Simplify the code by always caching Montgomery contexts in the RSA
structure, regardless of the |RSA_FLAG_CACHE_PUBLIC| and
|RSA_FLAG_CACHE_PRIVATE| flags. Deprecate those flags.
Now that we do this no more than once per key per RSA exponent, the
private key exponents better because the initialization of the
Montgomery contexts isn't perfectly side-channel protected.
Change-Id: I4fbcfec0f2f628930bfeb811285b0ae3d103ac5e
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/7521
Reviewed-by: David Benjamin <davidben@google.com>
The function wants the expected value first.
Change-Id: I6d3e21ebfa55d6dd99a34fe8380913641b4f5ff6
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/7501
Reviewed-by: Emily Stark (Dunn) <estark@google.com>
Reviewed-by: David Benjamin <davidben@google.com>
Imported from patch attached to
https://rt.openssl.org/Ticket/Display.html?id=4439.
But with the extra vs $extra typo fixed.
The root problem appears to be that lazy_reduction tries to use paddd instead
of paddq when they believe the sum will not overflow a u32. In the final call
to lazy_reduction, this is not true. svaldez and I attempted to work through
the bounds, but the bounds derived from the cited paper imply paddd is always
fine. Empirically in a debugger, the bounds are exceeded in the test case.
I requested more comments from upstream on the bug. When upstream lands their
final fix (hopefully with comments), I will update this code. In the meantime,
let's stop carrying known-broken stuff.
(vlazy_reduction is probably something similar, but since we don't enable that
code, we haven't bothered analyzing it.)
Also add the smaller of the two test cases that catch the bug. (The other uses
an update pattern which isn't quite what poly1305_test does.)
Change-Id: I446ed47c21f10b41a0745de96ab119a3f6fd7801
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/7544
Reviewed-by: Steven Valdez <svaldez@google.com>
Reviewed-by: David Benjamin <davidben@google.com>
Change-Id: If76154c8d255600e925a408acdc674fc7dad0359
Signed-off-by: Piotr Sikora <piotrsikora@google.com>
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/7526
Reviewed-by: David Benjamin <davidben@google.com>
Use |size_t| for array indexes. Use |int| for boolean flags. Declare
the variables that had their types changed closer to where they are
used.
Previously, some `for` loops depended on `i` being signed, so their
structure had to be changed to work with the unsigned type.
Change-Id: I247e4f04468419466733b6818d81d28666da0ad3
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/7468
Reviewed-by: David Benjamin <davidben@google.com>
There is a potential double free in EVP_DigestInit_ex. This is believed
to be reached only as a result of programmer error - but we should fix it
anyway.
(Imported from upstream's e78dc7e279ed98e1ab9845a70d14dafdfdc88f58)
Change-Id: I1da7be7db7afcbe9f30f168df000d64ed73d7edd
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/7541
Reviewed-by: David Benjamin <davidben@google.com>
We recently gained -Werror=missing-prototypes. (See also, we really need to get
those Android bots...)
Change-Id: I3962d3050bccf5f5a057d029b5cbff1695ca1a03
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/7540
Reviewed-by: Emily Stark (Dunn) <estark@google.com>
Reviewed-by: David Benjamin <davidben@google.com>
The fields of the |bn_blinding_st| are not updated atomically.
Consequently, one field (|A| or |Ai|) might get updated while the
other field (|Ai| or |A|) doesn't get updated, if an error occurs in
the middle of updating. Deal with this by reseting the counter so that
|A| and |Ai| will both get recreated the next time the blinding is
used.
Fix a separate but related issue by resetting the counter to zero after
calling |bn_blinding_create_param| only if |bn_blinding_create_param|
succeeded. Previously, regardless of whether an error occured in
|bn_blinding_create_param|, |b->counter| would get reset to zero. The
consequence of this was that potentially-bad blinding values would get
used 32 times instead of (32 - |b->counter|) times.
Change-Id: I236cdb6120870ef06cba129ed86619f593cbcf3d
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/7520
Reviewed-by: David Benjamin <davidben@google.com>
Make it match how it is done in p224-64.c. Note in particular that
|size| may be 17, so presumably |pre_comp[16]| is accessed, which one
would not expect when it was declared |precomp[16][3]|.
