boringssl/crypto/bn/asm/armv4-mont.pl

695 lines
18 KiB
Perl
Raw Normal View History

#!/usr/bin/env perl
# ====================================================================
# Written by Andy Polyakov <appro@openssl.org> for the OpenSSL
# project. The module is, however, dual licensed under OpenSSL and
# CRYPTOGAMS licenses depending on where you obtain it. For further
# details see http://www.openssl.org/~appro/cryptogams/.
# ====================================================================
# January 2007.
# Montgomery multiplication for ARMv4.
#
# Performance improvement naturally varies among CPU implementations
# and compilers. The code was observed to provide +65-35% improvement
# [depending on key length, less for longer keys] on ARM920T, and
# +115-80% on Intel IXP425. This is compared to pre-bn_mul_mont code
# base and compiler generated code with in-lined umull and even umlal
# instructions. The latter means that this code didn't really have an
# "advantage" of utilizing some "secret" instruction.
#
# The code is interoperable with Thumb ISA and is rather compact, less
# than 1/2KB. Windows CE port would be trivial, as it's exclusively
# about decorations, ABI and instruction syntax are identical.
# November 2013
#
# Add NEON code path, which handles lengths divisible by 8. RSA/DSA
# performance improvement on Cortex-A8 is ~45-100% depending on key
# length, more for longer keys. On Cortex-A15 the span is ~10-105%.
# On Snapdragon S4 improvement was measured to vary from ~70% to
# incredible ~380%, yes, 4.8x faster, for RSA4096 sign. But this is
# rather because original integer-only code seems to perform
# suboptimally on S4. Situation on Cortex-A9 is unfortunately
# different. It's being looked into, but the trouble is that
# performance for vectors longer than 256 bits is actually couple
# of percent worse than for integer-only code. The code is chosen
# for execution on all NEON-capable processors, because gain on
# others outweighs the marginal loss on Cortex-A9.
$flavour = shift;
if ($flavour=~/^\w[\w\-]*\.\w+$/) { $output=$flavour; undef $flavour; }
else { while (($output=shift) && ($output!~/^\w[\w\-]*\.\w+$/)) {} }
if ($flavour && $flavour ne "void") {
$0 =~ m/(.*[\/\\])[^\/\\]+$/; $dir=$1;
( $xlate="${dir}arm-xlate.pl" and -f $xlate ) or
( $xlate="${dir}../../perlasm/arm-xlate.pl" and -f $xlate) or
die "can't locate arm-xlate.pl";
open STDOUT,"| \"$^X\" $xlate $flavour $output";
} else {
open STDOUT,">$output";
}
$num="r0"; # starts as num argument, but holds &tp[num-1]
$ap="r1";
$bp="r2"; $bi="r2"; $rp="r2";
$np="r3";
$tp="r4";
$aj="r5";
$nj="r6";
$tj="r7";
$n0="r8";
########### # r9 is reserved by ELF as platform specific, e.g. TLS pointer
$alo="r10"; # sl, gcc uses it to keep @GOT
$ahi="r11"; # fp
$nlo="r12"; # ip
########### # r13 is stack pointer
$nhi="r14"; # lr
########### # r15 is program counter
#### argument block layout relative to &tp[num-1], a.k.a. $num
$_rp="$num,#12*4";
# ap permanently resides in r1
$_bp="$num,#13*4";
# np permanently resides in r3
$_n0="$num,#14*4";
$_num="$num,#15*4"; $_bpend=$_num;
$code=<<___;
#include <openssl/arm_arch.h>
.text
.code 32
