When building files separately, omitting this causes some #defines to be
missing.
Change-Id: I235231467d3f51ee0a53325698356aefa72c6a67
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/28944
Commit-Queue: Adam Langley <agl@google.com>
Commit-Queue: David Benjamin <davidben@google.com>
Reviewed-by: David Benjamin <davidben@google.com>
CQ-Verified: CQ bot account: commit-bot@chromium.org <commit-bot@chromium.org>
Change-Id: I07040cabcef191f0ab4a7b0e9bd4d46b37b09169
std::condition_variable has its own header to include.
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/28904
Commit-Queue: Steven Valdez <svaldez@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Steven Valdez <svaldez@google.com>
CQ-Verified: CQ bot account: commit-bot@chromium.org <commit-bot@chromium.org>
This matches the OpenSSL 1.1.0 spelling. I'd thought we could hide
SSL_SESSION this pass, but I missed one test that messed with session
IDs!
Bug: 6
Change-Id: I84ea113353eb0eaa2b06b68dec71cb9061c047ca
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/28866
Reviewed-by: Steven Valdez <svaldez@google.com>
Commit-Queue: Steven Valdez <svaldez@google.com>
CQ-Verified: CQ bot account: commit-bot@chromium.org <commit-bot@chromium.org>
GN does not like multiple files in the same target that share a name, so
add a script to check for this. A follow-up changes will hook that up to
the builders, so we'll flag this in try jobs rather than when the change
trickles downstream.
Change-Id: Ic413dd9aeed6da54fc85dea07f80fe7084be9e9e
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/28844
Reviewed-by: Adam Langley <agl@google.com>
In neither OpenSSL nor BoringSSL can this function actually fail, but
OpenSSL makes it return one anyway. Match them for compatibility.
Change-Id: I497437321ad9ccc5da738f06cd5b19c467167575
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/28784
Commit-Queue: Steven Valdez <svaldez@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Steven Valdez <svaldez@google.com>
CQ-Verified: CQ bot account: commit-bot@chromium.org <commit-bot@chromium.org>
We have a successful TLS 1.3 deployment, in spite of non-compliant
middleboxes everywhere, so now let's get this optimization in. It would
have been nice to test with this from the beginning, but sadly we forgot
about it. Ah well. This shaves 63 bytes off the server's first flight,
and then another 21 bytes off the pair of NewSessionTickets.
So we'll more easily notice in case of anything catastrophic, tie this
behavior to draft 28.
Update-Note: This slightly tweaks our draft-28 behavior.
Change-Id: I4f176a919bf7181239d6ebb31e7870f12364e0f9
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/28744
Reviewed-by: Steven Valdez <svaldez@google.com>
Commit-Queue: Steven Valdez <svaldez@google.com>
CQ-Verified: CQ bot account: commit-bot@chromium.org <commit-bot@chromium.org>
It would be nice to restrict these, limiting the incorrect sizes to a
separate EVP_AEAD, but start by documenting this.
Bug: 34
Change-Id: I09845882f76a53a010355ceefd168d4fc10a0681
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/28745
Commit-Queue: David Benjamin <davidben@google.com>
Commit-Queue: Adam Langley <agl@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Adam Langley <agl@google.com>
CQ-Verified: CQ bot account: commit-bot@chromium.org <commit-bot@chromium.org>
It appears Chromium still gets upset when two files in a target share a
base name.
Change-Id: I9e6f182d97405e7e70b2bcf8ced7c80ba23edca1
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/28724
Reviewed-by: Adam Langley <agl@google.com>
This allows consumers not to use crypto_test_data.cc (which embeds all
the test files), although they'll have to provide their own
implementation of that functionality.