Change-Id: I54c1555f9e20ccaacbd4cd75a7154b483b4197b7
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/7467
Reviewed-by: David Benjamin <davidben@google.com>
Since the function doesn't call |BN_CTX_get|, it doesn't need to call
|BN_CTX_start|/|BN_CTX_end|.
Change-Id: I6cb954d3fee2959bdbc81b9b97abc52bb6f7704c
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/7469
Reviewed-by: David Benjamin <davidben@google.com>
As far as I can tell, this is the last place within libcrypto where
this type of check is missing.
Change-Id: I3d09676abab8c9f6c4e87214019a382ec2ba90ee
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/7519
Reviewed-by: David Benjamin <davidben@google.com>
Partially fixes build with -Wmissing-prototypes -Wmissing-declarations.
Change-Id: I51209c30f532899f57cfdd9a50cff0a8ee3da5b5
Signed-off-by: Piotr Sikora <piotrsikora@google.com>
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/7512
Reviewed-by: David Benjamin <davidben@google.com>
Partially fixes build with -Wmissing-prototypes -Wmissing-declarations.
Change-Id: I6048f5b7ef31560399b25ed9880156bc7d8abac2
Signed-off-by: Piotr Sikora <piotrsikora@google.com>
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/7511
Reviewed-by: David Benjamin <davidben@google.com>
Change-Id: I44aa9be26ad9aea6771cb46a886a721b4bc28fde
Signed-off-by: Piotr Sikora <piotrsikora@google.com>
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/7510
Reviewed-by: David Benjamin <davidben@google.com>
(Imported from upstream's 2460c7f13389d766dd65fa4e14b69b6fbe3e4e3b.)
This is a no-op for us, but avoid a diff with upstream.
Change-Id: I6e875704a38dcd9339371393a4dd523647aeef44
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/7491
Reviewed-by: Steven Valdez <svaldez@google.com>
Reviewed-by: David Benjamin <davidben@google.com>
(Imported from upstream's 01c32b5e448f6d42a23ff16bdc6bb0605287fa6f.)
Change-Id: Ib52278dbbac1ed1ad5c80f0ad69e34584d411cec
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/7461
Reviewed-by: Steven Valdez <svaldez@google.com>
Reviewed-by: David Benjamin <davidben@google.com>
Not all assemblers of "gas" flavour handle binary constants, e.g.
seasoned MacOS Xcode doesn't, so give them a hand.
(Imported from upstream's ba26fa14556ba49466d51e4d9e6be32afee9c465.)
Change-Id: I35096dc8035e06d2fbef2363b869128da206ff9d
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/7459
Reviewed-by: Steven Valdez <svaldez@google.com>
Reviewed-by: David Benjamin <davidben@google.com>
Change-Id: I6267c9bfb66940d0b6fe5368514210a058ebd3cc
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/7494
Reviewed-by: Emily Stark (Dunn) <estark@google.com>
Reviewed-by: David Benjamin <davidben@google.com>
Having a different API for this case than upstream is more trouble than is
worth it. This is sad since the new API avoids incomplete EC_GROUPs at least,
but I don't believe supporting this pair of functions will be significantly
more complex than supporting EC_GROUP_new_arbitrary even when we have static
EC_GROUPs.
For now, keep both sets of APIs around, but we'll be able to remove the scar
tissue once Conscrypt's complex dependencies are resolved.
Make the restored EC_GROUP_set_generator somewhat simpler than before by
removing the ability to call it multiple times and with some parameters set to
NULL. Keep the test.
Change-Id: I64e3f6a742678411904cb15c0ad15d56cdae4a73
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/7432
Reviewed-by: David Benjamin <davidben@google.com>
I messed up a few of these.
