The Android NDK docs link to a ARM GNU/Linux Application Binary Interface
Supplement document. Also fix a type in trampoline-armv4.pl. The generic ARM
document is usually shortened AAPCS, not APCS.
I couldn't find a corresponding link for aarch64.
Change-Id: I6e5543f5c9e26955cd3945e9e7a5dcff27c2bd78
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/c/35064
Commit-Queue: David Benjamin <davidben@google.com>
Commit-Queue: Adam Langley <agl@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Adam Langley <agl@google.com>
GCC notices that one function believes < 0 is the error while the other
believes it's != 0. unw_get_reg never returns positive, but match them.
Change-Id: I40af614e6b1400bf3d398bd32beb6d3ec702bc11
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/c/34985
Reviewed-by: Adam Langley <agl@google.com>
Commit-Queue: Adam Langley <agl@google.com>
This should make things a bit easier to debug.
Update-Note: Test binaries on Windows now link to dbghelp.
Bug: 259
Change-Id: I9da1fc89d429080c5250238e4341445922b1dd8e
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/c/34868
Reviewed-by: Adam Langley <agl@google.com>
Commit-Queue: David Benjamin <davidben@google.com>
This caught a bug in bn_mul_mont. Tested manually on iOS and Android.
Change-Id: I1819fcd9ad34dbe3ba92bba952507d86dd12185a
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/c/34805
Commit-Queue: David Benjamin <davidben@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Adam Langley <agl@google.com>
Update-Note: There's some chance this'll break iOS since I was unable to
test it there. The iPad I have to test on is too new to run 32-bit code
at all.
Change-Id: I6593f91b67a5e8a82828237d3b69ed948b07922d
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/c/34725
Commit-Queue: David Benjamin <davidben@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Adam Langley <agl@google.com>
Unfortunately, due to most OpenSSL assembly using custom exception
handlers to unwind, most of our assembly doesn't work with
non-destructive unwind. For now, CHECK_ABI behaves like
CHECK_ABI_NO_UNWIND on Windows, and CHECK_ABI_SEH will test unwinding on
both platforms.
The tests do, however, work with the unwind-code-based assembly we
recently added, as well as the clmul-based GHASH which is also
code-based. Remove the ad-hoc SEH tests which intentionally hit memory
access exceptions, now that we can test unwind directly.
Now that we can test it, the next step is to implement SEH directives in
perlasm so writing these unwind codes is less of a chore.
Bug: 259
Change-Id: I23a57a22c5dc9fa4513f575f18192335779678a5
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/c/34784
Commit-Queue: David Benjamin <davidben@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Adam Langley <agl@google.com>
Calling conventions must specify how to handle arguments smaller than a
machine word. Should the caller pad them up to a machine word size with
predictable values (zero/sign-extended), or should the callee tolerate
an arbitrary bit pattern?
Annoyingly, I found no text in either SysV or Win64 ABI documentation
describing any of this and resorted to experiment. The short answer is
that callees must tolerate an arbitrary bit pattern on x86_64, which
means we must test this. See the comment in abi_test::internal::ToWord
for the long answer.
CHECK_ABI now, if the type of the parameter is smaller than
crypto_word_t, fills the remaining bytes with 0xaa. This is so the
number is out of bounds for code expecting either zero or sign
extension. (Not that crypto assembly has any business seeing negative
numbers.)
Doing so reveals a bug in ecp_nistz256_ord_sqr_mont. The rep parameter
is typed int, but the code expected uint64_t. In practice, the compiler
will always compile this correctly because:
- On both Win64 and SysV, rep is a register parameter.
- The rep parameter is always a constant, so the compiler has no reason
to leave garbage in the upper half.
However, I was indeed able to get a bug out of GCC via:
uint64_t foo = (1ull << 63) | 2; // Some global the compiler can't
// prove constant.
ecp_nistz256_ord_sqr_mont(res, a, foo >> 1);
Were ecp_nistz256_ord_sqr_mont a true int-taking function, this would
act like ecp_nistz256_ord_sqr_mont(res, a, 1). Instead, it hung. Fix
this by having it take a full-width word.
This mess has several consequences:
- ABI testing now ideally needs a functional testing component to fully cover
this case. A bad input might merely produce the wrong answer. Still,
this is fairly effective as it will cause most code to either segfault
or loop forever. (Not the enc parameter to AES however...)
