This reverts commits:
8d79ed674019fdcb52348d79ed6740
Because WebRTC (at least) includes our headers in an extern "C" block,
which precludes having any C++ in them.
Change-Id: Ia849f43795a40034cbd45b22ea680b51aab28b2d
This change scatters the contents of the two scoped_types.h files into
the headers for each of the areas of the code. The types are now in the
|bssl| namespace.
Change-Id: I802b8de68fba4786b6a0ac1bacd11d81d5842423
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/8731
Reviewed-by: Adam Langley <agl@google.com>
We currently have the situation where the |tool| and |bssl_shim| code
includes scoped_types.h from crypto/test and ssl/test. That's weird and
shouldn't happen. Also, our C++ consumers might quite like to have
access to the scoped types.
Thus this change moves some of the template code to base.h and puts it
all in a |bssl| namespace to prepare for scattering these types into
their respective headers. In order that all the existing test code be
able to access these types, it's all moved into the same namespace.
Change-Id: I3207e29474dc5fcc344ace43119df26dae04eabb
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/8730
Reviewed-by: David Benjamin <davidben@google.com>
We usually put main at the end. There's now nothing interesting in the
function, so avoid having to declare every test at the top.
Change-Id: Iac469f41f0fb7d1f58d12dfbf651bf0d39f073d0
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/8712
Reviewed-by: David Benjamin <davidben@google.com>
That removes the last of the bc stuff.
BUG=31
Change-Id: If64c974b75c36daf14c46f07b0d9355b7cd0adcb
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/8711
Reviewed-by: David Benjamin <davidben@google.com>
Amazingly, this function actually has (not crypto-related) callers, despite
being pretty much useless for cryptography.
BUG=31
Change-Id: I440827380995695c7a15bbf2220a05ffb28d9335
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/8594
Reviewed-by: David Benjamin <davidben@google.com>
These were generated by running test_mod_exp_mont5 10 times. The values with
Montgomery representation 1 were generated separately so the test file could
preserve the comment. (Though, at 10,000 lines, no one's going to find it...)
BUG=31
Change-Id: I8e9d4d6d7b5f7d283bd259df10a1dbdc90b888cf
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/8611
Reviewed-by: David Benjamin <davidben@google.com>
Honestly, with this size of number, they're pretty bad test vectors.
test_mod_exp_mont5 will be imported in the next commit which should help.
This was done by taking test_mod_exp's generation, running it a few times
(since otherwise the modulus is always the same). I also ran it a few times
with the odd constraint removed since BN_mod_exp is supposed to support it,
even if it's not actually useful.
BUG=31
Change-Id: Id53953f0544123a5ea71efac534946055dd5aabc
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/8610
Reviewed-by: David Benjamin <davidben@google.com>
That one needs reduced inputs and the other ought to be also tested against
unreduced ones is a bit annoying. But the previous commit made sure BN_nnmod
has tests, and test_mont could stand to inherit test_mod_mul's test data (it
only had five tests originally!), so I merged them.
BUG=31
Change-Id: I1eb585b14f85f0ea01ee81537a01e07ced9f5d9a
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/8608
Reviewed-by: David Benjamin <davidben@google.com>
In preparation for converting test_mont and test_mod_mul to test vectors, make
test_mont less silly. We can certainly get away with doing more than five
tests. Also generate |a| and |b| anew each time. Otherwise the first BN_nmod is
destructive.
Change-Id: I944007ed7b6013a16d972cb7290ab9992c9360ce
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/8605
Reviewed-by: David Benjamin <davidben@google.com>
No need for the special case and such.
Change-Id: If8fbc73eda0ccbaf3fd422e97c96fee6dc10b1ab
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/8604
Reviewed-by: David Benjamin <davidben@google.com>
Since the format no longer is readable by bc, compare it to Go's math/big
instead.
Change-Id: I34d37aa0c29c6f4178267858cb0d3941b4266b93
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/8603
Reviewed-by: David Benjamin <davidben@google.com>
Also, update the documentation about aliasing for |BN_usub|. It might
be better to find a way to factor out the shared logic between the
tests of these functions and the tests of |BN_add| and |BN_usub|, but
doing so would end up up creating a lot of parameters due to the many
distinct strings used in the messages.
Change-Id: Ic9d714858212fc92aa6bbcc3959576fe6bbf58c3
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/8593
Reviewed-by: David Benjamin <davidben@google.com>
Also update the documentation for |BN_sub|.
Change-Id: I544dbfc56f22844f6ca08e9e472ec13e76baf8c4
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/8592
Reviewed-by: David Benjamin <davidben@google.com>
|BN_mod_exp_mont| should be tested the same way as the other variants,
especially since it is exported.
Change-Id: I8c05725289c0ebcce7aba7e666915c4c1a841c2b
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/8590
Reviewed-by: David Benjamin <davidben@google.com>
The bc ones will all get replaced later.
