kris/th5
1
0
Fork 0
Code Issues Pull Requests Releases Wiki Activity
cde0e97e4c
th5/testdata/Client-TLSv12-RenegotiationRejected

97 lines
7.0 KiB
Plaintext
Raw Normal View History

crypto/tls: allow renegotiation to be handled by a client. This change adds Config.Renegotiation which controls whether a TLS client will accept renegotiation requests from a server. This is used, for example, by some web servers that wish to “add” a client certificate to an HTTPS connection. This is disabled by default because it significantly complicates the state machine. Originally, handshakeMutex was taken before locking either Conn.in or Conn.out. However, if renegotiation is permitted then a handshake may be triggered during a Read() call. If Conn.in were unlocked before taking handshakeMutex then a concurrent Read() call could see an intermediate state and trigger an error. Thus handshakeMutex is now locked after Conn.in and the handshake functions assume that Conn.in is locked for the duration of the handshake. Additionally, handshakeMutex used to protect Conn.out also. With the possibility of renegotiation that's no longer viable and so writeRecordLocked has been split off. Fixes #5742. Change-Id: I935914db1f185d507ff39bba8274c148d756a1c8 Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/22475 Run-TryBot: Adam Langley <agl@golang.org> TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org> Reviewed-by: Russ Cox <rsc@golang.org>
2016-04-26 18:45:35 +01:00
>>> Flow 1 (client to server)
00000000 16 03 01 00 85 01 00 00 81 03 03 00 00 00 00 00 |................|
00000010 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 |................|
00000020 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 22 c0 2f |............."./|
00000030 c0 2b c0 30 c0 2c c0 11 c0 07 c0 13 c0 09 c0 14 |.+.0.,..........|
00000040 c0 0a 00 9c 00 9d 00 05 00 2f 00 35 c0 12 00 0a |........./.5....|
00000050 01 00 00 36 00 05 00 05 01 00 00 00 00 00 0a 00 |...6............|
00000060 08 00 06 00 17 00 18 00 19 00 0b 00 02 01 00 00 |................|
00000070 0d 00 0e 00 0c 04 01 04 03 05 01 05 03 02 01 02 |................|
00000080 03 ff 01 00 01 00 00 12 00 00 |..........|
>>> Flow 2 (server to client)
crypto/x509: require a NULL parameters for RSA public keys. The RFC is clear that the Parameters in an AlgorithmIdentifer for an RSA public key must be NULL. BoringSSL enforces this so we have strong evidence that this is a widely compatible change. Embarrassingly enough, the major source of violations of this is us. Go used to get this correct in only one of two places. This was only fixed in 2013 (with 4874bc9b). That's why lots of test certificates are updated in this change. Fixes #16166. Change-Id: Ib9a4551349354c66e730d44eb8cee4ec402ea8ab Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/27312 Reviewed-by: Brad Fitzpatrick <bradfitz@golang.org>
2016-08-17 23:55:15 +01:00
00000000 16 03 03 00 59 02 00 00 55 03 03 ec 51 a4 79 dd |....Y...U...Q.y.|
00000010 3b 69 4a 16 5b 93 ed 46 28 04 ff 5c 85 75 bc f2 |;iJ.[..F(..\.u..|
00000020 f5 c1 73 1f a2 21 cf 2e 26 41 8d 20 f7 fb 87 4f |..s..!..&A. ...O|
00000030 0b 16 9c a9 ca fb 9a a9 7c eb 7f 92 c1 54 e8 eb |........|....T..|
00000040 5b c2 f5 4d 35 48 e9 42 a0 b9 ee be c0 2f 00 00 |[..M5H.B...../..|