ASN1_R_UNSUPPORTED_ALGORITHM doesn't exist. X509_R_UNSUPPORTED_ALGORITHM does
exist as part of X509_PUBKEY_set, but the SPKI parser doesn't emit this. (I
don't mind the legacy code having really weird errors, but since EVP is now
limited to things we like, let's try to keep that clean.) To avoid churn in
Conscrypt, we'll keep defining X509_R_UNSUPPORTED_ALGORITHM, but not actually
do anything with it anymore. Conscrypt was already aware of
EVP_R_UNSUPPORTED_ALGORITHM, so this should be fine. (I don't expect
EVP_R_UNSUPPORTED_ALGORITHM to go away. The SPKI parsers we like live in EVP
now.)
A few other ASN1_R_* values didn't quite match upstream, so make those match
again. Finally, I got some of the rsa_pss.c values wrong. Each of those
corresponds to an (overly specific) RSA_R_* value in upstream. However, those
were gone in BoringSSL since even the initial commit. We placed the RSA <-> EVP
glue in crypto/evp (so crypto/rsa wouldn't depend on crypto/evp) while upstream
placed them in crypto/rsa.
Since no one seemed to notice the loss of RSA_R_INVALID_SALT_LENGTH, let's undo
all the cross-module errors inserted in crypto/rsa. Instead, since that kind of
specificity is not useful, funnel it all into X509_R_INVALID_PSS_PARAMETERS
(formerly EVP_R_INVALID_PSS_PARAMETERS, formerly RSA_R_INVALID_PSS_PARAMETERS).
Reset the error codes for all affected modules.
(That our error code story means error codes are not stable across this kind of
refactoring is kind of a problem. Hopefully this will be the last of it.)
Change-Id: Ibfb3a0ac340bfc777bc7de6980ef3ddf0a8c84bc
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/7458
Reviewed-by: Emily Stark (Dunn) <estark@google.com>
Reviewed-by: David Benjamin <davidben@google.com>
This reverts commit ba70118d8e. Reverting this
did not resolve the regression and the cause is now known.
BUG=593963
Change-Id: Ic5e24b74e8f16b01d9fdd80f267a07ef026c82cf
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/7454
Reviewed-by: Steven Valdez <svaldez@google.com>
Reviewed-by: David Benjamin <davidben@google.com>
People seem to condition on these a lot. Since this code has now been moved
twice, just make them all cross-module errors rather than leave a trail of
renamed error codes in our wake.
Change-Id: Iea18ab3d320f03cf29a64a27acca119768c4115c
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/7431
Reviewed-by: Emily Stark (Dunn) <estark@google.com>
Reviewed-by: David Benjamin <davidben@google.com>
If the values of any of the coordinates in the output point |r| were
negative during nistz256 multiplication, then the calls to
|bn_set_word| would result in the wrong coordinates being returned
(the negatives of the correct coordinates would be returned instead).
Fix that.
Change-Id: I6048e62f76dca18f625650d11ef5a051c9e672a4
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/7442
Reviewed-by: David Benjamin <davidben@google.com>
The (internal) constant-time callers of this function already do a
constant-time reduction before calling. And, nobody should be calling
this function with out-of-range coordinates anyway. So, just require
valid coordinates as input.
Further, this function is rarely called, so don't bother with the
optimization to avoid encoding Montgomery encoding of 1 for the Z
coordinate.
Change-Id: I637ffaf4d39135ca17214915b9a8582ea052eea8
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/7441
Reviewed-by: David Benjamin <davidben@google.com>
Don't try to fix a bad |x| coordinate by reducing it. Instead, just
fail. This also makes the code clearer; in particular, it was confusing
why |x_| was used for some calculations when it seems like |x| was just
as good or better.
Change-Id: I9a6911f0d2bd72852a26b46f3828eb5ba3ef924f
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/7440
Reviewed-by: David Benjamin <davidben@google.com>
We never heap-allocate a GCM128_CONTEXT.
Change-Id: I7e89419ce4d81c1598a4b3a214c44dbbcd709651
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/7430
Reviewed-by: Steven Valdez <svaldez@google.com>
Reviewed-by: David Benjamin <davidben@google.com>
Although exactly one iteration of cmov_cached will always initialize selected,
it ends up messing with uninitialized memory. Initialize |selected| before the
loop.
