The key schedule in TLS 1.3 requires a separate Extract and Expand phase
for the cryptographic computations.
Change-Id: Ifdac1237bda5212de5d4f7e8db54e202151d45ec
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/7983
Reviewed-by: David Benjamin <davidben@google.com>
CECPQ1 is a new key exchange that concatenates the results of an X25519
key agreement and a NEWHOPE key agreement.
Change-Id: Ib919bdc2e1f30f28bf80c4c18f6558017ea386bb
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/7962
Reviewed-by: David Benjamin <davidben@google.com>
Use of strdup, close, lseek, read, and write prevent linking
statically againt libcmt.lib.
Change-Id: I04f7876ec0f03f29f000bbcc6b2ccdec844452d2
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/8010
Reviewed-by: David Benjamin <davidben@google.com>
This is consistent with the new convention in ssl_ecdh.c.
Along the way, change newhope_test.c to not iterate 1000 times over each
test.
Change-Id: I7a500f45b838eba8f6df96957891aa8e880ba089
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/8012
Reviewed-by: David Benjamin <davidben@google.com>
The recipes need to run with a funny GOROOT and we were clearing the
environment.
BUG=26
Change-Id: If233a16e060533ad3fa6f215ce596456c2d7afa5
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/7988
Reviewed-by: Adam Langley <agl@google.com>
This will be used by the bots to get adb and the NDK.
BUG=26
Change-Id: Iae07a380c49b4990f0aa7d73c4f0b399924b9784
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/7986
Reviewed-by: Adam Langley <agl@google.com>
We now have a copy of android-cmake. Also remove the mention of running cmake
twice. It seems to work fine once?
The API level also got specified twice somehow.
BUG=26
Change-Id: I1331b079a4d8531cd53f7de3605ac318c14b3e26
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/7985
Reviewed-by: Adam Langley <agl@google.com>
This will let the recipes use the copy pulled from Chromium's android_tools.
BUG=26
Change-Id: Ica6519223b9fb6daef30f3e14c72ef6422de0f6c
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/7982
Reviewed-by: Adam Langley <agl@google.com>
We don't use find_package/find_program on android to find go/perl
because the android toolchain reconfigure the $PATH. The pervious
way of solving this was to let ninja look for go/perl on the $PATH
but this approach prevented us from specifying explicit go/perl
executables what is needed for hermetic build using prebuilts. This
CL changes the Android specific discovery rule to only set
GO_EXECUTABLE and PERL_EXECUTABLE if they are not specified on the
command line or inside the toolchain file.
Change-Id: Ib6ef69707749073f2b79244ebb301502b2a5a34a
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/8000
Reviewed-by: David Benjamin <davidben@google.com>
We don't have any of these.
Change-Id: I8d12284fbbab0ff35ac32d35a5f2eba326ab79f8
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/7981
Reviewed-by: Steven Valdez <svaldez@google.com>
Reviewed-by: David Benjamin <davidben@google.com>
Those checks contradict an assert up in read_app_data. This is part of
shrinking read_bytes further into get_record and its callers until it goes
away. Here, this kind of policy should be controlled by the callers.
Change-Id: If8f9a45b8b95093beab1b3d4abcd31da55c65322
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/7954
Reviewed-by: Adam Langley <agl@google.com>
There is no good reason why this needs to be this way. Later work should make
this all use a much more appropriate design. In the meantime, leave a note here
so this does not look accidental.
Change-Id: I7599dea7a474f54e26d9ab175b0e3cada99a974d
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/7951
Reviewed-by: Adam Langley <agl@google.com>
This was needed because ssl3_get_message would get confused if init_num were
not set back to zero when reading the next message. However, ssl3_get_message
now treats init_num only as an output, not an input. (The message sending logic
and the individual handshake states still use it, so we can't get rid of it
altogether yet.)
I've kept the init_num reset at the start and end of the handshake loop alone
for now since that's more about initialization and cleanup. Though I believe
they too do not do anything.
