TestSharedSecret | 55.28988 | 57.23132 | |TestKeyGeneration | 61.68745 | 58.66396 | |TestSharedSecret | 63.19408 | 58.64774 | |TestKeyGeneration | 62.34022 | 61.62539 | |TestSharedSecret | 62.85453 | 68.74503 | |TestKeyGeneration | 52.58518 | 58.40115 | |TestSharedSecret | 50.77081 | 61.91699 | |TestKeyGeneration | 59.91843 | 61.09266 | |TestSharedSecret | 59.97962 | 62.98151 | |TestKeyGeneration | 64.57525 | 56.22863 | |TestSharedSecret | 56.40521 | 55.77447 | |TestKeyGeneration | 67.85850 | 58.52604 | |TestSharedSecret | 60.54290 | 65.14052 | |TestKeyGeneration | 65.45766 | 58.42823 | On average Go implementation is 2% faster.
2019-11-24 03:39:35 +00:00
func xDblAdd(PaP, PaQ, P, Q, PdQ *point, A24 *coeff) {
var t0, t1, t2 fp
addRdc(&t0, &P.x, &P.z)
subRdc(&t1, &P.x, &P.z)
mulRdc(&PaP.x, &t0, &t0)
subRdc(&t2, &Q.x, &Q.z)
addRdc(&PaQ.x, &Q.x, &Q.z)
mulRdc(&t0, &t0, &t2)
mulRdc(&PaP.z, &t1, &t1)
mulRdc(&t1, &t1, &PaQ.x)
subRdc(&t2, &PaP.x, &PaP.z)
mulRdc(&PaP.z, &PaP.z, &A24.c)
mulRdc(&PaP.x, &PaP.x, &PaP.z)
mulRdc(&PaQ.x, &A24.a, &t2)
subRdc(&PaQ.z, &t0, &t1)
addRdc(&PaP.z, &PaP.z, &PaQ.x)
addRdc(&PaQ.x, &t0, &t1)
mulRdc(&PaP.z, &PaP.z, &t2)
mulRdc(&PaQ.z, &PaQ.z, &PaQ.z)
mulRdc(&PaQ.x, &PaQ.x, &PaQ.x)
mulRdc(&PaQ.z, &PaQ.z, &PdQ.x)
mulRdc(&PaQ.x, &PaQ.x, &PdQ.z)
}
2020-05-14 00:48:43 +01:00
// cswappoint swaps P1 with P2 in constant time. The 'choice'
cSIDH-511: (#26) Implementation of Commutative Supersingular Isogeny Diffie Hellman, based on "A faster way to CSIDH" paper (2018/782). * For fast isogeny calculation, implementation converts a curve from Montgomery to Edwards. All calculations are done on Edwards curve and then converted back to Montgomery. * As multiplication in a field Fp511 is most expensive operation the implementation contains multiple multiplications. It has most performant, assembly implementation which uses BMI2 and ADOX/ADCX instructions for modern CPUs. It also contains slower implementation which will run on older CPUs * Benchmarks (Intel SkyLake): BenchmarkGeneratePrivate 6459 172213 ns/op 0 B/op 0 allocs/op BenchmarkGenerateKeyPair 25 45800356 ns/op 0 B/op 0 allocs/op BenchmarkValidate 297 3915983 ns/op 0 B/op 0 allocs/op BenchmarkValidateRandom 184683 6231 ns/op 0 B/op 0 allocs/op BenchmarkValidateGenerated 25 48481306 ns/op 0 B/op 0 allocs/op BenchmarkDerive 19 60928763 ns/op 0 B/op 0 allocs/op BenchmarkDeriveGenerated 8 137342421 ns/op 0 B/op 0 allocs/op BenchmarkXMul 2311 494267 ns/op 1 B/op 0 allocs/op BenchmarkXAdd 2396754 501 ns/op 0 B/op 0 allocs/op BenchmarkXDbl 2072690 571 ns/op 0 B/op 0 allocs/op BenchmarkIsom 78004 15171 ns/op 0 B/op 0 allocs/op BenchmarkFp512Sub 224635152 5.33 ns/op 0 B/op 0 allocs/op BenchmarkFp512Mul 246633255 4.90 ns/op 0 B/op 0 allocs/op BenchmarkCSwap 233228547 5.10 ns/op 0 B/op 0 allocs/op BenchmarkAddRdc 87348240 12.6 ns/op 0 B/op 0 allocs/op BenchmarkSubRdc 95112787 11.7 ns/op 0 B/op 0 allocs/op BenchmarkModExpRdc 25436 46878 ns/op 0 B/op 0 allocs/op BenchmarkMulBmiAsm 19527573 60.1 ns/op 0 B/op 0 allocs/op BenchmarkMulGeneric 7117650 164 ns/op 0 B/op 0 allocs/op * Go code has very similar performance when compared to C implementation. Results from sidh_torturer (4e2996e12d68364761064341cbe1d1b47efafe23) github.com:henrydcase/sidh-torture/csidh | TestName |Go | C | |------------------|----------|----------| |TestSharedSecret | 57.95774 | 57.91092 | |TestKeyGeneration | 62.23614 | 58.12980 | |TestSharedSecret | 55.28988 | 57.23132 | |TestKeyGeneration | 61.68745 | 58.66396 | |TestSharedSecret | 63.19408 | 58.64774 | |TestKeyGeneration | 62.34022 | 61.62539 | |TestSharedSecret | 62.85453 | 68.74503 | |TestKeyGeneration | 52.58518 | 58.40115 | |TestSharedSecret | 50.77081 | 61.91699 | |TestKeyGeneration | 59.91843 | 61.09266 | |TestSharedSecret | 59.97962 | 62.98151 | |TestKeyGeneration | 64.57525 | 56.22863 | |TestSharedSecret | 56.40521 | 55.77447 | |TestKeyGeneration | 67.85850 | 58.52604 | |TestSharedSecret | 60.54290 | 65.14052 | |TestKeyGeneration | 65.45766 | 58.42823 | On average Go implementation is 2% faster.
