pqc/crypto_kem/hqc-rmrs-256/avx2/reed_muller.c

390 lines
15 KiB
C
Raw Permalink Normal View History

2020-09-07 19:23:34 +01:00
#include "parameters.h"
#include "reed_muller.h"
#include <immintrin.h>
#include <stdint.h>
#include <string.h>
/**
* @file reed_muller.c
* Constant time implementation of Reed-Muller code RM(1,7)
*/
// number of repeated code words
#define MULTIPLICITY CEIL_DIVIDE(PARAM_N2, 128)
// copy bit 0 into all bits of a 64 bit value
#define BIT0MASK(x) (int64_t)(-((x) & 1))
static void encode(uint8_t *word, uint8_t message);
2020-09-07 19:23:34 +01:00
static void expand_and_sum(__m256i *dst, const uint64_t *src);
static void hadamard(__m256i *src, __m256i *dst);
static uint32_t find_peaks(__m256i *transform);
2020-09-07 19:23:34 +01:00
/**
* @brief Encode a single byte into a single codeword using RM(1,7)
*
* Encoding matrix of this code:
* bit pattern (note that bits are numbered big endian)
* 0 aaaaaaaa aaaaaaaa aaaaaaaa aaaaaaaa
* 1 cccccccc cccccccc cccccccc cccccccc
* 2 f0f0f0f0 f0f0f0f0 f0f0f0f0 f0f0f0f0
* 3 ff00ff00 ff00ff00 ff00ff00 ff00ff00
* 4 ffff0000 ffff0000 ffff0000 ffff0000
* 5 00000000 ffffffff 00000000 ffffffff
* 6 00000000 00000000 ffffffff ffffffff
* 7 ffffffff ffffffff ffffffff ffffffff
*
* @param[out] word An RM(1,7) codeword
* @param[in] message A message to encode
*/
static void encode(uint8_t *word, uint8_t message) {
uint32_t e;
2020-09-07 19:23:34 +01:00
// bit 7 flips all the bits, do that first to save work
e = BIT0MASK(message >> 7);
2020-09-07 19:23:34 +01:00
// bits 0, 1, 2, 3, 4 are the same for all four longs
// (Warning: in the bit matrix above, low bits are at the left!)
e ^= BIT0MASK(message >> 0) & 0xaaaaaaaa;
e ^= BIT0MASK(message >> 1) & 0xcccccccc;
e ^= BIT0MASK(message >> 2) & 0xf0f0f0f0;
e ^= BIT0MASK(message >> 3) & 0xff00ff00;
e ^= BIT0MASK(message >> 4) & 0xffff0000;
2020-09-07 19:23:34 +01:00
// we can store this in the first quarter
word[0 + 0] = (e >> 0x00) & 0xff;
word[0 + 1] = (e >> 0x08) & 0xff;
word[0 + 2] = (e >> 0x10) & 0xff;
word[0 + 3] = (e >> 0x18) & 0xff;
2020-09-07 19:23:34 +01:00
// bit 5 flips entries 1 and 3; bit 6 flips 2 and 3
e ^= BIT0MASK(message >> 5);
word[4 + 0] = (e >> 0x00) & 0xff;
word[4 + 1] = (e >> 0x08) & 0xff;
word[4 + 2] = (e >> 0x10) & 0xff;
word[4 + 3] = (e >> 0x18) & 0xff;
e ^= BIT0MASK(message >> 6);
word[12 + 0] = (e >> 0x00) & 0xff;
word[12 + 1] = (e >> 0x08) & 0xff;
word[12 + 2] = (e >> 0x10) & 0xff;
word[12 + 3] = (e >> 0x18) & 0xff;
e ^= BIT0MASK(message >> 5);
word[8 + 0] = (e >> 0x00) & 0xff;
word[8 + 1] = (e >> 0x08) & 0xff;
word[8 + 2] = (e >> 0x10) & 0xff;
word[8 + 3] = (e >> 0x18) & 0xff;
2020-09-07 19:23:34 +01:00
}
/**
* @brief Add multiple codewords into expanded codeword
*
* Note: this does not write the codewords as -1 or +1 as the green machine does
* instead, just 0 and 1 is used.