Change-Id: I64bbdd82122498de32364e7edb3b00b166059ecd
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/7950
Reviewed-by: Adam Langley <agl@google.com>
They're completely unused now. The handshake message reassembly logic should
not depend on the state machine. This should partially free it up (ugly as it
is) to be shared with a future TLS 1.3 implementation while, in parallel, it
and the layers below, get reworked. This also cuts down on the number of states
significantly.
Partially because I expect we'd want to get ssl_hash_message_t out of there
too. Having it in common code is fine, but it needs to be in the (supposed to
be) protocol-agnostic handshake state machine, not the protocol-specific
handshake message layer.
Change-Id: I12f9dc57bf433ceead0591106ab165d352ef6ee4
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/7949
Reviewed-by: Adam Langley <agl@google.com>
Rather than this confusing coordination with the handshake state machine and
init_num changing meaning partway through, use the length field already in
BUF_MEM. Like the new record layer parsing, is no need to keep track of whether
we are reading the header or the body. Simply keep extending the handshake
message until it's far enough along.
ssl3_get_message still needs tons of work, but this allows us to disentangle it
from the handshake state.
Change-Id: Ic2b3e7cfe6152a7e28a04980317d3c7c396d9b08
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/7948
Reviewed-by: Adam Langley <agl@google.com>
BUF_MEM is actually a rather silly API for the SSL stack. There's separate
length and max fields, but init_buf effectively treats length as max and max as
nothing.
We possibly don't want to be using it long-term anyway (if nothing else, the
char*/uint8_t* thing is irritating), but in the meantime, it'll be easier to
separately fix up get_message's book-keeping and state tracking from where the
handshake gets its messages from.
Change-Id: I9e56ea008173991edc8312ec707505ead410a9ee
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/7947
Reviewed-by: Adam Langley <agl@google.com>
On Windows, if we write to our socket and then close it, the peer sometimes
doesn't get all the data. This was working for our shimShutsDown tests because
we send close_notify in parallel with the peer and sendAlert(alertCloseNotify)
did not internally return an error.
For convenience, sendAlert returns a local error for non-close_notify alerts.
Suppress that error to avoid the race condition. This makes it behave like the
other shimShutsDown tests.
Change-Id: Iad256e3ea5223285793991e2eba9c7d61f2e3ddf
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/7980
Reviewed-by: Adam Langley <agl@google.com>
Previously, SSL_ECDH_METHOD consisted of two methods: one to produce a
public key to be sent to the peer, and another to produce the shared key
upon receipt of the peer's message.
This API does not work for NEWHOPE, because the client-to-server message
cannot be produced until the server's message has been received by the
client.
Solve this by introducing a new method which consumes data from the
server key exchange message and produces data for the client key
exchange message.
Change-Id: I1ed5a2bf198ca2d2ddb6d577888c1fa2008ef99a
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/7961
Reviewed-by: David Benjamin <davidben@google.com>
There's an off-by-one when skipping blank lines. The initial logic also has an
off-by-one but since it starts lineNo 0-based and then switches to 1-based, it
cancels out.
The decl error line number also was not of where the decl began.
Change-Id: I58fd157dad3276cb9de52ac48ff8c7c73e40f337
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/7959
Reviewed-by: Adam Langley <agl@google.com>
This explicitly forbids an API pattern which formerly kind of worked, but was
extremely buggy (see preceding commits). Depending on how one interprets
close_notify and our API, one might wish to call SSL_shutdown only once
(morally shutdown(SHUT_WR)) and then SSL_read until EOF.
However, this exposes additional confusing states where we might try to send an
alert post-SHUT_WR, etc. Early commits made us more robust here (whether one is
allowed to touch the SSL* after an operattion failed because it read an alert
is... unclear), so we could support it if we wanted to, but this doesn't seem
worth the additional statespace. See if we can get away with not allowing it.
Change-Id: Ie7a7e5520b464360b1e6316c34ec9854b571782f
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/7433
Reviewed-by: David Benjamin <davidben@google.com>
The logic to drop records really should be in the caller. Unless
ssl3_read_bytes is broken apart, condition on the type field which is more
robust.