Change-Id: I309d5b3bd9495137e1df788b34048794b0072f3b
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/28706
Reviewed-by: David Benjamin <davidben@google.com>
Change-Id: I3c1d77ac9dea6faefc3711e84cf93191f35fe755
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/28705
Commit-Queue: Adam Langley <agl@google.com>
Commit-Queue: David Benjamin <davidben@google.com>
Reviewed-by: David Benjamin <davidben@google.com>
CQ-Verified: CQ bot account: commit-bot@chromium.org <commit-bot@chromium.org>
This file is not part of the Wycheproof project and consumers of
BoringSSL who wish to provide Wycheproof themselves (and not have
third_party/wycheproof_testvectors) need it in another location.
Change-Id: I730fe294f46a9aac77b858a91a03ee64fb8ea579
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/28704
Commit-Queue: Adam Langley <agl@google.com>
Commit-Queue: David Benjamin <davidben@google.com>
Reviewed-by: David Benjamin <davidben@google.com>
CQ-Verified: CQ bot account: commit-bot@chromium.org <commit-bot@chromium.org>
VS2017 has added a new warning that indicates where Spectre mitigation
code would be inserted if /Qspectre were specified.
Change-Id: If80cd6a7d0c5a45313f4c3644b304cadecf465b0
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/28684
Reviewed-by: Adam Langley <agl@google.com>
Commit-Queue: Adam Langley <agl@google.com>
CQ-Verified: CQ bot account: commit-bot@chromium.org <commit-bot@chromium.org>
Between CBC being only parallelizable in one direction, bsaes vs vpaes,
and the Lucky 13 fix, seal and open look very different here. Benchmark
both directions.
Change-Id: I9266ab2800adc29dbeee0ca74502addb92409e23
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/28644
Commit-Queue: Adam Langley <agl@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Adam Langley <agl@google.com>
CQ-Verified: CQ bot account: commit-bot@chromium.org <commit-bot@chromium.org>
|alloca| is dangerous and poorly specified, according to any
description of |alloca|. It's also hard for some analysis tools to
reason about.
The code here assumed |alloca| is a macro, which isn't a valid
assumption. Depending on what which headers are included and what
toolchain is being used, |alloca| may or may not be defined as a macro,
and this might change over time if/when toolchains are updated. Or, we
might be doing static analysis and/or dynamic analysis with a different
configuration w.r.t. the availability of |alloca| than production
builds use.
Regardless, the |alloca| code path only kicked in when the inputs are
840 bits or smaller. Since the multi-prime RSA support was removed, for
interesting RSA key sizes the input will be at least 1024 bits and this
code path won't be triggered since powerbufLen will be larger than 3072
bytes in those cases. ECC inversion via Fermat's Little Theorem has its
own constant-time exponentiation so there are no cases where smaller
inputs need to be fast.
The RSAZ code avoids the |OPENSSL_malloc| for 2048-bit RSA keys.
Increasingly the RSAZ code won't be used though, since it will be
skipped over on Broadwell+ CPUs. Generalize the RSAZ stack allocation
to work for non-RSAZ code paths. In order to ensure this doesn't cause
too much stack usage on platforms where RSAZ wasn't already being used,
only do so on x86-64, which already has this large stack size
requirement due to RSAZ.
This change will make it easier to refactor |BN_mod_exp_mont_consttime|
to do that more safely and in a way that's more compatible with various
analysis tools.
This is also a step towards eliminating the |uintptr_t|-based alignment
hack.
Since this change increases the number of times |OPENSSL_free| is
skipped, I've added an explicit |OPENSSL_cleanse| to ensure the
zeroization is done. This should be done regardless of the other changes
here.
Change-Id: I8a161ce2720a26127e85fff7513f394883e50b2e
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/28584
Commit-Queue: David Benjamin <davidben@google.com>
CQ-Verified: CQ bot account: commit-bot@chromium.org <commit-bot@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: David Benjamin <davidben@google.com>
Thanks to Brian Smith for pointing this out.