crypto/tls: allow renegotiation to be handled by a client. This change adds Config.Renegotiation which controls whether a TLS client will accept renegotiation requests from a server. This is used, for example, by some web servers that wish to “add” a client certificate to an HTTPS connection. This is disabled by default because it significantly complicates the state machine. Originally, handshakeMutex was taken before locking either Conn.in or Conn.out. However, if renegotiation is permitted then a handshake may be triggered during a Read() call. If Conn.in were unlocked before taking handshakeMutex then a concurrent Read() call could see an intermediate state and trigger an error. Thus handshakeMutex is now locked after Conn.in and the handshake functions assume that Conn.in is locked for the duration of the handshake. Additionally, handshakeMutex used to protect Conn.out also. With the possibility of renegotiation that's no longer viable and so writeRecordLocked has been split off. Fixes #5742. Change-Id: I935914db1f185d507ff39bba8274c148d756a1c8 Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/22475 Run-TryBot: Adam Langley <agl@golang.org> TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org> Reviewed-by: Russ Cox <rsc@golang.org>
2016-04-26 18:45:35 +01:00
00000050 0d ff 01 00 01 00 00 0b 00 04 03 00 01 02 16 03 |................|
crypto/x509: require a NULL parameters for RSA public keys. The RFC is clear that the Parameters in an AlgorithmIdentifer for an RSA public key must be NULL. BoringSSL enforces this so we have strong evidence that this is a widely compatible change. Embarrassingly enough, the major source of violations of this is us. Go used to get this correct in only one of two places. This was only fixed in 2013 (with 4874bc9b). That's why lots of test certificates are updated in this change. Fixes #16166. Change-Id: Ib9a4551349354c66e730d44eb8cee4ec402ea8ab Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/27312 Reviewed-by: Brad Fitzpatrick <bradfitz@golang.org>
2016-08-17 23:55:15 +01:00
00000060 03 02 59 0b 00 02 55 00 02 52 00 02 4f 30 82 02 |..Y...U..R..O0..|
00000070 4b 30 82 01 b4 a0 03 02 01 02 02 09 00 e8 f0 9d |K0..............|
00000080 3f e2 5b ea a6 30 0d 06 09 2a 86 48 86 f7 0d 01 |?.[..0...*.H....|
00000090 01 0b 05 00 30 1f 31 0b 30 09 06 03 55 04 0a 13 |....0.1.0...U...|
000000a0 02 47 6f 31 10 30 0e 06 03 55 04 03 13 07 47 6f |.Go1.0...U....Go|
000000b0 20 52 6f 6f 74 30 1e 17 0d 31 36 30 31 30 31 30 | Root0...1601010|
000000c0 30 30 30 30 30 5a 17 0d 32 35 30 31 30 31 30 30 |00000Z..25010100|
000000d0 30 30 30 30 5a 30 1a 31 0b 30 09 06 03 55 04 0a |0000Z0.1.0...U..|
000000e0 13 02 47 6f 31 0b 30 09 06 03 55 04 03 13 02 47 |..Go1.0...U....G|
000000f0 6f 30 81 9f 30 0d 06 09 2a 86 48 86 f7 0d 01 01 |o0..0...*.H.....|
00000100 01 05 00 03 81 8d 00 30 81 89 02 81 81 00 db 46 |.......0.......F|
00000110 7d 93 2e 12 27 06 48 bc 06 28 21 ab 7e c4 b6 a2 |}...'.H..(!.~...|
00000120 5d fe 1e 52 45 88 7a 36 47 a5 08 0d 92 42 5b c2 |]..RE.z6G....B[.|
00000130 81 c0 be 97 79 98 40 fb 4f 6d 14 fd 2b 13 8b c2 |....y.@.Om..+...|
00000140 a5 2e 67 d8 d4 09 9e d6 22 38 b7 4a 0b 74 73 2b |..g....."8.J.ts+|
00000150 c2 34 f1 d1 93 e5 96 d9 74 7b f3 58 9f 6c 61 3c |.4......t{.X.la<|
00000160 c0 b0 41 d4 d9 2b 2b 24 23 77 5b 1c 3b bd 75 5d |..A..++$#w[.;.u]|
00000170 ce 20 54 cf a1 63 87 1d 1e 24 c4 f3 1d 1a 50 8b |. T..c...$....P.|
00000180 aa b6 14 43 ed 97 a7 75 62 f4 14 c8 52 d7 02 03 |...C...ub...R...|
00000190 01 00 01 a3 81 93 30 81 90 30 0e 06 03 55 1d 0f |......0..0...U..|
000001a0 01 01 ff 04 04 03 02 05 a0 30 1d 06 03 55 1d 25 |.........0...U.%|
000001b0 04 16 30 14 06 08 2b 06 01 05 05 07 03 01 06 08 |..0...+.........|