2019-11-24 03:39:35 +00:00
// parameter must have a value of either 1 (results
// in swap) or 0 (results in no-swap).
func cswappoint(P1, P2 *point, choice uint8) {
cswap512(&P1.x, &P2.x, choice)
cswap512(&P1.z, &P2.z, choice)
}
2020-05-14 00:48:43 +01:00
// xMul implements point multiplication with left-to-right Montgomery
// adder. co is A coefficient of x^3 + A*x^2 + x curve. k must be > 0
cSIDH-511: (#26) Implementation of Commutative Supersingular Isogeny Diffie Hellman, based on "A faster way to CSIDH" paper (2018/782). * For fast isogeny calculation, implementation converts a curve from Montgomery to Edwards. All calculations are done on Edwards curve and then converted back to Montgomery. * As multiplication in a field Fp511 is most expensive operation the implementation contains multiple multiplications. It has most performant, assembly implementation which uses BMI2 and ADOX/ADCX instructions for modern CPUs. It also contains slower implementation which will run on older CPUs * Benchmarks (Intel SkyLake): BenchmarkGeneratePrivate 6459 172213 ns/op 0 B/op 0 allocs/op BenchmarkGenerateKeyPair 25 45800356 ns/op 0 B/op 0 allocs/op BenchmarkValidate 297 3915983 ns/op 0 B/op 0 allocs/op BenchmarkValidateRandom 184683 6231 ns/op 0 B/op 0 allocs/op BenchmarkValidateGenerated 25 48481306 ns/op 0 B/op 0 allocs/op BenchmarkDerive 19 60928763 ns/op 0 B/op 0 allocs/op BenchmarkDeriveGenerated 8 137342421 ns/op 0 B/op 0 allocs/op BenchmarkXMul 2311 494267 ns/op 1 B/op 0 allocs/op BenchmarkXAdd 2396754 501 ns/op 0 B/op 0 allocs/op BenchmarkXDbl 2072690 571 ns/op 0 B/op 0 allocs/op BenchmarkIsom 78004 15171 ns/op 0 B/op 0 allocs/op BenchmarkFp512Sub 224635152 5.33 ns/op 0 B/op 0 allocs/op BenchmarkFp512Mul 246633255 4.90 ns/op 0 B/op 0 allocs/op BenchmarkCSwap 233228547 5.10 ns/op 0 B/op 0 allocs/op BenchmarkAddRdc 87348240 12.6 ns/op 0 B/op 0 allocs/op BenchmarkSubRdc 95112787 11.7 ns/op 0 B/op 0 allocs/op BenchmarkModExpRdc 25436 46878 ns/op 0 B/op 0 allocs/op BenchmarkMulBmiAsm 19527573 60.1 ns/op 0 B/op 0 allocs/op BenchmarkMulGeneric 7117650 164 ns/op 0 B/op 0 allocs/op * Go code has very similar performance when compared to C implementation. Results from sidh_torturer (4e2996e12d68364761064341cbe1d1b47efafe23) github.com:henrydcase/sidh-torture/csidh | TestName |Go | C | |------------------|----------|----------| |TestSharedSecret | 57.95774 | 57.91092 | |TestKeyGeneration | 62.23614 | 58.12980 | |TestSharedSecret | 55.28988 | 57.23132 | |TestKeyGeneration | 61.68745 | 58.66396 | |TestSharedSecret | 63.19408 | 58.64774 | |TestKeyGeneration | 62.34022 | 61.62539 | |TestSharedSecret | 62.85453 | 68.74503 | |TestKeyGeneration | 52.58518 | 58.40115 | |TestSharedSecret | 50.77081 | 61.91699 | |TestKeyGeneration | 59.91843 | 61.09266 | |TestSharedSecret | 59.97962 | 62.98151 | |TestKeyGeneration | 64.57525 | 56.22863 | |TestSharedSecret | 56.40521 | 55.77447 | |TestKeyGeneration | 67.85850 | 58.52604 | |TestSharedSecret | 60.54290 | 65.14052 | |TestKeyGeneration | 65.45766 | 58.42823 | On average Go implementation is 2% faster.