Change-Id: I27ae58df0028bc6aa3a11741acb5453369e202cc
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/28625
Reviewed-by: Adam Langley <agl@google.com>
Commit-Queue: Adam Langley <agl@google.com>
CQ-Verified: CQ bot account: commit-bot@chromium.org <commit-bot@chromium.org>
cryptography.io wants things exposed out of EVP_get_cipherby* including,
sadly, ECB mode.
Change-Id: I9bac46f8ffad1a79d190cee3b0c0686bf540298e
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/28464
Reviewed-by: Adam Langley <agl@google.com>
Commit-Queue: David Benjamin <davidben@google.com>
CQ-Verified: CQ bot account: commit-bot@chromium.org <commit-bot@chromium.org>
OpenSSL staples each certificate's friendly name to the X509 with
X509_alias_set1. Mimic this. pyOpenSSL expects to find it there.
Update-Note: We actually parse some attributes now. PKCS#12 files with
malformed ones may not parse.
Change-Id: I3b78958eedf195509cd222ea4f0c884be3753770
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/28551
Reviewed-by: Adam Langley <agl@google.com>
Commit-Queue: David Benjamin <davidben@google.com>
CQ-Verified: CQ bot account: commit-bot@chromium.org <commit-bot@chromium.org>
PKCS#12 encodes passwords as NUL-terminated UCS-2, so the empty password
is encoded as {0, 0}. Some implementations use the empty byte array for
"no password". OpenSSL considers a non-NULL password as {0, 0} and a
NULL password as {}. It then, in high-level PKCS#12 parsing code, tries
both options.
Match this behavior to appease pyOpenSSL's tests.
Change-Id: I07ef91d54454b6f2647f86b7eb9b13509b2876d3
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/28550
Commit-Queue: David Benjamin <davidben@google.com>
CQ-Verified: CQ bot account: commit-bot@chromium.org <commit-bot@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: Adam Langley <agl@google.com>
These are tied to OPENSSL_NO_OCSP in upstream but do not actually depend
on most of the OCSP machinery. The CRL invdate extension, in particular,
isn't associated with OCSP at all. cryptography.io gets upset if these
two extensions aren't parseable, and they're tiny.
I do not believe this actually affects anything beyond functions like
X509_get_ext_d2i. In particular, the list of NIDs for the criticality
check is elsewhere.
Change-Id: I889f6ebf4ca4b34b1d9ff15f45e05878132826a1
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/28549
Commit-Queue: David Benjamin <davidben@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Adam Langley <agl@google.com>
Change-Id: Ia24aae31296772e2ddccf78f10a6640da459adf7
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/28548
Commit-Queue: David Benjamin <davidben@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Adam Langley <agl@google.com>
Rather than have plain-C functions, asm functions, and accelerated
functions, just have accelerated and non-accelerated, where the latter
are either provided by assembly or by C code.
Pertinently, this allows Aarch64 to use hardware accel for the basic
|AES_*| functions.
Change-Id: I0003c0c7a43d85a3eee8c8f37697f61a3070dd40
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/28385
Reviewed-by: David Benjamin <davidben@google.com>
Commit-Queue: David Benjamin <davidben@google.com>
CQ-Verified: CQ bot account: commit-bot@chromium.org <commit-bot@chromium.org>
cryptography.io wants RSA_R_BLOCK_TYPE_IS_NOT_02, only used by the
ancient RSA_padding_check_SSLv23 function. Define it but never emit it.
Additionally, it's rather finicky about RSA_R_TOO_LARGE* errors. We
merged them in BoringSSL because having RSA_R_TOO_LARGE,
RSA_R_TOO_LARGE_FOR_MODULUS, and RSA_R_TOO_LARGE_FOR_KEY_SIZE is a
little silly. But since we don't expect well-behaved code to condition
on error codes anyway, perhaps that wasn't worth it. Split them back
up.
Looking through OpenSSL, there is a vague semantic difference:
RSA_R_DIGEST_TOO_BIG_FOR_RSA_KEY - Specifically emitted if a digest is
too big for PKCS#1 signing with this key.