000001c0 2b 06 01 05 05 07 03 02 30 0c 06 03 55 1d 13 01 |+.......0...U...|
000001d0 01 ff 04 02 30 00 30 19 06 03 55 1d 0e 04 12 04 |....0.0...U.....|
000001e0 10 9f 91 16 1f 43 43 3e 49 a6 de 6d b6 80 d7 9f |.....CC>I..m....|
000001f0 60 30 1b 06 03 55 1d 23 04 14 30 12 80 10 48 13 |`0...U.#..0...H.|
00000200 49 4d 13 7e 16 31 bb a3 01 d5 ac ab 6e 7b 30 19 |IM.~.1......n{0.|
00000210 06 03 55 1d 11 04 12 30 10 82 0e 65 78 61 6d 70 |..U....0...examp|
00000220 6c 65 2e 67 6f 6c 61 6e 67 30 0d 06 09 2a 86 48 |le.golang0...*.H|
00000230 86 f7 0d 01 01 0b 05 00 03 81 81 00 9d 30 cc 40 |.............0.@|
00000240 2b 5b 50 a0 61 cb ba e5 53 58 e1 ed 83 28 a9 58 |+[P.a...SX...(.X|
00000250 1a a9 38 a4 95 a1 ac 31 5a 1a 84 66 3d 43 d3 2d |..8....1Z..f=C.-|
00000260 d9 0b f2 97 df d3 20 64 38 92 24 3a 00 bc cf 9c |...... d8.$:....|
00000270 7d b7 40 20 01 5f aa d3 16 61 09 a2 76 fd 13 c3 |}.@ ._...a..v...|
00000280 cc e1 0c 5c ee b1 87 82 f1 6c 04 ed 73 bb b3 43 |...\.....l..s..C|
00000290 77 8d 0c 1c f1 0f a1 d8 40 83 61 c9 4c 72 2b 9d |w.......@.a.Lr+.|
000002a0 ae db 46 06 06 4d f4 c1 b3 3e c0 d1 bd 42 d4 db |..F..M...>...B..|
000002b0 fe 3d 13 60 84 5c 21 d3 3b e9 fa e7 16 03 03 00 |.=.`.\!.;.......|
000002c0 cd 0c 00 00 c9 03 00 17 41 04 fc eb 26 2a 1f 0d |........A...&*..|
000002d0 64 f0 4f 23 b3 82 ce 78 14 76 72 b2 45 c0 b0 d7 |d.O#...x.vr.E...|
000002e0 36 dd 9c c4 bf b4 4b 40 69 ad d6 84 76 2b 8f d1 |6.....K@i...v+..|
000002f0 d1 8d 4f 67 40 96 91 88 9c b0 20 46 0a e2 6e 62 |..Og@..... F..nb|
00000300 8d 83 d4 8e 38 d4 b9 d1 aa e0 04 01 00 80 05 c6 |....8...........|
00000310 e8 95 17 54 3e ee 0f 88 90 69 d8 d0 6f c4 f5 f0 |...T>....i..o...|
00000320 8c 5d 73 6a 9d 53 83 1b 63 ae 96 70 ce d6 3e 04 |.]sj.S..c..p..>.|
00000330 7d f6 4f 95 89 be 66 1c 3a e6 e0 79 45 b4 55 24 |}.O...f.:..yE.U$|
00000340 d0 a7 a1 18 4b d5 b7 b6 39 93 7c bf b6 37 d9 44 |....K...9.|..7.D|
00000350 ec 1a 0c b8 70 c5 7b ac a4 b8 7b 3e b0 45 00 27 |....p.{...{>.E.'|
00000360 8a 12 f1 e8 fe 07 ac 91 61 6b df 0c 36 19 ab 71 |........ak..6..q|
00000370 b6 9f db 61 b9 c4 04 10 37 81 ef 74 e5 94 fb 89 |...a....7..t....|
00000380 95 a4 44 84 5d d0 eb 3d 37 54 1e 63 da cb 16 03 |..D.]..=7T.c....|
00000390 03 00 04 0e 00 00 00 |.......|
crypto/tls: allow renegotiation to be handled by a client. This change adds Config.Renegotiation which controls whether a TLS client will accept renegotiation requests from a server. This is used, for example, by some web servers that wish to “add” a client certificate to an HTTPS connection. This is disabled by default because it significantly complicates the state machine. Originally, handshakeMutex was taken before locking either Conn.in or Conn.out. However, if renegotiation is permitted then a handshake may be triggered during a Read() call. If Conn.in were unlocked before taking handshakeMutex then a concurrent Read() call could see an intermediate state and trigger an error. Thus handshakeMutex is now locked after Conn.in and the handshake functions assume that Conn.in is locked for the duration of the handshake. Additionally, handshakeMutex used to protect Conn.out also. With the possibility of renegotiation that's no longer viable and so writeRecordLocked has been split off. Fixes #5742. Change-Id: I935914db1f185d507ff39bba8274c148d756a1c8 Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/22475 Run-TryBot: Adam Langley <agl@golang.org> TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org> Reviewed-by: Russ Cox <rsc@golang.org>