Change-Id: Ic1c6ee320b3a5689c7dadea3f483bd92f7e39612
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/8528
Reviewed-by: Adam Langley <agl@google.com>
These can all share one test type. Note test_div had a separate
division by zero test which had to be extracted.
BUG=31
Change-Id: I1de0220fba78cd7f82a5dc96adb34b79c07929e9
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/8527
Reviewed-by: Adam Langley <agl@google.com>
crypto/bn/bn_test.cc:404:44: error: ‘n’ may be used uninitialized in this
function [-Werror=maybe-uninitialized]
Change-Id: Id590dfee4b9ae1a4fbd0965e133310dac0d06ed3
Two of these were even regression tests for a past bug. These are also
moved to the file, now with the amazing innovation that we *actually
check the regression test gave the right answer*.
BUG=31
Change-Id: I8097336ad39a2bb5c0af07dd8e1e34723b68d182
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/8525
Reviewed-by: Adam Langley <agl@google.com>
This adds tests for:
for i = 0 to 199:
Sum: 2^i
A: 2^i - 1
B: 1
for i = 0 to 199:
Sum: 2^200
A: 2^200 - 2^i
B: 2^i
I don't believe any of the existing tests actually stressed this,
amazingly enough.
Change-Id: I5edab6327bad45fc21c62bd47f4169f8bb745ff7
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/8523
Reviewed-by: Adam Langley <agl@google.com>
This took some finesse. I merged the lshift1 and rshift1 test vectors as
one counted down and the other up. The rshift1 vectors were all rounded
to even numbers, with the test handling the odd case. Finally, each run
only tested positive or negative (it wasn't re-randomized), so I added
both positive and negative versions of each test vector.
BUG=31
Change-Id: Ic7de45ab797074547c44c2e4ff8089b1feec5d57
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/8522
Reviewed-by: Adam Langley <agl@google.com>
Test vectors taken from one run of bc_test with the -bc flag, along with
a handful of manual test vectors around numbers close to zero. (The
output was compared against bc to make sure it was correct.)
BUG=31
Change-Id: I9e9263ece64a877c8497716cd4713b4c3e44248c
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/8521
Reviewed-by: Adam Langley <agl@google.com>
Depending on architecture, perlasm differed on which one or both of:
perl foo.pl flavor output.S
perl foo.pl flavor > output.S
Upstream has now unified on the first form after making a number of
changes to their files (the second does not even work for their x86
files anymore). Sync those portions of our perlasm scripts with upstream
and update CMakeLists.txt and generate_build_files.py per the new
convention.
This imports various commits like this one:
184bc45f683c76531d7e065b6553ca9086564576 (this was done by taking a
diff, so I don't have the full list)
Confirmed that generate_build_files.py sees no change.
BUG=14
Change-Id: Id2fb5b8bc2a7369d077221b5df9a6947d41f50d2
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/8518
Reviewed-by: Adam Langley <agl@google.com>
As of 67cb49d045 and the corresponding upstream
change, BN_mod_word may fail, like BN_div_word. Handle this properly and
document in bn.h. Thanks to Brian Smith for pointing this out.
Change-Id: I6d4f32dc37bcabf70847c9a8b417d55d31b3a380
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/8491
Reviewed-by: Adam Langley <agl@google.com>
Make |BN_mod_inverse_ex| symmetric with |BN_mod_inverse_no_branch| in
this respect.
Change-Id: I4a5cbe685edf50e13ee1014391bc4001f5371fec
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/8316
Reviewed-by: David Benjamin <davidben@google.com>
There's no use doing the remaining work if we're going to fail due to
there being no inverse.
Change-Id: Ic6d7c92cbbc2f7c40c51e6be2de3802980d32543
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/8310
Reviewed-by: David Benjamin <davidben@google.com>
There's a __pragma expression which allows this. Android builds us Windows with
MinGW for some reason, so we actually do have to tolerate non-MSVC-compatible
Windows compilers. (Clang for Windows is much more sensible than MinGW and
intentionally mimicks MSVC.)
MinGW doesn't understand MSVC's pragmas and warns a lot. #pragma warning is
safe to suppress, so wrap those to shush them. This also lets us do away with a
few ifdefs.
Change-Id: I1f5a8bec4940d4b2d947c4c1cc9341bc15ec4972
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/8236
Reviewed-by: Adam Langley <agl@google.com>
On systems where we do not have BN_ULLONG (notably Win64), BN_mod_word() can
return incorrect results if the supplied modulus is too big.
(Imported from upstream's e82fd1b4574c8908b2c3bb68e1237f057a981820 and
e4c4b2766bb97b34ea3479252276ab7c66311809.)