RSA_R_DATA_TOO_LARGE_FOR_KEY_SIZE - You asked me to sign or encrypt a
digest/plaintext, but it's too big for this key.
RSA_R_DATA_TOO_LARGE_FOR_MODULUS - You gave me an RSA ciphertext or
signature and it is not fully reduced modulo N.
-OR-
The padding functions produced something that isn't reduced, but I
believe this is unreachable outside of RSA_NO_PADDING.
RSA_R_DATA_TOO_LARGE - Some low-level padding function was told to copy
a digest/plaintext into some buffer, but the buffer was too small. I
think this is basically unreachable.
-OR-
You asked me to verify a PSS signature, but I didn't need to bother
because the digest/salt parameters you picked were too big.
Update-Note: This depends on cl/196566462.
Change-Id: I2e539e075eff8bfcd52ccde365e975ebcee72567
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/28547
Reviewed-by: Adam Langley <agl@google.com>
If the callback returns an empty ALPN, we forget we negotiated ALPN at
all (bssl::Array does not distinguish null and empty). Empty ALPN
protocols are forbidden anyway, so reject these ahead of time.
Change-Id: I42f1fc4c843bc865e23fb2a2e5d57424b569ee99
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/28546
Reviewed-by: Adam Langley <agl@google.com>
gcc-8 complains that struct Test shadows class Test from googletest.
Change-Id: Ie0c61eecebc726973c6aaa949e338da3d4474977
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/28524
Reviewed-by: David Benjamin <davidben@google.com>
Commit-Queue: David Benjamin <davidben@google.com>
CQ-Verified: CQ bot account: commit-bot@chromium.org <commit-bot@chromium.org>
It's conditioned in OpenSSL on client offer, not server accept.
Change-Id: Iae5483a33d9365258446ce0ae34132aeb4a92c66
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/28545
Reviewed-by: Adam Langley <agl@google.com>
PyOpenSSL's tests expect all of the outputs to be distinct. OpenSSL also
tends to prefix the return values with strings like "compiler:", so do
something similar.
Change-Id: Ic411c95a276b477641ebad803ac309b3035c1b13
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/28544
Reviewed-by: Adam Langley <agl@google.com>
cryptography.io depends on this. Specifically, it assumes that any time
a CBC-mode cipher is defined, CMAC is also defined. This is incorrect;
CMAC also requires an irreducible polynomial to represent GF(2^b).
However, one is indeed defined for 64-bit block ciphers such as 3DES.
Import tests from CAVP to test it. I've omitted the 65536-byte inputs
because they're huge and FileTest doesn't like lines that long.
Change-Id: I35b1e4975f61c757c70616f9b372b91746fc7e4a
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/28466
Commit-Queue: David Benjamin <davidben@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Adam Langley <agl@google.com>
This was reverted a second time because it ended up always setting the
final argument to CRYPTO_gcm128_init to zero, which disabled some
acceleration of GCM on ≥Haswell. With this update, that argument will be
set to 1 if |aes_hw_*| functions are being used.
Probably this will need to be reverted too for some reason. I'm hoping
to fill the entire git short description with “Revert”.
Change-Id: Ib4a06f937d35d95affdc0b63f29f01c4a8c47d03
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/28484
Reviewed-by: Adam Langley <agl@google.com>
Commit-Queue: Adam Langley <agl@google.com>
CQ-Verified: CQ bot account: commit-bot@chromium.org <commit-bot@chromium.org>
This is so Chromium can verify the session before offering it, rather
than doing it after the handshake (at which point it's too late to punt
the session) as we do today. This should, in turn, allow us to finally
verify certificates off a callback and order it correctly relative to
CertificateRequest in TLS 1.3.
(It will also order "correctly" in TLS 1.2, but this is useless. TLS 1.2
does not bind the CertificateRequest to the certificate at the point the
client needs to act on it.)
