This was added in http://rt.openssl.org/Ticket/Display.html?id=2033 to support
a mode where a DTLS socket would statelessly perform the ClientHello /
HelloVerifyRequest portion of the handshake, to be handed off to a socket
specific to this peer address.
This is not used by WebRTC or other current consumers. If we need to support
something like this, it would be cleaner to do the listen portion (cookieless
ClientHello + HelloVerifyRequest) externally and then spin up an SSL instance
on receipt of a cookied ClientHello. This would require a slightly more complex
BIO to replay the second ClientHello but would avoid peppering the DTLS
handshake state with a special short-circuiting mode.
Change-Id: I7a413932edfb62f8b9368912a9a0621d4155f1aa
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/2220
Reviewed-by: Adam Langley <agl@google.com>
This code isn't compiled in. It seems there was some half-baked logic for a
7-byte alert that includes more information about handshake messages
retransmit.
No such alert exists, and the code had a FIXME anyway. If it gets resurrected
in DTLS 1.3 or some extension, we can deal with it then.
Change-Id: I8784ea8ee44bb8da4b0fe5d5d507997526557432
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/2121
Reviewed-by: Adam Langley <agl@google.com>
Thanks to Denis Denisov for running the analysis.
Change-Id: I80810261e013423e746fd8d8afefb3581cffccc0
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/1701
Reviewed-by: Adam Langley <agl@google.com>
This replaces the special-case in ssl3_get_message for Channel ID. Also add
ssl3_hash_current_message to hash the current message, taking TLS vs DTLS
handshake header size into account.
One subtlety with this flag is that a message intended to be processed with
SSL_GET_MESSAGE_DONT_HASH_MESSAGE cannot follow an optional message
(reprocessed with reuse_message, etc.). There is an assertion to that effect.
If need be, we can loosen it to requiring that the preceeding optional message
also pass SSL_GET_MESSAGE_DONT_HASH_MESSAGE and then maintain some state to
perform the more accurate assertion, but this is sufficient for now.
Change-Id: If8c87342b291ac041a35885b9b5ee961aee86eab
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/1630
Reviewed-by: Adam Langley <agl@google.com>
I see no internal users and the existence of a THIRD version encoding
complicates all version-checking logic. Also convert another version check to
SSL_IS_DTLS that was missed earlier.
Change-Id: I60d215f57d44880f6e6877889307dc39dbf838f7
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/1550
Reviewed-by: Adam Langley <agl@google.com>
In a couple of functions, a sequence number would be calculated twice.
Additionally, in |dtls1_process_out_of_seq_message|, we know that
|frag_len| <= |msg_hdr->msg_len| so the later tests for |frag_len <
msg_hdr->msg_len| can be more clearly written as |frag_len !=
msg_hdr->msg_len|, since that's the only remaining case.
Reviewed-by: Matt Caswell <matt@openssl.org>
Reviewed-by: Emilia Käsper <emilia@openssl.org>
(Imported from upstream's d345a24569edf0a966b3d6eaae525f0ca4c5e570)
Change-Id: I038f9f01a1d9379f1ee058b231d80e8b9ce6c2d7
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/1438
Reviewed-by: Adam Langley <agl@google.com>
Applying same fix as in dtls1_process_out_of_seq_message. A truncated
DTLS fragment would cause *ok to be clear, but the return value would
still be the number of bytes read.
Problem identified by Emilia Käsper, based on previous issue/patch by Adam
Langley.
Reviewed-by: Emilia Käsper <emilia@openssl.org>
(Imported from upstream's 3d5dceac430d7b9b273331931d4d2303f5a2256f)
Change-Id: Ibe30716266e2ee1489c98b922cf53edda096c23c
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/1437
Reviewed-by: Adam Langley <agl@google.com>
Previously, a truncated DTLS fragment in
|dtls1_process_out_of_seq_message| would cause *ok to be cleared, but
the return value would still be the number of bytes read. This would
cause |dtls1_get_message| not to consider it an error and it would
continue processing as normal until the calling function noticed that
*ok was zero.
I can't see an exploit here because |dtls1_get_message| uses
|s->init_num| as the length, which will always be zero from what I can
see.
Reviewed-by: Matt Caswell <matt@openssl.org>
Reviewed-by: Emilia Käsper <emilia@openssl.org>
(Imported from upstream's aad61c0a57a3b6371496034db61675abcdb81811.)