BUG=593540
Change-Id: I5921843f68c6dd1dc7f752538825bc43ba75df4a
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/7415
Reviewed-by: Arnar Birgisson <arnarb@google.com>
Reviewed-by: David Benjamin <davidben@google.com>
The points are only converted to affine form when there are at least
three points being multiplied (in addition to the generator), but there
never is more than one point, so this is all dead code.
Also, I doubt that the comments "...point at infinity (which normally
shouldn't happen)" in the deleted code are accurate. And, the
projective->affine conversions that were removed from p224-64.c and
p256-64.c didn't seem to properly account for the possibility that any of
those points were at infinity.
Change-Id: I611d42d36dcb7515eabf3abf1857e52ff3b45c92
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/7100
Reviewed-by: David Benjamin <davidben@google.com>
If the function returns early due to an error, then the coordinates of the
result will have their |top| value set to a value beyond what has actually
been been written. Fix that, and make it easier to avoid such issues in the
future by refactoring the code.
As a bonus, avoid a false positive MSVC 64-bit opt build "potentially
uninitialized value used" warning.
Change-Id: I8c48deb63163a27f739c8797962414f8ca2588cd
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/6579
Reviewed-by: David Benjamin <davidben@google.com>
Having |Z_is_one| be out of sync with |Z| could potentially be a very
bad thing, and in the past there have been multiple bugs of this sort,
including one currently in p256-x86_64.c (type confusion: Montgomery-
encoded vs unencoded). Avoid the issue entirely by getting rid of
|Z_is_one|.
Change-Id: Icb5aa0342df41d6bc443f15f952734295d0ee4ba
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/6576
Reviewed-by: David Benjamin <davidben@google.com>
This could live in decrepit, but it's tiny and having it makes the
interface more uniform that what we have for MD5 so I put it in the main
code. This is to more easily support nmap.
Change-Id: Ia098cc7ef6e00a90d2f3f56ee7deba8329c9a82e
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/7400
Reviewed-by: David Benjamin <davidben@google.com>
This reverts commit b944882f26.
Recent Chrome canaries show a visible jump in ERR_SSL_PROTOCOL_ERROR which
coincided with a DEPS roll that included this change. Speculatively revert it
to see if they go back down afterwards.
Change-Id: I067798db144c348d666985986dfb9720d1153b7a
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/7391
Reviewed-by: David Benjamin <davidben@google.com>
This removes a hard dependency on |BN_mod_exp|, which will allow the
linker to drop it in programs that don't use other features that
require it.
Also, remove the |mont| member of |bn_blinding_st| in favor of having
callers pass it when necssaary. The |mont| member was a weak reference,
and weak references tend to be error-prone.
Finally, reduce the scope of some parts of the blinding code to
|static|.
Change-Id: I16d8ccc2d6d950c1bb40377988daf1a377a21fe6
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/7111
Reviewed-by: David Benjamin <davidben@google.com>
See also 1b0c438e1a.
Change-Id: Ifcfe15caa4d0db8ef725f8dacd0e8c5c94b00a09
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/7390
Reviewed-by: Emily Stark (Dunn) <estark@google.com>
Reviewed-by: David Benjamin <davidben@google.com>
Instead of crashing when an empty key is passed to
EVP_marshal_public_key(), return with an
EVP_R_UNSUPPORTED_ALGORITHM_ERROR. This brings e.g. X509_PUBKEY_set()
closer to how it behaved before 68772b31 (previously, it returned an
error on an empty public key rather than dereferencing pkey->ameth).
Change-Id: Ieac368725adb7f22329c035d9d0685b44b885888
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/7351
Reviewed-by: David Benjamin <davidben@google.com>
I went with NID_x25519 to match NID_sha1 and friends in being lowercase.
However, upstream seems to have since chosen NID_X25519. Match their
name.