Remove inconsistency in ARM support. This facilitates "universal" builds, ones that target multiple architectures, e.g. ARMv5 through ARMv7. (Imported from upstream's c1669e1c205dc8e695fb0c10a655f434e758b9f7) This is a change from a while ago which was a source of divergence between our perlasm and upstream's. This change in upstream came with the following comment in Configure: Note that -march is not among compiler options in below linux-armv4 target line. Not specifying one is intentional to give you choice to: a) rely on your compiler default by not specifying one; b) specify your target platform explicitly for optimal performance, e.g. -march=armv6 or -march=armv7-a; c) build "universal" binary that targets *range* of platforms by specifying minimum and maximum supported architecture; As for c) option. It actually makes no sense to specify maximum to be less than ARMv7, because it's the least requirement for run-time switch between platform-specific code paths. And without run-time switch performance would be equivalent to one for minimum. Secondly, there are some natural limitations that you'd have to accept and respect. Most notably you can *not* build "universal" binary for big-endian platform. This is because ARMv7 processor always picks instructions in little-endian order. Another similar limitation is that -mthumb can't "cross" -march=armv6t2 boundary, because that's where it became Thumb-2. Well, this limitation is a bit artificial, because it's not really impossible, but it's deemed too tricky to support. And of course you have to be sure that your binutils are actually up to the task of handling maximum target platform. Change-Id: Ie5f674d603393f0a1354a0d0973987484a4a650c Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/4488 Reviewed-by: Adam Langley <agl@google.com>
2015-04-21 02:27:38 +01:00
#if __ARM_MAX_ARCH__>=7
.align 5
.LOPENSSL_armcap:
.word OPENSSL_armcap_P-.Lbn_mul_mont
#endif
.global bn_mul_mont
.hidden bn_mul_mont
.type bn_mul_mont,%function
.align 5
bn_mul_mont:
.Lbn_mul_mont:
ldr ip,[sp,#4] @ load num
stmdb sp!,{r0,r2} @ sp points at argument block
Remove inconsistency in ARM support. This facilitates "universal" builds, ones that target multiple architectures, e.g. ARMv5 through ARMv7. (Imported from upstream's c1669e1c205dc8e695fb0c10a655f434e758b9f7) This is a change from a while ago which was a source of divergence between our perlasm and upstream's. This change in upstream came with the following comment in Configure: Note that -march is not among compiler options in below linux-armv4 target line. Not specifying one is intentional to give you choice to: a) rely on your compiler default by not specifying one; b) specify your target platform explicitly for optimal performance, e.g. -march=armv6 or -march=armv7-a; c) build "universal" binary that targets *range* of platforms by specifying minimum and maximum supported architecture; As for c) option. It actually makes no sense to specify maximum to be less than ARMv7, because it's the least requirement for run-time switch between platform-specific code paths. And without run-time switch performance would be equivalent to one for minimum. Secondly, there are some natural limitations that you'd have to accept and respect. Most notably you can *not* build "universal" binary for big-endian platform. This is because ARMv7 processor always picks instructions in little-endian order. Another similar limitation is that -mthumb can't "cross" -march=armv6t2 boundary, because that's where it became Thumb-2. Well, this limitation is a bit artificial, because it's not really impossible, but it's deemed too tricky to support. And of course you have to be sure that your binutils are actually up to the task of handling maximum target platform. Change-Id: Ie5f674d603393f0a1354a0d0973987484a4a650c Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/4488 Reviewed-by: Adam Langley <agl@google.com>
2015-04-21 02:27:38 +01:00
#if __ARM_MAX_ARCH__>=7
tst ip,#7
bne .Lialu