2019-11-24 03:39:35 +00:00
//
2020-05-14 00:48:43 +01:00
// Non-constant time!
func xMul(kP, P *point, co *coeff, k *fp) {
cSIDH-511: (#26) Implementation of Commutative Supersingular Isogeny Diffie Hellman, based on "A faster way to CSIDH" paper (2018/782). * For fast isogeny calculation, implementation converts a curve from Montgomery to Edwards. All calculations are done on Edwards curve and then converted back to Montgomery. * As multiplication in a field Fp511 is most expensive operation the implementation contains multiple multiplications. It has most performant, assembly implementation which uses BMI2 and ADOX/ADCX instructions for modern CPUs. It also contains slower implementation which will run on older CPUs * Benchmarks (Intel SkyLake): BenchmarkGeneratePrivate 6459 172213 ns/op 0 B/op 0 allocs/op BenchmarkGenerateKeyPair 25 45800356 ns/op 0 B/op 0 allocs/op BenchmarkValidate 297 3915983 ns/op 0 B/op 0 allocs/op BenchmarkValidateRandom 184683 6231 ns/op 0 B/op 0 allocs/op BenchmarkValidateGenerated 25 48481306 ns/op 0 B/op 0 allocs/op BenchmarkDerive 19 60928763 ns/op 0 B/op 0 allocs/op BenchmarkDeriveGenerated 8 137342421 ns/op 0 B/op 0 allocs/op BenchmarkXMul 2311 494267 ns/op 1 B/op 0 allocs/op BenchmarkXAdd 2396754 501 ns/op 0 B/op 0 allocs/op BenchmarkXDbl 2072690 571 ns/op 0 B/op 0 allocs/op BenchmarkIsom 78004 15171 ns/op 0 B/op 0 allocs/op BenchmarkFp512Sub 224635152 5.33 ns/op 0 B/op 0 allocs/op BenchmarkFp512Mul 246633255 4.90 ns/op 0 B/op 0 allocs/op BenchmarkCSwap 233228547 5.10 ns/op 0 B/op 0 allocs/op BenchmarkAddRdc 87348240 12.6 ns/op 0 B/op 0 allocs/op BenchmarkSubRdc 95112787 11.7 ns/op 0 B/op 0 allocs/op BenchmarkModExpRdc 25436 46878 ns/op 0 B/op 0 allocs/op BenchmarkMulBmiAsm 19527573 60.1 ns/op 0 B/op 0 allocs/op BenchmarkMulGeneric 7117650 164 ns/op 0 B/op 0 allocs/op * Go code has very similar performance when compared to C implementation. Results from sidh_torturer (4e2996e12d68364761064341cbe1d1b47efafe23) github.com:henrydcase/sidh-torture/csidh | TestName |Go | C | |------------------|----------|----------| |TestSharedSecret | 57.95774 | 57.91092 | |TestKeyGeneration | 62.23614 | 58.12980 | |TestSharedSecret | 55.28988 | 57.23132 | |TestKeyGeneration | 61.68745 | 58.66396 | |TestSharedSecret | 63.19408 | 58.64774 | |TestKeyGeneration | 62.34022 | 61.62539 | |TestSharedSecret | 62.85453 | 68.74503 | |TestKeyGeneration | 52.58518 | 58.40115 | |TestSharedSecret | 50.77081 | 61.91699 | |TestKeyGeneration | 59.91843 | 61.09266 | |TestSharedSecret | 59.97962 | 62.98151 | |TestKeyGeneration | 64.57525 | 56.22863 | |TestSharedSecret | 56.40521 | 55.77447 | |TestKeyGeneration | 67.85850 | 58.52604 | |TestSharedSecret | 60.54290 | 65.14052 | |TestKeyGeneration | 65.45766 | 58.42823 | On average Go implementation is 2% faster.
2019-11-24 03:39:35 +00:00
var A24 coeff
var Q point
var j uint
var A = point{x: co.a, z: co.c}
var R = *P
// Precompyte A24 = (A+2C:4C) => (A24.x = A.x+2A.z; A24.z = 4*A.z)
addRdc(&A24.a, &co.c, &co.c)
addRdc(&A24.a, &A24.a, &co.a)
mulRdc(&A24.c, &co.c, &four)
// Skip initial 0 bits.