- We cannot freely change the type of assembly function prototypes. If the
prototype says int or unsigned, it must be ignoring the upper half and
thus "fixing" it to size_t cannot have handled the full range. (Unless
it was simply wrong of the parameter is already bounded.) If the
prototype says size_t, switching to int or unsigned will hit this type
of bug. The former is a safer failure mode though.
- The simplest path out of this mess: new assembly code should *only*
ever take word-sized parameters. This is not a tall order as the bad
parameters are usually ints that should have been size_t.
Calling conventions are hard.
Change-Id: If8254aff8953844679fbce4bd3e345e5e2fa5213
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/c/34627
Commit-Queue: David Benjamin <davidben@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Adam Langley <agl@google.com>
This is much less interesting (stack-based parameters, Windows and SysV
match, no SEH concerns as far as I can tell) than x86_64, but it was
easy to do and I'm more familiar with x86 than ARM, so it made a better
second architecture to make sure all the architecture ifdefs worked out.
Also fix a bug in the x86_64 direction flag code. It was shifting in the
wrong direction, making give 0 or 1<<20 rather than 0 or 1.
(Happily, x86_64 appears to be unique in having vastly different calling
conventions between OSs. x86 is the same between SysV and Windows, and
ARM had the good sense to specify a (mostly) common set of rules.)
Since a lot of the assembly functions use the same names and the tests
were written generically, merely dropping in a trampoline and
CallerState implementation gives us a bunch of ABI tests for free.
Change-Id: I15408c18d43e88cfa1c5c0634a8b268a150ed961
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/c/34624
Reviewed-by: Adam Langley <agl@google.com>
Commit-Queue: David Benjamin <davidben@google.com>
Linux and Windows ABIs both require that the direction flag be cleared
on function exit, so that functions can rely on it being cleared on
entry. (Some OpenSSL assembly preserves it, which is stronger, but we
only require what is specified by the ABI so CHECK_ABI works with C
compiler output.)
Change-Id: I1a320aed4371176b4b44fe672f1a90167b84160f
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/c/34187
Commit-Queue: Adam Langley <agl@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Adam Langley <agl@google.com>
This uses the x86 trap flag and libunwind to test CFI works at each
instruction. For now, it just uses the system one out of pkg-config and
disables unwind tests if unavailable. We'll probably want to stick a
copy into //third_party and perhaps try the LLVM one later.
This tester caught two bugs in P-256 CFI annotations already:
I47b5f9798b3bcee1748e537b21c173d312a14b42 and
I9f576d868850312d6c14d1386f8fbfa85021b347
An earlier design used PTRACE_SINGLESTEP with libunwind's remote
unwinding features. ptrace is a mess around stop signals (see group-stop
discussion in ptrace(2)) and this is 10x faster, so I went with it. The
question of which is more future-proof is complex:
- There are two libunwinds with the same API,
https://www.nongnu.org/libunwind/ and LLVM's. This currently uses the
system nongnu.org for convenience. In future, LLVM's should be easier
to bundle (less complex build) and appears to even support Windows,
but I haven't tested this. Moreover, setting the trap flag keeps the
test single-process, which is less complex on Windows. That suggests
the trap flag design and switching to LLVM later. However...
- Not all architectures have a trap flag settable by userspace. As far
as I can tell, ARMv8's PSTATE.SS can only be set from the kernel. If
we stick with nongnu.org libunwind, we can use PTRACE_SINGLESTEP and
remote unwinding. Or we implement it for LLVM. Another thought is for
the ptracer to bounce SIGTRAP back into the process, to share the
local unwinding code.
- ARMv7 has no trap flag at all and PTRACE_SINGLESTEP fails. Debuggers
single-step by injecting breakpoints instead. However, ARMv8's trap
flag seems to work in both AArch32 and AArch64 modes, so we may be
able to condition it on a 64-bit kernel.
Sadly, neither strategy works with Intel SDE. Adding flags to cpucap
vectors as we do with ARM would help, but it would not emulate CPUs
newer than the host CPU. For now, I've just had SDE tests disable these.