If we manage to call, say, SSL_read after SSL_shutdown completes at 0 (instead
of 1), this logic can incorrectly cause unknown record types to be dropped.
Change-Id: Iab90e5d9190fcccbf6ff55e17079a2704ed99901
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/7953
Reviewed-by: Steven Valdez <svaldez@google.com>
Reviewed-by: David Benjamin <davidben@google.com>
The existing logic gets confused in a number of cases around close_notify vs.
fatal alert. SSL_shutdown, while still pushing to the error queue, will fail to
notice alerts. We also get confused if we try to send a fatal alert when we've
already sent something else.
Change-Id: I9b1d217fbf1ee8a9c59efbebba60165b7de9689e
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/7952
Reviewed-by: David Benjamin <davidben@google.com>
SSL_RECEIVED_SHUTDOWN checks in the record layer happen in two different
places. Some operations (but not all) check it, and so does read_bytes. Move it
to get_record.
This check should be at a low-level since it is otherwise duplicated in every
operation. It is also a signal which originates from around the peer's record
layer, so it makes sense to check it near the same code. (This one's in
get_record which is technically lower-level than read_bytes, but we're trying
to get rid of read_bytes. They're very coupled functions.)
Also, if we've seen a fatal alert, replay an error, not an EOF.
Change-Id: Idec35c5068ddabe5b1a9145016d8f945da2421cf
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/7436
Reviewed-by: David Benjamin <davidben@google.com>
In practice it seems that it's not clear that consumers of BoringSSL
generally check in the generated files.
Change-Id: Iaa03aa62139bbcf3e7e7f68662073854954b835f
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/7956
Reviewed-by: David Benjamin <davidben@google.com>
This function will return whether BoringSSL was built with
OPENSSL_NO_ASM. This will allow us to write a test in our internal
codebase which asserts that normal builds should always have assembly
code included.
Change-Id: Ib226bf63199022f0039d590edd50c0cc823927b9
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/7960
Reviewed-by: David Benjamin <davidben@google.com>
OpenSSL used to only forbid it on the server in plain PSK and allow it on the
client. Enforce it properly on both sides. My read of the rule in RFC 5246 ("A
non-anonymous server can optionally request a certificate") and in RFC 4279
("The Certificate and CertificateRequest payloads are omitted from the
response.") is that client auth happens iff we're certificate-based.
The line in RFC 4279 is under the plain PSK section, but that doesn't make a
whole lot of sense and there is only one diagram. PSK already authenticates
both sides. I think the most plausible interpretation is that this is for
certificate-based ciphers.
Change-Id: If195232c83f21e011e25318178bb45186de707e6
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/7942
Reviewed-by: David Benjamin <davidben@google.com>
A handshake message can go up to 2^24 bytes = 16MB which is a little large for
the peer to force us to buffer. Accordingly, we bound the size of a
handshake message.
Rather than have a global limit, the existing logic uses a different limit at
each state in the handshake state machine and, for certificates, allows
configuring the maximum certificate size. This is nice in that we engage larger
limits iff the relevant state is reachable from the handshake. Servers without
client auth get a tighter limit "for free".
However, this doesn't work for DTLS due to out-of-order messages and we use a
simpler scheme for DTLS. This scheme also is tricky on optional messages and
makes the handshake <-> message layer communication complex.
Apart from an ignored 20,000 byte limit on ServerHello, the largest
non-certificate limit is the common 16k limit on ClientHello. So this
complexity wasn't buying us anything. Unify everything on the DTLS scheme
except, so as not to regress bounds on client-auth-less servers, also correctly
check for whether client auth is configured. The value of 16k was chosen based
on this value.
(The 20,000 byte ServerHello limit makes no sense. We can easily bound the
ServerHello because servers may not send extensions we don't implement. But it
gets overshadowed by the certificate anyway.)
Change-Id: I00309b16d809a3c2a1543f99fd29c4163e3add81
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/7941
Reviewed-by: David Benjamin <davidben@google.com>
The performance measurements seem to be very out-of-date. Also, the
idea for optimizing the case of an even modulus is interesting, but it
isn't useful because we never use an even modulus.