for j = 511; j > 0; j-- {
// performance hit from making it constant-time is actually
// quite big, so... unsafe branch for now
if uint8(k[j>>6]>>(j&63)&1) != 0 {
break
}
}
xDbl(&Q, P, &A)
prevBit := uint8(1)
for i := j; i > 0; {
i--
bit := uint8(k[i>>6] >> (i & 63) & 1)
2020-05-14 00:48:43 +01:00
cswappoint(&Q, &R, prevBit^bit)
cSIDH-511: (#26) Implementation of Commutative Supersingular Isogeny Diffie Hellman, based on "A faster way to CSIDH" paper (2018/782). * For fast isogeny calculation, implementation converts a curve from Montgomery to Edwards. All calculations are done on Edwards curve and then converted back to Montgomery. * As multiplication in a field Fp511 is most expensive operation the implementation contains multiple multiplications. It has most performant, assembly implementation which uses BMI2 and ADOX/ADCX instructions for modern CPUs. It also contains slower implementation which will run on older CPUs * Benchmarks (Intel SkyLake): BenchmarkGeneratePrivate 6459 172213 ns/op 0 B/op 0 allocs/op BenchmarkGenerateKeyPair 25 45800356 ns/op 0 B/op 0 allocs/op BenchmarkValidate 297 3915983 ns/op 0 B/op 0 allocs/op BenchmarkValidateRandom 184683 6231 ns/op 0 B/op 0 allocs/op BenchmarkValidateGenerated 25 48481306 ns/op 0 B/op 0 allocs/op BenchmarkDerive 19 60928763 ns/op 0 B/op 0 allocs/op BenchmarkDeriveGenerated 8 137342421 ns/op 0 B/op 0 allocs/op BenchmarkXMul 2311 494267 ns/op 1 B/op 0 allocs/op BenchmarkXAdd 2396754 501 ns/op 0 B/op 0 allocs/op BenchmarkXDbl 2072690 571 ns/op 0 B/op 0 allocs/op BenchmarkIsom 78004 15171 ns/op 0 B/op 0 allocs/op BenchmarkFp512Sub 224635152 5.33 ns/op 0 B/op 0 allocs/op BenchmarkFp512Mul 246633255 4.90 ns/op 0 B/op 0 allocs/op BenchmarkCSwap 233228547 5.10 ns/op 0 B/op 0 allocs/op BenchmarkAddRdc 87348240 12.6 ns/op 0 B/op 0 allocs/op BenchmarkSubRdc 95112787 11.7 ns/op 0 B/op 0 allocs/op BenchmarkModExpRdc 25436 46878 ns/op 0 B/op 0 allocs/op BenchmarkMulBmiAsm 19527573 60.1 ns/op 0 B/op 0 allocs/op BenchmarkMulGeneric 7117650 164 ns/op 0 B/op 0 allocs/op * Go code has very similar performance when compared to C implementation. Results from sidh_torturer (4e2996e12d68364761064341cbe1d1b47efafe23) github.com:henrydcase/sidh-torture/csidh | TestName |Go | C | |------------------|----------|----------| |TestSharedSecret | 57.95774 | 57.91092 | |TestKeyGeneration | 62.23614 | 58.12980 | |TestSharedSecret | 55.28988 | 57.23132 | |TestKeyGeneration | 61.68745 | 58.66396 | |TestSharedSecret | 63.19408 | 58.64774 | |TestKeyGeneration | 62.34022 | 61.62539 | |TestSharedSecret | 62.85453 | 68.74503 | |TestKeyGeneration | 52.58518 | 58.40115 | |TestSharedSecret | 50.77081 | 61.91699 | |TestKeyGeneration | 59.91843 | 61.09266 | |TestSharedSecret | 59.97962 | 62.98151 | |TestKeyGeneration | 64.57525 | 56.22863 | |TestSharedSecret | 56.40521 | 55.77447 | |TestKeyGeneration | 67.85850 | 58.52604 | |TestSharedSecret | 60.54290 | 65.14052 | |TestKeyGeneration | 65.45766 | 58.42823 | On average Go implementation is 2% faster.
2019-11-24 03:39:35 +00:00
xDblAdd(&Q, &R, &Q, &R, P, &A24)
2020-05-14 00:48:43 +01:00
prevBit = bit
cSIDH-511: (#26) Implementation of Commutative Supersingular Isogeny Diffie Hellman, based on "A faster way to CSIDH" paper (2018/782). * For fast isogeny calculation, implementation converts a curve from Montgomery to Edwards. All calculations are done on Edwards curve and then converted back to Montgomery. * As multiplication in a field Fp511 is most expensive operation the implementation contains multiple multiplications. It has most performant, assembly implementation which uses BMI2 and ADOX/ADCX instructions for modern CPUs. It also contains slower implementation which will run on older CPUs * Benchmarks (Intel SkyLake): BenchmarkGeneratePrivate 6459 172213 ns/op 0 B/op 0 allocs/op BenchmarkGenerateKeyPair 25 45800356 ns/op 0 B/op 0 allocs/op BenchmarkValidate 297 3915983 ns/op 0 B/op 0 allocs/op BenchmarkValidateRandom 184683 6231 ns/op 0 B/op 0 allocs/op BenchmarkValidateGenerated 25 48481306 ns/op 0 B/op 0 allocs/op BenchmarkDerive 19 60928763 ns/op 0 B/op 0 allocs/op BenchmarkDeriveGenerated 8 137342421 ns/op 0 B/op 0 allocs/op BenchmarkXMul 2311 494267 ns/op 1 B/op 0 allocs/op BenchmarkXAdd 2396754 501 ns/op 0 B/op 0 allocs/op BenchmarkXDbl 2072690 571 ns/op 0 B/op 0 allocs/op BenchmarkIsom 78004 15171 ns/op 0 B/op 0 allocs/op BenchmarkFp512Sub 224635152 5.33 ns/op 0 B/op 0 allocs/op BenchmarkFp512Mul 246633255 4.90 ns/op 0 B/op 0 allocs/op BenchmarkCSwap 233228547 