Change-Id: Icc7b183a2e2dfbe42c88e08e538fcbd242478ac3
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/7331
Reviewed-by: Steven Valdez <svaldez@google.com>
Reviewed-by: David Benjamin <davidben@google.com>
C is still kind of unsure about the whole two's complement thing and leaves
left-shifting of negative numbers undefined. Sadly, some sanitizers believe in
teaching the controversy and complain when code relies on the theory of two's
complement.
Shushing these sanitizers in this case is easier than fighting with build
configuration, so replace the shifts with masks. (This is equivalent as the
left-shift was of a value right-shifted by the same amount. Instead, we store
the unshifted value in carry0, etc., and mask off the bottom bits.) A few other
places get casts to unsigned types which, by some miracle, C compilers are
forbidden from miscompiling.
This is imported from upstream's b95779846dc876cf959ccf96c49d4c0a48ea3082 and
5b7af0dd6c9315ca76fba16813b66f5792c7fe6e.
Change-Id: I6bf8156ba692165940c0c4ea1edd5b3e88ca263e
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/7320
Reviewed-by: Adam Langley <agl@google.com>
The coverage tool revealed that we weren't testing all codepaths of the ChaCha
assembly. Add a standalone test as it's much easier to iterate over all lengths
when there isn't the entire AEAD in the way.
I wasn't able to find a really long test vector, so I generated a random one
with the Go implementation we have in runner.
This test gives us full coverage on the ChaCha20_ssse3 variant. (We'll see how
it fares on the other codepaths when the multi-variant test harnesses get in. I
certainly hope there isn't a more novel way to call ChaCha20 than this...)
Change-Id: I087e421c7351f46ea65dacdc7127e4fbf5f4c0aa
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/7299
Reviewed-by: Adam Langley <agl@google.com>
Only the 32-bit AVX2 code path needs this, but upstream choose to harmonize all
vector code paths.
RT#4346
(Imported from 1ea8ae5090f557fea2e5b4d5758b10566825d74b.)
Tested the new code manually on arm and aarch64, NEON and non-NEON. Steven
reports that all variants pass on x86 and x86-64 too.
I've left the 32-bit x86 AVX2 code disabled since valgrind can't measure the
code coverage, but this avoids diff with upstream. We can enable it if we ever
end up caring.
Change-Id: Id9becc2adfbe44b84764f8e9c1fb5e8349c4d5a8
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/7295
Reviewed-by: Adam Langley <agl@google.com>
The |fprintf| dependency is quite heavyweight for small targets. Also,
using |fprintf| on a closed file dsecriptor is undefined behavior, and
there's no way that this code can know whether |stderr| has already
been closed. So, just don't do it.
Change-Id: I1277733afe0649ae1324d11cac84826a1056e308
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/6812
Reviewed-by: David Benjamin <davidben@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: David Benjamin <davidben@google.com>
If running the stack through a fuzzer, we would like execution to be
completely deterministic. This is gated on a
BORINGSSL_UNSAFE_FUZZER_MODE #ifdef.
For now, this just uses the zero ChaCha20 key and a global counter. As
needed, we can extend this to a thread-local counter and a separate
ChaCha20 stream and counter per input length.
Change-Id: Ic6c9d8a25e70d68e5dc6804e2c234faf48e51395
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/7286
Reviewed-by: Adam Langley <agl@google.com>
There was some uncertainty about what the code is doing with |$end0|
and whether it was necessary for |$len| to be a multiple of 16 or 96.
Hopefully these added comments make it clear that the code is correct
except for the caveat regarding low memory addresses.
Change-Id: Iea546a59dc7aeb400f50ac5d2d7b9cb88ace9027
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/7194
Reviewed-by: Adam Langley <agl@google.com>
This was dropped in d27441a9cb due to lack
of use, but node.js now needs it.
Change-Id: I1e207d4b46fc746cfae309a0ea7bbbc04ea785e8
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/7270
Reviewed-by: David Benjamin <davidben@google.com>
See also upstream's dc22d6b37e8058a4334e6f98932c2623cd3d8d0d. (Though I'm not
sure why they didn't need to fix cmov.)
Change-Id: I2a194a8aea1734d4c1e7f6a0536a636379381627
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/7280
Reviewed-by: Adam Langley <agl@google.com>
