kris/pqcrypto
1
1
Fork 0
mirror of https://github.com/henrydcase/pqc.git synced 2024-11-22 07:35:38 +00:00
Code Issues 1 Releases Wiki Activity

ct_expect/require_umr -> ct_expect/require_uum

Browse Source
This commit is contained in:
Henry Case 2021-07-16 10:57:34 +01:00
parent 5f5b48891c
commit e96e7aaea8
2 changed files with 14 additions and 14 deletions
Show Stats Download Patch File Download Diff File Expand all files Collapse all files

4
src/common/ct_check.h
View File

@ -82,7 +82,7 @@ static inline void ct_purify(const volatile void *p, size_t sz) {
}
// Function instructs memory sanitizer that code expects to do operation on unintialized memory.
static inline void ct_expect_umr() {
static inline void ct_expect_uum() {
#if defined(PQC_USE_CTSANITIZER) && defined(__clang__) && defined(__has_feature)
#if __has_feature(memory_sanitizer)
__msan_set_expect_umr(1);
@ -94,7 +94,7 @@ static inline void ct_expect_umr() {
// then error is reported. It works in tandem with ct_expect_umr(). In current version of
// MSan, the code needs to be compiled with `-mllvm -msan-keep-going=1` flags in order to work
// correctly.
static inline void ct_require_umr() {
static inline void ct_require_uum() {
#if defined(PQC_USE_CTSANITIZER) && defined(__clang__) && defined(__has_feature)
#if __has_feature(memory_sanitizer)
__msan_set_expect_umr(0);

24
test/ct.cpp
View File

@ -12,11 +12,11 @@ TEST(ConstantTime, CtCheck_Negative) {
ct_poison(a, 16);
for (i = 0; i < 16; i++) {
ct_expect_umr();
ct_expect_uum();
if (a[i] != b[i]) {
break;
}
ct_require_umr();
ct_require_uum();
}
ct_purify(a, 16);
@ -53,9 +53,9 @@ TEST(ConstantTime, CtCheck_Negative_UseSecretAsIndex) {
ct_poison(a, 16);
ct_expect_umr();
ct_expect_uum();
result = tab[a[0] & 1];
ct_require_umr();
ct_require_uum();
ct_purify(a, 16);
@ -72,18 +72,18 @@ TEST(ConstantTime, CtCheck_memcmp) {
ct_poison(a, 16);
ret = ct_memcmp(a,b,16);
ct_expect_umr();
ct_expect_uum();
// Doesn't matter what we check. It's just to
// enusre UMR is triggered.
if (!ret) ASSERT_EQ(ret, 0);
ct_require_umr();
ct_require_uum();
ct_purify(&ret, 1);
b[1] = 0;
ct_expect_umr();
ct_expect_uum();
ret = ct_memcmp(a,b,16);
if (ret) ASSERT_EQ(ret,1);
ct_require_umr();
ct_require_uum();
ct_purify(&ret, 1);
}
@ -97,18 +97,18 @@ TEST(ConstantTime, CtCheck_memcmp_chained) {
ct_poison(a, 16);
ct_expect_umr();
ct_expect_uum();
// obviously must generate UMR if first check fails
// and second is not done
ret = (ct_memcmp(a,c,16)==0) && (ct_memcmp(a,b,16)==0);
ct_require_umr();
ct_require_uum();
ct_purify(&ret, 1);
ASSERT_EQ(ret,0);
ct_expect_umr();
ct_expect_uum();
// it's still UMR even if both checks are OK
ret = (ct_memcmp(a,d,16)==0) && (ct_memcmp(a,b,16)==0);
ct_require_umr();
ct_require_uum();
ct_purify(&ret, 1);
ASSERT_EQ(ret,1);