5.10 ns/op 0 B/op 0 allocs/op BenchmarkAddRdc 87348240 12.6 ns/op 0 B/op 0 allocs/op BenchmarkSubRdc 95112787 11.7 ns/op 0 B/op 0 allocs/op BenchmarkModExpRdc 25436 46878 ns/op 0 B/op 0 allocs/op BenchmarkMulBmiAsm 19527573 60.1 ns/op 0 B/op 0 allocs/op BenchmarkMulGeneric 7117650 164 ns/op 0 B/op 0 allocs/op * Go code has very similar performance when compared to C implementation. Results from sidh_torturer (4e2996e12d68364761064341cbe1d1b47efafe23) github.com:henrydcase/sidh-torture/csidh | TestName |Go | C | |------------------|----------|----------| |TestSharedSecret | 57.95774 | 57.91092 | |TestKeyGeneration | 62.23614 | 58.12980 | |TestSharedSecret | 55.28988 | 57.23132 | |TestKeyGeneration | 61.68745 | 58.66396 | |TestSharedSecret | 63.19408 | 58.64774 | |TestKeyGeneration | 62.34022 | 61.62539 | |TestSharedSecret | 62.85453 | 68.74503 | |TestKeyGeneration | 52.58518 | 58.40115 | |TestSharedSecret | 50.77081 | 61.91699 | |TestKeyGeneration | 59.91843 | 61.09266 | |TestSharedSecret | 59.97962 | 62.98151 | |TestKeyGeneration | 64.57525 | 56.22863 | |TestSharedSecret | 56.40521 | 55.77447 | |TestKeyGeneration | 67.85850 | 58.52604 | |TestSharedSecret | 60.54290 | 65.14052 | |TestKeyGeneration | 65.45766 | 58.42823 | On average Go implementation is 2% faster.
2019-11-24 03:39:35 +00:00
}
cswappoint(&Q, &R, uint8(k[0]&1))
*kP = Q
}
2020-05-14 00:48:43 +01:00
// xIso computes the isogeny with kernel point kern of a given order
// kernOrder. Returns the new curve coefficient co and the image img.
//
// During computation function switches between Montgomery and twisted
// Edwards curves in order to compute image curve parameters faster.
// This technique is described by Meyer and Reith in ia.cr/2018/782.
//
// Non-constant time.
func xIso(img *point, co *coeff, kern *point, kernOrder uint64) {
cSIDH-511: (#26) Implementation of Commutative Supersingular Isogeny Diffie Hellman, based on "A faster way to CSIDH" paper (2018/782). * For fast isogeny calculation, implementation converts a curve from Montgomery to Edwards. All calculations are done on Edwards curve and then converted back to Montgomery. * As multiplication in a field Fp511 is most expensive operation the implementation contains multiple multiplications. It has most performant, assembly implementation which uses BMI2 and ADOX/ADCX instructions for modern CPUs. It also contains slower implementation which will run on older CPUs * Benchmarks (Intel SkyLake): BenchmarkGeneratePrivate 6459 172213 ns/op 0 B/op 0 allocs/op BenchmarkGenerateKeyPair 25 45800356 ns/op 0 B/op 0 allocs/op BenchmarkValidate 297 3915983 ns/op 0 B/op 0 allocs/op BenchmarkValidateRandom 184683 6231 ns/op 0 B/op 0 allocs/op BenchmarkValidateGenerated 25 48481306 ns/op 0 B/op 0 allocs/op BenchmarkDerive 19 60928763 ns/op 0 B/op 0 allocs/op BenchmarkDeriveGenerated 8 137342421 ns/op 0 B/op 0 allocs/op BenchmarkXMul 2311 494267 ns/op 1 B/op 0 allocs/op BenchmarkXAdd 2396754 501 ns/op 0 B/op 0 allocs/op BenchmarkXDbl 2072690 571 ns/op 0 B/op 0 allocs/op BenchmarkIsom 78004 15171 ns/op 0 B/op 0 allocs/op BenchmarkFp512Sub 224635152 5.33 ns/op 0 B/op 0 allocs/op BenchmarkFp512Mul 246633255 4.90 ns/op 0 B/op 0 allocs/op BenchmarkCSwap 233228547 5.10 ns/op 0 B/op 0 allocs/op BenchmarkAddRdc 87348240 12.6 ns/op 0 B/op 0 allocs/op BenchmarkSubRdc 95112787 11.7 ns/op 0 B/op 0 allocs/op BenchmarkModExpRdc 25436 46878 ns/op 0 B/op 0 allocs/op BenchmarkMulBmiAsm 19527573 60.1 ns/op 0 B/op 0 allocs/op BenchmarkMulGeneric 7117650 164 ns/op 0 B/op 0 allocs/op * Go code has very similar performance when compared to C implementation. Results from sidh_torturer (4e2996e12d68364761064341cbe1d1b47efafe23) github.com:henrydcase/sidh-torture/csidh | TestName |Go | C | |------------------|----------|----------| |TestSharedSecret | 57.95774 | 57.91092 | |TestKeyGeneration | 62.23614 | 58.12980 | |TestSharedSecret | 55.28988 | 57.23132 | |TestKeyGeneration | 61.68745 | 58.66396 | |TestSharedSecret | 63.19408 | 58.64774 | |TestKeyGeneration | 62.34022 | 61.62539 | |TestSharedSecret | 62.85453 | 68.74503 | |TestKeyGeneration | 52.58518 | 58.40115 | |TestSharedSecret | 50.77081 | 61.91699 | |TestKeyGeneration | 59.91843 | 61.09266 | |TestSharedSecret | 59.97962 | 62.98151 | |TestKeyGeneration | 64.57525 | 56.22863 | |TestSharedSecret | 56.40521 | 55.77447 | |TestKeyGeneration | 67.85850 | 58.52604 | |TestSharedSecret | 60.54290 | 65.14052 | |TestKeyGeneration | 65.45766 | 58.42823 | On average Go implementation is 2% faster.