Annoyingly, CMake does not allow object libraries to have dependencies,
so make test_support a proper static library. Rename the target to
test_support_lib to avoid
https://gitlab.kitware.com/cmake/cmake/issues/17785
Update-Note: This adds a new optional test dependency, but it's disabled
by default (define BORINGSSL_HAVE_LIBUNWIND), so consumers do not need
to do anything. We'll probably want to adjust this in the future.
Bug: 181
Change-Id: I817263d7907aff0904a9cee83f8b26747262cc0c
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/c/33966
Commit-Queue: David Benjamin <davidben@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Adam Langley <agl@google.com>
Unwind testing will make CHECK_ABI much slower. The original
ptrace-based design is some 10,000x slower. I've found an alternate
design that's a mere 1,000x slower, but this probably warrants being
more straightforward. It also removes the weirdness where NDEBUG
controlled which tests were run.
While it does mean we need to write some extra tests for p256-x86_64.pl,
we otherwise do not directly unit test our assembly anyway. Usually we
test the public crypto APIs themselves. So, for most files, this isn't
actually extra work.
Bug: 181
Change-Id: I7cbb7f930c2ea6ae32a201da503dcd36844704f0
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/c/33965
Commit-Queue: David Benjamin <davidben@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Adam Langley <agl@google.com>
perlasm's bizarre mix of asm and perl indentation and clever editors always
mess me up.
Change-Id: Iac906a636207867939cc327b4c21b8a982abce29
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/c/33844
Commit-Queue: Adam Langley <agl@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Adam Langley <agl@google.com>
This is all manual right now. Once we've added SEH tests, we can add support
for emitting these in x86_64-xlate.pl, probably based on MASM and Yasm's unwind
directives, and unify with CFI. (Sadly, NASM does not support these
directives.) Then we can push that upstream to replace the error-prone and
non-standard custom handlers.
Change-Id: I5a734fd494b7eaafab24a00e6df624bd03b37d43
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/c/33785
Reviewed-by: Adam Langley <agl@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Adam Langley <alangley@gmail.com>
Commit-Queue: David Benjamin <davidben@google.com>
Dear reader, I must apologize in advance. This CL contains the following:
- A new 256-line perlasm file with non-trivial perl bits and a dual-ABI
variadic function caller.
- C preprocessor gymnastics, with variadic macros and fun facts about
__VA_ARGS__'s behavior on empty argument lists.
- C++ template gymnastics, including variadic arguments, template
specialization, std::enable_if, and machinery to control template argument
deduction.
Enjoy.
This tests that our assembly functions correctly honor platform ABI
conventions. Right now this only tests callee-saved registers, but it should be
extendable to SEH/CFI unwind testing with single-step debugging APIs.
Register-checking does not involve anything funny and should be compatible with
SDE. (The future unwind testing is unlikely to be compatible.)
This CL adds support for x86_64 SysV and Win64 ABIs. ARM, AArch64, and x86 can
be added in the future. The testing is injected in two places. First, all the
assembly tests in p256-x86_64-test.cc are now instrumented. This is the
intended workflow and should capture all registers.
However, we currently do not unit-test our assembly much directly. We should do
that as follow-up work[0] but, in the meantime, I've also wrapped all of the GTest
main function in an ABI test. This is imperfect as ABI failures may be masked
by other stack frames, but it costs nothing[1] and is pretty reliable at
catching Win64 xmm register failures.
[0] An alternate strategy would be, in debug builds, unconditionally instrument
every assembly call in libcrypto. But the CHECK_ABI macro would be difficult to
replicate in pure C, and unwind testing may be too invasive for this. Still,
something to consider when we C++ libcrypto.
[1] When single-stepped unwind testing exists, it won't cost nothing. The
gtest_main.cc call will turn unwind testing off.
Change-Id: I6643b26445891fd46abfacac52bc024024c8d7f6
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/c/33764
Reviewed-by: Adam Langley <agl@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Adam Langley <alangley@gmail.com>
Commit-Queue: David Benjamin <davidben@google.com>
Make it more obvious something is happening.
Change-Id: Ie68d1e96a9bedd4b572c1cc99910348f89f07624
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/c/33244
Commit-Queue: Adam Langley <agl@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Adam Langley <agl@google.com>
CQ-Verified: CQ bot account: commit-bot@chromium.org <commit-bot@chromium.org>
We test all Intel variants via SDE. For ARM, we can do the next best
thing and tweak with OPENSSL_armcap_P. If the host CPU does not support
the instructions we wish to test, skip it, but print something so we
know whether we need a more featureful test device.