adr r0,bn_mul_mont
ldr r2,.LOPENSSL_armcap
ldr r0,[r0,r2]
#ifdef __APPLE__
ldr r0,[r0]
#endif
tst r0,#1 @ NEON available?
ldmia sp, {r0,r2}
beq .Lialu
add sp,sp,#8
b bn_mul8x_mont_neon
.align 4
.Lialu:
#endif
cmp ip,#2
mov $num,ip @ load num
movlt r0,#0
addlt sp,sp,#2*4
blt .Labrt
stmdb sp!,{r4-r12,lr} @ save 10 registers
mov $num,$num,lsl#2 @ rescale $num for byte count
sub sp,sp,$num @ alloca(4*num)
sub sp,sp,#4 @ +extra dword
sub $num,$num,#4 @ "num=num-1"
add $tp,$bp,$num @ &bp[num-1]
add $num,sp,$num @ $num to point at &tp[num-1]
ldr $n0,[$_n0] @ &n0
ldr $bi,[$bp] @ bp[0]
ldr $aj,[$ap],#4 @ ap[0],ap++
ldr $nj,[$np],#4 @ np[0],np++
ldr $n0,[$n0] @ *n0
str $tp,[$_bpend] @ save &bp[num]
umull $alo,$ahi,$aj,$bi @ ap[0]*bp[0]
str $n0,[$_n0] @ save n0 value
mul $n0,$alo,$n0 @ "tp[0]"*n0
mov $nlo,#0
umlal $alo,$nlo,$nj,$n0 @ np[0]*n0+"t[0]"
mov $tp,sp
.L1st:
ldr $aj,[$ap],#4 @ ap[j],ap++
mov $alo,$ahi
ldr $nj,[$np],#4 @ np[j],np++
mov $ahi,#0
umlal $alo,$ahi,$aj,$bi @ ap[j]*bp[0]
mov $nhi,#0
umlal $nlo,$nhi,$nj,$n0 @ np[j]*n0
adds $nlo,$nlo,$alo
str $nlo,[$tp],#4 @ tp[j-1]=,tp++
adc $nlo,$nhi,#0
cmp $tp,$num
bne .L1st
adds $nlo,$nlo,$ahi
ldr $tp,[$_bp] @ restore bp
mov $nhi,#0
ldr $n0,[$_n0] @ restore n0
adc $nhi,$nhi,#0
str $nlo,[$num] @ tp[num-1]=
str $nhi,[$num,#4] @ tp[num]=
.Louter:
sub $tj,$num,sp @ "original" $num-1 value
sub $ap,$ap,$tj @ "rewind" ap to &ap[1]
ldr $bi,[$tp,#4]! @ *(++bp)
sub $np,$np,$tj @ "rewind" np to &np[1]
ldr $aj,[$ap,#-4] @ ap[0]
ldr $alo,[sp] @ tp[0]
ldr $nj,[$np,#-4] @ np[0]
ldr $tj,[sp,#4] @ tp[1]
mov $ahi,#0
umlal $alo,$ahi,$aj,$bi @ ap[0]*bp[i]+tp[0]
str $tp,[$_bp] @ save bp
mul $n0,$alo,$n0
mov $nlo,#0
umlal $alo,$nlo,$nj,$n0 @ np[0]*n0+"tp[0]"
mov $tp,sp
.Linner:
ldr $aj,[$ap],#4 @ ap[j],ap++
adds $alo,$ahi,$tj @ +=tp[j]
ldr $nj,[$np],#4 @ np[j],np++
mov $ahi,#0
umlal $alo,$ahi,$aj,$bi @ ap[j]*bp[i]
mov $nhi,#0
umlal $nlo,$nhi,$nj,$n0 @ np[j]*n0
adc $ahi,$ahi,#0
ldr $tj,[$tp,#8] @ tp[j+1]
adds $nlo,$nlo,$alo
str $nlo,[$tp],#4 @ tp[j-1]=,tp++
adc $nlo,$nhi,#0
cmp $tp,$num
bne .Linner
adds $nlo,$nlo,$ahi
mov $nhi,#0
ldr $tp,[$_bp] @ restore bp
adc $nhi,$nhi,#0
ldr $n0,[$_n0] @ restore n0
adds $nlo,$nlo,$tj
ldr $tj,[$_bpend] @ restore &bp[num]
adc $nhi,$nhi,#0
str $nlo,[$num] @ tp[num-1]=
str $nhi,[$num,#4] @ tp[num]=
cmp $tp,$tj
bne .Louter
ldr $rp,[$_rp] @ pull rp
add $num,$num,#4 @ $num to point at &tp[num]
sub $aj,$num,sp @ "original" num value
mov $tp,sp @ "rewind" $tp
mov $ap,$tp @ "borrow" $ap
sub $np,$np,$aj @ "rewind" $np to &np[0]
subs $tj,$tj,$tj @ "clear" carry flag
.Lsub: ldr $tj,[$tp],#4
ldr $nj,[$np],#4
sbcs $tj,$tj,$nj @ tp[j]-np[j]
str $tj,[$rp],#4 @ rp[j]=
teq $tp,$num @ preserve carry
bne .Lsub
sbcs $nhi,$nhi,#0 @ upmost carry
mov $tp,sp @ "rewind" $tp
sub $rp,$rp,$aj @ "rewind" $rp
and $ap,$tp,$nhi
bic $np,$rp,$nhi
orr $ap,$ap,$np @ ap=borrow?tp:rp
.Lcopy: ldr $tj,[$ap],#4 @ copy or in-place refresh
str sp,[$tp],#4 @ zap tp
str $tj,[$rp],#4
cmp $tp,$num
bne .Lcopy
add sp,$num,#4 @ skip over tp[num+1]
ldmia sp!,{r4-r12,lr} @ restore registers
add sp,sp,#2*4 @ skip over {r0,r2}
mov r0,#1
.Labrt:
#if __ARM_ARCH__>=5
ret @ bx lr
#else
tst lr,#1
moveq pc,lr @ be binary compatible with V4, yet
bx lr @ interoperable with Thumb ISA:-)
#endif
.size bn_mul_mont,.-bn_mul_mont
___
{
sub Dlo() { shift=~m|q([1]?[0-9])|?"d".($1*2):""; }
sub Dhi() { shift=~m|q([1]?[0-9])|?"d".($1*2+1):""; }
my ($A0,$A1,$A2,$A3)=map("d$_",(0..3));
my ($N0,$N1,$N2,$N3)=map("d$_",(4..7));
my ($Z,$Temp)=("q4","q5");
my ($A0xB,$A1xB,$A2xB,$A3xB,$A4xB,$A5xB,$A6xB,$A7xB)=map("q$_",(6..13));