2019-11-24 03:39:35 +00:00
var t0, t1, t2, S, D fp
var Q, prod point
var coEd coeff
var M = [3]point{*kern}
// Compute twisted Edwards coefficients
// coEd.a = co.a + 2*co.c
// coEd.c = co.a - 2*co.c
// coEd.a*X^2 + Y^2 = 1 + coEd.c*X^2*Y^2
addRdc(&coEd.c, &co.c, &co.c)
addRdc(&coEd.a, &co.a, &coEd.c)
subRdc(&coEd.c, &co.a, &coEd.c)
// Transfer point to twisted Edwards YZ-coordinates
// (X:Z)->(Y:Z) = (X-Z : X+Z)
addRdc(&S, &img.x, &img.z)
subRdc(&D, &img.x, &img.z)
subRdc(&prod.x, &kern.x, &kern.z)
addRdc(&prod.z, &kern.x, &kern.z)
mulRdc(&t1, &prod.x, &S)
mulRdc(&t0, &prod.z, &D)
addRdc(&Q.x, &t0, &t1)
subRdc(&Q.z, &t0, &t1)
xDbl(&M[1], kern, &point{x: co.a, z: co.c})
2020-05-14 00:48:43 +01:00
// NOTE: Not constant time.
for i := uint64(1); i < kernOrder>>1; i++ {
cSIDH-511: (#26) Implementation of Commutative Supersingular Isogeny Diffie Hellman, based on "A faster way to CSIDH" paper (2018/782). * For fast isogeny calculation, implementation converts a curve from Montgomery to Edwards. All calculations are done on Edwards curve and then converted back to Montgomery. * As multiplication in a field Fp511 is most expensive operation the implementation contains multiple multiplications. It has most performant, assembly implementation which uses BMI2 and ADOX/ADCX instructions for modern CPUs. It also contains slower implementation which will run on older CPUs * Benchmarks (Intel SkyLake): BenchmarkGeneratePrivate 6459 172213 ns/op 0 B/op 0 allocs/op BenchmarkGenerateKeyPair 25 45800356 ns/op 0 B/op 0 allocs/op BenchmarkValidate 297 3915983 ns/op 0 B/op 0 allocs/op BenchmarkValidateRandom 184683 6231 ns/op 0 B/op 0 allocs/op BenchmarkValidateGenerated 25 48481306 ns/op 0 B/op 0 allocs/op BenchmarkDerive 19 60928763 ns/op 0 B/op 0 allocs/op BenchmarkDeriveGenerated 8 137342421 ns/op 0 B/op 0 allocs/op BenchmarkXMul 2311 494267 ns/op 1 B/op 0 allocs/op BenchmarkXAdd 2396754 501 ns/op 0 B/op 0 allocs/op BenchmarkXDbl 2072690 571 ns/op 0 B/op 0 allocs/op BenchmarkIsom 78004 15171 ns/op 0 B/op 0 allocs/op BenchmarkFp512Sub 224635152 5.33 ns/op 0 B/op 0 allocs/op BenchmarkFp512Mul 246633255 4.90 ns/op 0 B/op 0 allocs/op BenchmarkCSwap 233228547 5.10 ns/op 0 B/op 0 allocs/op BenchmarkAddRdc 87348240 12.6 ns/op 0 B/op 0 allocs/op BenchmarkSubRdc 95112787 11.7 ns/op 0 B/op 0 allocs/op BenchmarkModExpRdc 25436 46878 ns/op 0 B/op 0 allocs/op BenchmarkMulBmiAsm 19527573 60.1 ns/op 0 B/op 0 allocs/op BenchmarkMulGeneric 7117650 164 ns/op 0 B/op 0 allocs/op * Go code has very similar performance when compared to C implementation. Results from sidh_torturer (4e2996e12d68364761064341cbe1d1b47efafe23) github.com:henrydcase/sidh-torture/csidh | TestName |Go | C | |------------------|----------|----------| |TestSharedSecret | 57.95774 | 57.91092 | |TestKeyGeneration | 62.23614 | 58.12980 | |TestSharedSecret | 55.28988 | 57.23132 | |TestKeyGeneration | 61.68745 | 58.66396 | |TestSharedSecret | 63.19408 | 58.64774 | |TestKeyGeneration | 62.34022 | 61.62539 | |TestSharedSecret | 62.85453 | 68.74503 | |TestKeyGeneration | 52.58518 | 58.40115 | |TestSharedSecret | 50.77081 | 61.91699 | |TestKeyGeneration | 59.91843 | 61.09266 | |TestSharedSecret | 59.97962 | 62.98151 | |TestKeyGeneration | 64.57525 | 56.22863 | |TestSharedSecret | 56.40521 | 55.77447 | |TestKeyGeneration | 67.85850 | 58.52604 | |TestSharedSecret | 60.54290 | 65.14052 | |TestKeyGeneration | 65.45766 | 58.42823 | On average Go implementation is 2% faster.