Also fix the "CRASHED" status to "CRASH", to match
https://chromium.googlesource.com/chromium/src/+/master/docs/testing/json_test_results_format.md
(It's unclear if anything actually parses that JSON very carefully...)
Bug: 19
Change-Id: I811cc00a0d210a454287ac79c06f18fbc54f96dd
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/c/33204
Commit-Queue: David Benjamin <davidben@google.com>
CQ-Verified: CQ bot account: commit-bot@chromium.org <commit-bot@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: Adam Langley <agl@google.com>
We're a far cry from the good old days when we just read from /dev/urandom
without any fuss...
In particular, the threading logic is slightly non-trivial and probably worth
some basic sanity checks. Also write a fork-safety test, and test the
fork-unsafe-buffering path.
The last one is less useful right now, since fork-unsafe-buffering is a no-op
with RDRAND enabled (although we do have an SDE bot...), but it's probably
worth exercising the code in
https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/c/boringssl/+/31564.
Change-Id: I14b1fc5216f2a93183286aa9b35f5f2309107fb2
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/31684
Reviewed-by: Adam Langley <agl@google.com>
Commit-Queue: David Benjamin <davidben@google.com>
CQ-Verified: CQ bot account: commit-bot@chromium.org <commit-bot@chromium.org>
- In base.h, if BORINGSSL_PREFIX is defined, include
boringssl_prefix_symbols.h
- In all .S files, if BORINGSSL_PREFIX is defined, include
boringssl_prefix_symbols_asm.h
- In base.h, BSSL_NAMESPACE_BEGIN and BSSL_NAMESPACE_END are
defined with appropriate values depending on whether
BORINGSSL_PREFIX is defined; these macros are used in place
of 'namespace bssl {' and '}'
- Add util/make_prefix_headers.go, which takes a list of symbols
and auto-generates the header files mentioned above
- In CMakeLists.txt, if BORINGSSL_PREFIX and BORINGSSL_PREFIX_SYMBOLS
are defined, run util/make_prefix_headers.go to generate header
files
- In various CMakeLists.txt files, add "global_target" that all
targets depend on to give us a place to hook logic that must run
before all other targets (in particular, the header file generation
logic)
- Document this in BUILDING.md, including the fact that it is
the caller's responsibility to provide the symbol list and keep it
up to date
- Note that this scheme has not been tested on Windows, and likely
does not work on it; Windows support will need to be added in a
future commit
Change-Id: If66a7157f46b5b66230ef91e15826b910cf979a2
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/31364
Commit-Queue: David Benjamin <davidben@google.com>
CQ-Verified: CQ bot account: commit-bot@chromium.org <commit-bot@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: David Benjamin <davidben@google.com>
Imported from upstream's 0971432f6f6d8b40d797133621809bd31eb7bf4e and
7d4c97add12cfa5d4589880b09d6139c3203e2f4, but with missing tests added. Along
the way, make Bytes work with any Span<const uint8_t>-convertable type.
Change-Id: If365f981fe8a8274e12000309ffd99b1bb719842
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/31086
Reviewed-by: Adam Langley <agl@google.com>
Along the way, split up the EVPTest Wycheproof tests into separate tests (they
shard better when running in parallel).
Change-Id: I5ee919f7ec7c35a7f2e0cc2af4142991a808a9db
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/30846
Reviewed-by: Adam Langley <agl@google.com>
Change-Id: I33c5259f066693c912ba751dff0205ae240f4a92
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/29964
Reviewed-by: David Benjamin <davidben@google.com>
Commit-Queue: David Benjamin <davidben@google.com>
CQ-Verified: CQ bot account: commit-bot@chromium.org <commit-bot@chromium.org>
Update-Note: This changes causes BoringSSL to be stricter about handling
Unicode strings:
· Reject code points outside of Unicode
· Reject surrogate values
· Don't allow invalid UTF-8 to pass through when the source claims to
be UTF-8 already.
· Drop byte-order marks.