my ($Bi,$Ni,$M0)=map("d$_",(28..31));
my $zero=&Dlo($Z);
my $temp=&Dlo($Temp);
my ($rptr,$aptr,$bptr,$nptr,$n0,$num)=map("r$_",(0..5));
my ($tinptr,$toutptr,$inner,$outer)=map("r$_",(6..9));
$code.=<<___;
Remove inconsistency in ARM support. This facilitates "universal" builds, ones that target multiple architectures, e.g. ARMv5 through ARMv7. (Imported from upstream's c1669e1c205dc8e695fb0c10a655f434e758b9f7) This is a change from a while ago which was a source of divergence between our perlasm and upstream's. This change in upstream came with the following comment in Configure: Note that -march is not among compiler options in below linux-armv4 target line. Not specifying one is intentional to give you choice to: a) rely on your compiler default by not specifying one; b) specify your target platform explicitly for optimal performance, e.g. -march=armv6 or -march=armv7-a; c) build "universal" binary that targets *range* of platforms by specifying minimum and maximum supported architecture; As for c) option. It actually makes no sense to specify maximum to be less than ARMv7, because it's the least requirement for run-time switch between platform-specific code paths. And without run-time switch performance would be equivalent to one for minimum. Secondly, there are some natural limitations that you'd have to accept and respect. Most notably you can *not* build "universal" binary for big-endian platform. This is because ARMv7 processor always picks instructions in little-endian order. Another similar limitation is that -mthumb can't "cross" -march=armv6t2 boundary, because that's where it became Thumb-2. Well, this limitation is a bit artificial, because it's not really impossible, but it's deemed too tricky to support. And of course you have to be sure that your binutils are actually up to the task of handling maximum target platform. Change-Id: Ie5f674d603393f0a1354a0d0973987484a4a650c Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/4488 Reviewed-by: Adam Langley <agl@google.com>
2015-04-21 02:27:38 +01:00
#if __ARM_MAX_ARCH__>=7
.arch armv7-a
.fpu neon
.type bn_mul8x_mont_neon,%function
.align 5
bn_mul8x_mont_neon:
mov ip,sp
stmdb sp!,{r4-r11}
vstmdb sp!,{d8-d15} @ ABI specification says so
ldmia ip,{r4-r5} @ load rest of parameter block
sub $toutptr,sp,#16
vld1.32 {${Bi}[0]}, [$bptr,:32]!
sub $toutptr,$toutptr,$num,lsl#4
vld1.32 {$A0-$A3}, [$aptr]! @ can't specify :32 :-(
and $toutptr,$toutptr,#-64
vld1.32 {${M0}[0]}, [$n0,:32]
mov sp,$toutptr @ alloca
veor $zero,$zero,$zero
subs $inner,$num,#8
vzip.16 $Bi,$zero
vmull.u32 $A0xB,$Bi,${A0}[0]
vmull.u32 $A1xB,$Bi,${A0}[1]
vmull.u32 $A2xB,$Bi,${A1}[0]
vshl.i64 $temp,`&Dhi("$A0xB")`,#16
vmull.u32 $A3xB,$Bi,${A1}[1]
vadd.u64 $temp,$temp,`&Dlo("$A0xB")`
veor $zero,$zero,$zero
vmul.u32 $Ni,$temp,$M0
vmull.u32 $A4xB,$Bi,${A2}[0]
vld1.32 {$N0-$N3}, [$nptr]!
vmull.u32 $A5xB,$Bi,${A2}[1]
vmull.u32 $A6xB,$Bi,${A3}[0]
vzip.16 $Ni,$zero
vmull.u32 $A7xB,$Bi,${A3}[1]
bne .LNEON_1st
@ special case for num=8, everything is in register bank...
vmlal.u32 $A0xB,$Ni,${N0}[0]
sub $outer,$num,#1
vmlal.u32 $A1xB,$Ni,${N0}[1]
vmlal.u32 $A2xB,$Ni,${N1}[0]
vmlal.u32 $A3xB,$Ni,${N1}[1]
vmlal.u32 $A4xB,$Ni,${N2}[0]
vmov $Temp,$A0xB
vmlal.u32 $A5xB,$Ni,${N2}[1]
vmov $A0xB,$A1xB
vmlal.u32 $A6xB,$Ni,${N3}[0]
vmov $A1xB,$A2xB
vmlal.u32 $A7xB,$Ni,${N3}[1]
vmov $A2xB,$A3xB
vmov $A3xB,$A4xB
vshr.u64 $temp,$temp,#16
vmov $A4xB,$A5xB
vmov $A5xB,$A6xB
vadd.u64 $temp,$temp,`&Dhi("$Temp")`
vmov $A6xB,$A7xB
veor $A7xB,$A7xB
vshr.u64 $temp,$temp,#16
b .LNEON_outer8
.align 4
.LNEON_outer8:
vld1.32 {${Bi}[0]}, [$bptr,:32]!