2016-04-26 18:45:35 +01:00
>>> Flow 3 (client to server)
00000000 16 03 03 00 46 10 00 00 42 41 04 1e 18 37 ef 0d |....F...BA...7..|
00000010 19 51 88 35 75 71 b5 e5 54 5b 12 2e 8f 09 67 fd |.Q.5uq..T[....g.|
00000020 a7 24 20 3e b2 56 1c ce 97 28 5e f8 2b 2d 4f 9e |.$ >.V...(^.+-O.|
00000030 f1 07 9f 6c 4b 5b 83 56 e2 32 42 e9 58 b6 d7 49 |...lK[.V.2B.X..I|
00000040 a6 b5 68 1a 41 03 56 6b dc 5a 89 14 03 03 00 01 |..h.A.Vk.Z......|
crypto/x509: require a NULL parameters for RSA public keys. The RFC is clear that the Parameters in an AlgorithmIdentifer for an RSA public key must be NULL. BoringSSL enforces this so we have strong evidence that this is a widely compatible change. Embarrassingly enough, the major source of violations of this is us. Go used to get this correct in only one of two places. This was only fixed in 2013 (with 4874bc9b). That's why lots of test certificates are updated in this change. Fixes #16166. Change-Id: Ib9a4551349354c66e730d44eb8cee4ec402ea8ab Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/27312 Reviewed-by: Brad Fitzpatrick <bradfitz@golang.org>
2016-08-17 23:55:15 +01:00
00000050 01 16 03 03 00 28 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 52 89 |.....(........R.|
00000060 96 4a 6a 3a 06 d7 39 7c cf 9b 98 94 5a 9c 24 61 |.Jj:..9|....Z.$a|
00000070 c4 a7 a6 2c bf a1 58 2c 7b ae a7 42 3f 75 |...,..X,{..B?u|
crypto/tls: allow renegotiation to be handled by a client. This change adds Config.Renegotiation which controls whether a TLS client will accept renegotiation requests from a server. This is used, for example, by some web servers that wish to “add” a client certificate to an HTTPS connection. This is disabled by default because it significantly complicates the state machine. Originally, handshakeMutex was taken before locking either Conn.in or Conn.out. However, if renegotiation is permitted then a handshake may be triggered during a Read() call. If Conn.in were unlocked before taking handshakeMutex then a concurrent Read() call could see an intermediate state and trigger an error. Thus handshakeMutex is now locked after Conn.in and the handshake functions assume that Conn.in is locked for the duration of the handshake. Additionally, handshakeMutex used to protect Conn.out also. With the possibility of renegotiation that's no longer viable and so writeRecordLocked has been split off. Fixes #5742. Change-Id: I935914db1f185d507ff39bba8274c148d756a1c8 Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/22475 Run-TryBot: Adam Langley <agl@golang.org> TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org> Reviewed-by: Russ Cox <rsc@golang.org>
2016-04-26 18:45:35 +01:00
>>> Flow 4 (server to client)
crypto/x509: require a NULL parameters for RSA public keys. The RFC is clear that the Parameters in an AlgorithmIdentifer for an RSA public key must be NULL. BoringSSL enforces this so we have strong evidence that this is a widely compatible change. Embarrassingly enough, the major source of violations of this is us. Go used to get this correct in only one of two places. This was only fixed in 2013 (with 4874bc9b). That's why lots of test certificates are updated in this change. Fixes #16166. Change-Id: Ib9a4551349354c66e730d44eb8cee4ec402ea8ab Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/27312 Reviewed-by: Brad Fitzpatrick <bradfitz@golang.org>
2016-08-17 23:55:15 +01:00
00000000 14 03 03 00 01 01 16 03 03 00 28 92 8c 2a 95 70 |..........(..*.p|