2019-11-24 03:39:35 +00:00
if i >= 2 {
xAdd(&M[i%3], &M[(i-1)%3], kern, &M[(i-2)%3])
}
subRdc(&t1, &M[i%3].x, &M[i%3].z)
addRdc(&t0, &M[i%3].x, &M[i%3].z)
mulRdc(&prod.x, &prod.x, &t1)
mulRdc(&prod.z, &prod.z, &t0)
mulRdc(&t1, &t1, &S)
mulRdc(&t0, &t0, &D)
addRdc(&t2, &t0, &t1)
mulRdc(&Q.x, &Q.x, &t2)
subRdc(&t2, &t0, &t1)
mulRdc(&Q.z, &Q.z, &t2)
}
mulRdc(&Q.x, &Q.x, &Q.x)
mulRdc(&Q.z, &Q.z, &Q.z)
mulRdc(&img.x, &img.x, &Q.x)
mulRdc(&img.z, &img.z, &Q.z)
2020-05-14 00:48:43 +01:00
// coEd.a^kernOrder and coEd.c^kernOrder
modExpRdc64(&coEd.a, &coEd.a, kernOrder)
modExpRdc64(&coEd.c, &coEd.c, kernOrder)
cSIDH-511: (#26) Implementation of Commutative Supersingular Isogeny Diffie Hellman, based on "A faster way to CSIDH" paper (2018/782). * For fast isogeny calculation, implementation converts a curve from Montgomery to Edwards. All calculations are done on Edwards curve and then converted back to Montgomery. * As multiplication in a field Fp511 is most expensive operation the implementation contains multiple multiplications. It has most performant, assembly implementation which uses BMI2 and ADOX/ADCX instructions for modern CPUs. It also contains slower implementation which will run on older CPUs * Benchmarks (Intel SkyLake): BenchmarkGeneratePrivate 6459 172213 ns/op 0 B/op 0 allocs/op BenchmarkGenerateKeyPair 25 45800356 ns/op 0 B/op 0 allocs/op BenchmarkValidate 297 3915983 ns/op 0 B/op 0 allocs/op BenchmarkValidateRandom 184683 6231 ns/op 0 B/op 0 allocs/op BenchmarkValidateGenerated 25 48481306 ns/op 0 B/op 0 allocs/op BenchmarkDerive 19 60928763 ns/op 0 B/op 0 allocs/op BenchmarkDeriveGenerated 8 137342421 ns/op 0 B/op 0 allocs/op BenchmarkXMul 2311 494267 ns/op 1 B/op 0 allocs/op BenchmarkXAdd 2396754 501 ns/op 0 B/op 0 allocs/op BenchmarkXDbl 2072690 571 ns/op 0 B/op 0 allocs/op BenchmarkIsom 78004 15171 ns/op 0 B/op 0 allocs/op BenchmarkFp512Sub 224635152 5.33 ns/op 0 B/op 0 allocs/op BenchmarkFp512Mul 246633255 4.90 ns/op 0 B/op 0 allocs/op BenchmarkCSwap 233228547 5.10 ns/op 0 B/op 0 allocs/op BenchmarkAddRdc 87348240 12.6 ns/op 0 B/op 0 allocs/op BenchmarkSubRdc 95112787 11.7 ns/op 0 B/op 0 allocs/op BenchmarkModExpRdc 25436 46878 ns/op 0 B/op 0 allocs/op BenchmarkMulBmiAsm 19527573 60.1 ns/op 0 B/op 0 allocs/op BenchmarkMulGeneric 7117650 164 ns/op 0 B/op 0 allocs/op * Go code has very similar performance when compared to C implementation. Results from sidh_torturer (4e2996e12d68364761064341cbe1d1b47efafe23) github.com:henrydcase/sidh-torture/csidh | TestName |Go | C | |------------------|----------|----------| |TestSharedSecret | 57.95774 | 57.91092 | |TestKeyGeneration | 62.23614 | 58.12980 | |TestSharedSecret | 55.28988 | 57.23132 | |TestKeyGeneration | 61.68745 | 58.66396 | |TestSharedSecret | 63.19408 | 58.64774 | |TestKeyGeneration | 62.34022 | 61.62539 | |TestSharedSecret | 62.85453 | 68.74503 | |TestKeyGeneration | 52.58518 | 58.40115 | |TestSharedSecret | 50.77081 | 61.91699 | |TestKeyGeneration | 59.91843 | 61.09266 | |TestSharedSecret | 59.97962 | 62.98151 | |TestKeyGeneration | 64.57525 | 56.22863 | |TestSharedSecret | 56.40521 | 55.77447 | |TestKeyGeneration | 67.85850 | 58.52604 | |TestSharedSecret | 60.54290 | 65.14052 | |TestKeyGeneration | 65.45766 | 58.42823 | On average Go implementation is 2% faster.