Change-Id: Icee8a7c5c67a8ee14c276097f43a7c491e68c2f9
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/8233
Reviewed-by: Adam Langley <agl@google.com>
Windows SRWLOCK requires you call different functions here. Split
them up in preparation for switching Windows from CRITICAL_SECTION.
BUG=37
Change-Id: I7b5c6a98eab9ae5bb0734b805cfa1ff334918f35
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/8080
Reviewed-by: Adam Langley <agl@google.com>
The performance measurements seem to be very out-of-date. Also, the
idea for optimizing the case of an even modulus is interesting, but it
isn't useful because we never use an even modulus.
Change-Id: I012eb37638cda3c63db0e390c8c728f65b949e54
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/7733
Reviewed-by: David Benjamin <davidben@google.com>
This function is only really useful for DSA signature verification,
which is something that isn't performance-sensitive. Replace its
optimized implementation with a naïve implementation that's much
simpler.
Note that it would be simpler to use |BN_mod_mul| in the new
implementation; |BN_mod_mul_montgomery| is used instead only to be
consistent with other work being done to replace uses of non-Montgomery
modular reduction with Montgomery modular reduction.
Change-Id: If587d463b73dd997acfc5b7ada955398c99cc342
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/7732
Reviewed-by: David Benjamin <davidben@google.com>
|BN_mod_exp_mont_word| is only useful when the base is a single word
in length and timing side channel protection of the exponent is not
needed. That's never the case in real life.
Keep the function in the API, but removes its single-word-base
optimized implementation with a call to |BN_mod_exp_mont|.
Change-Id: Ic25f6d4f187210b681c6ee6b87038b64a5744958
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/7731
Reviewed-by: David Benjamin <davidben@google.com>
Previously, the verification was only done when using the CRT method,
as the CRT method has been shown to be extremely sensitive to fault
attacks. However, there's no reason to avoid doing the verification
when the non-CRT method is used (performance-sensitive applications
should always be using the CRT-capable keys).
Previously, when we detected a fault (attack) through this verification,
libcrypto would fall back to the non-CRT method and assume that the
non-CRT method would give a correct result, despite having just
detecting corruption that is likely from an attack. Instead, just give
up, like NSS does.
Previously, the code tried to handle the case where the input was not
reduced mod rsa->n. This is (was) not possible, so avoid trying to
handle that. This simplifies the equality check and lets us use
|CRYPTO_memcmp|.
Change-Id: I78d1e55520a1c8c280cae2b7256e12ff6290507d
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/7582
Reviewed-by: David Benjamin <davidben@google.com>
See also upstream's 91fb42ddbef7a88640d1a0f853c941c20df07de7, though that has a
bug if |out| was non-NULL on entry. (I'll send them a patch.)
Change-Id: I807f23007b89063c23e02dac11c4ffb41f847fdf
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/7810
Reviewed-by: David Benjamin <davidben@google.com>
This reduces the chance of double-frees.
BUG=10
Change-Id: I11a240e2ea5572effeddc05acb94db08c54a2e0b
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/7583
Reviewed-by: David Benjamin <davidben@google.com>
In the case |BN_CTX_get| failed, the function returned without calling
|BN_CTX_end|. Fix that.
Change-Id: Ia24cba3256e2cec106b539324e9679d690048780
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/7592
Reviewed-by: David Benjamin <davidben@google.com>
It looks like we started reformatting that function and adding curly braces,
etc., but forget to finish it. This is corroborated by the diff. Although git
thinks I removed the EAY-style one and tweaked the #if-0'd one, I actually
clang-formatted the EAY-style one anew and deleted the #if-0'd one after
tweaking the style to match. Only difference is the alignment stuff is
uintptr_t rather than intptr_t since the old logic was using unsigned
arithmetic.
Change-Id: Ia244e4082a6b6aed3ef587d392d171382c32db33
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/7574
Reviewed-by: David Benjamin <davidben@google.com>
Since the function doesn't call |BN_CTX_get|, it doesn't need to call
|BN_CTX_start|/|BN_CTX_end|.
Change-Id: I6cb954d3fee2959bdbc81b9b97abc52bb6f7704c
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/7469
Reviewed-by: David Benjamin <davidben@google.com>
Partially fixes build with -Wmissing-prototypes -Wmissing-declarations.
Change-Id: I6048f5b7ef31560399b25ed9880156bc7d8abac2
Signed-off-by: Piotr Sikora <piotrsikora@google.com>
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/7511
Reviewed-by: David Benjamin <davidben@google.com>
If the values of any of the coordinates in the output point |r| were
negative during nistz256 multiplication, then the calls to
|bn_set_word| would result in the wrong coordinates being returned
(the negatives of the correct coordinates would be returned instead).
Fix that.
Change-Id: I6048e62f76dca18f625650d11ef5a051c9e672a4
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/7442
Reviewed-by: David Benjamin <davidben@google.com>