00000010 1c e9 5c 9a e3 38 40 36 06 2c 90 8b 60 71 fd 79 |..\..8@6.,..`q.y|
00000020 11 3a 5a 6a 2d 48 a1 25 48 26 62 b3 b9 5e 20 2a |.:Zj-H.%H&b..^ *|
00000030 96 e4 36 |..6|
crypto/tls: allow renegotiation to be handled by a client. This change adds Config.Renegotiation which controls whether a TLS client will accept renegotiation requests from a server. This is used, for example, by some web servers that wish to “add” a client certificate to an HTTPS connection. This is disabled by default because it significantly complicates the state machine. Originally, handshakeMutex was taken before locking either Conn.in or Conn.out. However, if renegotiation is permitted then a handshake may be triggered during a Read() call. If Conn.in were unlocked before taking handshakeMutex then a concurrent Read() call could see an intermediate state and trigger an error. Thus handshakeMutex is now locked after Conn.in and the handshake functions assume that Conn.in is locked for the duration of the handshake. Additionally, handshakeMutex used to protect Conn.out also. With the possibility of renegotiation that's no longer viable and so writeRecordLocked has been split off. Fixes #5742. Change-Id: I935914db1f185d507ff39bba8274c148d756a1c8 Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/22475 Run-TryBot: Adam Langley <agl@golang.org> TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org> Reviewed-by: Russ Cox <rsc@golang.org>
2016-04-26 18:45:35 +01:00
>>> Flow 5 (client to server)
crypto/x509: require a NULL parameters for RSA public keys. The RFC is clear that the Parameters in an AlgorithmIdentifer for an RSA public key must be NULL. BoringSSL enforces this so we have strong evidence that this is a widely compatible change. Embarrassingly enough, the major source of violations of this is us. Go used to get this correct in only one of two places. This was only fixed in 2013 (with 4874bc9b). That's why lots of test certificates are updated in this change. Fixes #16166. Change-Id: Ib9a4551349354c66e730d44eb8cee4ec402ea8ab Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/27312 Reviewed-by: Brad Fitzpatrick <bradfitz@golang.org>
2016-08-17 23:55:15 +01:00
00000000 17 03 03 00 1e 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 01 ec 70 62 |..............pb|
00000010 95 4c 48 dd e3 75 e7 05 bb 0a e0 cf d9 2e dd a0 |.LH..u..........|
00000020 75 43 dd |uC.|
crypto/tls: allow renegotiation to be handled by a client. This change adds Config.Renegotiation which controls whether a TLS client will accept renegotiation requests from a server. This is used, for example, by some web servers that wish to “add” a client certificate to an HTTPS connection. This is disabled by default because it significantly complicates the state machine. Originally, handshakeMutex was taken before locking either Conn.in or Conn.out. However, if renegotiation is permitted then a handshake may be triggered during a Read() call. If Conn.in were unlocked before taking handshakeMutex then a concurrent Read() call could see an intermediate state and trigger an error. Thus handshakeMutex is now locked after Conn.in and the handshake functions assume that Conn.in is locked for the duration of the handshake. Additionally, handshakeMutex used to protect Conn.out also. With the possibility of renegotiation that's no longer viable and so writeRecordLocked has been split off. Fixes #5742. Change-Id: I935914db1f185d507ff39bba8274c148d756a1c8 Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/22475 Run-TryBot: Adam Langley <agl@golang.org> TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org> Reviewed-by: Russ Cox <rsc@golang.org>