Previously, for example, a UniversalString could contain a large-valued
code point that would cause the UTF-8 encoder to emit invalid UTF-8.
Change-Id: I94d9db7796b70491b04494be84249907ff8fb46c
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/28325
Commit-Queue: Adam Langley <agl@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Adam Langley <agl@google.com>
Unfortunately, this driver suffers a lot from Wycheproof's Java
heritgate, but so it goes. Their test formats bake in a lot of Java API
mistakes.
Change-Id: I3299e85efb58e99e4fa34841709c3bea6518968d
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/27865
Reviewed-by: Steven Valdez <svaldez@google.com>
Commit-Queue: David Benjamin <davidben@google.com>
CQ-Verified: CQ bot account: commit-bot@chromium.org <commit-bot@chromium.org>
Along the way, add some utility functions for getting common things
(curves, hashes, etc.) in the names Wycheproof uses.
Change-Id: I09c11ea2970cf2c8a11a8c2a861d85396efda125
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/27786
Commit-Queue: David Benjamin <davidben@google.com>
CQ-Verified: CQ bot account: commit-bot@chromium.org <commit-bot@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: Adam Langley <agl@google.com>
FileTest and Wycheproof express more-or-less the same things, so I've
just written a script to mechanically convert them. Saves writing a JSON
parser.
I've also left a TODO with other files that are worth converting. Per
Thai, the webcrypto variants of the files are just a different format
and will later be consolidated, so I've ignored those. The
curve/hash-specific ECDSA files and the combined one are intended to be
the same, so I've ignored the combined one. (Just by test counts, there
are some discrepancies, but Thai says he'll fix that and we can update
when that happens.)
Change-Id: I5fcbd5cb0e1bea32964b09fb469cb43410f53c2d
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/27785
Commit-Queue: David Benjamin <davidben@google.com>
CQ-Verified: CQ bot account: commit-bot@chromium.org <commit-bot@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: Adam Langley <agl@google.com>
This change adds support for two specific CAVP tests, in order to
meet NIAP requirements.
These tests are currently only run when “-niap” is passed to run_cavp.go
because they are not part of our FIPS validation (yet).
Change-Id: I511279651aae094702332130fac5ab64d11ddfdb
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/24665
Reviewed-by: Adam Langley <agl@google.com>
CMake targets are visible globally but gtest_main has boringssl-specific
behavior that isn't appropriate for general use.
This change makes it possible to use boringssl and abseil-cpp in the
same project (since abseil-cpp expects gtest_main to exist and be useful
for its own tests).
Change-Id: Icc81c11b8bb4b1e21cea7c9fa725b6c082bd5369
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/24604
Reviewed-by: Adam Langley <agl@google.com>
Commit-Queue: Adam Langley <agl@google.com>
CQ-Verified: CQ bot account: commit-bot@chromium.org <commit-bot@chromium.org>
Rather than clear them, even on failure, detect if an individual test
failed and dump the error queue there. We already do this at the GTest
level in ErrorTestEventListener, but that is too coarse-grained for the
file tests.
Change-Id: I3437626dcf3ec43f6fddd98153b0af73dbdcce84
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/19966
Reviewed-by: Steven Valdez <svaldez@google.com>
Reviewed-by: David Benjamin <davidben@google.com>
Commit-Queue: David Benjamin <davidben@google.com>
CQ-Verified: CQ bot account: commit-bot@chromium.org <commit-bot@chromium.org>
crypto/{asn1,x509,x509v3,pem} were skipped as they are still OpenSSL
style.
Change-Id: I3cd9a60e1cb483a981aca325041f3fbce294247c
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/19504
Reviewed-by: Adam Langley <agl@google.com>
Commit-Queue: David Benjamin <davidben@google.com>
CQ-Verified: CQ bot account: commit-bot@chromium.org <commit-bot@chromium.org>
There are still a ton of them, almost exclusively complaints that
function declaration and definitions have different parameter names. I
just fixed a few randomly.
Change-Id: I1072f3dba8f63372cda92425aa94f4aa9e3911fa
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/18706
Reviewed-by: Steven Valdez <svaldez@google.com>
Comments in CAVP are semantically important and we need to copy them
from the input to the output.
