The RFC is clear that the Parameters in an AlgorithmIdentifer for an RSA
public key must be NULL. BoringSSL enforces this so we have strong
evidence that this is a widely compatible change.
Embarrassingly enough, the major source of violations of this is us. Go
used to get this correct in only one of two places. This was only fixed
in 2013 (with 4874bc9b). That's why lots of test certificates are
updated in this change.
Fixes#16166.
Change-Id: Ib9a4551349354c66e730d44eb8cee4ec402ea8ab
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/27312
Reviewed-by: Brad Fitzpatrick <bradfitz@golang.org>
This fixes some 40 warnings from go vet.
Fixes#16134.
Change-Id: Ib9fcba275fe692f027a2a07b581c8cf503b11087
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/24287
Reviewed-by: Brad Fitzpatrick <bradfitz@golang.org>
Run-TryBot: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@golang.org>
The current code, introduced after Go 1.6 to improve latency on
low-bandwidth connections, sends 1 kB packets until 1 MB has been sent,
and then sends 16 kB packets (the maximum record size).
Unfortunately this decreases throughput for 1-16 MB responses by 20% or so.
Following discussion on #15713, change cutoff to 128 kB sent
and also grow the size allowed for successive packets:
1 kB, 2 kB, 3 kB, ..., 15 kB, 16 kB.
This fixes the throughput problems: the overhead is now closer to 2%.
I hope this still helps with latency but I don't have a great way to test it.
At the least, it's not worse than Go 1.6.
Comparing MaxPacket vs DynamicPacket benchmarks:
name maxpkt time/op dyn. time/op delta
Throughput/1MB-8 5.07ms ± 7% 5.21ms ± 7% +2.73% (p=0.023 n=16+16)
Throughput/2MB-8 15.7ms ±201% 8.4ms ± 5% ~ (p=0.604 n=20+16)
Throughput/4MB-8 14.3ms ± 1% 14.5ms ± 1% +1.53% (p=0.000 n=16+16)
Throughput/8MB-8 26.6ms ± 1% 26.8ms ± 1% +0.47% (p=0.003 n=19+18)
Throughput/16MB-8 51.0ms ± 1% 51.3ms ± 1% +0.47% (p=0.000 n=20+20)
Throughput/32MB-8 100ms ± 1% 100ms ± 1% +0.24% (p=0.033 n=20+20)
Throughput/64MB-8 197ms ± 0% 198ms ± 0% +0.56% (p=0.000 n=18+7)
The small MB runs are bimodal in both cases, probably GC pauses.
But there's clearly no general slowdown anymore.
Fixes#15713.
Change-Id: I5fc44680ba71812d24baac142bceee0e23f2e382
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/23487
Reviewed-by: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@golang.org>
Currently, if a client of crypto/tls (e.g., net/http, http2) calls
tls.Conn.Write with a 33KB buffer, that ends up writing three TLS
records: 16KB, 16KB, and 1KB. Slow clients (such as 2G phones) must
download the first 16KB record before they can decrypt the first byte.
To improve latency, it's better to send smaller TLS records. However,
sending smaller records adds overhead (more overhead bytes and more
crypto calls), which slightly hurts throughput.
A simple heuristic, implemented in this change, is to send small
records for new connections, then boost to large records after the
first 1MB has been written on the connection.
Fixes#14376
Change-Id: Ice0f6279325be6775aa55351809f88e07dd700cd
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/19591
TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Tom Bergan <tombergan@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Adam Langley <agl@golang.org>
With this in place, a TLS server is capable of selecting the correct
certificate based on the client's ServerNameIndication extension.
The need to call Config.BuildNameToCertificate is unfortunate, but
adding a sync.Once to the Config structure made it uncopyable and I
felt that was too high a price to pay. Parsing the leaf certificates
in each handshake was too inefficient to consider.
R=bradfitz, rsc
CC=golang-dev
https://golang.org/cl/5151048
This is largely based on ality's CL 2747042.
crypto/rc4: API break in order to conform to crypto/cipher's
Stream interface
cipher/cipher: promote to the default build
Since CBC differs between TLS 1.0 and 1.1, we downgrade and
support only 1.0 at the current time. 1.0 is what most of the
world uses.
Given this CL, it would be trival to add support for AES 256,
SHA 256 etc, but I haven't in order to keep the change smaller.
R=rsc
CC=ality, golang-dev
https://golang.org/cl/3659041