Bug: chromium:347402
Change-Id: I0daac2868c97b820aead6c3a7e4dc30d8ba44dc4
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/28405
Commit-Queue: Steven Valdez <svaldez@google.com>
CQ-Verified: CQ bot account: commit-bot@chromium.org <commit-bot@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: Steven Valdez <svaldez@google.com>
Previously, we'd omitted OpenSSL's OCSP APIs because they depend on a
complex OCSP mechanism and encourage the the unreliable server behavior
that hampers using OCSP stapling to fix revocation today. (OCSP
responses should not be fetched on-demand on a callback. They should be
managed like other server credentials and refreshed eagerly, so
temporary CA outage does not translate to loss of OCSP.)
But most of the APIs are byte-oriented anyway, so they're easy to
support. Intentionally omit the one that takes a bunch of OCSP_RESPIDs.
The callback is benign on the client (an artifact of OpenSSL reading
OCSP and verifying certificates in the wrong order). On the server, it
encourages unreliability, but pyOpenSSL/cryptography.io depends on this.
Dcument that this is only for compatibility with legacy software.
Also tweak a few things for compatilibility. cryptography.io expects
SSL_CTX_set_read_ahead to return something, SSL_get_server_tmp_key's
signature was wrong, and cryptography.io tries to redefine
SSL_get_server_tmp_key if SSL_CTRL_GET_SERVER_TMP_KEY is missing.
Change-Id: I2f99711783456bfb7324e9ad972510be8a95e845
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/28404
Commit-Queue: David Benjamin <davidben@google.com>
CQ-Verified: CQ bot account: commit-bot@chromium.org <commit-bot@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: Adam Langley <agl@google.com>
These were added in OpenSSL 1.1.0.
Change-Id: I261e0e0ccf82544883c4a2ef5c5dc4a651c0c756
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/28329
Reviewed-by: Adam Langley <agl@google.com>
PyOpenSSL calls this function these days. Tested by roundtripping with
ourselves and also manually confirming our output interoperates with
OpenSSL. (For anyone repeating this experiment, the OpenSSL
command-line tool has a bug and does not correctly output friendlyName
attributes with non-ASCII characters. I'll send them a PR to fix this
shortly.)
Between this and the UTF-8 logic earlier, the theme of this patch series
seems to be "implement in C something I last implemented in
JavaScript"...
Change-Id: I258d563498d82998c6bffc6789efeaba36fe3a5e
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/28328
Reviewed-by: Adam Langley <agl@google.com>
This is not very useful without PKCS12_create, which a follow-up change
will implement.
Change-Id: I355ccd22a165830911ae189871ab90a6101f42ae
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/28327
Reviewed-by: Adam Langley <agl@google.com>
This aligns with OpenSSL 1.1.0's behavior, which deviated from OpenSSL
1.0.2. OpenSSL 1.0.2 effectively assumed input passwords were always
Latin-1.
Update-Note: If anyone was using PKCS#12 passwords with non-ASCII
characters, this changes them from being encoding-confused to hopefully
interpretting "correctly". If this breaks anything, we can add a
fallback to PKCS12_get_key_and_certs/PKCS12_parse, but OpenSSL 1.1.0
does not have such behavior. It only implements a fallback in the
command-line tool, not the APIs.
Change-Id: I0aa92db26077b07a40f85b89f4d3e0f6b0d7be87
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/28326
Reviewed-by: Adam Langley <agl@google.com>
Update-Note: This changes causes BoringSSL to be stricter about handling
Unicode strings:
· Reject code points outside of Unicode
· Reject surrogate values
· Don't allow invalid UTF-8 to pass through when the source claims to
be UTF-8 already.
· Drop byte-order marks.
Previously, for example, a UniversalString could contain a large-valued
code point that would cause the UTF-8 encoder to emit invalid UTF-8.
