cryptography.io wants RSA_R_BLOCK_TYPE_IS_NOT_02, only used by the
ancient RSA_padding_check_SSLv23 function. Define it but never emit it.
Additionally, it's rather finicky about RSA_R_TOO_LARGE* errors. We
merged them in BoringSSL because having RSA_R_TOO_LARGE,
RSA_R_TOO_LARGE_FOR_MODULUS, and RSA_R_TOO_LARGE_FOR_KEY_SIZE is a
little silly. But since we don't expect well-behaved code to condition
on error codes anyway, perhaps that wasn't worth it. Split them back
up.
Looking through OpenSSL, there is a vague semantic difference:
RSA_R_DIGEST_TOO_BIG_FOR_RSA_KEY - Specifically emitted if a digest is
too big for PKCS#1 signing with this key.
RSA_R_DATA_TOO_LARGE_FOR_KEY_SIZE - You asked me to sign or encrypt a
digest/plaintext, but it's too big for this key.
RSA_R_DATA_TOO_LARGE_FOR_MODULUS - You gave me an RSA ciphertext or
signature and it is not fully reduced modulo N.
-OR-
The padding functions produced something that isn't reduced, but I
believe this is unreachable outside of RSA_NO_PADDING.
RSA_R_DATA_TOO_LARGE - Some low-level padding function was told to copy
a digest/plaintext into some buffer, but the buffer was too small. I
think this is basically unreachable.
-OR-
You asked me to verify a PSS signature, but I didn't need to bother
because the digest/salt parameters you picked were too big.
Update-Note: This depends on cl/196566462.
Change-Id: I2e539e075eff8bfcd52ccde365e975ebcee72567
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/28547
Reviewed-by: Adam Langley <agl@google.com>
We don't check it is fully reduced because different implementations use
Carmichael vs Euler totients, but if d exceeds n, something is wrong.
Note the fixed-width BIGNUM changes already fail operations with
oversized d.
Update-Note: Some blatantly invalid RSA private keys will be rejected at
RSA_check_key time. Note that most of those keys already are not
usable with BoringSSL anyway. This CL moves the failure from
sign/decrypt to RSA_check_key.
Change-Id: I468dbba74a148aa58c5994cc27f549e7ae1486a2
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/26374
Reviewed-by: Adam Langley <alangley@gmail.com>
I messed up a few of these.
ASN1_R_UNSUPPORTED_ALGORITHM doesn't exist. X509_R_UNSUPPORTED_ALGORITHM does
exist as part of X509_PUBKEY_set, but the SPKI parser doesn't emit this. (I
don't mind the legacy code having really weird errors, but since EVP is now
limited to things we like, let's try to keep that clean.) To avoid churn in
Conscrypt, we'll keep defining X509_R_UNSUPPORTED_ALGORITHM, but not actually
do anything with it anymore. Conscrypt was already aware of
EVP_R_UNSUPPORTED_ALGORITHM, so this should be fine. (I don't expect
EVP_R_UNSUPPORTED_ALGORITHM to go away. The SPKI parsers we like live in EVP
now.)
A few other ASN1_R_* values didn't quite match upstream, so make those match
again. Finally, I got some of the rsa_pss.c values wrong. Each of those
corresponds to an (overly specific) RSA_R_* value in upstream. However, those
were gone in BoringSSL since even the initial commit. We placed the RSA <-> EVP
glue in crypto/evp (so crypto/rsa wouldn't depend on crypto/evp) while upstream
placed them in crypto/rsa.
Since no one seemed to notice the loss of RSA_R_INVALID_SALT_LENGTH, let's undo
all the cross-module errors inserted in crypto/rsa. Instead, since that kind of
specificity is not useful, funnel it all into X509_R_INVALID_PSS_PARAMETERS
(formerly EVP_R_INVALID_PSS_PARAMETERS, formerly RSA_R_INVALID_PSS_PARAMETERS).
Reset the error codes for all affected modules.
(That our error code story means error codes are not stable across this kind of
refactoring is kind of a problem. Hopefully this will be the last of it.)
Change-Id: Ibfb3a0ac340bfc777bc7de6980ef3ddf0a8c84bc
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/7458
Reviewed-by: Emily Stark (Dunn) <estark@google.com>
Reviewed-by: David Benjamin <davidben@google.com>
People seem to condition on these a lot. Since this code has now been moved
twice, just make them all cross-module errors rather than leave a trail of
renamed error codes in our wake.
Change-Id: Iea18ab3d320f03cf29a64a27acca119768c4115c
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/7431
Reviewed-by: Emily Stark (Dunn) <estark@google.com>
Reviewed-by: David Benjamin <davidben@google.com>
Running make_errors.go every time a function is renamed is incredibly
tedious. Plus we keep getting them wrong.
Instead, sample __func__ (__FUNCTION__ in MSVC) in the OPENSSL_PUT_ERROR macro
and store it alongside file and line number. This doesn't change the format of
ERR_print_errors, however ERR_error_string_n now uses the placeholder
"OPENSSL_internal" rather than an actual function name since that only takes
the uint32_t packed error code as input.
This updates err scripts to not emit the function string table. The
OPENSSL_PUT_ERROR invocations, for now, still include the extra
parameter. That will be removed in a follow-up.
BUG=468039
Change-Id: Iaa2ef56991fb58892fa8a1283b3b8b995fbb308d
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/5275
Reviewed-by: Adam Langley <agl@google.com>
This removes the version field from RSA and instead handles versioning
as part of parsing. (As a bonus, we now correctly limit multi-prime RSA
to version 1 keys.)
Most consumers are also converted. old_rsa_priv_{de,en}code are left
alone for now. Those hooks are passed in parameters which match the old
d2i/i2d pattern (they're only used in d2i_PrivateKey and
i2d_PrivateKey).
Include a test which, among other things, checks that public keys being
serialized as private keys are handled properly.
BUG=499653
Change-Id: Icdd5f0382c4a84f9c8867024f29756e1a306ba08
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/5273
Reviewed-by: Adam Langley <agl@google.com>
Platform crypto APIs for PKCS#1 RSA signatures vary between expecting the
caller to prepend the DigestInfo prefix (RSA_sign_raw) and prepending it
internally (RSA_sign). Currently, Chromium implements sign or sign_raw as
appropriate. To avoid needing both variants, the new asynchronous methods will
only expose the higher-level one, sign.
To satisfy ports which previously implemented sign_raw, expose the DigestInfo
prefix as a utility function.
BUG=347404
Change-Id: I04c397b5e9502b2942f6698ecf81662a3c9282e6
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/4940
Reviewed-by: Adam Langley <agl@google.com>
This saves about 6-7k of error data.
Change-Id: Ic28593d4a1f5454f00fb2399d281c351ee57fb14
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/3385
Reviewed-by: Adam Langley <agl@google.com>
Previously, error strings were kept in arrays for each subdirectory and
err.c would iterate over them all and insert them at init time to a hash
table.
This means that, even if you have a shared library and lots of processes
using that, each process has ~30KB of private memory from building that
hash table.
This this change, all the error strings are built into a sorted list and
are thus static data. This means that processes can share the error
information and it actually saves binary space because of all the
pointer overhead in the old scheme. Also it saves the time taken
building the hash table at startup.
This removes support for externally-supplied error string data.
Change-Id: Ifca04f335c673a048e1a3e76ff2b69c7264635be