Change-Id: I012eb37638cda3c63db0e390c8c728f65b949e54
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/7733
Reviewed-by: David Benjamin <davidben@google.com>
This function is only really useful for DSA signature verification,
which is something that isn't performance-sensitive. Replace its
optimized implementation with a naïve implementation that's much
simpler.
Note that it would be simpler to use |BN_mod_mul| in the new
implementation; |BN_mod_mul_montgomery| is used instead only to be
consistent with other work being done to replace uses of non-Montgomery
modular reduction with Montgomery modular reduction.
Change-Id: If587d463b73dd997acfc5b7ada955398c99cc342
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/7732
Reviewed-by: David Benjamin <davidben@google.com>
sk_FOO_num may be called on const stacks. Given that was wrong, I suspect no
one ever uses a const STACK_OF(T)...
Other macros were correctly const, but were casting the constness a way (only
to have it come back again).
Also remove the extra newline after a group. It seems depending on which
version of clang-format was being used, we'd either lose or keep the extra
newline. The current file doesn't have them, so settle on that.
Change-Id: I19de6bc85b0a043d39c05ee3490321e9f0adec60
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/7946
Reviewed-by: Steven Valdez <svaldez@google.com>
Reviewed-by: David Benjamin <davidben@google.com>
It's only used in one file.
Change-Id: I5d60cbc02799b22317f5f7593faf25eb8eea0a24
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/7943
Reviewed-by: David Benjamin <davidben@google.com>
The array is of size two for the level and description, not because we allow
two alerts outstanding; we don't.
Change-Id: I25e42c059ce977a947397a3dc83e9684bc8f0595
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/7940
Reviewed-by: Steven Valdez <svaldez@google.com>
Reviewed-by: David Benjamin <davidben@google.com>
Allow running only one of the test suites. The recipe expects these happen in
two separate steps (it wants only one JSON results file per "step"). Also add
an option to extract the results file.
BUG=26
Change-Id: I0cda19bd9643b66f40a30bc8410a357da33baacc
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/7945
Reviewed-by: Adam Langley <agl@google.com>
When *pp is NULL, don't write garbage, return an unexpected pointer
or leak memory on error.
(Imported from upstream's 36c37944909496a123e2656ad1f651769a7cc72f.)
This calling convention...
Change-Id: Ic733092cfb942a3e1d3ceda6797222901ad55bef
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/7944
Reviewed-by: Adam Langley <agl@google.com>
The specification, sadly, did not say that servers MUST NOT send it, only that
they are "not expected to" do anything with the client extension. Accordingly,
we decided to tolerate this. Add a test for this so that we check this
behavior.
This test also ensures that the original session's value for it carries over.
Change-Id: I38c738f218a09367c9d8d1b0c4d68ab5cbec730e
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/7860
Reviewed-by: Adam Langley <agl@google.com>
|BN_mod_exp_mont_word| is only useful when the base is a single word
in length and timing side channel protection of the exponent is not
needed. That's never the case in real life.
Keep the function in the API, but removes its single-word-base
optimized implementation with a call to |BN_mod_exp_mont|.
Change-Id: Ic25f6d4f187210b681c6ee6b87038b64a5744958
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/7731
Reviewed-by: David Benjamin <davidben@google.com>
This allows an application to override the default of 1 second, which
is what's instructed in RFC 6347 but is not an absolute requirement.
Change-Id: I0bbb16e31990fbcab44a29325b6ec7757d5789e5
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/7930
Reviewed-by: David Benjamin <davidben@google.com>
|BN_mod_exp_mont| will forward to |BN_mod_exp_mont_consttime|, so this
is a no-op semantically. However, this allows the linker to drop the
implementation of |BN_mod_exp_mont| even when the DH code is in use.
Change-Id: I0cb8b260224ed661ede74923bd134acb164459c1
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/7730
Reviewed-by: David Benjamin <davidben@google.com>
When setting a new SRTP connection profile using
SSL_CTX_set_tlsext_use_srtp() or SSL_set_tlsext_use_srtp() we should
free any existing profile first to avoid a memory leak.