* The resulting hadamard transform has:
* all values are halved
* the first entry is 64 too high
*
* @param[out] dst Structure that contain the expanded codeword
* @param[in] src Structure that contain the codeword
*/
inline void expand_and_sum(__m256i *dst, const uint64_t *src) {
uint16_t v[16];
2020-09-10 21:36:42 +01:00
for (size_t part = 0; part < 8; part++) {
2020-09-07 19:23:34 +01:00
dst[part] = _mm256_setzero_si256();
}
2020-09-10 21:36:42 +01:00
for (size_t copy = 0; copy < MULTIPLICITY; copy++) {
2020-09-07 19:23:34 +01:00
for (size_t part = 0; part < 8; part++) {
for (size_t bit = 0; bit < 16; bit++) {
v[bit] = (((uint16_t *)(&src[2 * copy]))[part] >> bit) & 1;
}
dst[part] += _mm256_set_epi16(v[15], v[14], v[13], v[12], v[11], v[10], v[9], v[8],
v[7], v[6], v[5], v[4], v[3], v[2], v[1], v[0]);
}
}
}
/**
* @brief Hadamard transform
*
* Perform hadamard transform of src and store result in dst
* src is overwritten: it is also used as intermediate buffer
* Method is best explained if we use H(3) instead of H(7):
*
* The routine multiplies by the matrix H(3):
* [1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1]
* [1 -1 1 -1 1 -1 1 -1]
* [1 1 -1 -1 1 1 -1 -1]
* [a b c d e f g h] * [1 -1 -1 1 1 -1 -1 1] = result of routine
* [1 1 1 1 -1 -1 -1 -1]
* [1 -1 1 -1 -1 1 -1 1]
* [1 1 -1 -1 -1 -1 1 1]
* [1 -1 -1 1 -1 1 1 -1]
* You can do this in three passes, where each pass does this:
* set lower half of buffer to pairwise sums,
* and upper half to differences
* index 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7
* input: a, b, c, d, e, f, g, h
* pass 1: a+b, c+d, e+f, g+h, a-b, c-d, e-f, g-h
* pass 2: a+b+c+d, e+f+g+h, a-b+c-d, e-f+g-h, a+b-c-d, e+f-g-h, a-b-c+d, e-f-g+h
* pass 3: a+b+c+d+e+f+g+h a+b-c-d+e+f-g-h a+b+c+d-e-f-g-h a+b-c-d-e+-f+g+h
* a-b+c-d+e-f+g-h a-b-c+d+e-f-g+h a-b+c-d-e+f-g+h a-b-c+d-e+f+g-h
* This order of computation is chosen because it vectorises well.
* Likewise, this routine multiplies by H(7) in seven passes.
*
* @param[out] src Structure that contain the expanded codeword
* @param[out] dst Structure that contain the expanded codeword
*/
inline void hadamard(__m256i *src, __m256i *dst) {
// the passes move data:
// src -> dst -> src -> dst -> src -> dst -> src -> dst
// using p1 and p2 alternately
__m256i *p1 = src;
__m256i *p2 = dst;
__m256i *p3;
2020-09-10 21:36:42 +01:00
for (size_t pass = 0; pass < 7; pass++) {
2020-09-07 19:23:34 +01:00
// warning: hadd works "within lanes" as Intel call it
// so you have to swap the middle 64 bit blocks of the result
2020-09-10 21:36:42 +01:00
for (size_t part = 0; part < 4; part++) {
2020-09-07 19:23:34 +01:00
p2[part] = _mm256_permute4x64_epi64(_mm256_hadd_epi16(p1[2 * part], p1[2 * part + 1]), 0xd8);
p2[part + 4] = _mm256_permute4x64_epi64(_mm256_hsub_epi16(p1[2 * part], p1[2 * part + 1]), 0xd8);
}
// swap p1, p2 for next round
p3 = p1;
p1 = p2;
p2 = p3;
}
}
/**
* @brief Finding the location of the highest value
*
* This is the final step of the green machine: find the location of the highest value,
* and add 128 if the peak is positive
* Notes on decoding
* The standard "Green machine" decoder words as follows:
* if the received codeword is W, compute (2 * W - 1) * H7
* The entries of the resulting vector are always even and vary from
* -128 (= the complement is a code word, add bit 7 to decode)
* via 0 (this is a different codeword)
* to 128 (this is the code word).