veor $zero,$zero,$zero
vzip.16 $Bi,$zero
vadd.u64 `&Dlo("$A0xB")`,`&Dlo("$A0xB")`,$temp
vmlal.u32 $A0xB,$Bi,${A0}[0]
vmlal.u32 $A1xB,$Bi,${A0}[1]
vmlal.u32 $A2xB,$Bi,${A1}[0]
vshl.i64 $temp,`&Dhi("$A0xB")`,#16
vmlal.u32 $A3xB,$Bi,${A1}[1]
vadd.u64 $temp,$temp,`&Dlo("$A0xB")`
veor $zero,$zero,$zero
subs $outer,$outer,#1
vmul.u32 $Ni,$temp,$M0
vmlal.u32 $A4xB,$Bi,${A2}[0]
vmlal.u32 $A5xB,$Bi,${A2}[1]
vmlal.u32 $A6xB,$Bi,${A3}[0]
vzip.16 $Ni,$zero
vmlal.u32 $A7xB,$Bi,${A3}[1]
vmlal.u32 $A0xB,$Ni,${N0}[0]
vmlal.u32 $A1xB,$Ni,${N0}[1]
vmlal.u32 $A2xB,$Ni,${N1}[0]
vmlal.u32 $A3xB,$Ni,${N1}[1]
vmlal.u32 $A4xB,$Ni,${N2}[0]
vmov $Temp,$A0xB
vmlal.u32 $A5xB,$Ni,${N2}[1]
vmov $A0xB,$A1xB
vmlal.u32 $A6xB,$Ni,${N3}[0]
vmov $A1xB,$A2xB
vmlal.u32 $A7xB,$Ni,${N3}[1]
vmov $A2xB,$A3xB
vmov $A3xB,$A4xB
vshr.u64 $temp,$temp,#16
vmov $A4xB,$A5xB
vmov $A5xB,$A6xB
vadd.u64 $temp,$temp,`&Dhi("$Temp")`
vmov $A6xB,$A7xB
veor $A7xB,$A7xB
vshr.u64 $temp,$temp,#16
bne .LNEON_outer8
vadd.u64 `&Dlo("$A0xB")`,`&Dlo("$A0xB")`,$temp
mov $toutptr,sp
vshr.u64 $temp,`&Dlo("$A0xB")`,#16
mov $inner,$num
vadd.u64 `&Dhi("$A0xB")`,`&Dhi("$A0xB")`,$temp
add $tinptr,sp,#16
vshr.u64 $temp,`&Dhi("$A0xB")`,#16
vzip.16 `&Dlo("$A0xB")`,`&Dhi("$A0xB")`
b .LNEON_tail2
.align 4
.LNEON_1st:
vmlal.u32 $A0xB,$Ni,${N0}[0]
vld1.32 {$A0-$A3}, [$aptr]!
vmlal.u32 $A1xB,$Ni,${N0}[1]
subs $inner,$inner,#8
vmlal.u32 $A2xB,$Ni,${N1}[0]
vmlal.u32 $A3xB,$Ni,${N1}[1]
vmlal.u32 $A4xB,$Ni,${N2}[0]
vld1.32 {$N0-$N1}, [$nptr]!
vmlal.u32 $A5xB,$Ni,${N2}[1]
vst1.64 {$A0xB-$A1xB}, [$toutptr,:256]!
vmlal.u32 $A6xB,$Ni,${N3}[0]
vmlal.u32 $A7xB,$Ni,${N3}[1]
vst1.64 {$A2xB-$A3xB}, [$toutptr,:256]!
vmull.u32 $A0xB,$Bi,${A0}[0]
vld1.32 {$N2-$N3}, [$nptr]!
vmull.u32 $A1xB,$Bi,${A0}[1]
vst1.64 {$A4xB-$A5xB}, [$toutptr,:256]!
vmull.u32 $A2xB,$Bi,${A1}[0]
vmull.u32 $A3xB,$Bi,${A1}[1]
vst1.64 {$A6xB-$A7xB}, [$toutptr,:256]!
vmull.u32 $A4xB,$Bi,${A2}[0]
vmull.u32 $A5xB,$Bi,${A2}[1]
vmull.u32 $A6xB,$Bi,${A3}[0]
vmull.u32 $A7xB,$Bi,${A3}[1]
bne .LNEON_1st
vmlal.u32 $A0xB,$Ni,${N0}[0]
add $tinptr,sp,#16
vmlal.u32 $A1xB,$Ni,${N0}[1]
sub $aptr,$aptr,$num,lsl#2 @ rewind $aptr
vmlal.u32 $A2xB,$Ni,${N1}[0]
vld1.64 {$Temp}, [sp,:128]
vmlal.u32 $A3xB,$Ni,${N1}[1]
sub $outer,$num,#1
vmlal.u32 $A4xB,$Ni,${N2}[0]
vst1.64 {$A0xB-$A1xB}, [$toutptr,:256]!
vmlal.u32 $A5xB,$Ni,${N2}[1]
vshr.u64 $temp,$temp,#16
vld1.64 {$A0xB}, [$tinptr, :128]!
vmlal.u32 $A6xB,$Ni,${N3}[0]
vst1.64 {$A2xB-$A3xB}, [$toutptr,:256]!
vmlal.u32 $A7xB,$Ni,${N3}[1]
vst1.64 {$A4xB-$A5xB}, [$toutptr,:256]!