Change-Id: I2fb0ea93b6e812e19723ada3351f842cc7b2fa91
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/1436
Reviewed-by: Adam Langley <agl@google.com>
The |pqueue_insert| function can fail if one attempts to insert a
duplicate sequence number. When handling a fragment of an out of
sequence message, |dtls1_process_out_of_seq_message| would not call
|dtls1_reassemble_fragment| if the fragment's length was zero. It would
then allocate a fresh fragment and attempt to insert it, but ignore the
return value, leaking the fragment.
This allows an attacker to exhaust the memory of a DTLS peer.
Fixes CVE-2014-3507
Reviewed-by: Matt Caswell <matt@openssl.org>
Reviewed-by: Emilia Käsper <emilia@openssl.org>
(Imported from upstream's 8ca4c4b25e050b881f3aad7017052842b888722d.)
Change-Id: I387e3f6467a0041f6367965ed3c1ad4377b9ac08
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/1435
Reviewed-by: Adam Langley <agl@google.com>
In |dtls1_reassemble_fragment|, the value of
|msg_hdr->frag_off+frag_len| was being checked against the maximum
handshake message size, but then |msg_len| bytes were allocated for the
fragment buffer. This means that so long as the fragment was within the
allowed size, the pending handshake message could consume 16MB + 2MB
(for the reassembly bitmap). Approx 10 outstanding handshake messages
are allowed, meaning that an attacker could consume ~180MB per DTLS
connection.
In the non-fragmented path (in |dtls1_process_out_of_seq_message|), no
check was applied.
Fixes CVE-2014-3506
Wholly based on patch by Adam Langley with one minor amendment.
Reviewed-by: Emilia Käsper <emilia@openssl.org>
(Imported from upstream's 0598468fc04fb0cf2438c4ee635b587aac1bcce6)
Change-Id: I4849498eabb45ec973fcb988d639b23145891e25
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/1434
Reviewed-by: Adam Langley <agl@google.com>
The |item| variable, in both of these cases, may contain a pointer to a
|pitem| structure within |s->d1->buffered_messages|. It was being freed
in the error case while still being in |buffered_messages|. When the
error later caused the |SSL*| to be destroyed, the item would be double
freed.
Thanks to Wah-Teh Chang for spotting that the fix in 1632ef74 was
inconsistent with the other error paths (but correct).
Fixes CVE-2014-3505
Reviewed-by: Matt Caswell <matt@openssl.org>
Reviewed-by: Emilia Käsper <emilia@openssl.org>
(Imported from upstream's 49850075555893c9c60d5b981deb697f3b9515ea)
Change-Id: Ie40007184f6194ba032b4213c18d36254e80aaa6
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/1432
Reviewed-by: David Benjamin <davidben@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: Adam Langley <agl@google.com>
It's current a void* and gets explicitly cast everywhere. Make it a uint8_t and
only add the casts when converting it come init_buf, which internally stores a
char*.
Change-Id: I28bed129e46ed37ee1ce378d5c3bd0738fc1177f
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/1163
Reviewed-by: Adam Langley <agl@google.com>
A buffer overrun attack can be triggered by sending invalid DTLS fragments
to an OpenSSL DTLS client or server. This is potentially exploitable to
run arbitrary code on a vulnerable client or server.
Fixed by adding consistency check for DTLS fragments.
Thanks to Jüri Aedla for reporting this issue.
(Imported from upstream's eb6508d50c9a314b88ac155bd378cbd79a117c92)
Unnecessary recursion when receiving a DTLS hello request can be used to
crash a DTLS client. Fixed by handling DTLS hello request without
recursion.
Thanks to Imre Rad (Search-Lab Ltd.) for discovering this issue.
(Imported from upstream's 8942b92c7cb5fa144bd79b7607b459d0b777164c)
A missing bounds check in the handling of the TLS heartbeat extension
can be used to reveal up to 64k of memory to a connected client or
server.
Thanks for Neel Mehta of Google Security for discovering this bug and to
Adam Langley <agl@chromium.org> and Bodo Moeller <bmoeller@acm.org> for
preparing the fix (CVE-2014-0160)
(Imported from upstream's 7e840163c06c7692b796a93e3fa85a93136adbb2)
Initial fork from f2d678e6e89b6508147086610e985d4e8416e867 (1.0.2 beta).
(This change contains substantial changes from the original and
effectively starts a new history.)