*
* Our decoding differs in two ways:
* - We take W instead of 2 * W - 1 (so the entries are 0,1 instead of -1,1)
* - We take the sum of the repititions (so the entries are 0..MULTIPLICITY)
* This implies that we have to subtract 64M (M=MULTIPLICITY)
* from the first entry to make sure the first codewords is handled properly
* and that the entries vary from -64M to 64M.
* -64M or 64M stands for a perfect codeword.
* If there are fewer than 32M errors, there is always a unique codeword
* which an entry with absolute value > 32M;
* this is because an error changes an entry by 1.
* The highest number that seem to be decodable is 50 errors, so that the
* highest entries in the hadamard transform can be as low as 12.
* But this is different for the repeated code.
* Because multiple codewords are added, this changes: the lowest value of the
* hadamard transform of the sum of six words is seen to be as low as 43 (!),
* which is way less than 12*6.
*
* It is possible that there are more errors, but the word is still uniquely
* decodable: we found a word with distance of 50 from the nearest codeword.
* That means that the highest entry can be as low as 14M.
* Since we have to do binary search, we search for the range 1-64M
* which can be done in 6+l2g(M) steps.
* The binary search is based on (values>32M are unique):
* M 32M min> max> firstStep #steps
* 2 64 1 64 33 +- 16 6
* 4 128 1 128 65 +- 32 7
* 6 192 1 192 129 +- 64 8
*
* As a check, we run a sample for M=6 to see the peak value; it ranged
* from 43 to 147, so my analysis looks right. Also, it shows that decoding
* far beyond the bound of 32M is needed.
*
* For the vectors, it would be tempting to use 8 bit ints,
* because the values "almost" fit in there.
* We could use some trickery to fit it in 8 bits, like saturated add or
* division by 2 in a late step.
* Unfortunately, these instructions do not exist.
* the adds _mm512_adds_epi8 is available only on the latest processors,
* and division, shift, mulhi are not available at all for 8 bits.
* So, we use 16 bit ints.
*
* For the search of the optimal comparison value,
* remember the transform contains 64M-d,
* where d are the distances to the codewords.
* The highest value gives the most likely codeword.
* There is not fast vectorized way to find this value, so we search for the
* maximum value itself.
* In each pass, we collect a bit map of the transform values that are,
* say >bound. There are three cases:
* bit map = 0: all code words are further away than 64M-bound (decrease bound)
* bit map has one bit: one unique code word has distance < 64M-bound
* bit map has multiple bits: multiple words (increase bound)
* We will search for the lowest value of bound that gives a nonzero bit map.