vadd.u64 $temp,$temp,`&Dhi("$Temp")`
veor $Z,$Z,$Z
vst1.64 {$A6xB-$A7xB}, [$toutptr,:256]!
vld1.64 {$A1xB-$A2xB}, [$tinptr, :256]!
vst1.64 {$Z}, [$toutptr,:128]
vshr.u64 $temp,$temp,#16
b .LNEON_outer
.align 4
.LNEON_outer:
vld1.32 {${Bi}[0]}, [$bptr,:32]!
sub $nptr,$nptr,$num,lsl#2 @ rewind $nptr
vld1.32 {$A0-$A3}, [$aptr]!
veor $zero,$zero,$zero
mov $toutptr,sp
vzip.16 $Bi,$zero
sub $inner,$num,#8
vadd.u64 `&Dlo("$A0xB")`,`&Dlo("$A0xB")`,$temp
vmlal.u32 $A0xB,$Bi,${A0}[0]
vld1.64 {$A3xB-$A4xB},[$tinptr,:256]!
vmlal.u32 $A1xB,$Bi,${A0}[1]
vmlal.u32 $A2xB,$Bi,${A1}[0]
vld1.64 {$A5xB-$A6xB},[$tinptr,:256]!
vmlal.u32 $A3xB,$Bi,${A1}[1]
vshl.i64 $temp,`&Dhi("$A0xB")`,#16
veor $zero,$zero,$zero
vadd.u64 $temp,$temp,`&Dlo("$A0xB")`
vld1.64 {$A7xB},[$tinptr,:128]!
vmul.u32 $Ni,$temp,$M0
vmlal.u32 $A4xB,$Bi,${A2}[0]
vld1.32 {$N0-$N3}, [$nptr]!
vmlal.u32 $A5xB,$Bi,${A2}[1]
vmlal.u32 $A6xB,$Bi,${A3}[0]
vzip.16 $Ni,$zero
vmlal.u32 $A7xB,$Bi,${A3}[1]
.LNEON_inner:
vmlal.u32 $A0xB,$Ni,${N0}[0]
vld1.32 {$A0-$A3}, [$aptr]!
vmlal.u32 $A1xB,$Ni,${N0}[1]
subs $inner,$inner,#8
vmlal.u32 $A2xB,$Ni,${N1}[0]
vmlal.u32 $A3xB,$Ni,${N1}[1]
vst1.64 {$A0xB-$A1xB}, [$toutptr,:256]!
vmlal.u32 $A4xB,$Ni,${N2}[0]
vld1.64 {$A0xB}, [$tinptr, :128]!
vmlal.u32 $A5xB,$Ni,${N2}[1]
vst1.64 {$A2xB-$A3xB}, [$toutptr,:256]!
vmlal.u32 $A6xB,$Ni,${N3}[0]
vld1.64 {$A1xB-$A2xB}, [$tinptr, :256]!
vmlal.u32 $A7xB,$Ni,${N3}[1]
vst1.64 {$A4xB-$A5xB}, [$toutptr,:256]!
vmlal.u32 $A0xB,$Bi,${A0}[0]
vld1.64 {$A3xB-$A4xB}, [$tinptr, :256]!
vmlal.u32 $A1xB,$Bi,${A0}[1]
vst1.64 {$A6xB-$A7xB}, [$toutptr,:256]!
vmlal.u32 $A2xB,$Bi,${A1}[0]
vld1.64 {$A5xB-$A6xB}, [$tinptr, :256]!
vmlal.u32 $A3xB,$Bi,${A1}[1]
vld1.32 {$N0-$N3}, [$nptr]!
vmlal.u32 $A4xB,$Bi,${A2}[0]
vld1.64 {$A7xB}, [$tinptr, :128]!
vmlal.u32 $A5xB,$Bi,${A2}[1]
vmlal.u32 $A6xB,$Bi,${A3}[0]
vmlal.u32 $A7xB,$Bi,${A3}[1]
bne .LNEON_inner
vmlal.u32 $A0xB,$Ni,${N0}[0]
add $tinptr,sp,#16
vmlal.u32 $A1xB,$Ni,${N0}[1]
sub $aptr,$aptr,$num,lsl#2 @ rewind $aptr
vmlal.u32 $A2xB,$Ni,${N1}[0]
vld1.64 {$Temp}, [sp,:128]
vmlal.u32 $A3xB,$Ni,${N1}[1]
subs $outer,$outer,#1
vmlal.u32 $A4xB,$Ni,${N2}[0]
vst1.64 {$A0xB-$A1xB}, [$toutptr,:256]!
vmlal.u32 $A5xB,$Ni,${N2}[1]
vld1.64 {$A0xB}, [$tinptr, :128]!
vshr.u64 $temp,$temp,#16
vst1.64 {$A2xB-$A3xB}, [$toutptr,:256]!