Change-Id: Ib798c4ad79de924487d0c4a0f8fc16b757e766d8
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/16725
Commit-Queue: David Benjamin <davidben@google.com>
Reviewed-by: David Benjamin <davidben@google.com>
CQ-Verified: CQ bot account: commit-bot@chromium.org <commit-bot@chromium.org>
Most importantly, this version of delocate works for ppc64le. It should
also work for x86-64, but will need significant testing to make sure
that it covers all the cases that the previous delocate.go covered.
It's less stringtastic than the old code, however the parser isn't as
nice as I would have liked. I thought that the reason we put up with
AT&T syntax with Intel is so that assembly syntax could be somewhat
consistent across platforms. At least for ppc64le, that does not appear
to be the case.
Change-Id: Ic7e3c6acc3803d19f2c3ff5620c5e39703d74212
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/16464
Reviewed-by: Adam Langley <agl@google.com>
Commit-Queue: Adam Langley <agl@google.com>
CQ-Verified: CQ bot account: commit-bot@chromium.org <commit-bot@chromium.org>
This introduces machinery to start embedding the test data files into
the crypto_test binary. Figuring out every CI's test data story is more
trouble than is worth it. The GTest FileTest runner is considerably
different from the old one:
- It returns void and expects failures to use the GTest EXPECT_* and
ASSERT_* macros, rather than ExpectBytesEqual. This is more monkey
work to convert, but ultimately less work to add new tests. I think
it's also valuable for our FileTest and normal test patterns to align
as much as possible. The line number is emitted via SCOPED_TRACE.
- I've intentionally omitted the Error attribute handling, since that
doesn't work very well with the new callback. This means evp_test.cc
will take a little more work to convert, but this is again to keep our
two test patterns aligned.
- The callback takes a std::function rather than a C-style void pointer.
This means we can go nuts with lambdas. It also places the path first
so clang-format doesn't go nuts.
BUG=129
Change-Id: I0d1920a342b00e64043e3ea05f5f5af57bfe77b3
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/16507
Reviewed-by: Adam Langley <agl@google.com>
In GTest, we'll just burn the files into the binary and not worry about
this. Apparently test files is a one of computer science's great
unsolved problems and everyone has their own special-snowflake way of
doing it. Burning them into the executable is easier.
BUG=129
Change-Id: Ib39759ed4dba6eb9ba97f0282f000739ddf931fe
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/16506
Reviewed-by: Adam Langley <agl@google.com>
Saves having it in several places.
Change-Id: I329e1bf4dd4a7f51396e36e2604280fcca32b58c
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/16026
Reviewed-by: David Benjamin <davidben@google.com>
Commit-Queue: David Benjamin <davidben@google.com>
CQ-Verified: CQ bot account: commit-bot@chromium.org <commit-bot@chromium.org>
Change-Id: I64533d2b4a6b075fa3ccea1abfd0ec5106673453
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/15704
Reviewed-by: David Benjamin <davidben@google.com>
Commit-Queue: David Benjamin <davidben@google.com>
CQ-Verified: CQ bot account: commit-bot@chromium.org <commit-bot@chromium.org>
This CL adds utility code to process NIST CAVP test vectors using the
existing FileTest code.
Also add binaries for processing AESAVS (AES) and GCMVS (AES-GCM) vector
files.
Change-Id: I8e5ebf751d7d4b5504bbb52f3e087b0065babbe0
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/15484
Reviewed-by: Adam Langley <agl@google.com>
Chromium's test infrastruction does not actually support GTest. It
requires a custom test runner in //base. Split gtest_main.cc up into a
gtest_main.h which defines a support function we maintain and a default
runner. Chromium's build will swap that file out for a custom one.
BUG=129
Change-Id: I3e39fe3a931b3051a61d5f8eef514ca6a504f11c
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/15564
Reviewed-by: Steven Valdez <svaldez@google.com>
Commit-Queue: Steven Valdez <svaldez@google.com>
CQ-Verified: CQ bot account: commit-bot@chromium.org <commit-bot@chromium.org>
BUG=129
Change-Id: If91d97ea653177d55d5c703f091366ddce24da60
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/15006
Reviewed-by: David Benjamin <davidben@google.com>
Commit-Queue: David Benjamin <davidben@google.com>
CQ-Verified: CQ bot account: commit-bot@chromium.org <commit-bot@chromium.org>