2016-04-26 18:45:35 +01:00
>>> Flow 6 (server to client)
crypto/x509: require a NULL parameters for RSA public keys. The RFC is clear that the Parameters in an AlgorithmIdentifer for an RSA public key must be NULL. BoringSSL enforces this so we have strong evidence that this is a widely compatible change. Embarrassingly enough, the major source of violations of this is us. Go used to get this correct in only one of two places. This was only fixed in 2013 (with 4874bc9b). That's why lots of test certificates are updated in this change. Fixes #16166. Change-Id: Ib9a4551349354c66e730d44eb8cee4ec402ea8ab Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/27312 Reviewed-by: Brad Fitzpatrick <bradfitz@golang.org>
2016-08-17 23:55:15 +01:00
00000000 16 03 03 00 1c 92 8c 2a 95 70 1c e9 5d f8 42 e3 |.......*.p..].B.|
00000010 56 2d da 6a e6 65 bd d8 48 d7 60 80 67 9b 78 df |V-.j.e..H.`.g.x.|
00000020 40 |@|
crypto/tls: allow renegotiation to be handled by a client. This change adds Config.Renegotiation which controls whether a TLS client will accept renegotiation requests from a server. This is used, for example, by some web servers that wish to “add” a client certificate to an HTTPS connection. This is disabled by default because it significantly complicates the state machine. Originally, handshakeMutex was taken before locking either Conn.in or Conn.out. However, if renegotiation is permitted then a handshake may be triggered during a Read() call. If Conn.in were unlocked before taking handshakeMutex then a concurrent Read() call could see an intermediate state and trigger an error. Thus handshakeMutex is now locked after Conn.in and the handshake functions assume that Conn.in is locked for the duration of the handshake. Additionally, handshakeMutex used to protect Conn.out also. With the possibility of renegotiation that's no longer viable and so writeRecordLocked has been split off. Fixes #5742. Change-Id: I935914db1f185d507ff39bba8274c148d756a1c8 Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/22475 Run-TryBot: Adam Langley <agl@golang.org> TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org> Reviewed-by: Russ Cox <rsc@golang.org>
2016-04-26 18:45:35 +01:00
>>> Flow 7 (client to server)
crypto/x509: require a NULL parameters for RSA public keys. The RFC is clear that the Parameters in an AlgorithmIdentifer for an RSA public key must be NULL. BoringSSL enforces this so we have strong evidence that this is a widely compatible change. Embarrassingly enough, the major source of violations of this is us. Go used to get this correct in only one of two places. This was only fixed in 2013 (with 4874bc9b). That's why lots of test certificates are updated in this change. Fixes #16166. Change-Id: Ib9a4551349354c66e730d44eb8cee4ec402ea8ab Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/27312 Reviewed-by: Brad Fitzpatrick <bradfitz@golang.org>
2016-08-17 23:55:15 +01:00
00000000 15 03 03 00 1a 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 02 b5 10 47 |...............G|
00000010 3e c1 98 c1 ad e1 05 83 ca 46 83 91 1e 4b d1 15 |>........F...K..|
00000020 03 03 00 1a 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 03 bb a7 ca fd |................|
00000030 d6 be d3 2e 30 7c d9 d7 8a d9 83 78 90 a3 |....0|.....x..|
Reference in New Issue Copy Permalink