vmlal.u32 $A6xB,$Ni,${N3}[0]
vld1.64 {$A1xB-$A2xB}, [$tinptr, :256]!
vmlal.u32 $A7xB,$Ni,${N3}[1]
vst1.64 {$A4xB-$A5xB}, [$toutptr,:256]!
vadd.u64 $temp,$temp,`&Dhi("$Temp")`
vst1.64 {$A6xB-$A7xB}, [$toutptr,:256]!
vshr.u64 $temp,$temp,#16
bne .LNEON_outer
mov $toutptr,sp
mov $inner,$num
.LNEON_tail:
vadd.u64 `&Dlo("$A0xB")`,`&Dlo("$A0xB")`,$temp
vld1.64 {$A3xB-$A4xB}, [$tinptr, :256]!
vshr.u64 $temp,`&Dlo("$A0xB")`,#16
vadd.u64 `&Dhi("$A0xB")`,`&Dhi("$A0xB")`,$temp
vld1.64 {$A5xB-$A6xB}, [$tinptr, :256]!
vshr.u64 $temp,`&Dhi("$A0xB")`,#16
vld1.64 {$A7xB}, [$tinptr, :128]!
vzip.16 `&Dlo("$A0xB")`,`&Dhi("$A0xB")`
.LNEON_tail2:
vadd.u64 `&Dlo("$A1xB")`,`&Dlo("$A1xB")`,$temp
vst1.32 {`&Dlo("$A0xB")`[0]}, [$toutptr, :32]!
vshr.u64 $temp,`&Dlo("$A1xB")`,#16
vadd.u64 `&Dhi("$A1xB")`,`&Dhi("$A1xB")`,$temp
vshr.u64 $temp,`&Dhi("$A1xB")`,#16
vzip.16 `&Dlo("$A1xB")`,`&Dhi("$A1xB")`
vadd.u64 `&Dlo("$A2xB")`,`&Dlo("$A2xB")`,$temp
vst1.32 {`&Dlo("$A1xB")`[0]}, [$toutptr, :32]!
vshr.u64 $temp,`&Dlo("$A2xB")`,#16
vadd.u64 `&Dhi("$A2xB")`,`&Dhi("$A2xB")`,$temp
vshr.u64 $temp,`&Dhi("$A2xB")`,#16
vzip.16 `&Dlo("$A2xB")`,`&Dhi("$A2xB")`
vadd.u64 `&Dlo("$A3xB")`,`&Dlo("$A3xB")`,$temp
vst1.32 {`&Dlo("$A2xB")`[0]}, [$toutptr, :32]!
vshr.u64 $temp,`&Dlo("$A3xB")`,#16
vadd.u64 `&Dhi("$A3xB")`,`&Dhi("$A3xB")`,$temp
vshr.u64 $temp,`&Dhi("$A3xB")`,#16
vzip.16 `&Dlo("$A3xB")`,`&Dhi("$A3xB")`
vadd.u64 `&Dlo("$A4xB")`,`&Dlo("$A4xB")`,$temp
vst1.32 {`&Dlo("$A3xB")`[0]}, [$toutptr, :32]!
vshr.u64 $temp,`&Dlo("$A4xB")`,#16
vadd.u64 `&Dhi("$A4xB")`,`&Dhi("$A4xB")`,$temp
vshr.u64 $temp,`&Dhi("$A4xB")`,#16
vzip.16 `&Dlo("$A4xB")`,`&Dhi("$A4xB")`
vadd.u64 `&Dlo("$A5xB")`,`&Dlo("$A5xB")`,$temp
vst1.32 {`&Dlo("$A4xB")`[0]}, [$toutptr, :32]!
vshr.u64 $temp,`&Dlo("$A5xB")`,#16
vadd.u64 `&Dhi("$A5xB")`,`&Dhi("$A5xB")`,$temp
vshr.u64 $temp,`&Dhi("$A5xB")`,#16
vzip.16 `&Dlo("$A5xB")`,`&Dhi("$A5xB")`
vadd.u64 `&Dlo("$A6xB")`,`&Dlo("$A6xB")`,$temp
vst1.32 {`&Dlo("$A5xB")`[0]}, [$toutptr, :32]!
vshr.u64 $temp,`&Dlo("$A6xB")`,#16
vadd.u64 `&Dhi("$A6xB")`,`&Dhi("$A6xB")`,$temp
vld1.64 {$A0xB}, [$tinptr, :128]!
vshr.u64 $temp,`&Dhi("$A6xB")`,#16
vzip.16 `&Dlo("$A6xB")`,`&Dhi("$A6xB")`
vadd.u64 `&Dlo("$A7xB")`,`&Dlo("$A7xB")`,$temp
vst1.32 {`&Dlo("$A6xB")`[0]}, [$toutptr, :32]!