(Imported from upstream's fbdf0299dc98bc611d854c0a62c6ab1810d856fc.)
Change-Id: I738e711f1c23ed4a8ac97486d94c08cc0db7aea7
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/7910
Reviewed-by: Steven Valdez <svaldez@google.com>
Reviewed-by: David Benjamin <davidben@google.com>
Also add a test.
This is the last of the openssl/asn1.h includes from the directories that are
to be kept in the core libcrypto library. (What remains is to finish sorting
out the crypto/obj stuff. We'll also want to retain a decoupled version of the
PKCS#12 stuff.)
Functions that need to be audited for reuse:
i2d_DHparams
BUG=54
Change-Id: Ibef030a98d3a93ae26e8e56869f14858ec75601b
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/7900
Reviewed-by: Steven Valdez <svaldez@google.com>
Reviewed-by: David Benjamin <davidben@google.com>
The SSL tests are fairly different from most test suites. Add some high-level
documentation so people know where to start.
Change-Id: Ie5ea108883dca82675571a3025b3fbc4b9d66da9
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/7890
Reviewed-by: Adam Langley <agl@google.com>
This is particularly questionable with ClientHello encompassing several states.
ssl->shutdown is already initialized to zero and further reset in
SSL_set_{connect,accept}_state. At any other state, if it manages to not be a
no-op, it will erase a close_notify we have sent or received, neither of which
is okay. (I don't think this is possible, but I'm not positive.)
This dates to the initial commit in OpenSSL, so git is not enlightening. The
state machine logic historically reset many fields it had no reason to reset,
so this is likely more of that.
Change-Id: Ie872316701720cb8ef2cfcb67b7f07a9fea3620f
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/7874
Reviewed-by: Adam Langley <agl@google.com>
Having bbio be tri-state (not allocated, allocated but not active, and
allocated and active) is confusing.
The extra state is only used in the client handshake, where ClientHello is
special-cased to not go through the buffer while everything else is. This dates
to OpenSSL's initial commit and doesn't seem to do much. I do not believe it
can affect renego as the buffer only affects writes; although OpenSSL accepted
interleave on read (though this logic predates it slightly), it never sent
application data while it believed a handshake was active. The handshake would
always be driven to completion first.
My guess is this was to save a copy since the ClientHello is a one-message
flight so it wouldn't need to be buffered? This is probably not worth the extra
variation in the state. (Especially with the DTLS state machine going through
ClientHello twice and pushing the BIO in between the two. Though I suspect that
was a mistake in itself. If the optimization guess is correct, there was no
need to do that.)
Change-Id: I6726f866e16ee7213cab0c3e6abb133981444d47
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/7873
Reviewed-by: Adam Langley <agl@google.com>
That we're ignoring the return value is clearly wrong when
dtls1_retransmit_message has other code that doesn't ignore it, by way of
dtls1_do_handshake_write.
Change-Id: Ie3f8c0defdf1f5e709d67af4ca6fa4f0d83c76c9
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/7872
Reviewed-by: Adam Langley <agl@google.com>
The DTLS bbio logic is rather problematic, but this shouldn't make things
worse. In the in-handshake case, the new code merges the per-message
(unchecked) BIO_flush calls into one call at the end but otherwise the BIO is
treated as is. Otherwise any behavior around non-block writes should be
preserved.
In the post-handshake case, we now install the buffer when we didn't
previously. On write error, the buffer will have garbage in it, but it will be
discarded, so that will preserve any existing retry behavior. (Arguably the
existing retry behavior is a bug, but that's another matter.)
Add a test for all this, otherwise it is sure to regress. Testing for
record-packing is a little fuzzy, but we can assert ChangeCipherSpec always
shares a record with something.
BUG=57
Change-Id: I8603f20811d502c71ded2943b0e72a8bdc4e46f2
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/7871
Reviewed-by: Adam Langley <agl@google.com>