2019-11-24 03:39:35 +00:00
// prod^8
mulRdc(&prod.x, &prod.x, &prod.x)
mulRdc(&prod.x, &prod.x, &prod.x)
mulRdc(&prod.x, &prod.x, &prod.x)
mulRdc(&prod.z, &prod.z, &prod.z)
mulRdc(&prod.z, &prod.z, &prod.z)
mulRdc(&prod.z, &prod.z, &prod.z)
// Compute image curve params
mulRdc(&coEd.c, &coEd.c, &prod.x)
mulRdc(&coEd.a, &coEd.a, &prod.z)
// Convert curve coefficients back to Montgomery
addRdc(&co.a, &coEd.a, &coEd.c)
subRdc(&co.c, &coEd.a, &coEd.c)
addRdc(&co.a, &co.a, &co.a)
}
2020-05-14 00:48:43 +01:00
// montEval evaluates x^3 + Ax^2 + x.
cSIDH-511: (#26) Implementation of Commutative Supersingular Isogeny Diffie Hellman, based on "A faster way to CSIDH" paper (2018/782). * For fast isogeny calculation, implementation converts a curve from Montgomery to Edwards. All calculations are done on Edwards curve and then converted back to Montgomery. * As multiplication in a field Fp511 is most expensive operation the implementation contains multiple multiplications. It has most performant, assembly implementation which uses BMI2 and ADOX/ADCX instructions for modern CPUs. It also contains slower implementation which will run on older CPUs * Benchmarks (Intel SkyLake): BenchmarkGeneratePrivate 6459 172213 ns/op 0 B/op 0 allocs/op BenchmarkGenerateKeyPair 25 45800356 ns/op 0 B/op 0 allocs/op BenchmarkValidate 297 3915983 ns/op 0 B/op 0 allocs/op BenchmarkValidateRandom 184683 6231 ns/op 0 B/op 0 allocs/op BenchmarkValidateGenerated 25 48481306 ns/op 0 B/op 0 allocs/op BenchmarkDerive 19 60928763 ns/op 0 B/op 0 allocs/op BenchmarkDeriveGenerated 8 137342421 ns/op 0 B/op 0 allocs/op BenchmarkXMul 2311 494267 ns/op 1 B/op 0 allocs/op BenchmarkXAdd 2396754 501 ns/op 0 B/op 0 allocs/op BenchmarkXDbl 2072690 571 ns/op 0 B/op 0 allocs/op BenchmarkIsom 78004 15171 ns/op 0 B/op 0 allocs/op BenchmarkFp512Sub 224635152 5.33 ns/op 0 B/op 0 allocs/op BenchmarkFp512Mul 246633255 4.90 ns/op 0 B/op 0 allocs/op BenchmarkCSwap 233228547 5.10 ns/op 0 B/op 0 allocs/op BenchmarkAddRdc 87348240 12.6 ns/op 0 B/op 0 allocs/op BenchmarkSubRdc 95112787 11.7 ns/op 0 B/op 0 allocs/op BenchmarkModExpRdc 25436 46878 ns/op 0 B/op 0 allocs/op BenchmarkMulBmiAsm 19527573 60.1 ns/op 0 B/op 0 allocs/op BenchmarkMulGeneric 7117650 164 ns/op 0 B/op 0 allocs/op * Go code has very similar performance when compared to C implementation. Results from sidh_torturer (4e2996e12d68364761064341cbe1d1b47efafe23) github.com:henrydcase/sidh-torture/csidh | TestName |Go | C | |------------------|----------|----------| |TestSharedSecret | 57.95774 | 57.91092 | |TestKeyGeneration | 62.23614 | 58.12980 | |TestSharedSecret | 55.28988 | 57.23132 | |TestKeyGeneration | 61.68745 | 58.66396 | |TestSharedSecret | 63.19408 | 58.64774 | |TestKeyGeneration | 62.34022 | 61.62539 | |TestSharedSecret | 62.85453 | 68.74503 | |TestKeyGeneration | 52.58518 | 58.40115 | |TestSharedSecret | 50.77081 | 61.91699 | |TestKeyGeneration | 59.91843 | 61.09266 | |TestSharedSecret | 59.97962 | 62.98151 | |TestKeyGeneration | 64.57525 | 56.22863 | |TestSharedSecret | 56.40521 | 55.77447 | |TestKeyGeneration | 67.85850 | 58.52604 | |TestSharedSecret | 60.54290 | 65.14052 | |TestKeyGeneration | 65.45766 | 58.42823 | On average Go implementation is 2% faster.
2019-11-24 03:39:35 +00:00
func montEval(res, A, x *fp) {
var t fp
*res = *x
mulRdc(res, res, res)
mulRdc(&t, A, x)
addRdc(res, res, &t)
addRdc(res, res, &one)
mulRdc(res, res, x)
}