vshr.u64 $temp,`&Dlo("$A7xB")`,#16
vadd.u64 `&Dhi("$A7xB")`,`&Dhi("$A7xB")`,$temp
vld1.64 {$A1xB-$A2xB}, [$tinptr, :256]!
vshr.u64 $temp,`&Dhi("$A7xB")`,#16
vzip.16 `&Dlo("$A7xB")`,`&Dhi("$A7xB")`
subs $inner,$inner,#8
vst1.32 {`&Dlo("$A7xB")`[0]}, [$toutptr, :32]!
bne .LNEON_tail
vst1.32 {${temp}[0]}, [$toutptr, :32] @ top-most bit
sub $nptr,$nptr,$num,lsl#2 @ rewind $nptr
subs $aptr,sp,#0 @ clear carry flag
add $bptr,sp,$num,lsl#2
.LNEON_sub:
ldmia $aptr!, {r4-r7}
ldmia $nptr!, {r8-r11}
sbcs r8, r4,r8
sbcs r9, r5,r9
sbcs r10,r6,r10
sbcs r11,r7,r11
teq $aptr,$bptr @ preserves carry
stmia $rptr!, {r8-r11}
bne .LNEON_sub
ldr r10, [$aptr] @ load top-most bit
veor q0,q0,q0
sub r11,$bptr,sp @ this is num*4
veor q1,q1,q1
mov $aptr,sp
sub $rptr,$rptr,r11 @ rewind $rptr
mov $nptr,$bptr @ second 3/4th of frame
sbcs r10,r10,#0 @ result is carry flag
.LNEON_copy_n_zap:
ldmia $aptr!, {r4-r7}
ldmia $rptr, {r8-r11}
movcc r8, r4
vst1.64 {q0-q1}, [$nptr,:256]! @ wipe
movcc r9, r5
movcc r10,r6
vst1.64 {q0-q1}, [$nptr,:256]! @ wipe
movcc r11,r7
ldmia $aptr, {r4-r7}
stmia $rptr!, {r8-r11}
sub $aptr,$aptr,#16
ldmia $rptr, {r8-r11}
movcc r8, r4
vst1.64 {q0-q1}, [$aptr,:256]! @ wipe
movcc r9, r5
movcc r10,r6
vst1.64 {q0-q1}, [$nptr,:256]! @ wipe
movcc r11,r7
teq $aptr,$bptr @ preserves carry
stmia $rptr!, {r8-r11}
bne .LNEON_copy_n_zap
sub sp,ip,#96
vldmia sp!,{d8-d15}
ldmia sp!,{r4-r11}
ret @ bx lr
.size bn_mul8x_mont_neon,.-bn_mul8x_mont_neon
#endif
___
}
$code.=<<___;
.asciz "Montgomery multiplication for ARMv4/NEON, CRYPTOGAMS by <appro\@openssl.org>"
.align 2
Remove inconsistency in ARM support. This facilitates "universal" builds, ones that target multiple architectures, e.g. ARMv5 through ARMv7. (Imported from upstream's c1669e1c205dc8e695fb0c10a655f434e758b9f7) This is a change from a while ago which was a source of divergence between our perlasm and upstream's. This change in upstream came with the following comment in Configure: Note that -march is not among compiler options in below linux-armv4 target line. Not specifying one is intentional to give you choice to: a) rely on your compiler default by not specifying one; b) specify your target platform explicitly for optimal performance, e.g. -march=armv6 or -march=armv7-a; c) build "universal" binary that targets *range* of platforms by specifying minimum and maximum supported architecture; As for c) option. It actually makes no sense to specify maximum to be less than ARMv7, because it's the least requirement for run-time switch between platform-specific code paths. And without run-time switch performance would be equivalent to one for minimum. Secondly, there are some natural limitations that you'd have to accept and respect. Most notably you can *not* build "universal" binary for big-endian platform. This is because ARMv7 processor always picks instructions in little-endian order. Another similar limitation is that -mthumb can't "cross" -march=armv6t2 boundary, because that's where it became Thumb-2. Well, this limitation is a bit artificial, because it's not really impossible, but it's deemed too tricky to support. And of course you have to be sure that your binutils are actually up to the task of handling maximum target platform. Change-Id: Ie5f674d603393f0a1354a0d0973987484a4a650c Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/4488 Reviewed-by: Adam Langley <agl@google.com>
2015-04-21 02:27:38 +01:00
#if __ARM_MAX_ARCH__>=7
.comm OPENSSL_armcap_P,4,4
.hidden OPENSSL_armcap_P
#endif
___
$code =~ s/\`([^\`]*)\`/eval $1/gem;
$code =~ s/\bbx\s+lr\b/.word\t0xe12fff1e/gm; # make it possible to compile with -march=armv4
$code =~ s/\bret\b/bx lr/gm;
print $code;
close STDOUT;