*
* @param[in] transform Structure that contain the expanded codeword
*/
inline uint32_t find_peaks(__m256i *transform) {
2020-09-07 19:23:34 +01:00
// a whole lot of vector variables
__m256i bitmap, abs_rows[8], bound, active_row, max_abs_rows;
2020-09-15 15:33:06 +01:00
__m256i tmp = _mm256_setzero_si256();
__m256i vect_mask;
__m256i res;
int32_t lower;
int32_t width;
uint32_t message;
uint32_t mask;
int8_t index;
int8_t abs_value;
int8_t mask1;
int8_t mask2;
uint16_t result;
2020-09-07 19:23:34 +01:00
// compute absolute value of transform
2020-09-10 21:36:42 +01:00
for (size_t i = 0; i < 8; i++) {
2020-09-07 19:23:34 +01:00
abs_rows[i] = _mm256_abs_epi16(transform[i]);
}
// compute a vector of 16 elements which contains the maximum somewhere
// (later used to compute bits 0 through 3 of message)
max_abs_rows = abs_rows[0];
2020-09-10 21:36:42 +01:00
for (size_t i = 1; i < 8; i++) {
2020-09-07 19:23:34 +01:00
max_abs_rows = _mm256_max_epi16(max_abs_rows, abs_rows[i]);
}
// do binary search for the highest value that is lower than the maximum
// loop invariant: lower gives bit map = 0, lower + width gives bit map > 0
2020-09-15 15:33:06 +01:00
lower = 1;
2020-09-07 19:23:34 +01:00
// this gives 64, 128 or 256 for MULTIPLICITY = 2, 4, 6
2020-09-15 15:33:06 +01:00
width = 1 << (5 + MULTIPLICITY / 2);
2020-09-07 19:23:34 +01:00
// if you don't unroll this loop, it fits in the loop cache
// uncomment the line below to speeding up the program by a few percent
// #pragma GCC unroll 0
while (width > 1) {
width >>= 1;
// compare with lower + width; put result in bitmap
// make vector from value of new bound
bound = _mm256_broadcastw_epi16(_mm_cvtsi32_si128(lower + width));
bitmap = _mm256_cmpgt_epi16(max_abs_rows, bound);
// step up if there are any matches
// rely on compiler to use conditional move here
2020-09-15 15:33:06 +01:00
mask = (uint32_t) _mm256_testz_si256(bitmap, bitmap);
mask = ~(uint32_t) ((-(int64_t) mask) >> 63);
lower += mask & width;
2020-09-07 19:23:34 +01:00
}
// lower+width contains the maximum value of the vector
// or less, if the maximum is very high (which is OK)
// normally, there is one maximum, but sometimes there are more
// find where the maxima occur in the maximum vector
// (each determines lower 4 bits of peak position)
// construct vector filled with bound-1
bound = _mm256_broadcastw_epi16(_mm_cvtsi32_si128(lower + width - 1));
// find in which of the 8 groups a maximum occurs to compute bits 4, 5, 6 of message
// find lowest value by searching backwards skip first check to save time
2020-09-15 15:33:06 +01:00
message = 0x70;
for (size_t i = 0; i < 8; i++) {
bitmap = _mm256_cmpgt_epi16(abs_rows[7 - i], bound);
mask = (uint32_t) _mm256_testz_si256(bitmap, bitmap);
mask = ~(uint32_t) ((-(int64_t) mask) >> 63);
message ^= mask & (message ^ ((7 - i) << 4));
2020-09-07 19:23:34 +01:00
}
// we decided which row of the matrix contains the lowest match
// select proper row
2020-09-15 15:33:06 +01:00
index = message >> 4;
2020-09-07 19:23:34 +01:00
2020-09-15 15:33:06 +01:00
tmp = _mm256_setzero_si256();
for (size_t i = 0; i < 8; i++) {
abs_value = (int8_t)(index - i);
mask1 = abs_value >> 7;
2020-09-07 19:23:34 +01:00
abs_value ^= mask1;
abs_value -= mask1;
2020-09-15 15:33:06 +01:00
mask2 = ((uint8_t) - abs_value >> 7);
mask = (-1ULL) + mask2;
vect_mask = _mm256_set1_epi32(mask);
2020-09-07 19:23:34 +01:00