Change-Id: I94d9db7796b70491b04494be84249907ff8fb46c
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/28325
Commit-Queue: Adam Langley <agl@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Adam Langley <agl@google.com>
Build (and carry) issues are now resolved (as far as we know). Let's try
this again...
Measurements on a Skylake VM (so a little noisy).
Before:
Did 3135 RSA 2048 signing operations in 3015866us (1039.5 ops/sec)
Did 89000 RSA 2048 verify (same key) operations in 3007271us (29594.9 ops/sec)
Did 66000 RSA 2048 verify (fresh key) operations in 3014363us (21895.2 ops/sec)
Did 324 RSA 4096 signing operations in 3004364us (107.8 ops/sec)
Did 23126 RSA 4096 verify (same key) operations in 3003398us (7699.9 ops/sec)
Did 21312 RSA 4096 verify (fresh key) operations in 3017043us (7063.9 ops/sec)
Did 31040 ECDH P-256 operations in 3024273us (10263.6 ops/sec)
Did 91000 ECDSA P-256 signing operations in 3019740us (30135.0 ops/sec)
Did 25678 ECDSA P-256 verify operations in 3046975us (8427.4 ops/sec)
After:
Did 3640 RSA 2048 signing operations in 3035845us (1199.0 ops/sec)
Did 129000 RSA 2048 verify (same key) operations in 3003691us (42947.2 ops/sec)
Did 105000 RSA 2048 verify (fresh key) operations in 3029935us (34654.2 ops/sec)
Did 510 RSA 4096 signing operations in 3014096us (169.2 ops/sec)
Did 38000 RSA 4096 verify (same key) operations in 3092814us (12286.5 ops/sec)
Did 34221 RSA 4096 verify (fresh key) operations in 3003817us (11392.5 ops/sec)
Did 38000 ECDH P-256 operations in 3061758us (12411.2 ops/sec)
Did 116000 ECDSA P-256 signing operations in 3001637us (38645.6 ops/sec)
Did 35100 ECDSA P-256 verify operations in 3023872us (11607.6 ops/sec)
Tested with Intel SDE.
Change-Id: Ib27c0d6012d14274e331ab03f958e5a0c8b7e885
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/28104
Reviewed-by: Adam Langley <agl@google.com>
These will be used for the PKCS#12 code and to replace some of the
crypto/asn1 logic. So far they support the ones implemented by
crypto/asn1, which are Latin-1, UCS-2 (ASN.1 BMPStrings can't go beyond
the BMP), UTF-32 (ASN.1 UniversalString) and UTF-8.
Change-Id: I3d5c0d964cc6f97c3a0a1e352c9dd7d8cc0d87f2
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/28324
Commit-Queue: Adam Langley <agl@google.com>
CQ-Verified: CQ bot account: commit-bot@chromium.org <commit-bot@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: Adam Langley <agl@google.com>
Broke Aarch64 on the main builders (but not the trybots, somehow.)
Change-Id: I53eb09c99ef42a59628b0506b5ddb125299b554a
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/28364
Reviewed-by: Adam Langley <agl@google.com>
Callers should not mutate these.
Update-Note: I believe I've fixed up everything. If I missed one, the
fix should be straightforward.
Change-Id: Ifbce4961204822f57502a0de33aaa5a2a08b026d
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/28266
Commit-Queue: Steven Valdez <svaldez@google.com>
CQ-Verified: CQ bot account: commit-bot@chromium.org <commit-bot@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: Steven Valdez <svaldez@google.com>
This also happens to make the AES_[en|de]crypt functions use AES-NI
(where available) on Intel.
Update-Note: this substantially changes how AES-NI is triggered. Worth running bssl speed (on both k8 and ppc), before and after, to confirm that there are no regressions.
Change-Id: I5f22c1975236bbc1633c24ab60d683bca8ddd4c3
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/28026
Reviewed-by: David Benjamin <davidben@google.com>