res = _mm256_and_si256(abs_rows[i], vect_mask);
tmp = _mm256_or_si256(tmp, res);
}
active_row = tmp;
// get the column number of the vector element
// by setting the bits corresponding to the columns
// and then adding elements within two groups of 8
2020-09-15 15:33:06 +01:00
vect_mask = _mm256_cmpgt_epi16(active_row, bound);
vect_mask &= _mm256_set_epi16(-32768, 16384, 8192, 4096, 2048, 1024, 512, 256, 128, 64, 32, 16, 8, 4, 2, 1);
for (size_t i = 0; i < 3; i++) {
vect_mask = _mm256_hadd_epi16(vect_mask, vect_mask);
2020-09-07 19:23:34 +01:00
}
// add low 4 bits of message
2020-09-15 15:33:06 +01:00
message |= __tzcnt_u16(_mm256_extract_epi16(vect_mask, 0) + _mm256_extract_epi16(vect_mask, 8));
2020-09-07 19:23:34 +01:00
// set bit 7 if sign of biggest value is positive
// make sure a jump isn't generated by the compiler
2020-09-15 15:33:06 +01:00
tmp = _mm256_setzero_si256();
for (size_t i = 0; i < 8; i++) {
mask = ~(uint32_t) ((-(int64_t)(i ^ message / 16)) >> 63);
vect_mask = _mm256_set1_epi32(mask);
2020-09-07 19:23:34 +01:00
tmp = _mm256_or_si256(tmp, _mm256_and_si256(vect_mask, transform[i]));
}
2020-09-15 15:33:06 +01:00
result = 0;
for (size_t i = 0; i < 16; i++) {
mask = ~(uint32_t) ((-(int64_t)(i ^ message % 16)) >> 63);
result |= mask & ((uint16_t *)&tmp)[i];
2020-09-07 19:23:34 +01:00
}
message |= (0x8000 & ~result) >> 8;
2020-09-15 15:33:06 +01:00
return message;
2020-09-07 19:23:34 +01:00
}
/**
* @brief Encodes the received word
*
* The message consists of N1 bytes each byte is encoded into PARAM_N2 bits,
* or MULTIPLICITY repeats of 128 bits
*
* @param[out] cdw Array of size VEC_N1N2_SIZE_64 receiving the encoded message
* @param[in] msg Array of size VEC_N1_SIZE_64 storing the message
*/
void PQCLEAN_HQCRMRS256_AVX2_reed_muller_encode(uint8_t *cdw, const uint8_t *msg) {
2020-09-10 21:36:42 +01:00
for (size_t i = 0; i < VEC_N1_SIZE_BYTES; i++) {
2020-09-07 19:23:34 +01:00
// encode first word
encode(&cdw[16 * i * MULTIPLICITY], msg[i]);
2020-09-07 19:23:34 +01:00
// copy to other identical codewords
2020-09-10 21:36:42 +01:00
for (size_t copy = 1; copy < MULTIPLICITY; copy++) {
memcpy(&cdw[16 * i * MULTIPLICITY + 16 * copy], &cdw[16 * i * MULTIPLICITY], 16);
2020-09-07 19:23:34 +01:00
}
}
}
/**
* @brief Decodes the received word
*
* Decoding uses fast hadamard transform, for a more complete picture on Reed-Muller decoding, see MacWilliams, Florence Jessie, and Neil James Alexander Sloane.
* The theory of error-correcting codes codes @cite macwilliams1977theory
*
* @param[out] msg Array of size VEC_N1_SIZE_64 receiving the decoded message
* @param[in] cdw Array of size VEC_N1N2_SIZE_64 storing the received word
*/
void PQCLEAN_HQCRMRS256_AVX2_reed_muller_decode(uint8_t *msg, const uint8_t *cdw) {
2020-09-07 19:23:34 +01:00
__m256i expanded[8];
__m256i transform[8];
2020-09-10 21:36:42 +01:00
for (size_t i = 0; i < VEC_N1_SIZE_BYTES; i++) {
2020-09-07 19:23:34 +01:00
// collect the codewords
expand_and_sum(expanded, (uint64_t *)&cdw[16 * i * MULTIPLICITY]);
2020-09-07 19:23:34 +01:00
// apply hadamard transform
hadamard(expanded, transform);
// fix the first entry to get the half Hadamard transform
transform[0] -= _mm256_set_epi16(0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0,
0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 64 * MULTIPLICITY);
// finish the decoding
msg[i] = find_peaks(transform);
2020-09-07 19:23:34 +01:00
}
}